Видео

Thanks a lot my friend. Finally I understand this topic

Very good, learned it very well. Thank you sir!

how about by using the standard table of values method?

exactly what im looking for

Thank you sir, your explanation is perfect 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

Who else was expecting "8" examples? 😂

Nice work😊

stupid , worse session ever seen

Usefull video , thank u...

Here is an idea: I think both space and velocity DO NOT EXIST because both depend on an absolute and arbitrary frame of reference that do not exist. On the other hand, acceleration can be measured absolutely, independent of any frame of reference. So acceleration exists, but not space or velocity. So we need a NEW theory of Physics, in which only acceleration exists, but not space or velocity. For example, it is possible to measure the acceleration of a spaceship independent of any frame of reference. But it is impossible to measure the position or velocity of the spaceship if you don't have a frame of reference. A frame of reference is always RELATIVE to some arbitrary object in the universe. An absolute frame of reference does not exist. Since an absolute frame of reference does not exist, neither do position or velocity. So both position or velocity need to be purged from Physics.

is there another situation, where you hold 2 rulers parallel in front of you, and tilt one but dont twist it under the other? or is that the same?

That’s really awesome

Thanks for the brilliant video !!!!!

u explain in a chilled maner which is enjoyeable

Don't see why the bounds for z are 0 to 2 and not 2 to 4. You plug in 0 for x and y to get z = 4 and we are given the other bound of z=2.

Thank u so much

Please y is the function 1

:')

do write backwards??? how does your setup work?? thats so cool!!

hello, great video, thanks for that :)

really good

actually you are doing good

Excellent explanation

thank you bro

awesome video and instructor!

"you can start with any order, im going to start with y because y not. "🤣🤣. great thinking there

Timeless! Thank you Brian for the quality explanation

Thank you, this was extremely helpful ❤️♥️♥️

Thank you

absolute legend thank you

is this guy writing backwards???

Very very nice and clear proof.

Thanks

I don't know if this man is so good or professor at college is dumb. Both may be true.

Thanks for posting these videos. Very helpful.

Excellent mesmerizing work.

Thank you for your reply. I was instigated with your final statement about "what is the difference ?", hoping to see the line of thought from (line integrals with respect to x and y ) to (their summation becomes line integral of vector field). (i.e. P (x, y)dx+ Q(x, y)dy ). In the following video which I was so eager to see, you simply draw the conclusion by introducing the definition. I am a visual person, I wonder if you can project your thought into graphs. Thank you very much.

where do I find the next video ?

Thanks ♥️✌️

Hello. Could you please provide the code? Thanks in advance.

Thank you so much!! My Professor linked this video for our class, and you're amazing!!

For the bounds of y, wouldn't you put x = 0 as well, so it's just 4 - z (like you did with the x bounds, setting y = 0)?

thank you so much

1:06 if you subtract those integrals, wouldn't it just give you zero?

when u realize this guy has to write backwards and do double integrals

You are a LEGEND remember that

Superb sir. So much love from 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳.

Excellent Explaination👍

I think your notes are wrong. I get 5pi/2.