- Видео 3
- Просмотров 869 037
Richard Feynman
Добавлен 10 май 2015
On teaching
Fair Use
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
Просмотров: 384 339
Видео
On religion
Просмотров 485 тыс.9 лет назад
Fair Use Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
'...it doesn't frighten me.' The genius soundbyte...
DR. Feynman anymore Integration tricks?
I’ll bet he was frightened when he looked into the blackness and void at his last breath. Too late then. I’d rather believe in something than believe in nothing. And no, I’m not frightened either, I just prefer faith to doubt.
He can't argue religion but I can demolish it with basic logic easily
Science is the art of the Gods.
Doing theoretical physics is probably no different from doing philosophy.
Pauli was one of the most scathing and brilliant critics of errors in physics. Yet, Pauli,along with C.G. Jung studied Jung's paranormal theory of 'Synchronicity' and possible connections to quantum mechanics. Pauli was very,very brilliant and hard working. Why would he waste his valuable time studying a paranormal theory unless he thought that it might be true? Feynman valued Pauli's criticisms of his theories. Synchronicity is often connected with a supreme intelligence or God.
Monotheism is the instigator of ignorance, oppression, and violence. Monotheism has been a "totalizing discourse", often co-opting all aspects of a social belief system, resulting in the exclusion of "others". Monotheism is less pluralistic , because monotheism stipulates that people pigeonhole their beliefs into one tenet. "Monotheism is irreconcilable with the existence in our nature of the instincts of benevolence" because it compels followers to devote themselves to a single Creator. The logic of monotheism yields little basis for tolerating other religions". Monotheism anesthetize the sense of wonder as if one were committed to a single line of thought by a cosmic legal contract".
I find it enlightening listening to him.
Science doesn't mean experiments. The processes to get you to science knowledge are different. He called himself a scientist but knew nothing. How?
Religion is man-made. God was, is & will be.
Interesting thoughts...but some people still think that faith and religion must accommodate in science worldview and think that a person who believes is a person who doesn't doubt. If we look to history of science we'll find a lot of great scientists who believe and doubt simultaneously and, I believe, because of that pursued the "truth" and made a lot of contributions to science and society.
He was a brilliant scientist, but his scientism got in the way of him embracing religion. Ironically, the phenomenon of scientists and science-minded people rejecting religion because of scientism has only been around for two or maybe three centuries. I was one of them.
Scientism😂. Anyway, what got u out? Just curious.
This is what honesty sounds like.
The problem ✡️✝️☪️ The solution 🧠
To što ne plaši njega i mnoge druge ne znači da neče nikada biti onih koje če plašiti. To što on i mnogi drugi uživaju riješavati ne riješive zagonetke ne znači da nema onih koji mrze ili nisu sposobni riješavati zagonetke. Ali najvažnije je da če uvijek biti onih koji če njima ponuditi neko instant riješenje. Kao promjenu spola u trans gender debil. A još i važnije od najvažnijeg je da su mase jako podložne hipnozi.
I love this man.
this is the philosophy of the Holi Quran. The Quran says to us thet we must ask and wandering about the nature of the World. There is a verse in the Qur’an that says: (Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of night and day are signs for those of understanding. Those who remember God while they are standing, sitting, and on their sides, and contemplate the creation of the heavens and the earth. Our Lord, You did not create this in vain. Glory be to You, so protect us from the torment of the Fire)
Praise the lord Jesus Christ.
Nah praise be to Abraham.
@@Qwerty123zzuy Abraham as well.
Anyone who put a comment here is a wanker 😅
It clearly bothered him deeply that he had no faith. Otherwise he wouldn't get all worked up trying to explain it away
Aint nobody worked up here😂
Who is this that darkens my counsel with words without knowledge? Brace yourself like a man; I will question you, and you shall answer me....
Every student is eager to learn knowledge from him. 😊
maybe the world needs all kind of people.
It’s interesting that he acknowledges he has a soul. Did he ever ponder the question where that came from?
Why complicate thing. We all are created, yes?!
No
Best teacher in this civilizáció!
Having an intellectual leave an opening for the possibility of something more then their personal conclusions is refreshing.
That's really common, having a religious leave an opening for the possibility of his dogmas being wrong would be way more refreshing
Looks like Oppenheimer didn't give him a copy of the BhagavadGita.
He didn't know that the Bible never stated humans were the only thing God ever made.....
