
- Видео 9
- Просмотров 29 419
Eula Monroe
Добавлен 10 мар 2012
Heaven and Hell: Q&A Panel
Q&A Panel facilitated by Dr. Eula Monroe and Dr. Brad Wilcox. Questions addressed by Dr. Brent Top (LDS), Iman Shuaib ud Din (Islam), Monsignor M. Francis (Catholic), and Dr. Travis Kerns (Evangelical/Protestant).
Просмотров: 1 344
Видео
Heaven and Hell: An Evangelical/Protestant Perspective-Dr. Travis Kerns
Просмотров 4568 лет назад
Heaven and Hell Symposium- October 15, 2015. Evangelical/Protestant perspective of Heaven and Hell presented by Dr. Travis Kerns.
Heaven and Hell: An LDS Perspective- Dr. Brent Top
Просмотров 12 тыс.8 лет назад
Heaven and Hell Symposium- October 15, 2015. LDS perspective of Heaven and Hell presented by Dr. Brent Top.
Heaven and Hell: An Islamic Perspective- Iman Shuaib ud Din
Просмотров 5728 лет назад
Heaven and Hell Symposium- October 15, 2015. Islamic perspective of Heaven and Hell presented by Iman Shuaib ud Din.
Heaven and Hell: A Catholic Perspective- Monsignor M. Francis Mannion
Просмотров 5 тыс.8 лет назад
Heaven and Hell Symposium- October 15, 2015. Catholic perspective of Heaven and Hell presented by Monsignor M. Francis Manni.
The Amazing Gift of Grace: An LDS Perspective - Dr. Robert Millet
Просмотров 2,8 тыс.9 лет назад
Part 1 of 4
The Amazing Gift of Grace: LDS, Catholic, and Evangelical Perspectives - Panel Discussion
Просмотров 6349 лет назад
Part 4 of 4
The Amazing Gift of Grace: A Catholic Perspective - Father Peter Hannah
Просмотров 6 тыс.9 лет назад
Part 2 of 4
The Amazing Gift of Grace: An Evangelical/Protestant Perspective - Dr. Travis Kerns
Просмотров 3629 лет назад
Part 3 of 4
The bible says unless you believe in jesus alone you will be saves. What happened to those whom died before mormonism. I don,t listen to mormons that say we believe the bible as long as it is correctly written GOD dosent make mistakes.This guy is full of balony. we were not preexistant. none of the normon books have any credibility.
Please read the bible. Mormons teach you can get to heaven by works. Bible says we are saved by grace NOT BY WORKS so no man can boast. Mormons teach jesus is a created being. Bible says he is eternal and uncreated. Mormons teach that we can become gods one day. Bible says that their are NO other gods but the God of the bible. Mormons are a false church.
Joseph Smith had false prophecies. That makes him a false prophet
Satan working through this man…
When I hear his descriptions of Hell it makes clear the spirit prison. Where those are damned ( stuck ).
As a member, mohammad is NOT nor was a prophet to our God...Koran says it as does O/T...Jesus spoke of this of the resurrection of heaven [paradise] and hell in Lazarus and the rich man....We as LDS have all the worlds answers to their questions of spirit, heaven and hell and outer darkness....Christ said to the Brother of Jared as you see me now, show shall I be in the flesh...(Book of Mormon | Ether 3:16) Behold, this body, which ye now behold, is the body of my spirit; and man have I created after the body of my spirit; and even as I appear unto thee to be in the spirit will I appear unto my people in the flesh.
Christ mentions hell more than double the times he mentioned heaven in the Bible. People have died and came back and experienced a part in one of these places. The BOM (lehi) calls it the dark void. And if you’re not with God the demons will get those souls.
Galatians 1:8
Only those “spiritually dead” are immune from the different aspects of this talk.
Excellent talk! Thank you so very much, Brother! I am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, but it is still good for me to learn, and I learned some things here from your talk...
I’ve listened to this talk at least twice, if not three times. I always cringe when he brings up Mohammed having Godly Light. These educated people that do not do all the research on their intended subject matter is disturbing. Mohammed is & was a false prophet, murderer, & pedophile. Islam has Satan at its head. There is nothing redeeming about Islam.
