- Видео 1 494
- Просмотров 666 759
Robert B Hayes
Добавлен 22 мар 2020
NC State Associate Professor of Nuclear Engineering
www.ne.ncsu.edu/people/rbhayes/
www.ne.ncsu.edu/people/rbhayes/
How scary is the transportation of nuclear waste?
How scary is the transportation of nuclear waste?
Просмотров: 9
Видео
Can radiation cause genetic defects in your progeny?
Просмотров 144 часа назад
Can radiation cause genetic defects in your progeny?
A banana is not NORM, but it does have elevated natural radioactivity
Просмотров 309 часов назад
A banana is not NORM, but it does have elevated natural radioactivity
Is it reasonable to ask for zero radioactivity in drinking water?
Просмотров 499 часов назад
Is it reasonable to ask for zero radioactivity in drinking water?
Radioactivity, the decay constant and half-life
Просмотров 3712 часов назад
Radioactivity, the decay constant and half-life
Comparing the radioactivity of coal waste to nuclear
Просмотров 4016 часов назад
Comparing the radioactivity of coal waste to nuclear
Fukushima and other anti-nuclear narratives
Просмотров 30День назад
Fukushima and other anti-nuclear narratives
How are SMRs supposed to make nuclear construction more affordable?
Просмотров 22День назад
How are SMRs supposed to make nuclear construction more affordable?
Is nuclear energy too risky because of war?
Просмотров 2114 дней назад
Is nuclear energy too risky because of war?
Nuclear reactor physics and the dollar of reactivity
Просмотров 5314 дней назад
Nuclear reactor physics and the dollar of reactivity
How is advanced nuclear better than our current fleet?
Просмотров 2814 дней назад
How is advanced nuclear better than our current fleet?
What would it cost to start recycling used nuclear fuel?
Просмотров 2621 день назад
What would it cost to start recycling used nuclear fuel?
Why do nuclear reactors need external cooling?
Просмотров 2428 дней назад
Why do nuclear reactors need external cooling?
Mother nature's own natural nuclear fission reactor from our ancient past
Просмотров 2428 дней назад
Mother nature's own natural nuclear fission reactor from our ancient past
Do not accept media assessments of radiological risk.
Просмотров 39Месяц назад
Do not accept media assessments of radiological risk.
Comparing the production of electricity with that of weapons of mass destruction.
Просмотров 28Месяц назад
Comparing the production of electricity with that of weapons of mass destruction.
if you go and watch the movie, the nuclear scientist there himself admits that this "melting down to the very core of the earth" is just a parallel, a metaphor, and that in reality the core would hit the ground water and explode into fume of radiation. so movie isnt really pushing this narrative
And yet many still think it is possible, it's very sad, I know
you are the nuclear Walter white
There is a licensed geological repository for transuranic waste, e.g., plutonium in Southeast New Mexico. Its radioactive materials license was issued by the EPA in 1999 and has been operating ever since. www.wipp.energy.gov/
I think I am learning Oilers identity
Where is that research?
Hayes, R.B. Cleaner Energy Systems Vol 2, July 2022, 100009 Nuclear energy myths versus facts support its expanded use - a review doi.org/10.1016/j.cles.2022.100009 www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772783122000085
Hayes, R.B. Cleaner Energy Systems Vol 2, July 2022, 100009 Nuclear energy myths versus facts support its expanded use - a review doi.org/10.1016/j.cles.2022.100009
Do u need enriched uranium to make plu like 3 or 5 percent or not
No but it makes it a lot easier
@@robertbhayes5039 so only uranium 238?Im kinda confused can you give a quick understanding of how it is produced 🙏
Awesome. But why normal reactors are not able to do this.
They are not designed to
😮😎 🆒️
There's never been water on the planet since the beginning of time that has not been radioactive.
Having an alloy plug that melts at a precise temperature, and thus allows gravity to drain out the liquid reactant, is inherently safer than relying on mechanical control rods to try and prevent a runaway reactor. For this reason alone I believe that the liquid fuel type reactor should be given every chance to prove itself.
