- Видео 1
- Просмотров 82 442
Logan Ury
Добавлен 18 сен 2017
All things love, dating, and relationships!
For more from Logan Ury check out loganury.com and loganury
For more from Logan Ury check out loganury.com and loganury
The History of Marriage
Marry for love? For most of history, the idea would have seemed silly. Discover the history of marriage, from thousands of years ago until today. Check out Eli Finkel's new book, "The All-or-Nothing Marriage" goo.gl/d1rQaz. Produced by Logan Ury: check out loganury.com and loganury for all things love, dating, + relationships.
Produced by White Animation: ruclips.net/channel/UC28tpBjSIo8RL8u7ohK7uBg
Produced by White Animation: ruclips.net/channel/UC28tpBjSIo8RL8u7ohK7uBg
Просмотров: 82 469
If divorce rate doubled since the 60s than something wrong happend there.😅😂
I was expecting so much more honestly. "The institution of marriage is at least 4,350 years old, with the first recorded marriage taking place in Mesopotamia in 2350 B.C. However, some speculate that the concept may be even older."
To the agrarian, marrying for love would be silly. To the caveman, marrying at all would be silly.
ignoring this video, it starts at 1850 America.. wrong title for the actual content of this video.
You expect too much from another person....which will likely lead to disappointment. 😊😊
Marriage was not about contracts, money ,property, child support, spousal support , or lifestyle upkeep., it was about two people coming together under God in order to create a family, raise children, take care of their lands etc. divorce wasn’t accepted norm, today you have more people marrying and divorcing than ever many people marrying and divorcing multiple times and still there is no joy. Also, it’s become a business transaction, people that have money want to make sure they’re not going to part with half of their assets and those that have less or no money are wanting to gain more money and so it becomes a calculating game of who can manipulate the other the best.
@KingJonathanThe1st God read the book of Genesis. That will show you that God was the one that created marriage.
total woke crap
marriage started about 10,000 year's ago when agriculture started! before then we had an alfa male for millions of years same as all other mammals. The reason that nature created alfa male is due to biological reasons to ensure mammals' offsprings are healthier to prevent extinction.
Marriage likely existed in some form long before then, but the first evidence we have of it's existence was when it was formalized with agriculture likely because of a greater need to organize family units. The idea prehistoric humans operated on alpha male hierarchies, from evidence we have, it likely not true for most groups. While it likely did happen at points, evidence generally points to early humans having a variety of social structures and reproductive strategies that go beyond just a dominant male
The advent of the pill in the 60s then abortion on demand in the 70s has led the wake of carnage .. medical advancements aren't always good.
Most of this is nonsense and historically inaccurate.
Enlighten us with your historical accuracy?
@@SpiritualityUnwrapped oh, shut. Go read a book. Which is a bit unfair to say; you'd have to read a lot to get a better understanding. Don't worry, I believe that if you truly care about the topic, you'll go educate yourself.
Already Thomas Aquinas thought that friendship is maybe the most important thing in the marriage. Bible also makes it pretty clear that the prayers spouses pray together are of huge importance.
It starts with a celebration and end with deceive and drama. 🤔😒
Not sure about this video. Grandparents seemed a lot happier in their marriage than todays married couple.
like to see the percentage of marriages that would baffle the grandparents. Gotta be less than 5%
I would not recommend marriage to anyone. You can have an exclusive long term relationship without it.
Eww.
This a bullshit video.
nah. can you please tell the reall history. how marriage was a construct if religion and power hunger priests, losers and small dick men.
Marriage is an old concept, about as old as civilization around 12,000 years ago. Most marriages were done for economic and/or political alignment. But the idea of love and sex being the significance of marriage signifies is a common theme. The idea of marriage for love dates back to the Indus River Valley, but throughout history it's mostly been a nice benefit until the past two hundred years or so in the West
History of divorce please! lol
Marriage was worthwhile when, back in the day, you married for life. Nowadays, a woman can break up with you for any reason, and get you for alimony and child support if she was a stay at home mother, as well as half your stuff. No thank you.
Beer does the same thing but with out all the bull shit.
There's no such thing as a "soulmate". The divorce rate doubling between '60 + '80, is from none other than the satanic idea called feminism. Today, only 6.5/1,000 people are getting married. That's not 6.5%, it's literally 6.5 out of 1,000. Marriage is nothing more than a government backed scam to steal money from men and give it to women when she files for divorce. Which is 80% of the time, in the 51% of divorces. There is NO benefit for a man to get married.
