Видео

I thought the Rabbi is a believer in Yeshua. I will pray for him.

Here is an honest conversation of Scripture. Never heard honest teaching like this from the Jewish faith. Praise God.

interesting... we should have a collective of knowledge in which everyone can access the sources and from that sources we have different understanding and perspective.

From Kosovo Katholik I Love ❤ my orthodox Brother 🇦🇱✝️🙏 Jesus is King ❤️

Ако двојазичноста целосно се имплементира во РМ тогаш ќе треба и на албански јазик да се пее по црквите и манастирите во нашата. Како што тече времето, во македонските цркви ќе бараат и молитви на албански да се слушаат од страна на верниците. 😇🇲🇰💓☦️⛪🇦🇱

6,7 %

GEZUAR KRISHTLINDJET GJITH ORTHODHOKSET KUDO ,,,GREQI ALBANI SERBI BULLGARI ,,,,,,,❤❤❤❤❤ GREKORTHODHOKS BIZANT =GREK ALBANI ORTHODHOKS ,,,KIRJE LEJSON AMIN ,,❤❤❤❤❤

ALBANIAN ORTHODOX = GREK ORTHODOX,❤❤❤❤❤,,,,,,

Daniel Boyarin is brilliant.

This mean is not a believer 😂

This is true.

He said BC and not BCE! W rabbi! 13:44

There is a difference between causation, grounding and supervenience. In philosophy these are well-known distinctions. The difference between the Son and the universe is not merely temporality. The Son is a necessary being, i.e. he exist in all possible world (there is no possibility for his non-existence) and he lacks any beginning. But there is a difference between a *necessity* and *dependence* . The Son is a necessary being independent *of all creation* , but he is not independent of the *Father* . To take an analogy. God’s omnipotence is an essential property of God (God could not fail to have it), yet the property of omnipotence is dependent on God’s essence, that is God is omnipotent *by virtue* of his divine essence. Likewise while the Son is a necessary being and divine he exist by virtue of the Fatherhood of of the Divine Father. To take a more concrete analogy. The sun is not the same as its rays, and its rays exist by virtue of the sun, still there is no sun without rays, and you cannot have a sun without rays. Thus, the Son is by virtue of the Father, but you will not have the Father without the Son.

Jesus siting on Gods throne means that their authority is precisely the same. God will eventually give a throne to Jesus.

Hey I'm new to Orthodoxy & could you pls explain why aseity is extrinsic and not intrinsic? because in my opinion, both the essence and the hypostasis of the Father can be considered to be ase since the essence of the Father is also uncaused. I get how ab alio is extrinsic but can you pls explain why aseity is also extrinsic.

Oh Zoti yne Jezu Krisht, na mbro dhe na beko te gjithe neve, popullit tend! Na udhehiq drejt rruges tende pa interes dhe me dashuri! Oh Biri Perendise, hajde sa me pare dhe triumfo mbi erresiren! Na fal mekatet dhe na udhehiq o i premtuar, Jezu Krisht, Mesiah dhe i dashuri yne! Zoti ju bekoftë te gjitheve!❤️☦️🇦🇱

I love you so much my Albanian Orthodhox chants, Greetings from Albanian from Dardania/ Kosova. Ju dua shum Shqipetar Orthodhoks, Kenge Orthodhokse, Psalmet qe jan te njejta ne Islam gjithashtu. E dua Kulturen Bizantine, rrenjet e Shqiptareve jan Bizanti. Femijeve te mi i frymezoi me Kenge Arberore Bizantine Shqiptare, duke me shkuer mendsh, qe dikur ishem orthodhoks ne shpirt e zember. Edhepse ne fillim pata zemerim/ dyshim me Greket qe po na rrembejne Orthodhoksine ne vitet 1990,mirepo frytet duken, edhe me duet te lavderoi Anastas Janulatosin gjithsesi, qe ndihmoi per ringritjen e Orthodhoksis Shqiptare, me von pashe qe vet kisha Greke ne krye ka Arberorin/ Arvanitin, Joanin. Kshuqe na e jena Grekun, Greket e kan tanin, Joanin. Jena vllazen, po ea e spjegojua disave. Jam praktikues i fejes Islane me bindje, por e dashuroi gjuhen Shqipe Kulturen tone Bizantine, Orthodhokse. Bravo

Albanian ILLYRO-PELASGE the most beautiful Langue ❤❤

THESE THINGS THEY CAN BE REVEALED BY GOD. jameswiliamsblog.wordpress.com/2023/05/27/the-holy-trinity/

From his voice, you can feel the calm serenity he embodies.

Today, 08.11.2024 (21.11.2024 in the world) Father Seraphim was canonized by ROCOR in Odessa on the Synaxis of the Archangel Michael and the other Bodiless Powers: the Archangels Gabriel, Raphael, Uriel, Salaphiel, Jegudiel, Barachiel, and Jeremiel. Dear Father among the Saints, the Venerable Seraphim, Hieromonk of Platina pray for us in these last days!

