Видео

Blind can see an deaf can hear, greening the desert how can they themselves not have ears to hear what was meant to these prophetic holy words and use them for an abomonation Jesus warned about..

if you read carefully, it says you will *LIVE*, not be 'cured'. They believed, so they lived. THat's why the word of god is so formidable. The word of god is the very gift of speech itself. We were given power but we're tricked into not believing it. Like the old saying goes: "THe greatest trick the devil played on mankind was convincing them he doesnt exist"

Dark matter is the vision of the mind to be able to seethe images ,for God made man in his image

U are ur neihgbor

Don't get hollow with your name

The difficulty that you,ll have with the spine is the healing of the injection of graphene expoudeture of cell because the the cell will mutate the communication of body witch I gave to ADAM

Why not use graphene to produce gold by taking precautions of toxicity of procedure

רב רפורמי תיזהרו ממנו

He is a firm believer in Jesus Christ as Lord, Saviour, and Messiah. Get that?

Can't trust people with the power they have how will we use thise technology. They always say the good but how will it be abused? Very scary.

Sir what if the wicked ones, start to use all these your Discoveries for evil (wicked things against humanity).

Hi YHWH empowered Bezalel to function for HIS glory exclusively making the things for the Tabernacle! YHWH empowers US to serve His Son Jesus Yeshua by doing the works that He did Himself before His resurrection. Healing the sick by the power of the Holy Spirit NOT BY NANOTECHNOLOGY! He said ‘ Do not be surprised that the world hate you, for it hated Me first! But do not worry FOR I HAVE OVERCOME THE WORLD! AND ‘ A servant is not above his Master’ ‘ Do not love the world or the things in the world, for love of the world is enmity with God’. ‘ Go ye therefore into all the world and make disciples of all men and then THE END SHALL COME’. We are not to employ our time and energy to buy into this worldly system and be at one with it because of our inventions. Resurrection is Christ’s TOTAL RESET OF CREATION. NO HUMAN SCIENCE CAN SO THIS! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua returning soon to reign over the world from Jerusalem forever.

G.OD S MERCY

Baruch HaShem Adonai! Forever! Amen 🕎✝️ .

I have fought that same battle, and still but I have given it to Christ he is my victory, born again Oct 1975, fighting with the full armour of God!

James 1:5 wisdom the gift to use knowledge, just ask as did Solomon

שלום וברכה! האם יש הסרטון של המפגש הראשון?

You are a real blessing Dr Tour!!!!

