Видео

Hi @Arkomaangel19 - yes, the foam used in the evacuation mat has enough density, which means it provides cushion to the heads while going down a flight of stairs. If you have further questions, feel free to contact us and we'll do the necessary to help out. Have a great day! KR, Tetcon Team

Dear Yotsuba - We can assure you that there's limited to no pressure on the torso of the person lying on the ground. The two ladies are essentially 'locking' the elbows and shoulders without force. They press their backs to one another, so there's no force on the person's back, but it limits the person's ability to move up and down. I have lain down myself and tried to get out, but with this technique, you stop resisting because your motion is limited. I didn't feel any pressure on my back except for my legs, as we've observed that you need to lay down your ankles/knees due to the strength of those. And yes, of course, to get someone on the ground, some force might be needed, but if a person suffers from a severe meltdown, they can be a danger to other staff or patients, and in those cases, only force will allow you to start using this type of transfer. This technique is a last resort, and if that's the case, they try to do it in the least harmful way for the patient. We have tried many techniques, and this is by far the best way to make it as friendly as possible. Hope this explanation is helpful but feel free to give us a call if you like to discuss this in further detail: +31 40 298 99 55. KR, Bob

​@@TetconEindhoven My criticism was targeted towards the lack of force. That shoulder lock (similar to a kimura) would be difficult to achieve on a resisting adult who has no pressure on his back. I also acknowledged that, since you don't want to put on any pressure on the torso to prevent injury, a noble goal, this becomes a difficult scenario. Maybe another solution would be to mount the belly down individual on the hips instead of the ribs while the other person controls the legs like in the video. Their arms wouldn't be particularly dangerous in this scenario and they wouldn't be able to buck you off thanks to the rear person's leg control, and despite this level of control their upper body wouldn't be endangered. Additionally, because you would be essentially sitting/ kneeling on the individuals hips and ground while the other person sprawls out on their legs, this hypothetical "technique" would require less fine motor skills and more gross motor skills, as nobody needs to remember any pseudo shoulder submissions in the heat of the moment.

Thanks for sharing Honey - do you have any instructions available how you teach this kind of restraints? We're always curious and eager to learn from others around the world.

Definitely!!

🤣 yup....

@@TetconEindhovenwhat did you eat?

About the same thing😂

Just added a lock 💀

Haha😂​@@tieskebarten473

​@bart😂vy

In The Netherlands and Belgium ;)

You are correct and thanks for sharing your thoughts and concerns. Complete restraints are often out of the question in The Netherlands. This is a technique to simply transfer the patient from point A to point B if they suffer from a severe meltdown and cause a danger to either themselves or to their surroundings. The goal of this type of this restraint is to use as little force as possible, but use the person's body to restrict movements (e.g. lock the elbow instead of the cuffing it). Also, the ladies press their backs against each other and lock the elbows without putting any pressure to the person's torso. These are techniques that are trained to actually improve the well-being of the patients compared to full restraints and using force and pressure which could harm the patients.

No, because there's no pressure being applied to the chest.

@oddward5759 except the weight of the individuals own body and the weight of the people holding onto his arms. Add to that the fact that that his ribcage is directly on the ground, meaning his intercostal muscles, designed to expand his ribcage now have to lift his entire body and the two people holding his arms. His arms being positioned in that way will further impact his ability to breathe. This is a death waiting to happen, no to mention the psychological harm you are doing to a patient This is more barbaric than C&R training.

Haha, I'll pass this to the marketing team 😄

@@TetconEindhoven ok

Für Bestatter 🙂

@@TetconEindhoven Haha okay, sowas in der Art dacht ich mir schon ✌🏽😄 Ich bin mir zwar nicht sicher ob diese Werbung die richtigen Leute erreicht, aber ich drücke euch trotzdem ganz fest die Daumen! 💪🏽✌🏽😁

Vielen Dank@@ryanthemage ! :D

Good to know

😂😂 if you say so

This is mechanical restraint. It’s used in a few places and must be legally done.

Love to hear more about the practices you have learned. Feel free to send us an email to info(@)tetcon-ge.com. Always great to learn from one and other and improve from other's experiences. Have a wonderful day @mrbritishguyesq2846

This is mechanical restraint. It’s rarely used.

Yes, you can still walk while wearing the suit, but you will notice that movements will be restricted. :)

We'd love to see your work once you're finished, Freddie!

I don’t know if you are still writing it but I absolutely can help with this. From a professional perspective.

You are 100% correct! The goal of this technique is to ensure there's no pressure on the torso to prevent any fractures. The ladies are putting against each other backs instead of the torso of the patient on the ground. This technique is used to remove the strength of sweeping with arms or legs and reduce movement possibilities while not completely shutting down freedom of movement. Luckily, the facility that is educating their staff on this technique now, there hasn't been any accident and transfers are much smoother now (and less injuries for patients and staff members). If you have any other suggestions, feel free to email us or give us a phone call =) Have an enjoyable day.

Hi @Anonymousgamer-gi7kj - this is to check if the person doesn't have anything in their pockets or socks that could be used as a weapon to harm himself when they are inside the seclusion room. Hope this explains.

it's illegal only police can do that@@TetconEindhoven

@@TetconEindhoven He will use the bed to harm himself. It's no sense seclude a patient limbs free without any sedation. It's fatally dangerous, indeed.

Also yes :) But most important, is the extremely high tear resistance of the fabric to ensure that it can't be ripped into fabric pieces, because those fabric pieces could cause dangerous situations such as making knots.

Hi there - this blanket is used in seclusion rooms by psychiatric and detention facilities. In Europe, these are considered calm-down zones to ensure patients won't harm themselves when they are in temporary state of shock or have a meltdown. Hope this explains!

It’s based off the idea that suicidal ideation is a very clouded state of judgement that’s a symptom of extreme psychological distress, and that it’s a desire one wouldn’t ever have in a state of contentment and mental clarity. In other words, most health organizations do not believe it’s truly possible to legitimately want to end your life, and such desires are always a symptom of intense yet treatable mental agony. All of this is of course still heavily studied and debated, and critics of suicide prevention do very much exist, and do produce compelling arguments against involuntary psychosocial intervention, which this company seemingly manufactures products for.

Turning off life isn't beneficial for capitalism

Hi Liam - thanks for sharing your thoughts. I'm here to give some extra explanation. This is actually a product which is used by many detention and psychiatric facilities around the world. They place the blankets in seclusion rooms or solitary confiment rooms. In Europe, these are considered calm-down zones to ensure patients won't harm themselves when they are in temporary state of shock or have a meltdown. Hope this explains!