The Word became flesh so the our flesh may become the word... Thank you Dr. Boyarin.

is this his voice?

Fantastic exhortation 🤝🤝🤝

He passed away years ago he is with the Lord Jesus Christ and The Father.

Thats a new way to say "Im scared shitless"

Are there three subjects, "I"s, in God or one subject, one "I", when he/they refers to themself?

Thos man is a fake academic ...Muslim apologetics should refute & expose this clown

💯Envy is even worse than Pride, according to Exorcists ✝️ this wonderful Saint 💖sees the Whole Picture from Beginning

Where do U get Ur nonsense from no Muslim ever says there's a tablet thats eternal alongside Allah.thats nonsense.attributes r not persons.does Ur attribute separate from U n become something U can touch n see?U r nuts

Nuk na duhet as kisha as xhamia na duhet njerzillik për njëritjetrin

Românii și alabezii = frați de sânge...

Please allow me to share these verses of the Quran in which God describes Himself. Be blessed. For clarification, Allah is the Arabic name of the one and only god, the Creator. It is also the name of God in Aramaic, the language of Jesus pbuh, and it is with this name that Jesus addressed God. Quran (2:255) “Allah - there is no deity except Him, the Ever-Living, the All-Sustaining. Neither slumber overtakes Him nor sleep. To Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. Who is it that can intercede with Him except by His permission? He knows what is before them and what is behind them; while they grasp nothing of His knowledge, except what He wills. His Kursiyy (Chair) encompasses the Heavens and the Earth, and their preservation does not tire Him. He is the All-High, the Supreme. (2:256) Let there be no compulsion in religion, for the truth stands out clearly from falsehood, so whoever renounces false gods and believes in Allah has certainly grasped the firmest, unfailing handhold. And Allah is The All-Hearing, All-Knowing”. (2:257) Allah is the Ultimate Guardian of those who have attained faith; He brings them out of the darkness(es) into the light, while those who have denied-their guardians are the false masters; they bring them out of the light into the darkness(es) . Those are the fellows of the Fire; therein they abide. Chapter 112 of the Quran In the name of Allah, the Most Compassionate, the Most Merciful. Say: “He is Allah, the One and Only; Allah the Besought by all, needing none. He begot no one nor was He begotten, and never has there been to Him anyone equivalent.” Quran (42:11) “[He is] Creator of the heavens and the earth. He has made for you from yourselves, mates, and among the cattle, mates; He multiplies you thereby. There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing.” Quran (2:186) “And when My servants ask you, concerning Me - indeed I am near. I respond to the invocation of the supplicant when he calls upon Me. So let them respond to Me and believe in Me that they may be [rightly] guided. Chapter 19 (Mary) 77-98 77 Have you seen ˹O Prophet˺ the one who rejects Our revelations yet boasts, “I will definitely be granted wealth and children. 78 Has he obtained knowledge of the unseen, or has he taken a pledge from the Most Compassionate? 79 No! We will record what he says and extend for him from the punishment extensively. 80 We shall inherit from him all that he speaks of and he will come to Us all alone. 81 They have taken other gods instead of Allah that they may be a source of strength for them. 82 By no means! They shall soon deny their worship and shall become their adversaries instead. 83 Do you ˹O Prophet˺ not see that We have sent the devils against the disbelievers, constantly inciting them? 84 So do not be in haste against them, for indeed We are counting down their days. 85 On the Day We will gather the righteous to the Most Merciful as a delegation 86 and We shall drive the guilty ones to Hell as a thirsty herd. 87 None will have the right to intercede, except those who have taken a covenant from the Most Compassionate. 88 And they say, "The Most Merciful has begotten a son." 89 You have certainly made an outrageous claim, 90 The heavens almost rupture therefrom and the earth split open and the mountains collapse in devastation 91 That they attribute to the Most Merciful a son. 92 And it is not appropriate for the Most Merciful to beget a son. 93 Everyone who is in the Heavens and the Earth will come to The All-Merciful as a servant; 94 He has enumerated them and counted them precisely. 95 Each of them is coming to Him on Resurrection Day individually. 96 As for those who believe and do good, the Most Compassionate will ˹certainly˺ bless them with ˹genuine˺ love. 97 So indeed, We have made it (the Quran) easy in your tongue, that you may give glad tidings to the ones who were mindful (of God) and warn with it a hostile people. 98 And how many a generation have We annihilated before them? Can you feel a single one of them or hear from them the slightest whisper? And Quran (17:110-111) “Say, "Call upon Allah or call upon the Most Merciful [ar-Raḥmān]. Whichever [name] you call - to Him belong the best names." And do not recite [too] loudly in your prayer or [too] quietly but seek between that an [intermediate] way. And say, "Praise to Allah, who has not taken a son and has had no partner in [His] dominion and has no [need of a] protector out of weakness; and glorify Him with [great] glorification."”

