Видео

Uno

He truly is a great scientist

Amazing talk!

Is this prof craigs page????

Fantastic talk. Can you select for selecting for early fecundity not reducing late fecundity? Also interesting to consider: individuals who have less late-life ugliness and also women who don't have the menopause will have more opportunity to reproduce BUT before that can accumulate the resources to have even more offspring. Or conversely, when an individual mutates to lack the instinct to find older people ugly, there will be more opportunity to reproduced in a society largely composed of elderlies. So this should be advantageous, rather than reject people because they are older and so restrict unnecessarily the opportunity to reproduced. Also 40:25 is so careless! Many stupid people are watching this and won't understand that the genes are there anyway and cannot be stopped by not having children! It's not having children that cause the heart disease, but the genes which decided already long before birth. I greatly must disagree with conclusion that cultural restrictions against early reproduction (not even laws - cultural restrictions are at work right now already) are necessary to increased lifespan - it's sufficient that it is possible to reproduce at the greater age. If two individuals reproduce at age 14 and then have a child every 4 years, but one of them dies at 40, and the other has children until they are 80, then obviously the latter contributes much more to gene-pool. So selection for late-life reproduction is sufficient for selection for long life span. And the increase in lifespan has made this possible. I also disagree with the spiritual conclusions, like larmoyance about oh we are not the main cast and we will disappear and all that. I certainly am the main cast of my life and death. Meat-lump and genes are the supporting cast to make we can inhabit special meat-lump experience. I am looking forward to new adventures in new body after death. No need for heavy heart pseudo wisdom larmoyance about we are disappearing and help us accept and all that. We are not. Science has a lot of evidence that the body is just a lump that we leave behind after death to become spirit. But I'm sure that's a "subjective" opinion - subjective as in, the science paradigm of today makes the relevant evidence not to be circulated to people who are working in different fields. Everyone knows about Big Bang theory, even if they work in evolutionary biologies. But evidence for reincarnation and near-death experiences is not circulated outside of very limited academic scene, and so can't be the basis. Just want to point out that it's not one I agree with. I'm looking forward to "disappear". I just hope I don't have to be more old for longer time in between, as being old is very uncomfortable and painful. He really overstepped himself in the pseudo-wisdom department, trying to hammer down materialist viewpoints on viewers that have nothing to do with his scientific specialty and furthers wrong materialist paradigm in the population. He is not the specialist on that. Still fantastic talk! Thanks!

Great talk!

Brilliant lecture! Thank you ☺️🙏

I met him, a great scientist

Thank you

Thank you for a wonderful talk! L Victoria is less than 5% of the age of L Tanganyika, yet has even greater cichlid diversity. You have been quite specific about timings of radiations, morphological, colour and genomic features within your L Tanganyika clade. How do you reconcile your findings with what must be quite different timings for L Victoria? Could it be that the Victoria assemblage actually derives from an older "extinct" lake (as has been suggested for Malawi I think), but I think the molecular time estimates would argue not? Are the cichlids different in some way, or is the morphological diversity within L Victoria actually much less than L Tanganyika?

what an interesting talk! Thank you!

Ich bin ein großer Fan! Beim letzten DCG Symposium habe ich an Prof. Salzburgers Lippen gehangen, als er seinen Vortrag über adaptive Radiation gehalten hat! Schrecklich interessant, sehr informativ und kurzweilig gestaltet! 👍

Great work Professor. Respect!

That was a great talk, thanks a lot!

7:10 start

Could Bell Beaker expansion be the culprit for homogenising EU dogs

wow. I'm gobsmacked. What a fantastic talk!

Great talk and nice discussion. Very informative for phage therapy folks

It isn't often that an in depth scientific talk is cute as well. But watching these two people, one young and one old, is just so darn cute!

Wow. great stuff!

6:39 start

Really enjoyed your talk. Thank you for carving out some time at the end of the talk to advocate for yourself and other marginalized people.

Excellent!

Excellent Swanne. Clear goals, results, and talk too!

great talk! thanks Swanne :)

Thank you for the very interesting series of talks! Is it possible to turn off the setting that prevents this video from being played on other websites? I'd like to have students in my class view this video and use their annotation software (Perusall) to have conversations about the video.

Excellent talk. Thanks Rob and organizers!

Incredible talk!

Fantastic talk. Stephen Stearns remains one of my favourite scientists. Up there with the likes of Richard Feynman, Leonard Susskind, and Ben Goertzel. His contribution to the discussion is impossible to overstate. Thank you for sharing.

Kudos to your seminars. I really dig them, and love the diverse topics you present. I love evolution and all the subfield it entails. Keep up with it!

Thank you for doing this!)

Beautiful work. So interesting. I've followed your work off and on for many years and it keeps bearing fruit. Congratulations.

links to selected #preprint and published resources would make this even more appealing... thanks to speakers and organizers

This was very interesting. Thanks so much for sharing!

Hello, late question, but, 16:57, how do you deal with uncertainty (i.e. grey blocks)? is it that you don't need to because you are interested in the number of COs not the exact position / length of blocks? could not find reference for upper-right figure. thank you.

Nice talk! Thanks.

Biomass calculation from OD as a proxy for adaptation rate in the face of selection pressure has some potential shortcomings though. This is what I have found in my experiments.

Presentation starts @25:30 to save everyone almost 30 min of there day staring at a blank screen.

Middens are hot real estates in the world of red squirrels.

Thank you for the lecture and for the organization! I think it could be nice to put some information about the lecturers in the video description :)