Also pfffft my grandma and grandpa had the best marriage I've ever seen.
I don't think anyone gets married so that another person can "fix" them or make them better. That sounds like such a drag actually. I think my husband and I get along best when we respect each other and stay on our own page instead of telling one another what to do. I highly recommend it!
Marriage.. never mentioned a word about the spiritual, non physical meaning or purpose for it. Karma! Before we decided to come to this planet we decided who we would have in our lives, and most of the time it's to repay karma from a previous life. I know 90% of people have never learned about the non physical reasons and that's ok. Everyone has a right to their own opinion, it's still a free country the last time I checked. Happiness... if people are getting married because someone else makes them happy...ok. The only person that can make you happy is yourself, it's 100% a personal choice. If you think otherwise, you're giving your power away.
It all begs the question (which, judging by the comments here, no one seems to be asking): If one could reduce a complex, multivariate subject like the history of traditional marriage into a three-and-a-half minute one-dimensional political (and quite literal) cartoon, replete with corporate-speak and shallow feminist banalities ("gender stereotypes," "constricting social roles"), what kind of a person would buy into this sort of crap unconditionally? Would it not be best disseminated on RUclips to an untold multitude of well-intentioned and perfectly misguided disciples?
I'm struggling to see how we have a doubled divorce rate and yet the best marriages of today are better than the best marriages of earlier eras. Is there a reason you have to subject your audience to such contradictions?
Because the Potential for deep and meaningful relationships has grown over history. However we also need marriage less to survive, so if marriages don't feel meaningful and deep, people often just divorce.
@@mysticafiora are you seeing anyone ACTUALLY pursuing meaningful and deep? Or are they just expecting it?
@@dredey1971 yeah I think I know multiple couples who look for exploration of depth spiritually, intellectually, sentimentally and in their adventures in their relationship.
@@mysticafiora unfortunately your experience is the anomaly.
Gender roles started in the 1850's?! Have you read the bible?
Please make more videos!!!!
Pretty sure marriage existed for millenia before 1850
Thing is, we're all different people. Spouses can be on different levels of the hierarchy-of-needs pyramid, either realistically or perceived. One spouse may be on level 3 while the other is on level 5.
Great videos :) Only a technical complaint: something nasty is happening with the audio from 2:00 onwards... Clipping on the narration, makes it hard to listen to through headphones. Nice work tho!
keep making more videos
I like this!!
Doesn't take into account changes in the legal landscape, specifically no-fault divorce.
Oh for God's sake.
I only have one criticism of this video. Did not marriage start way before the 1800's? I would love to know the history dating farther back. I would also love to know the Eastern cultural aspects of marriage.
They dont tell you because it's actually demonic. Dont ever get married.
@@reikidreams9265 😂😂😂
In the video it's a W.Europe centered viewpoint on a marriage. I've found that the theme was described in the Ruthenian Chronicles (Руський літопис) under the year of 1114. So in the Stone age the man-woman relations were defined as blud/блуд "occasional". In the Copper age there came the kingdom of Svaroh "Heaven" and Svaroh established the couple marriage law shlüb/шлюб "one man - one woman". The sanction for braking the law was cutting the head off. In Ukraine the most developed Copper age culture was Trypillia. The earlier and middle periods of Trypillia date back to 7500-5300 years ago. So in these version we can fix the time and place of the couple marriage appearance - ar. 7500-5500 years ago, Trypillia. There also remained Ukrainian people's songs kolädky/колядки, somewhat like carrols. Ukrainian linguist Potebnya stated their motives had been created in the Trypillian old past. One of the basic kolädky motives is a devoted couple of the man and the woman. The Ruthenian Chronicles (Руський літопис) also gives us the continuation of the couple marriage story. The next (after Svaroh) king Dažďboh went on protecting the couple marriage law. Let's assume the Dažďboh era was at the Early Bronze, the Yamna culture. At the time of Svaroh the tax law also was adopted. The sanction for law brakers was burning in the oven. The couple marriage and the tax laws were, I think, basic for establishing the great urban civilization of Trypillia and the rise of the Indo-European civilization. Consequently the corruption of the couple marriage law/tradition ruins complex societies, institutions, countries, peoples, civilizations.
Marriage for love, not marriage alltogether
it was referring to love-based marriage, not marriage generally
so the history of marriage has no beginning? nice gap there. you should have titled this the PURPOSE of marriage
Loved your video. It made a lot of logical sense. You should make more videos.