What the number of verse?

🧠

👆

The premise being advanced by Dr. Steven Nemes is the Eunomian Premise (EP): In other words, he is affirming the following: God’s essential intrinsic properties entail the extrinsic property of being a se. This negates the following that: God’s broadly essential intrinsic properties, and being ab alio, taken together, are compossible. In other words, there would be no contradiction between having all of God’s essential intrinsic properties, and having the property of being ab alio. The EP says much more than merely that aseity is broadly essential to God. Everybody in the argument admits that. Rather, it must state that, in addition to aseity being broadly essential to God, there is also an entailment relation between God’s intrinsic essential properties and God’s extrinsic essential property of aseity. It is not just that God has these essential intrinsic properties, such as God’s nature and His perfections of being omnipotent, etc., but God has a property of being a se essentially (which is agreed to by everybody), but also that there is this entailment relation existing between the intrinsic and the extrinsic properties. But what reason is there to think that? Remember, this is absolutely necessary to make the EP work. The unitarian will want to claim that only God is a se in any possible world. Nobody wants to affirm that other things besides God are a se. And they probably do not want to affirm that there may be a possible world where anything other than God could be a se. But that just means that aseity will identify God uniquely (it will always identify God) in any possible world. And this is just another way of saying that it is God’s hypostatic property. In other words, the unitarian is committed to saying that aseity is one of God’s hypostatic properties. But once we grant that, why should we need aseity to also be part of God’s ousia in addition to that? I.e., it is one of God’s hypostatic properties that uniquely identifies God, but it is also part of God’s kind essence too. This is nothing but a completely invalid move! Plucking aseity into God’s ousia in addition to God’s hypostasis would be superfluous. It would also be superfluous to add an entailment relation between the ousia (or any other intrinsic properties) and the property of aseity. (Think about these sets of properties: God has a set of essential intrinsic properties-they are all essential to God, so God must have them-and then there is this essential extrinsic property of aseity, so God must have that. Now I insert an entailment relation-what does that do for me? Aseity was already essential to God anyway.) There are also positive reasons to reject the EP. Ousia (“kind essences”) are generally agreed to be intrinsic. By definition, the ancient way of thinking about nature is that it must be intrinsic, and nature is what gives a thing its intrinsic causal powers. Most philosophers will say that a thing’s “kind essence” is intrinsic to it, and that is just what an ousia is. They are plausibly taken to be individuated by the causal powers and dispositions they bestow upon their bearers, which are themselves intrinsic. There are also arguments from contemporary philosophy that support this view, such as those by Dr. Sydney Shoemaker, who is famous for arguing that properties in general must be individuated by the causal powers they bestow upon their bearers, and his argument would even more certainly apply to natures (as we are using the term). In fact, St. Gregory of Nyssa in “Ad Eustathium” makes essentially the same argument as Dr. Shoemaker, but specifically about natures/ousiai. Dr. Shoemaker’s argument can be summarised as follows: The way I identify, say, the property of being red, is that if a thing has that property, it causes a certain kind of sensation in my experience when I look at it. On the other hand, I identify the property of being green by the fact that it causes a different kind of sensation in my experience when I look at it. Suppose it were possible for the property of being green (not like a green thing turning red, or a red thing turning green, but suppose it were possible for the property of being green to start causing the kind of sensation a person normally has when they see red, and likewise with the property of red starting to cause the sensation a person normally has when they see green). If that is possible, then a person cannot tell whether something is red or green just by looking at it. But, of course, I can tell whether something is red or green by looking at it. If a red tomato starts looking green to me, or a green avocado starts looking red, I would not say that red started causing the same experience in me that green used to, and that green started causing the same experience in me that red used to.

While I disagree with quite a bit of Daniel he has some really great talks with fabulous insight.

Im confused, is Dr. Sijuwade is RC, Uniate, or Orthodox? I can't find anything on what he is.

Is it proper to state the son was caused by the Father?

If Jesus is fully God, I don't understand the logic of his argument. If Jesus is God in a derivative sense, then Arianism would be correct! I don't see his argument or emphasis aligning with what historical writings have claimed.

Look how slimy these Muslims are lmao

4:JA in italics

Enjoy your work brother. One thing I'd point out is how the early church and the Fathers understood the concept of "monotheism" in comparison to how modern Muslims apply this word and any notion of "oneness" in their theology. For the early church Fathers, they used the word monarchia or monarchy when applied to God, and that was that God is one because the Father is the one God, which is what the Nicene Creed states. However, they were not unitarians and so the word "God" is also applied to the Son and Holy Spirit because God can pick out the one divine essence and nature as well. Sorry if I sound like I'm preaching to the choir. Just sharing my 2 cents.

Wonder what Sam Shamoun has to say about his take on the Trinity.