Видео

к примеру в чём ?

Несравнимо, миг 29 это истребитель, миг 25 - перехватчик

I'd love to know your proof that the MiG-25 was " the very reason the F-15 Eagle was created" or that anyone was in real fear of this airplane. The F-15 was developed in the late 1960s to replace the F-4 Phantom. It was a big, heavy and extremely expensive airplane that was replacing another big, heavy and extremely expensive airplane. The F-15 was much more manuverable than the Phantom, because Phantoms had encountered highly manuverable MiGs. The MiG-25 was only 1 of a number of Soviet jets that had either entered service, or were about to, or were in development at that time, and were expected to be built in large numbers. As for "milking fear" - the MiG-25 was an unknown, always source of worry, but likely caused little more than that. Foxbats displayed in 1967 demonstrated no exceptional manuverability. Foxbats flown over Israel and Iran were able to outrun Phantoms, but otherwise did nothing more than that. The MiG-25 was large and therefore easy to spot, it was obviously an interceptor, with little capacity to fightthings out in prolonged ACM.

@@winternow2242 да да зачем тебе мало заметность когда ты находишься у себя дома . миг был и есть перехватчик и при этом один из самых быстрых в мире

@@Donetik-v3o in other words, just what I said. Yes, you don't need visibility when you are flying an interceptor. Which is why I believe it was only an interceptor, and that everyone else knew that.

Not really, SR71 could go almost a 600kmh faster than Mig25

There's nothing terribly unique about radars that can burn through jamming, especially since ASPJ is often used against ground radars, which can put out more radiation than airborne radars. There's more to jamming than brute force. "it would microwave anything up to the size of a Rabbit" I've heard that same phrase, though it could easily be hyperbole. That rabbit could survive the encounter, but end up needing a good oncologist down the line. " the Israeli radar operators sat watching a Foxbat doing mach 3.2 at 80,000 feet and the Israelis couldn't do a thing about it!" Because the Migs were running, I doubt the Israeli operators lost much sleep over the incident. Those Foxbats were reconnaisance aircraft with no real combat capability, and made no attempt to fool anyone about that. Recce birds tend to be much faster than combat aircraft of the same type. Interceptor Foxbats weren't operational before 1972, and even those models would have known better than to engage F-4 Phantoms. Oddly enough, the first Foxbats lost in air combat had been ambushed trying to intercept Israeli recon Phantoms.

mine is a-10 but for the first military aircraft i saw 3 ah-64D apaches and i saw one useing flaires for the pacific airshow

Bro this is some shit i am adhamed of having made

@@danishman5983 nah you should be rpoud its really good

Hello

real

it is good

because we want more of these cool edits)))))

not too many Mig25 edits idk i liked it

"Americans Hijacked and copied mig 25 to make f15 " America did that? When? The Americans didn't get a close look at the MiG-25 until 1976, 4 years after the 1st F-15 flight. "it can detect fighter jets and bombers hundreds of miles a away because of its huge radar." You wouldn't happen to have any hard numbers and evidence suppporting that "hundreds of miles" figure, would you? Stuff I found in an old "Janes" gives detection range within 100 miles. "Mig 25 made for to intercept Sr 71 black bird, B1 bomber, XB70 Valkyrie and other bombers " SR-71 didn't exist in 1961 when the Soviets began develioping the MiG-25. Neither did the B-1. XB-70 was never built, and cancelled within 2 months of MiG-25's being officially authorized. The Soviets spent the next decade developing the MiG-25, so the connection to XB-70 is also non-existent.

You mean the US didn't think that the MiG-25 was a high speed, high altitude missile-armed interceptor?