Видео

at its very best, its a dogshite host and interview

the sexism accusation is so fucking idiotic

Lynne Joyrich is professor of Modern Culture and Media at Brown University and a member of the editorial collective of Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies. What sort of useless non-job is that 😆

When she says "phallic constructions of power" you just know she is completely insane.

47:13. The student on the right would love Game of Thrones for a good nap... 🤣🤣🤣

*PromoSM*

Very neat, thanks for the video!

27:44 rare laugh lol

George is so easy to listen to on and on. i never would have thought that i would be angry with producers . They should have given him more respect to the guy who actually knows what is what.

I loved listening to the guests that were willing to give us their time. Very, very good!

Start at 7.00, the beginning is tedious.

Professor lady to GRRM: Why didn't you stop the TV producers from hiring Moroccan extras when filming in Morocco so I didn't have to get tr!gger!ng "wh!te s@vior" vibes from that "Mhysa" scene?? (Never mind that in context Dany ends up being anything but a white savior and struggles to make long-term improvements in any of the places she conquers in Slaver's Bay)

Sometimes, the moderators need to learn to shut up and just let the interviewees talk

This video is like serving two different great meals at the same time but they don't necessarily complement each other.

That publisher is terrible At answering questions.

ah when the show was good

a lot of people down here in the comments who don't seem to understand or appreciate how big, important public events go down at places of higher learning -- the fact that woman SPEAKS for quite a while before introducing anybody is just something these people do. and some people do it more successfully than others, clearly. it's a big deal, these events - they're often fundraisers of some sort, and all their peers are there, so they write long, wandering intros for the big deal guests on the big deal stage waiting to start talking for all the big deal people out there in the audience. I guess in academic, scientific or literary circles it's its own art form. talking someone on; introducing the guests and the night's itinerary. and again, some people do it very very well and others I guess not so much, hence all the negative comments about her. oh well. next time.

Annoying interviewer looking for racism

1:24:42

Academics love to hear themselves talk

These interviewers really can't just let them talk. They had a five minute introduction. And a set of questions they have to get through in a certain time. There's no conversation is sounds so robotic. And they keep cutting the guys off. Truly awful interviewers.

16:08 A game of ice and fire? What?

So much time wasted with all these other people😅 why do that when you have GRRM in the building?

I loved that he loves his characters, and that the Red Wedding was the hardest thing he'd ever written.

Re. George: I feel like the interviewers were more interested in talking about the show than his actual books

I must admit, I am baffled by the decision to have two questions asked before answering.

Making 2 questions at the time was a dum ass idea...

The women interviewer was a terrible interviewer. 20 minute long questions with 8 separate questions and she'd sit there shaking her head yea the whole time. Drove me crazy.

GRRM... smaller hands than Trump.

So irritating the critics, thats the left for ya, always viewing everything thru the lens of a constant power struggle between race or gender or watever. FYI to the moronic critics, half of white America freed the slaves, Lincoln and the Republican Party. It was the Democrats that owned slaves, and fought for keeping slavery right up until FDR's last term as president. Instead of seeing George made Daenerys a strong willed, independent WOMAN with strong morals, leadership skills, and determination despite the hurdles in her way, instead you saw a white hero saving minorities as some sort of racially disingenious idea that was politically motivated? What the hell has happend to America these last 10 years to watch G.O.T and come up with that? All the left do is if there is not 100% equality on every level in every situation then it must be discrimination. What a low level, ignorant, and abhorrent way to think.

My bad...I kept getting distracted by the microphone noise.

Wished the lady wouldn’t have interrupted the guys story Now we’ll never know the full story

Finish the book, George.

Short haired femenist likes the sound of her own voice and completely owned by George R.R. Martin

This fatcat "publisher" needs to stay on subject. Talentless cashin hack.

To be fair to George R. R. Martin on the "sexposition" critque, the sex acting in the background did serve a worldbuilding purpose in the story. 1. Sex in King's Landing is a tool. The women are learning to put on a performance for money. 2. Petyr Baelish is completely unphased by what they are doing. It shows us just how cold and calculated he is, separated from the carnal desires that drive most of the men in that time period. I think George was being too polite in conceding that this was merely "sexposition," and was just written in so the dummies in front of the TV wouldn't change the channel before another ad break.

Gorge takes his time away from writing his books and is insulted by these barbaric questions. Huge disgrace

Horribly conducted interview

Interviewer: Was this an accident? Georges: No. Interviewer: Aight, so, Tom, you know what I think was an accident AS WELL...? Georges:...

Who else is just here for GRRM?

I'm only 6.43 in. "A Song of Fire and Ice"... 🙄 what an embarrassing mistake when you're interviewing an author!

So good to see these old videos.

I get why they tried to do the question format by asking two questions at once, but it honestly made everything longer and we probably missed out a bunch of questions because of it. I mean they double back every time when they forget the other question, so might as well ask them one at a time lol

With no visual context. Audio only without intros. I could have guessed that this was done at Brown University.

Understand from brown library books more games thrones I now books reding from Daniel

I really felt sorry for George R. R. Martin for the way they badgered him and interruptions. Intentionally trying to cast him in a bad light.

Seven minutes in, George finally gets to speak. And the questions are just ridiculously long and overblown, like they're desperate to prove just how smart they are. Seriously shut up and realise that people are there to hear the guests talk, not you.

A worn born is a loved book. A torn book is an unloved book.

I’m not denigrating academic/cultural criticism but you would think the interviewers would know by now that most fiction writers tend to feel kind of irritated by that line of questioning because it tries to reduce human story to argument. Despite Brecht, As a rule, drama and fiction that is first concerned with making a political/culture argument tends to kind of suck.

I swear this lady thinks everyone in the crowd is here to listen to her ask "deep, complex and insightful" questions, and that GRRM and the publisher guy are just stage props for her night of questions tour lol. God this is horrible