23:52 Appropriately, _The New York Times_ quoted one professor of biological sciences as stating: “The physical marks of design are visible in aspects of biology.” He added: “Life overwhelms us with the appearance of design.” Is it intellectually honest to admire the design without acknowledging the designer? The apostle Paul, a keen observer of things around him, spoke of those who “honoured and served the creature more than him who had created it.” (Romans 1:25, _Darby_ ) Affected by pervasive evolutionary ideas, some refuse or fail to recognize that design certainly points to a designer. But does the theory of evolution represent true science at its best? Note the conclusion that Christoph Schönborn, Catholic archbishop of Vienna, presented in _The New York Times:_ “Any system of thought that denies or seeks to explain away the overwhelming evidence for design in biology is ideology, not science.” There are, however, those who feel that accepting the position that there is evidence of a Creator would “stifle research.” An article in the magazine _New Scientist_ expressed such fears, asserting that “science as an open-ended pursuit would come to an end, halted by an impenetrable barrier labelled ‘the designer did it.’” Is that fear well-founded? Not at all. In fact, the opposite is true. Why? To accept blind chance and subsequent evolution as the cause of our universe and life on earth would actually be to abandon any attempt to get a meaningful explanation. On the other hand, accepting that an intelligent Creator is behind what we see around us can lead us to investigate the nature and application of his intelligence manifested in the physical universe. Consider this: Knowing that Leonardo da Vinci painted the “Mona Lisa” has not stopped art historians from investigating his technique and the materials he used. Similarly, accepting that there is a Designer should not discourage us from inquiring into the details and complexity of his designs and creations. Acceptance of the existence of a Creator does not hinder scientific progress. Some object that God is arbitrarily inserted “as an explanatory fix” wherever there is no provable scientific explanation. In other words, the claim is that such a divine Designer becomes the “God-of-the-gaps,” as if “God” were a magic word to use whenever men cannot figure things out. But what are the gaps referred to here? Are they merely small and insignificant gaps in our knowledge? No, they are real chasms of plausibility that exist in Darwinian evolution. They are fundamental breaches in aspects of biology that the theory of evolution has been incapable of bridging. In all fairness, evolutionists who rely on unsupported assertions effectively make the Darwinian theory their “God-of-the-gaps.” (in essence arguing that 'nature did it', or you can come across phrases such as 'nature found a way to evolve a ...', 'or 'nature invented ...', fill in some piece of biomolecular machinery found in living organisms, it is just assumed that it evolved, even though there is no indication from our research into mutations and so-called "natural selection", that this mechanism of evolution could accomplish such feats of engineering; Dr. Tour referred to this behaviour at 22:45) The Creator presented in the Bible is no “God-of-the-gaps.” Rather, his activity covers all phases, aspects, and details of creation. We need to consider the question of common sense. Commenting in general on the validity of various scientific theories, science writer John Horgan observed: “When the evidence is tentative, we should not be embarrassed to call on common sense for guidance.” Does it really make sense to claim that life came about simply by chance or through blind forces? Despite the widespread popularity of the theory of evolution, many intelligent people, including scientists, are convinced that there is an intelligent Creator. A science professor notes that the general public “overwhelmingly, and sensibly, thinks that life was designed.” Why so? Most people will readily agree with the apostle Paul’s statement: “Every house is constructed by someone.” (Hebrews 3:4) Then Paul continues with the logical conclusion: “He that constructed all things is God.” From the Bible’s viewpoint, it simply does not make sense to acknowledge that a house needs a designer and builder and at the same time claim that a complicated cell made up of biomolecular machinery and nanotechnology* accidentally sprang into existence. (*: and smaller scales) The Bible makes an observation regarding those who reject the existence of a Designer and Creator: “The senseless one has said in his heart: ‘There is no Jehovah.’” (Psalm 14:1) Here, the psalmist reproves those who have yet to be convinced. A person might be guided by personal opinion rather than by pure objectivity. On the other hand, the wise, discerning person humbly acknowledges the existence of a Creator.​-Isaiah 45:18. For many thinking individuals, the evidence that supports a Supreme Designer is unmistakable. Isaac Newton put this common sense approach this way: “Rule I. We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances. ... Rule IV. In experimental philosophy we are to look upon propositions collected by general induction from phenomena as accurately or very nearly true, notwithstanding any contrary hypotheses that may be imagined, 'till such time as other phenomena occur, by which they may either be made more accurate, or liable to exceptions, This rule we must follow, that the argument of induction may not be evaded by hypotheses.” “As in Mathematicks, so in Natural Philosophy, the Investigation of difficult Things by the Method of Analysis, ought ever to precede the Method of Composition. This Analysis consists in making Experiments and Observations, and in drawing general Conclusions from them by Induction, and admitting of no Objections against the Conclusions, but such as are taken from Experiments, or other certain Truths. For Hypotheses are not to be regarded in experimental Philosophy.” (and certainly not the assumption of evolution backed up by 'we just don't know how yet' and in light of the reality of no evidence actually pointing in that direction, in spite of misleading impressions to the contrary generated by those who hype their research into evolutionary philosophies/ideas and storylines and don't even attempt to answer the question raised by Tour at 23:05 from an evolutionary perspective) - Isaac Newton (from _Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica_ ) The _Encyclopaedia Britannica_ on inductive reasoning: "When a person uses a number of established facts to draw a general conclusion, he uses inductive reasoning. THIS IS THE KIND OF LOGIC NORMALLY USED IN THE SCIENCES. ..." After all, we all know what the established cause is for the emergence of machinery and technology. Why do we have SETI projects again? For earning a living?

They always use God of the gaps as the excuse for the other side. They say, " well they don't want to accept it because they believe it's God in the gaps" which I don't think lay believer that's open to science uses very much. I think the it's not the God of the gaps people die on that hill.

18:52 Rabbi didn't like orthodox Judaism being compared to lay people who have trouble agreeing with scientists who have been known to lie for generations. I'd like to hear what Tour meant by that and what the Rabbi thinks makes his group different.

אשכנזים זה חכמה למראית עין הם מסרסים את כולם מסביבם כת של יזמי אידאולוגיות משמידות חברות עמים ומדינות ומחוללי אנטישמיות עם טכנוקרטיה רפואית דיקטטורית יצירי מסתננים לעם היהודי זה תוכנת מיפוי הגינום הישראלי הראה בבירור קיצר קוזרים בני עוולה

אל דאגה, בעולם המערבי תהיה קריסה של האוכלוסייה - אז יהיה איזון

I am glad to see open minded progresive religious people having this type of conversations.

