- Видео 13
- Просмотров 279 084
Ray2D2
Добавлен 2 авг 2006
Snowball with Family
I made this video for our dog Snowball who died on Saturday, Nov 21, 2009. He was a tough lovable dog.
Our 1st dog.
We never knew having him changed our lives. Never thought you can have such an attachment.
He was always there for us. A companion for about 6 years.
Its sad he didn't make it throgh especially the holidays & not to hear him bark & wiggle his tail when you get home from work.
He was really sick & the doctors couldn't save him. Glad he's not suffering anymore. Snowball RIP in doggie heaven.
We miss you.
Our 1st dog.
We never knew having him changed our lives. Never thought you can have such an attachment.
He was always there for us. A companion for about 6 years.
Its sad he didn't make it throgh especially the holidays & not to hear him bark & wiggle his tail when you get home from work.
He was really sick & the doctors couldn't save him. Glad he's not suffering anymore. Snowball RIP in doggie heaven.
We miss you.
Просмотров: 104
Видео
Snowball R.I.P.
Просмотров 37514 лет назад
I made this video for our dog Snowball who died on Saturday, Nov 21, 2009. He was a tough lovable dog. Our 1st dog. We never knew having him changed our lives. Never thought you can have such an attachment. He was always there for us. A companion for about 6 years. Its sad he didn't make it throgh especially the holidays & not to hear him bark & wiggle his tail when you get home from work. He w...
Snowball Running
Просмотров 7014 лет назад
Here he is running all over the place. He's was very happy here & a speed racer he is. He was only 3 yrs old in this clip. (2006)
Snowball opening his Christmas GIft #2
Просмотров 7814 лет назад
He needed some help & he got lucky at the end.(2007)
Snowball opening his Christmas GIft #1
Просмотров 6914 лет назад
Here's Snowball opening his 1st gift. He seemed very surprised that his present sqeaked. (2007)
Snowball as Santa
Просмотров 7114 лет назад
Just a quick clip. He was trying to run before people find his true idenity. (2008)
Snowball bad fur day
Просмотров 7414 лет назад
Here's Snowball @ the spa. Ya right hehe. Just getting brushed. He was only 2 years old here. (2005)
Snowball Watching TV
Просмотров 3814 лет назад
He was watching the movie Roscoe Jekins the dog scene & he got kinda nosey there LOL.
Star Trek Voyager
Просмотров 20 тыс.18 лет назад
Click this link to hear the audio: ruclips.net/video/7jAiYjz05Jc/видео.html Star Trek Voyager - Time of your Life video
If you've seen the films before watching VOY, this landing is nothing.
The atmosphere is full of made up bs, let’s land the bloody starship instead lol, the 37s I think this episode is called…
I always disliked the idea of Voyager being capable of landing with the saucer protruding so far in front of the front landing struts. Not worrying about whether or not the struts would fail, how would Voyager keep from nose-diving into the ground in severe weather conditions. It's like designing a car and placing the front wheels where the front doors should be. It may look good on paper and even in the showroom, but on the streets...
The Kazon had already managed to land Voyager by this point. If they could, Tom clearly gould.
Damn, this is recorded with VHS and then digitized.
I got early to see that.
"altitude 100 kilometres, speed 10,000KPH" I always felt this was wrong on two accounts (a) American show, "Starfleet HQ" been in San Francisco would operate in MPH (b) the Space shuttle lands at 364kph (226mph)
United Earth goes metric, a logic thing to do. Also, anti-gravitational devices and thrusters to reduce speed.
Well now, most other ships of the distant past had their own landers. A separate landing vehicle. Talk about time saving
This got me thinking did Enterprise ever land the ship?
there was that time they hot droped the saucer section on veridian 3, but other than that i dont believe so.
SMH, 25th century and still using the metric system (kph)
Could you imagine some poor bastard down in the lower levels, hears Tuvok say "We're landing the ship." I'd be like wtf are they doing up there?!
Very interesting
Condition Blue? I bet they had to change the lightbulbs for that one.