12 PROMISES OF THE SACRED HEART OF JESUS TO ST. MARGARET MARY www.ourcatholicprayers.com/promises-of-the-sacred-heart-of-jesus.html
thank you
Typical Catholic mistake. In Protestantism, grace does indeed transform us. We are made new creatures. We are united to Christ. In fact, it is Catholicism, not Protestantism, which downplays this transformation. Conversion, for Catholics, is something that happens only rarely, to folks like St. Paul and St. Augustine. To make it normative for regenerate men and women, as the Reformers did, is actually derided by most Catholic apologists. What Protestants say is that the transformation is not part of justification. Why not? Because if justification is effected by Christ alone--and thus, by grace alone--it cannot include what we do. If you affirm grace, you cannot include works. For if you do, you do not affirm grace. Grace is not grace unless it is alone. You cannot work for it even a smidgen. It's a totally free gift. It's as simple as that. The laws of logic do not allow Rome to maintain what Rome maintains. Catholics talk about grace...but do not believe in it.
Wonderful. Thank you Father!
If your seeking Truth throw the BOM away and read the Bible. Gods only word. It is true Joseph Smith has at least 7 prophecies that never came to pass. Joseph had at least 30 wives. The BOM has been changed many times. What do you do with these truths?
Well we can talk about each one of your issues one at a time if you'd like. but how can you say the Bible is the word of God when it has been changed thousands of times? Which version of the Bible? Which translation? Or are you reading the original Hebrew? Because we don't even have the original Hebrew! and that's just the old testament, what language does the New testament originally recorded in, Aramaic? The best we have is Greek. And different profits showed in different languages and different apostles wrote in different languages and we don't have any original texts from the Bible. Not one! So how can you say the Bible is the word of God when it's a record written down by men from their individual and specific point of view. Yes it's inspired, but people have had their fingers in the Bible since at least before Isaiah. The deuteronomist went through and changed things specifically at the time of Josiah. And the translations of the Bible are so varied, then none of them are reliable as perfect or authentic. So which one do you pick? So while you can say things about the Book of Mormon, to assume that the Bible is perfect is a complete and utter fallacy. and if the Bible were perfect, and if everybody's interpretations of the Bible were perfect, you wouldn't have thousands of different Christian churches. which one of those churches is correct. And you can't say all of them because they all contradict each other in their different teachings and beliefs. So what do you do with those truths?
@@dankuchar6821 what about the failed prophecies?
"2 Nephi 29. 1 But behold, there shall be many-at that day when I shall proceed to do a marvelous work among them, that I may remember my covenants which I have made unto the children of men, that I may set my hand again the second time to recover my people, which are of the house of Israel; 2 And also, that I may remember the promises which I have made unto thee, Nephi, and also unto thy father, that I would remember your seed; and that the words of your seed should proceed forth out of my mouth unto your seed; and my words shall hiss forth unto the ends of the earth, for a standard unto my people, which are of the house of Israel; 3 And because my words shall hiss forth-many of the Gentiles shall say: A Bible! A Bible! We have got a Bible, and there cannot be any more Bible. 4 But thus saith the Lord God: O fools, they shall have a Bible; and it shall proceed forth from the Jews, mine ancient covenant people. And what thank they the Jews for the Bible which they receive from them? Yea, what do the Gentiles mean? Do they remember the travails, and the labors, and the pains of the Jews, and their diligence unto me, in bringing forth salvation unto the Gentiles? 5 O ye Gentiles, have ye remembered the Jews, mine ancient covenant people? Nay; but ye have cursed them, and have hated them, and have not sought to recover them. But behold, I will return all these things upon your own heads; for I the Lord have not forgotten my people. 6 Thou fool, that shall say: A Bible, we have got a Bible, and we need no more Bible. Have ye obtained a Bible save it were by the Jews? 7 Know ye not that there are more nations than one? Know ye not that I, the Lord your God, have created all men, and that I remember those who are upon the isles of the sea; and that I rule in the heavens above and in the earth beneath; and I bring forth my word unto the children of men, yea, even upon all the nations of the earth? 8 Wherefore murmur ye, because that ye shall receive more of my word? Know ye not that the testimony of two nations is a witness unto you that I am God, that I remember one nation like unto another? Wherefore, I speak the same words unto one nation like unto another. And when the two nations shall run together the testimony of the two nations shall run together also. 9 And I do this that I may prove unto many that I am the same yesterday, today, and forever; and that I speak forth my words according to mine own pleasure. And because that I have spoken one word ye need not suppose that I cannot speak another; for my work is not yet finished; neither shall it be until the end of man, neither from that time henceforth and forever. 