Видео

I’m so glad this was helpful! Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment!

I’m glad you found this helpful! Feel free to share and/or comment on other videos you found helpful so others can find them more easily!

I’m glad it was helpful! I don’t remember off of the top of my head let me review and get back to you in 24 hours and I’ll have a few possible explanations you can use to see if that’s where we differed!

Did you get what I got for x1 star and x2 star? What about lambda star?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles Yes I got all the same numbers for x1*, x2* as well as lambda*. But when I plugged in x1* and x2* I did plug it into x1x2 + 2x1. I am assuming that is the equation that we plug it into to? So when finding Y* I had the equation (8*14)+2(8) and that is how I got 128

Ah I see I didn’t do the multiplication you are correct! Sorry about that and thanks for pointing it out!

@@InCaseofEconStruggles Its no issue at all! I sincerely did love the video though, it was very informative, thank you so much again!

No this is Patrick (and intro/intermediate microeconomics). Advanced macro uses linear programming but this is different.

Thank you!!!

Im glad you found this so helpful! Please feel free to share to anyone you think could benefit from it and I’m appreciative you took the time to leave a comment!

I’m glad you liked the video and it was helpful! Are you also looking for a first welfare theorem explanation with that or just that every Pareto optimal allocation is not necessarily possible in the competitive equilibrium?

Just because you can use a price equilibrium with transfers to sometimes get to a Pareto optimal allocation even if a pure walrasian equilibrium won’t get you to that Pareto optimal allocation

@@InCaseofEconStruggles thank you for your answer, however, I still struggle to make the conclusion, would you mind making a short video regarding this?

@NG_GN sorry I’m trying to clarify if you just want a short video on that not all competitive equilibrium are Pareto optimal or also want the subtle explanation of what can make them be Pareto optimal?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles the latter one, thank you in advance for doing this :)

Thank you for the comment and taking the time to let me know this video helped you! Glad to hear it!

I’m so glad this was helpful and I really appreciate you taking the time to leave a comment!

I’m glad this was helpful thank you so much for the comment!

Thank you for the comment!

Can you be a bit specific? Like what do you mean referenced? Like you want to sort mpg on the basis of price?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles yes, keeping with the example; I want to create a new variable that is the mpg of the lowest priced car for each manufacturer. not necessarily the lowest or highest mpg, but the referenced value to the lowest priced car.

@@InCaseofEconStruggles my research is looking at the close dates of businesses within an area and I want to identify the close date of the closest in distance business for a specific area.

@tawilk I see it’s hard to explain over words I’ll make that my stata tip for this coming Sunday

I’m so glad this was helpful? Was there any video in particular of these you found more helpful?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles Your video going in depth into compliers and defiers. But all of these are really good. I'm a grad student in an applied econ program and my professor began covering the issues present in IV strategies, the LATE theorem, monotonicity, etc. but he used a very by the books way of presenting it which left me pretty lost. The cat lottery scenario though makes it more clear who receives treatment and why some might find ways to circumvent your initial choices for treatment & control groups.

@thesk1nny1 gotcha thank you that is very helpful feedback! Also feel free to share my videos with others in your class if they’re helpful! And good luck with your graduate studies!

Thank you so much for the comment and I’m glad you appreciated the video!

Great question and yes a very subtle one that granted I did not explicitly talk about so I appreciate you bringing it up! We’re assuming that the states follow a Markov process and so conditional on whichever state happens to occur in period t its all conditional on the state in period 0 we can use the probability of state t to stand in for the probability of a given event history. Does that make sense?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles makes sense but only for the pi(s^t)! not for the sum. I still thank you for having responded so quickly.

@juanbonillabernal7295 let me check my notes I believe conditioning on the state in the previous period, which goes into the pis, should do the trick of capturing each node but I will double check

I’m glad it was helpful!

Thanks Bill!