Same cliff the Jupiter 2 once crashed by?
15 years and still not deleted, so crappy
Why am I watching this in 2022
I presume that you like me (in 2023) started the special manouvers flightschool training program for an Intrepid class starship. Out and in of Spacedock is easy compared to landing one. 😉
@@obelic71 you need to use commas, or I’m going to blush ☺️
"That's alright Lt. neither have I" Yeah, but you aren't the one being asked to put 700,000 metric tons of starship daintly onto a planetary surface!
I forgot how bad this looked 25 years ago. now I remember
Wasn’t blue alert used in Star Trek 3 the search for Spock as well. During the automated space docking at the beginning.
Fifteen years. Damn.
Blue Alert or Blue Light special Nelix is going shopping at K-Mart for new cook ware.
37s, no apostrophe
10000 kph is Mach 8. 100km is Karman line on earth.
The real world reason for the transporters in the original series was to avoid the cost of filming a landing sequence. Several decades later, they come up with a reason to not use them so they have to land the ship.
They had better technoolgy to land the ship
Warp 20in gauge
The upcoming 1/1000 scale voyager model kit will come with the landing gear
And according to the Build Video on Star Trek Model Kit Previews, Voyager balances on the landing legs perfectly.
Im actually curious is this is somthing only the Intrepid class can do, the other Starships dont looked designed to actually land
I'm not as versed in this as others in the fandom, but I think Voyager as an Intrepid class is the first ship shown in Star Trek shows that was actually small enough to land. Based on comparisons to other objects, I'm tempted to say that the Galaxy class Enterprise-D would be too large to put down on a planet without damaging the surroundings or the ship itself. Google says the Enterprise-D doesn't even have landing gear.
@@dahken417 100% agree Voyager i belive is a science type vessel so it makes sense it would be smaller and maybe be able to land if the need was there, where as the Galaxy class is about the size of a small city
I would bet Defiant (DS9) has the capability for a ground landing. After all, it is a tough little ship.
@@calkelpdiver Defiant was actually capable of atmospheric landing and fight. They just never used it.
....10,000kph descent speed. Uh... that's a bit FAST for entering atmo... Atmosphere is what, max 100 km deep, maybe 200 or something? Cover that distance in less than a second. Voyager just T-K Boundary-ed that planet. LOL.
NASA shuttles re entry speed was apparently 28,000 kph so Voyager was actually taking it quite slow. Friction from the atmosphere would probably be a bigger challenge but this is a universe where they can fly ships into stars.
@@danielkwillers yeah I guess you're right. Just checked a second time for shuttle reentry speeds: got a completely different number than when I posted that before. You're right: if anything they were coasting slower than the Shuttle does when it comes down.
Too cute 💕
240p, we meet again...
It was something to see... Voyager landing and cooling down for a moment.
Code Blue...are you sure? It will mean we have to change the bulb.
Space Corps directive 34124?
Shame they didn’t do this more often
This is a big advantage voyager has.
well since the USS Voyager is one of many Intrepid class ships
It looks to front heavy to land and not tip over.
Maintenance crew. Move all containers and furniture to the back of the ship
Great video what app is this???
Happy birthday rebel the meerkat beanie boo!!!! 🎁🎂 🍰
Bluebird456 Hi
beanie boo turtle hi
Hi 👋 hihihihihihi
[voyager lands, a groaning noise is heard as the ship keels forward and noseplants as the weight of the saucer sections tips it forward]
It’s center of mass might be farther back. I remember in Enterprise they mentioned the nacelles were made of osmium, so Voyager’s are probably also made of some similarly dense metal.
Yet the 1000 scale model from Polar Lights balances perfectly on the landing legs. See the details on Star Trek Model Kit Previews.
I’m sure if this was real… that the Starfleet engineers would have thought of all this.
@@steveleeart - But would that make for winning (if thoroughly uninformed) social media comments? 😜
...yaa , rookie , park that thing...
Voyager keeps breaking the primary directive.
doesnt count if its to answer an SOS. For reason...