10 Wherefore, because that ye have a Bible ye need not suppose that it contains all my words; neither need ye suppose that I have not caused more to be written. 11 For I command all men, both in the east and in the west, and in the north, and in the south, and in the islands of the sea, that they shall write the words which I speak unto them; for out of the books which shall be written I will judge the world, every man according to their works, according to that which is written. 12 For behold, I shall speak unto the Jews and they shall write it; and I shall also speak unto the Nephites and they shall write it; and I shall also speak unto the other tribes of the house of Israel, which I have led away, and they shall write it; and I shall also speak unto all nations of the earth and they shall write it. 13 And it shall come to pass that the Jews shall have the words of the Nephites, and the Nephites shall have the words of the Jews; and the Nephites and the Jews shall have the words of the lost tribes of Israel; and the lost tribes of Israel shall have the words of the Nephites and the Jews. 14 And it shall come to pass that my people, which are of the house of Israel, shall be gathered home unto the lands of their possessions; and my word also shall be gathered in one. And I will show unto them that fight against my word and against my people, who are of the house of Israel, that I am God, and that I covenanted with Abraham that I would remember his seed forever." May the Lord judge between you and me :)
2Nephi Chapter 29 Many Gentiles will reject the Book of Mormon-They will say, We need no more Bible-The Lord speaks to many nations-He will judge the world out of the books which will be written. About 559-545 B.C.
4:32 @@EricSmyth4Christ
but bishop baron said all are saved.....isn't he supposed to know stuff ?
No, he never said that.
He specifically did not say that
@@aaronthompson5633 a reasonable hope. w/e
Is there a printed version of this talk?
I stopped listening because he’s yelling. It’s like everyone is going to leave...
I’m very sorry to hear that the volume button on your device is broken. Or maybe you don’t have any fingers and you’re not capable of turning it down the volume yourself.
its called a microphone. It amplifies sounds. Man's actually using his inside voice. ;)
Why is he SHOUTING?
He is not really shouting, whoever was controlling the mic has the volume up way too high. It's as simple as that, but the volume does detract from the presentation.
Frizz Bee to make sure it all goes in 😆 all jokes aside maybe he has a hearing problem.
Great teaching
You can turn down the volume.
He was a lecturer used to filling a big room with no microphone.
This life sucks and the next one will too, if your a loser here you'll be a loser there also I rither have my spirit body destroyed and never be again. I am a terrible mistake and never should of been born.
You are a beautiful child of God!
What you believe is what you will be... change your mind, be positive, have good self talk, trust in Christ. It’s your choice.
Alfred Harding you are being silly you are a special choice spirit you chose Jesus’s plan in the pre existence that’s why you are here and the Lord loves you more then you could ever believe he gave his life for you because you are worth it! And if you have had a bad time here the next life will not suck believe me you will be happy 😊
Who you are and what you become is up to you. It's not easy for anyone. but whatever effort you put into being a good person, you will get that effort back in the next life a billion fold.
Many many things about the LDS faith become clear when you put them in the context of their unique cosmology. According to LDS writer Terryl Givens in "Wrestling the Angel," Joseph Smith taught that the universe was eternal, composed of two aspects, matter and "intelligences." From the intelligences, the Mormon God eventually evolved. But he is not the Creator of the Universe. He is not Ultimate and does not make the laws by which the universe is governed. He became God by perfect discovery of and compliance with these laws. Consequently, the religion he makes for Mormons is based on principles and processes which he discovered, but which he did not himself create. So his "grace" (and almost everything else Mormonism teaches) has a meaning altogether different from the Christian God. The Mormon Father God, Elohim, is far more like the Buddha than he is like Jehovah, one whose pre-eminence is based on discovering the pre-existent laws of the universe, not the one who made them.
I'm surprised at how much more you know about our theology than we do. We do not know, for example, that Elohim (the plural form of the Hebrew word for God - El, by the way, which is problematic when you are trying to promote a "God beside whom there is no other". But let's leave that for another day), is not the creator of the universe. It doesn't say that anywhere in our scriptures. It is you that is taking a Mormon theological idea and supposing what it means for cosmology, to come to that conclusion.