You are welcome to invest in it or lobby for it yourself to be sure
Muppet
Nice explanation.
there are two benefits to thorium it hasnt been crippled by regulations yet, give it half a year of being viable its still a pipe dream allowing for lots of investor fellating into free money neither of wich gets power into the grid at any speed
Says the person who has _never_ drunk "zero" radioactivity water in their entire life. Nothing makes me angrier than flawed reasoning based on linear no-threshold modeling for harms caused by radiation or other contaminants. At some point, you have to consider the realities and practicalities of living in the actual world and recognize that we _must_ accept some reasonable threshold for purity (of anything), because the money it would take to lower it further would be better spent cleaning up some other substance we contact in our daily lives instead.
Shame more people don't see what you do.
Davis Ruth Miller Barbara Clark Ronald
If we radiant a none radioactive element like iron, will it turn into radioactive fissionable element?
Disagree with this completely…. Solid fuel reactors use highly pressurized water as a moderator to maintain fission.. Often thorium is suggested to be best used in a molten salt reactors, and the calculus completely changes with liquid fuel reactors. Graphite is the proposed moderator, so if you remove the liquid fuel from the graphite, fissioning eventually ends. It’s wayyyyyyy easier to remove a liquid fuel from a solid moderator. Plus this liquid fuel doesn’t need to be pressurized to maintain its liquid phase. All LWR use pressurized water which inherently creates the “boom” when mistakes happen. So it’s bananas to even try and compare the safety of these two designs as LWRs are wayyyyy more problematic because of their pressurized water.
molten salt doesnt need thorium
I suspect that what the person in the original post refers to is exactly that there is no water in the molten salt thorium reactor typically favoured by thorium proponents. No water under some hundred atmospheres of pressure and a reaction that tends towards a temperature several hundred degrees lower than what is needed for a phase shift for the molten salt. No kaboom from water is what I suspect is referred to. Since that is the only kind of kaboom that has ever happened in a nuclear power plant. Just a guess of course.
I suspect you are right, so let's give them the benefit of the doubt. Regardless, thorium is mostly hype, the same molten salt reactor is simpler and cheaper using uranium 235. Even ThorCon Power is redesigning its thorium MSR over to uranium only. Terrestrial Energy figured that out from the beginning and is using only uranium and they are 2/3rd the way through a joint licensing process with Canada/US.
It all comes down to the potential for operator error
This is one of the best advertisements for nuclear energy that I've come across.
One advantage of thorium based liquid salt reactors is supposedly that they can be used to burn up the plutonium and uranium that otherwise could be used to make bombs.
Uranium based ones can do the same
I am curious as to how accurate the values of half lives for different radioactive elements are. I can't think helping that something with a half life of hundreds of thousands of years would be difficult to measure precisely in 1 year. Are our instruments that precise?
Too many people have replaced faith in God with faith in science. The truth is that science doesn't explain nearly as much as people have been told and there is a fair amount of science that is wrong.
I worked at a Nuclear Plant and yes, their pretend safety efforts go to far. I witnessed the ridiculous red tape required to get anything done. But IMHO it was mostly for show, very little of the red tape actually made anything safer. It did however make Nuclear power more expensive than it needed to be.
We should just lock up retired power plants and walk away for a few decades while the radiation decays. Doesn't the radiation decay exponentially? Same with fuel, just park the casks full of spent fuel in a secure area. People get too emotionally irrational about radiation.
Mox fuel is a good thing period. It 100%cannot be used to make a nuclear weapon. Of course it could be made into a dirty bomb that just contaminates an area with radialogical material but thats true of any radiactive substance. The susquehanna nuclear plant is about 40 minutes from me and uses mox fuels
Shifty
@robertbhayes5039 id like to get your thoughts on a specific reactor design called the mker. It was a Soviet gen 3 graphite moderated reactor and the successor to the rbmk design. The mker was reportedly safer and more efficient than the rbmk
wow🎉😮
How about recycling nuclear waste to reduce the amount of time it has to be stored?
This is really a special case. The full equation is e^it = cos(t) + isin(t) ... just let t = pi to get the equation in the video. I think it is much cooler to let t = pi/4 and then you get e^{i pi/4} - sqrt(2)/2 * (1 + i) = 0. This allows the constant sqrt(2) be part of the fun. Side note, imaginary numbers are no less "real" that real numbers -- I have never stubbed my toe on the number 2.
Although there are countries that can and do build on time and on cost...
