Видео

It also seems like the film passage is too narrow at times of the film.

@@alohaangel33 make sure the 8mm switch is set on the right type of film. 8mm os super 8mm.

Do you mean Decades not Centuries?

@@ScottChamberlain-j9m Yes sorry got carried away

@abbashussein6161 it would be deserved if he does reside in our playlists for Centuries to come, but we will only hope music doesn't tarnish itself beyond all recognition by then!

@@bettylambe9817 Love Elvis Forever !!

Hi, Kittycat

Right.

No one stumbles on Facebook accounts.I ask my wife to respond to you question. Here's what she said...A lot of hacker going on in social media. They are stealing your identity and your pictures to make money off their own. The more people view their stuff the more money comes from their website. Be careful what you are watching or what you see as fake accounts and they will hack your account too. I separated my account to Teddy account because that's he's business account. I don't trust people now . My FB is in private just family. I think this is one of the reasons we stopped our Philippine vlog. People use avatar's, and hide their identity like you. Our life is a happy life. We've been married 14 years now. It's much better we don't get involved in people's comments..

I don't have any plans to go back.

Trying to change the bad reviews of the "REELZ". That why. Still not good. Plus so slow..35 minute for a 3 inch reel of film. Ugh. 4.5 hours for a 5" reel.

@@teddlear970 Interesting. Suspected something like that might have been the reason. Although, regarding the scan times, I'm willing to tolerate longer digitizing times if the trade-off is more accurate frame-to-frame registration. When film's moving at regular speed, the little advance claws have less than 1/20th of a second per "grab" to reach up, grab the next sprocket hole, yank it down into place for the 1/18th of a second the frame will be shot through with light, then repeat again, endlessly. When projected onto a very large screen, that "chatter" reveals itself as each frame coming up in a very tiny but different place. Our eyes learn to accept this imprecision, but for the sake of archiving some very important dramatic films done a few decades ago, the better the precision in scanning at the start (registering each frame in exactly the same place as the previous), the better the digital successors will be. What HAS been bugging me is watching a number of reviews of scanned movies, and the surprising graininess of the resulting MPEGs. The grittiness and JPEG-y looking artifacts are surprisingly visible, which is weird, considering they're taking such a small frame and dividing it into (depending on manufacturer) 3280 x 2464 pixels on the sensor, there should be incredible smoothness of the final image, like watching a movie on your cellphone. But apparently the compression method is what's responsible for most of what's getting screwed up. Some other technical issues have been blamed too. Sad, because Kodak used to be world leaders, and they've completely dropped the ball. My very first movie camera in 1966 was a Kodak. Now they just license Chinese firms to slap their name and logo onto whatever rinky-dink products come out of their tech sweatshops. All done in the name of raw, soulless profiteering for the boardroom execs and shareholders.

Thanks

yes

Splicing is a problem on all the Chines machines. I found that the Magnasonic FS81 is the easiest to get passed the splices. It only has two hold down tabs in the gate. The Wolverines stop a lot. Because of the three tabs. The method is to release the gate. Then make sure the the advance paw is down so the film is loose. Then pull the film from the back of the gate passed the splice. Then, shut the gate down. It will start again. This may happen each splice. Not fun. It will start a new file every time you have to do this. Very slow process. Good Luck. The reels jams the same as the Wolverine

don't count on it.

These are classic history. Thanks

@@teddlear970 What got you into Elvis, and whats your favorite song?

@@meepliss7560I was in junior high school when Elvis hit. I guess you can guess I'm old. 80 to be exact. I thought he was a pure natural performer. I also played guitar and a few years later I had a Rock & Rock band. 16 I was. That's the story as short as I can tell you.

@@teddlear970 you totally live in the best generation, it would be so cool to see him in person. God bless you sir!

@@meepliss7560Yes. It was. Things in music were so interesting back then.That Era from the late 50's to the late 70's were so exciting and challenging too.

wow, glad you like it.

Sounds Great.

you're welcome. I really did enjoy Elvis.

I love you my Young gypsy man YOU REST UNIQUE 😢😢😢

Yes, seems real.

ok

I upscale B&W 2K, then Color. Then upscale all 4K. No Ai. That's my process. Thanks for you telling me yours. Took 4 days to complete my process.