It is not uncommon for a curious and motivated outsider (who is not an anti-Mormon apologist for any alternative faith, by the way) to discover things about a religion that most of its adherents do not know. Most practitioners of any faith are not theologians. In this case, it is a prominent Mormon writer who made Joseph Smith's very clear teachings about the nature of the universe clear to me. The comparison between Elohim and Buddha, however, is mine. Perhaps because Elohim is the organizer of this particular universe out of pre-existing matter and intelligences, as all Gods are, he may thus loosely be spoken of as the "creator," but the usual notion of creation, creation out of nothing, seems to have no ground in LDS cosmology and is the reason that neither Heavenly Father or the Gods of other worlds are Ultimate. Speaking of scriptures, it is a great puzzle to me why Smith's amazing King Follett discourse has not so far been "canonized." It is a most extraordinary tour de force of religious imagination, especially considering Smith's non-elite background. And it makes clear that my (and Givens') reading of Mormon cosmology matches the prophet's. And speaking of scriptures a second time, one of the rather Catholic things about Mormonism is its rejection of the narrow Protestant sola scripture principle. Just because a teaching is not found on the printed page does not mean it is not part of revelation, I believe.
I esteem the King Follett Discourse highly as it appears you do. Why is it not canonized? Perhaps because it was not a revelation, but was a discourse of principles he already knew, and though he only lived a short time after it was given, it was still time enough to canonize if he wanted to. We have 4 written accounts of the discourse from 4 different scribes who were accustomed to taking notes of conferences. All 4 are worded differently. So it becomes difficult to canonize a work that the prophet did not review and correct/approve when all 4 versions are not the same. As for his, yours, Bro. Given's, or my views of cosmology, none of them are either accepted or rejected formally by this church. The Church doesn't need to. We are free to wonder and learn as we choose. If that knowledge were necessary to obtain salvation, it would certainly be addressed formally. Since it is not necessary, it, like many other principles, is left for us to find out on our own. If we stay guided by the Spirit, the church is confident that we are on safe ground. Many members (and non-members I suppose), do have some cosmological answers, (I doubt anyone has all of them), but we choose not to reveal what we learn from the spirit because of its being personally sacred and unnecessary for other's growth. Lastly, I agree with you about creation ex nihilo, and sola Scriptura. This, however, does not force God the Father to be less than the ultimate (what ever that is). It is simply one's perspective that is limiting.
How do you get this editor to recognize paragraphs?
Paragraphs...hmmm. Well, on my Mac, I hold down SHIFT with my left hand and press RETURN with my right hand.
This is true, and is Christ's Church.
Read D&C 130:20-21. In Mormonism you EARN everything. The 3rd Article of Faith says the atonement applies by OBEDIENCE to the laws.
Section 130:20-21 says nothing about earning anything. Obedience and earning are not the same thing. It is interesting that you left out the first sentence in that 3rd article of faith. You should have included it, but since it mentions the atonement, I suspect it didn't serve your purposes. I'll help you out: We believe that through the Atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel. Salvation comes through and only through the Atonement of Christ. That is a Mormon way of saying through Grace. Yes obedience is expected. When Christ spoke to the woman taken in adultery he said "Nor do I condemn thee. Go, and sin no more." Christ does expect obedience but that isn't a bad thing. He knows it is the best path we can choose. And obedience is a choice. A choice to follow His example. Perhaps mine is a typical Mormon perspective on life. I do know that the Mormons I worship with feel this way: I stand all amazed at the love Jesus offers me. Confused at the Grace that so fully He proffers me. That he would extend his great love unto such as I. That for me a sinner, He suffered, He bled and died. Oh it is wonderful that He should care for me enough to die for me. Oh it is wonderful, wonderful to me.
You forgot the "L" in front of "earn".
Christ's Body is not in a 'state' or 'condition' but in the 'place' of Heaven, same as His Mother, and the same for the final Resurrection of bodies. Universalism is a heresy as attractive as it is - you need to know that. Fatima showed souls in Hell. I then stopped watching.
unless i'm mistaken, he was trying to make the point that they aren't physical "places" WITHIN the universe. But, Heaven and Hell, are metaphysical realities, albeit with a couple notable exceptions namely Jesus and Mary in their physical bodies.
I am a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints but I'm not a Mormon as a Mormon can be. I am a follower of our Saviour Jesus Christ as much as I can be. Mormon is the name of a place, a book, person. Mormon is NOT my Saviour, Jesus is. It is very disrespectful for members of His Church to refer to themselves as Mormon, here why-- think of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. THINK---PONDER of Jesus suffering in that garden, then think of when he refer to ourselves by a slang term with what we express what signal do we send to God.
Thank you for sharing an interesting perspective.