Perfect explain, thank you.
Cobalt-60: A Versatile Radioisotope Cobalt-60 is a radioactive isotope of cobalt. It's widely used in various industries due to its strong gamma radiation emission. Key Characteristics: * Half-life: Approximately 5.27 years. * Radiation type: Gamma rays. * Production: Produced in nuclear reactors by neutron bombardment of cobalt-59. Applications: * Medical: * Radiation therapy: Used to treat cancer by destroying tumor cells. * Sterilization: Used to sterilize medical equipment and pharmaceuticals. * Industrial: * Radiography: Used to inspect metal products for defects, such as cracks or corrosion. * Food preservation: Used to preserve food by killing harmful microorganisms. * Gauging: Used to measure the thickness of materials, such as paper and plastic. * Research: * Tracer studies: Used to track the movement of substances in biological and chemical processes. Safety Considerations: Cobalt-60 is a powerful radioactive source and requires careful handling and storage to prevent exposure. Proper shielding and protective equipment are essential when working with it. safety protocols: * Transport and Storage: Cobalt-60 sources are transported and stored in heavily shielded containers to minimize exposure. These containers are designed to withstand accidents and provide adequate protection during transportation. * Handling: When handling Cobalt-60 sources, personnel must wear protective clothing, including lead aprons and gloves, to shield themselves from radiation exposure. Remote handling tools are often used to minimize direct contact. * Radiation Monitoring: Regular radiation monitoring is essential to ensure that workers are not exposed to excessive levels of radiation. Dosimeters are worn to measure individual radiation exposure, and area monitors are used to monitor radiation levels in work areas. * Emergency Preparedness: Facilities that handle Cobalt-60 must have emergency plans in place to respond to accidents or spills. These plans should include procedures for containment, decontamination, and medical response. If you have any further questions about Cobalt-60 or its applications.
Snns
We are going to have to do something to charge all of theses EV. Our Government is spending $ on worse stupid crap.
If your SMR is a high-pressure/low-temperature power plant, you won't save a dime. If your SMR is a low-pressure/high-temperature power plant, you might save half or more but that's up to the regulator.
I guess the anti-nukers will have to be anti-hydro now as well.
Is that apply to nuclear weaponries too?
No
What up sir
Radioactivity levels and half-life are tied together. Thanks for pointing this out. Even just a couple decades in an interim storage system, the activity drops tremendously. Combined with a method of 'recycling/ burning' the transuranics makes the waste problem a whole lot smaller. I dare say disposal of many other man-made hazardous waste is a lot harder than this.
Unless, rather than trying to turn SNF into new light water reactor fuel, you just built fast reactors to use the SNF AS fuel, say in a molten salt fast reactor. Since we haven't yet built a single fast MSR, how about we try that?
"Dollar is king" It feels like we chose stupidity over common sense. Should I have hope that this will change anytime soon?
Where can I see longer lectures ? Thanks
Register for classes I guess, sorry
THANKS! I was asking myself exactly that and this saves me a lot of reading! Wich I will do anyways!
Disassembled lol.
it may sound like an explosion, but it's not that. it's the same thing that happens to glass with a large rapid temperature change, same physics
Could you please provide sources for this?
What do they have at the labs that they need security
Classified tech
No, idiot, they are "weed-out classes". You make these programs and majors unnecessarily exclusive based upon arbitrary measures to keep your little racket going. It's the most circular reasoning I have ever heard. "We define "quality" as passing these classes that we make arbitrarily hard and then claim the external validation is that everyone who has made it through our program based upon these arbitrary criteria is "high quality"". . . . .