Did you install esttab? Like have you done ssc install esttab?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles thank you for your reply. Yes I have installed esttab and it worked well with tabstat. But with tabstat by group, somehow it doesn’t work.

hmmm and your stata output works in terms of in the command window it looks like everything works? Like no error messages?

@@InCaseofEconStruggles yep, that’s the case. But the file is empty sheet.

Can you pose your code here? I want to make sure nothing weird happened when I pasted it into a RUclips comment or when you tried to copy and paste it

Yes that is a good point and I definitely need to add a video about that. My method is more general to using different observations relative to an observation to calculate values and I should be more clear about being careful when using it with data when you can use lags and leads. Thanks!

I think a video on doing it this way would be super helpful just in general.

Best of luck in the coming years and I’m glad you find these videos helpful!!

Hi Toni, It depends what you are using to output your logistic results. I highly recommend checking out my videos on exporting results which may be helpful for doing that. Feel free to let me know if you still have questions on those videos!

Yes exactly and thank you for the comment! You can also generally get at it a different way, which is what I show just because I think it’s more intuitive to say “_se[mpg] than figure out row and column number of the matrix but you’re absolutely correct that your method would work as well! Useful for other viewers of this video sure so thank you again!

Im glad you thought it was clear! I also really appreciate the comment!

Some auctions are not how they look on TV, with a guy at the front calling out the bid and saying "going once, going twice, sold" sort of deal. Instead another type of auction is there is an object in the room and a box in the middle of the room. If you want to bid on the object you write down your name and your bid, how much you want to pay, on a piece of paper in a little booth, so no one else can see your bid. You put that paper in a sealed envelope and drop it into the box. When the auction closes they take out all the envelopes and decide who gets the object and what they pay. Does that make more sense?

I am glad you find these videos helpful! I do not have a video, but see if this helps you: Suppose you define each variable as "diff_x" e.g. "diff_see" is 1 if the person has difficulty seeing. The easiest option is to use a generate function like the following: gen difficulty=(diff_see==1 | diff_walk==1 | diff_speak==1 | diff_hear==1) This will create a variable that is 1 if any of those four variables are equal to 1, and 0 ONLY if the person has a 0 for each of the 4 difficulty variables. Hope this helps!

@@InCaseofEconStruggles Thank you so much for the quick reply. Let me try.

I’ll update this description shortly and paste the code thank you for letting me know sorry about that!

Just posted as a comment!

Hello! Thank you for the comment! I am still working on the material for OLG for infinite periods, which should help with 3 period models. When I get that out if it is not helping you let me know and I can try to do specifically 3 periods or something similar.

Thank you for the comment I’m so glad this video was helpful!!

This is useful if your table gets really wide and you want to make sure it fits on a single page and doesn’t get cut off by the width of the page

Are you talking like in theory to show them or like using an empirical example or both?

Thank you so much! I’m glad you found these videos helpful and appreciate the comment!

You got this!

@@InCaseofEconStrugglesif i pass im giving you all the credit

If you pass it means you had the basics, I just helped you get the last bit to make it through! Also please share with your friends if these videos help, and feel free to comment on other videos so that other people can find them more easily!

I think you found the wrong channel. We do econ here

I struggle how that relates to iv weights

Not quite what an RDD is.

Definitely Bill

Not quite what that is but close!

Thanks? I think?

Not the kinda struggle I can help with

Valid I guess

Label scalars not feelings.

Those are extremities close though!

Its fiat money not feet money

Don’t Web Md that

You and me both! Glad you liked it

It’s not created yet but I will add it to the list yes. Thanks for the comment!

Thank you so much!! Comments really help RUclips share my videos with new people so I really appreciate you letting me know! Feel free to comment on any other videos you found helpful and share links with your friends!

@@InCaseofEconStruggles I will.

Glad it was helpful! Thank you for commenting!

Thank you so much! Comments and likes on each video really help RUclips push these videos/this channel to new people so I really appreciate it! Also feel free to share!