I agree. Voyager was answering a distress call, and Mr. Tuvok considered using the shuttlecraft was unwise because of the turbulence in the planet’s atmosphere , so landing Voyager was Captain Janeway’s only option.
9 times the speed of light lol even at that speed which break the laws of physics you couldn't even cross over are own milky way gallexy in a entire life time.
Warp 9 isn't equal to 9c. That said, the Star Trek writers have always been extremely inconsistent with just how fast warp speeds were. In the semi recent Star Trek reboot, they were able to warp to Vulcan in mere minutes, when it probably should have taken a few days or so.
@@crucisnh Bout a week or two at fairly high warp . Its confusing now that they changed the scale but warp 9.975 which is voyagers maximum warp is about 3400c. Still takes decades to travel across the galaxy at that speed. In enterprise it took them like a Month or more to get to Kronos at warp 4.5. Even at the enterprises top seed of warp 8 it would take a few days at least
Also as warp drive is described it doesn't break any physical laws that we know of. These is nothing preventing space itself expanding or contracting faster than light. An example of this being black holes contracting space faster than light within their event horizon. Although current energy estimates using theoretical and possible impossible particles still require more energy than would be practically possible.
Can We Travel Faster Than Light? with Dr. Miguel Alcubierre ruclips.net/video/JafY92PhgKU/видео.html
ONE LESS POODLE! :-)
What is the year in that movie?
Pffft they did a good job venting the nacelles!
Amelia Earheart wouldn't be related to anyone on the planet. She was caught in 1937 and then put in cryo sleep. She never gave birth to anyone, so how could she be related to the the people on the planet?
Neices or nephews
I particularly do not like this possibility of seeing these large ships landing on planets, but I have always regarded the special case of Voyager, beacuse... - If you can teleport people... - if you can keep energy shields as physical protection... - if your ship feeds on antimatter... - if you navigate through very strong gravitational fields... - If you have Warp Technology... So landing a ship on the planet is not the hardest ... However I insist ... - The structural design adopted for this ship would not be appropriate for this type of landing - The survey of soil mechanics would have to be an absolute obligation - Take-off would require adequate propulsion systems. And after Voyager, we have worse: JJ.Abrahms ignored this physics and did worse in the new movies.
This is pretty much the only good part about this episode. The rest is almost too ridiculous and farfetched for words. Writers were really stretching it here, even by Voyager standards and that's saying something.
Agreed. _Well, whaddaya know? Sixty trillion trillion trillion trillion cubic miles in this galaxy and we just so happen to run into Amelia Earhart. What are the odds, amirite?_
Just saying... For all who don't know this isn't normally standard procedure for most vessels... Because ships didn't have landing legs (unless i'm missing something)... Therefore I appreciate voyagers attempt at bringing a new feature to a new vessel good creativity in star-ship design we don't really see anymore... Here's hoping the Discovery has some kind of unique ability
Justin PLace spore drive was a lore breaking idea
@@Movie_Duels473 I bet the lore breaking idea of Spore Drive involved Black Aleart since the idea of the Landing Struts involved Blue Aleart.
@@Movie_Duels473 Time travel.
Why would the Discovery need to do anything special when Mikey Spock can do everything without help?
I think it had a mutant tartigrade as a taxi driver, like Rev. Jim Ignatowski but with suckers...
I see you used a Maine potato for this video. Good call.
looks like VHS
It's no Idaho
you would think in a real world gravity scinario a top heavy starship...especially a big headed snuby design like voyager...would tip forward
Voyager uses anti-gravity systems to prevent this from happening. Why won't she hover on antigravs? It'll use too much energy, so landing entire ship and the supporting only the saucer section is more optimal.
But why would Voyager be top heavy? The warp core, engineering, the warp nacelles... all the heavy machinery is in the drive section. The saucer section is nothing but hollow decks, quarters and corridors in comparison.
That would be more of a Red Dwarf thing I think, especially if "Rimmer" is landing the ship.
Wow, recorded with Calculator?