Видео

I believe the rain is coming!! Halelujah!

Wonderful 10 minutes of great encouragement!!!

Amen

It might help you to look at two other peoples coming to faith in scripture to understand its not what you preach but what your led by the spirit to preach to... what God hath cleansed Think Saul and Cornelius gal 3:2,3,5 Acts 9:6 Acts 9:15 Gal 3:5 Ananias ministered the spirit to him how? When I came to faith at an altar call it was nothing more than the preacher during everyone's singing yelling out does anyone want to come up and be saved and hearing God's literal call was the only thing prompting me to go up there (first time in this kind of church) there was no "and they were pricked in their heart " Because I was led to believe who Jesus was a long time before John 6:45,65 Mat 16:17 a trying of the spirits 1 John 4:6 Peace Bro loved what you preached may God bless you with understanding!

MORE!!!!

AMEN 🙏🏾

I serve a God of more!!!!

Victory belongs to Jesus!

😪 *PromoSM*

Amen!!!

cthybluiess.byper6^control.i(8LLt.tech.nologist.tT,orgg,icom.icom..///nd.D

There is absolutely nothing mysterious about Biblical "tongues" - and there is only one type - when referring to something spoken, they are nothing more than real, rational language(s); usually, but not always, unknown to those listening to them, but always known by the speaker(s) - it’s their native language (in some cases, it is a language the speaker has learned). In contrast, the “tongues” Pentecostal and Charismatic Christians are producing today is an entirely self-created phenomenon. It is non-cognitive non-language utterance; random free vocalization based upon a subset of the existing underlying sounds (called phonemes) of the speaker’s native language, and any other language(s) the speaker may be familiar with or have had contact with. It is, in part, typically characterized by repetitive syllables, plays on sound patterns, alliteration, assonance, and over-simplification of syllable structure. It is also interesting to note that any and all phonological rules (rules governing how sounds are put together in a given language - what is allowed and what is disallowed) governing a speaker's native language, will _also_ govern their tongues-speech. Further, this subset of phonemes mentioned above typically contains only those sounds which are easiest to produce physiologically. Occasionally some speakers will use two or more subsets of phonemes to generate glossolalia, producing what, to them, sounds like two (or more) distinct “tongues languages”, thus claiming to be able to speak in “divers tongues”. There is absolutely _nothing_ that “tongues-speakers” are producing that cannot be explained in relatively simple linguistic terms. Conversely, when it comes to something spoken, there are absolutely _no_ Biblical references to “tongues” that do not refer to, and cannot be explained in light of, real rational language(s), though it may not be the explanation you want to hear, and it may be one which is radically different from what you believe, or were taught. _Nowhere in the Bible is modern tongues-speech advocated or evidenced._ “Praying in the Spirit” does _not_ refer to the words one is saying. Rather, it refers to how one is praying. In the three places it is used (Corinthians, Ephesians, and Jude), there is absolutely zero reference to 'languages' in connection with this phrase. “Praying in the Spirit” should be understood as praying in the power of the Spirit, by the leading of the Spirit, and according to His will. I'm not doubting or questioning the 'tongues experience'; glossolalia as the spiritual tool that it is, can be very powerful and, for many people, the experience is profound. As one commenter put it, “Speaking in tongues distracts the ego/analytical/conscious mind while leaving the subconscious (the heart) wide open to import the divine." Both the spiritual and physical benefits of using this tool are also well documented. Again though, it is important to note that this same statement can be made for virtually _any_ other culture that practices glossolalia. Religious and cultural differences aside, the glossolalia an Evenki Shaman in Siberia, a vodoun priestess in Togo and a Christian tongues-speaker in Alabama are producing are in no way different from each other. They’re all producing their glossolalia in the exact same way; they just have different explanations and beliefs as to why they’re doing it, and where it comes from. It is only in certain Christian denominations where is it construed as something it never was. For many tongues-speakers, a lot of it seems to be about perception. To use an analogy, why is that when people with Schizophrenia say that someone is watching and following them, we tend to think it’s paranoia, but when your mum says it, you go to the police? Same perception and associated claim (i.e. each perceive that someone is watching and following them) The (probable) validity and meaning of the claim hinges and changes on the difference in the physical state and capacity of who is doing the perceiving and claiming. Same as with glossolalia - it’s validity, so to speak, tends to hinge on how it is perceived by the individual from what they are experiencing….or, perhaps even more so, what they were _taught_ to experience. I tend to think it’s a bit of both. ‘Tongues’ (read, *‘languages’* ) - the divine gift, is the God given ability to effortlessly learn to speak and be understood through real-language barriers. It is not xenoglossy, nor is it modern tongues-speech. As a point of note, I’m a Linguist, and let me also add here that I am neither a so-called ‘cessationist’ nor a ‘continuationist’ - I do not identify with either term; in fact, I had never heard the two terms until just late in 2016. As far as I’m concerned, quite frankly, since the Biblical reference of “tongues” is to real, rational languages, obviously “tongues” haven’t “ceased”.

AMEN 🙏🏾

Thank you Jesus!

Amen Elder

Ｐｒⓞм𝕠𝕤𝐌 🌺

Karen having spinal surgery - wants prayer

Praise the Lord!

yu5en vun.fyi