cobalt-60 radiation All Images Videos News Books Maps Web Flights Short videos Finance Search tools Feedback Cobalt-60 Isotope Chemistry in Pictures: Drop & Run Cobalt 60 Radiation Therapy Instrument | Nuclear Medicine ... Cobalt-60 Pool Source | NIST Cobalt therapy - Wikipedia Cobalt-60 - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics Radionuclide Basics: Cobalt-60 | US EPA Cobalt-60 - Wikipedia Cobalt-60 Source: The Effects of Gamma Radiation - RUclips Co-60 Irradiation Facilities - Fraunhofer INT Cobalt-60 - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics Cobalt 60 Radiation Therapy Instrument | Nuclear Medicine ... Gamma Irradiation Technology using Cobalt-60 A Balanced Approach to Radiotherapy: Integrating Cobalt-60 ... Cobalt-60 Pool Source | NIST Dosimetric evaluation of cobalt-60 teletherapy in advanced ... Cobalt-60 is a synthetic radioactive isotope of cobalt with a half-life of 5.2714 years. It is produced artificially in nuclear reactors. Wikipedia Protons 27 Half-life (t1/2) 5.27 years People also ask Is cobalt-60 harmful to humans? Because it decays by gamma radiation, external exposure to large sources of Co-60 can cause skin burns, acute radiation sickness, or death.Apr 17, 2024 www.cdc.gov Cobalt-60 | Radiation Emergencies - CDC What radiation does cobalt-60 emit? Does cobalt cause radiation? Why is cobalt-60 used in external radiotherapy? Is cobalt cancerous? Why is cobalt-60 no longer used medically? What is the most radioactive thing on Earth? What is the exposure limit for cobalt-60? Why is cobalt-60 used in Gamma Knife? Is cobalt FDA approved? Is cobalt safe to wear? Is cobalt MRI safe? How radioactive is cobalt-60? How much cobalt is safe? Why is cobalt bad for you? Feedback Videos 2:00 Now see how the experts handled cobalt-60. This blue glow in the water comes from radioactivity emitted from the cobalt-60. 1:00 1:25 Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org Cobalt-60 Cobalt-60 (60Co) is a synthetic radioactive isotope of cobalt with a half-life of 5.2714 years. : 39 It is produced artificially in nuclear reactors. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | CDC (.gov) Apr 17, 2024 · www.cdc.gov Cobalt-60 | Radiation Emergencies Cobalt-60 (Co-60) is a metal that is used medically for radiation therapy. Large external exposure can lead to skin burns, acute radiation ... People also search for what is cobalt-60 used for Cobalt 60 radiation effects Cobalt-60 half-life is cobalt-60 dangerous Cobalt-60 rod Cobalt-60 decay U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (.gov) Feb 5, 2024 · www.epa.gov Radionuclide Basics: Cobalt-60 | US EPA Cobalt-60 is a byproduct of nuclear reactor operations. It is formed when metal structures, such as steel rods, are exposed to neutron radiation. | Washington State Department of Health (.gov) doh.wa.govPDF Office of Radiation Protection - Cobalt-60 (Co 60) Fact Sheet Therapy: An external sealed source of cobalt-60 is used in a teletherapy unit as a source of intense gamma radiation for the treatment of a variety of. 3 pages·260 KB U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (.gov) semspub.epa.govPDF EPA FACTS ABOUT COBALT-60 Cobalt-60 is widely used as a medical and industrial source of radiation. Medical use consists primarily of cancer radiotherapy. Industrial uses include testing ... 2 pages·384 KB Britannica www.britannica.com Cobalt-60 | Uses & Radiation Cobalt-60 is the longest-lived radioactive isotope of cobalt, with a half-life of 5.27 years. It is produced by irradiating the stable isotope cobalt-59 with ... ScienceDirect.com www.sciencedirect.com Cobalt-60 - an overview Cobalt 60 (60Co) is often the ideal mode of radiation for treating laryngeal cancer. For primary treatment of laryngeal cancer, 60Co allows adequate dosing of ... ScienceDirect.com www.sciencedirect.com Cobalt 60 - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics Figure 2A shows the decay scheme of cobalt-60, a radionuclide that is frequently used as a radiation source in industrial nuclear applications. Because of the ... National Institutes of Health (NIH) (.gov) www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov The role of Cobalt-60 in modern radiation therapy: Dose delivery and ... by LJ Schreiner · 2009 · Cited by 79 - We show that conformal dose delivery is possible and also that Co-60 can be used as the radiation source in megavoltage computed tomography imaging. These ... People also ask How toxic is cobalt to the human body? How much cobalt is safe? What are the positive effects of cobalt-60? What are the side effects of cobalt therapy? Feedback People also search for How is cobalt-60 made cobalt-60 used in cancer treatment Cobalt-60 symbol Cobalt-60 radiation poisoning Cobalt-60 atomic number Cobalt-60 decay equation