22:04 that was the Spirit entering the room.

Is there a reason that not a single one of these comments has anything to do with nano technology?

Christian bible is false

נהדר תודה

They still have not been able to isolate and purify any “virus” from any animal or person. Admittedly by every study and per many FOIA requests.

They still to this day have not been able to isolate and purify any “virus” from an animal or person admittedly in every study and per the many Foia requests.

That slide is not "busy" - it's garbage. It's like someone asked if any god damn fucking liar to paint a Gish Gallop and so he did... then he invited some bronze age mentality bigots to look it over with him. I'm not watching this shit and I'm blocking your channel AND sending it to ffrf.

what is the stock symbol of TerraForm or AquaForm Israeli stocks, please?

James is the type of leader we need. The leaders we have are in those in the Tech industry. They live to bread hatred, shut down communication, beat us with their deamon philosophies.

He is very smart and very stupid at the same time..being so obsessed with mere 2000 year old scriptures writen by a story teller. LOOK AT THE SUMMERIAN CIVILIZATION!!!.. Do you believe that Moses could lead 600,000 men Israelites (+ their women, children, elders, some estimate that would mean north of 2 million people + livestock, material possessions and whatnot) wondering the desert for decades and leave no archaeological traces?

God is not a particular man made religion!..

I knew at an early age that the proof of a "god" would be discovered by "science". Pretty ironic eh? Especially when Darwin and Co. did so much to to make science "anti-spiritual". Less than 100 years later the observations made by our top genetic and nano-tech scientists proved that subscribing to Darwinism was the equivalent to believing in Santa Clause. (also a creation of the same hellbent mind-washers) You can't have your cake and eat it too! That was the problem for those who said God was dead while brandishing telescopes and micro-scopes. It wouldn't be too long before 2 lies would threaten each others validity. Science has proved intelligent design. Now it is all about keeping the peasants ignorant. Who are these peasants? Why they are you of course, you idiotic presumers who considered yourselves middle class. You were never anything other than peasants!