It only talks about creating creatures in this world and most of his 6 days of createion were wasted here, but you sure can as always dodge by changing the meaning of things, like saying that days are not days but thousands of years or that world doesn't mean world but universe so anything can mean anything or even the opposite of what it actually says, which is the same as saying all that BS means nothing
@@eidiazcas but if that's what the Bible says then everything you just said is correct whether you like it or not buy
@@eidiazcas okay well most of the world knows .... by now I think the Bible was rewritten by man but ultimately what I said is not wrong and what you said is not wrong
@@eidiazcas So the electron is really condensed energy made up from the electromagnetic field.... Now the negative charge around the electron is just the field being pulled in by the electron ... And for the nucleus of the Adam the same thing with positive charge..... And the same thing with the neutral charge inside the nucleus.... Now whenever negative charge meets negative charge the field around the electron is the same density as the other field around the other electron (and of course I'm talking about the charge around the electron or the energy around the electron)so ... Because the negative charge around the electrons are the same density they bounce off one another.... And whenever positive charge meets negative charge they are different densities so they pull into one another.... But positive charge and neutral charge are around the same density so they pull into one another.... And positive charge is more condensed so it condenses the neutral charge inside of it.... Then whenever the electron comes along with its negative charge then the energy that's already condensed inside the positive and neutral fields around the nucleus becomes even more condensed inside the electron and that energy that is condensed inside the electron made up of the neutral and positive charges....... Pulls on the neutral and positive charges more because it is more condensed and they're around the same condensity... So whenever the election leaves the electron does not have a strong enough pull to pull on the positive and neutral charge that it made more condensed inside of it so the electron moves away from the nucleus and then the nucleus pulls out the energy that was in the electron and that creates a photon my name is dylan stone...... If energy in a particle acts like a ghost then you can compact other energy inside of energy.... Which would probably be how you got decay.... Basically what would happen the center energy in the particle would push out other bits of energy and they would become different condensities in other parts of the particle....😂 And obviously the bits of the energy being pushed out of the center of the particle would already be part of the particle..... It would just become packed in other energy on the edge of the particle.
@@eidiazcas hey so if the photon can create a field for a couple of seconds because the energy and the photon pushes to its edges and pulls them just a little bit of the electromagnetic field then you could say the electromagnetic field crushes it to become or give it enough pull to crush the photon into a straight line
He is amazing!
Just WOW :)
i agree with Feynman, it's too local, we can't say the origins of the universe, at least all worlds/ doesn't come from the Sun. It's too provincial as he says.
Feynman was an incredible man
What a legend.
Smart man. Flawed as we all are. King Solomon would've been nice to have in the room. He would've laughed a bit. Then proceeded to question all primitive logic before dropping key proverbs of wisdom that would quiet the room. *exits the room to proceed ruling his kingdom*
Soo cool yes sir
perhaps he didn't doubt hard enough
Need a good accurate movie on his Life.
Oh, I wish I could have been a student of his, or even met him. We need more like him--especially now. Well, admittedly, we are always in the darkness in some respect. It is the scientists, philosophers and thinkers who keep us out of the murk--at least to a degree--in any era.
Having knowledge makes the simple lies easy to spot.
Remarkable.
0:37...Simply brilliantly summed up!
I am a high school teacher, and the central question of my existence is how to hook the interest of students who have no interests. "What are you interested in?" "Nothing." "What are your hobbies?" "I have no hobbies." "What's your favorite movie?" "I don't have one." "What's your favorite tv show?" "People don't watch tv anymore." "Do you play sports?" "No." "Do you like any sports?" "No." "What do you do on the weekend?" "Nothing." "What's your favorite book?" "I don't have one." And these are the students who give you any kind of answer at all. Sometimes all you get are blank stares and a refusal to even write an answer. At least 20 years ago when I'd give a questionnaire on the first day of school, kids would actually write things that were mostly true--things they were actually somewhat interested in. Today they might write their favorite song or something, but the rest are "IDK", blank, or "I don't have one."
@@redryder3721 I think you are severely out of touch with the reality of the situation today.
@redryder3721 Yes, you are severely out of touch. Consider for a moment that maybe you don't understand the big picture. That someone with 20 years teaching experience may have some insight that you don't have. And that my 20 years does indeed trump your "time and effort" into writing a handful of paragraphs in a youtube comment. (And now you've deleted your comments and run away. Typical.) If you sincerely want to learn something about the issue I'm concerned about, I'm here.
A highly intelligent person speaking with a new york accent is the greatest thing ever
ily feynman
Total and complete Zen
Isn’t it the quest for the next question, not the answers?
Listening to him makes me wonder if there really is any difference among science, philosophy and a religious mind (free of religious organization) ...the ability to doubt and question without fear or seeking security in an answer is an amazing and rare capacity
As charming and brilliant as Dr Feynman clearly is, he is disguising with his verbal prowess a certain intellectual pride that will lead to his downfall if he doesn't address it - playing God. Since ordinary, average IQ people know that "the fear (and search for) God is the beginning of wisdom....." Dr F, by bragging that he is not afraid of not knowing what happens after death, is reeking of ugly pride. The fear of death is bedrock human nature, and he is lying to himself.
If that's the beggining of wisdom why are they average IQ in the first place, and that kind of thinking is more prominent in places with very low IQ, how the beggining of wisdom ends always in low IQ people?
A genius walking on eggshells