צריך להגדיר מה זה "ספק" ומה זה "ספק סביר" לפני שדנים בנושא. ספק סביר פירושו שניתן לראות אפשרות שלפיה מה שקרה מציג את הנאשם כזכאי. למשל, במקרה של זדורוב, ישנה טביעת נעל שאינה שלו בתא, ולעומת זאת אין טביעת נעל שלו בתא. כמו כן יש לא מעט דנא בתא וגם שערות אבל אין שום דנא או שערות של זדורוב. זדורוב הודה שרצח עם סכין יפנית אבל הצוואר של הנרצחת חתוך בסכין משוננת. כל אחת מהעובדות האלו לבדן יכולה לשמש בסיס להתרחשות שלא כוללת את זדורוב כרוצח. כלומר יש לנו שלושה "ספק סביר", ולא מניתי עוד עובדות כאלו (וישנן עוד): 1. הנעל לא שייכת לזדורוב אלא לרוצח. 2. הרוצח השאיר דנא ושערות במהלך המאבק, ומכיוון שאין דנא ושערות של זדורוב, זדורוב לא הרוצח. 3. זדורוב לא יודע איך הנרצחת נרצחה. הוא לא הרוצח. המינוח "ספק סביר" הוא מטעה. מה שעל השופט לקבוע הוא לא מה יותר סביר: שזדורוב רצח או שהוא לא רצח. זה לא משחק של לוטו או רולטה. השאלה איננה האם יותר סביר שיצא מספר זוגי או מספר ראשוני ברולטה. המונח "ספק סביר" פירושו האם ניתן לספר את הסיפור של מה שקרה כך שאינו כולל את הנאשם, ושזהו סיפור סביר - לא ביחס לאפשרות השניה, שזדורוב כן רצח (!) אלא ביחס למה שאנחנו מכירים באופן כללי מן המציאות, כלומר סיפור שלא כולל חוצנים, הליכה על המים ושאר סיפורי סבתא. זו נקודה חשובה ביותר. איננו משווים את הסיכוי שהסיפור לפיו זדורוב רצח סביר יותר מהסיפור שלפיו זדורוב לא רצח, אלא האם קיים, ללא קשר לשום סיפור אחר, סיפור שלפיו זדורוב לא רצח, ושהוא סביר מבחינת תפיסת המציאות הכללית שלנו. ואחזור לדוגמאות: האם במאבק שכזה הרוצח משאיר דנא ושערות? כן. האם נמצאו כאלו של זדורוב? לא. לכן אני יכול בהחלט לספר סיפור סביר מבחינת תפיסת המציאות שלי שלפיו זדורוב לא רצח. אני חושב ששופטים רבים, במיוחד כאלו שבאים מן התביעה הכללית, אינם מבינים את מה שהסברתי לעיל. הם שוקלים בטעות מין משחק של הסתברויות בין הסיפור שלפיו זדורוב רצח ובין הסיפור שלפיו זדורוב לא רצח. הרי ישנן עדויות שלפיהן ניתן לבנות סיפור לפיו זדורוב כן רצח, למשל שהוא היה בבית הספר בשעת הרצח. אבל אין כאן תחרות של סיפורים. הגישה הנכונה היא גישה של הפרכה: אם קיים סיפור סביר אחד לפיו זדורוב לא רצח (כגון זה שלא נמצא דנא או שערות בתא למרות שהוא היה עמוס בכאלו - אבל לא שלו - ולמרות שהמאבק בבירור ועל פי כל שכל בריא השאיר דנא או שערות של הרוצח) הרי שהוא משמש בתור הפרכה, ולא משנה כמה ממצאים יכולים לשמש כדי לבנות סיפור לפיו הוא כן רצח. למה הדבר דומה? לקביעה בשאלה האם כל העורבים שחורים. אם ראיתי מאה עורבים שחורים ורק עורב אחד לבן, מה יותר סביר? שכל העורבים שחורים או שהם לא שחורים? לפי מידת הסבירות, הרי אני בסיכוי של מאה כנגד אחד לטובת הקביעה שכל העורבים שחורים, אבל זו כמובן טעות מתודולוגית, משום שאני נדרש לקבוע האם *כל* העורבים שחורים, ולכן מספיק שעורב אחד אינו שחור כדי לבטל את הטענה. זו המשמעות של הרשעה "מעבר לכל ספק סביר". קיומו של ספק סביר, בדיוק כמו קיומו של עורב לבן, מבטל את האפשרות להרשיע. משום כך אני סבור שאין משמעות לטענה "יש לי ספק של עשרה אחוז". הספק הסביר קיים או לא קיים, בשלמותו. יתכן שיהיה שופט שיקבע שהסיפור הספציפי לפיו הנאשם לא רצח אינו סיפור שמתקבל על הדעת (כי הוא מערב חוצנים, לדוגמה), אבל אי אפשר לדבר על הספק הסביר כשלעצמו במונחים של סבירות, ולכן אין משמעות לשאלה באילו אחוזים אני חושב שהרוצח אכן רצח. לא רק ההכרעה חד משמעית, גם הדרך אליה חד משמעית: או שיש ספק סביר, או שאין. אם יש, אפילו לדעת שופט אחד, שהוא כפי שהיטבת להגדיר, אדם סביר וגם מקצועי, הרי שדינה של ההרשעה להתבטל.

תודה

Bad religion is to pretend you are a Jew when you aren’t...

כאישה דתיה, אני ממש נהנת לשמוע אותך. שאת מצליחה למצות תאמת .

מרצה מרתק

Frank Tipler! In the audience.

Does anyone know who the audience is. It looks like Don Page on the left and could that be Frank Tipler a couple seats down?

A genius@! And a Christian @!!!!!

AXIOS! AXIOS! AXIOS! With the greatest of love, ALL OF YOUR COUSINS!

On Earth you are quarantined, cut off from any benevolent deities. If you pray for something and get your wish, Satan is only to happy to reinforce your ridiculous belief that prayers work in any way. Satan is the only entity able to hear your prayers whilst you live out your incarnation on Earth, the 1st plane of hell. Romans created Christianity as a form of herd management. This man will no doubt create many things, all which are of some service to Satan. His inventions will bring untold misery to the meek peoples of this world. Still, he refuses to see this and instead forces ahead, excepting Satan's coins for his misguided good intentions. Creative inspiration that comes from prayer can only be diabolical. Sorry.

Get'em, Cleaver!!!!!!!!!!!!!

כשאני רואה פרופסורים ורופאים שומרי תורה ומצוות לבי שמח

Brilliant I love to see God get the glory by what His doing in the lives of people . God bless James and His family.

Dr James tour is a prophet for our times . God is the infinite knowledge and wisdom giver. And God is speaking to and through Dr James tour. Bless and his family.