Видео

I have exam in next two days, mine is self study, and I am so grateful to have come across your video , thank you so much .

Hi mark, do you have a specific pdf format about that?

Which of his books has this information?

Damn, if only I’d remember half of what I learned in university 😅 don’t even know what use this pertains to in my job… damn piece of paper 😂

Ace.

Merci infiniment 🍒

Short, precise and in simple terms. keep up the amazing work.

Sir got class done in hindi

Thank you🙏🙏 It is a great presentation.

You said Hymes had described 6 steps for analysis of events. But I have also read somewhere that Hymes Described S.P.E.A.K.I.N.G model for such analysis which includes 8 steps. Which one is official or widely accepted?

This lecture slapped hard and you should be extremely proud. I'm currently taking ATH 175 at Miami and now I'm super excited for the rest of the course!

Can you discuss about Need for Advocacy:Is there one best way? This is under Section 8: Make Recommendations... Please

the very first thing to rethink is human uniqueness, which doesn't exist. Anthropologie should be about uniqueness but about connection with everything, because after all we are part of a much bigger picture.

That was explained soo perfectly! Thanks

Beautifully explained with the help of real life example. Thank you

This is great. what a practical summary

Do you have a sample of policy analysis report?

Y don't u focus on anthropology subjects matter

will u comment on how anthro related to our current crises?

So where does gays figure into this 🤔

highly prescient,relevant. everyone from millennial age drowned in their own virtual worlds.

Hella more afghan oshins being created now. More importantly,when is pokemun ep. releasing? Don't end like that!

19:59 RIP 🙏 🕊 SAD this series went downhill. Great memes ,how can Anthropology relate to history?offshoot of it as a modern concept imo.

This gotconvoluted fast

What are the functions of Social Organization?

* Philosophical anthropology is an incredibly interesting topic imo. In my COMMUNITY section: "The human evolution process, an approach with modern philosophical anthropology as a basis" I reflect on the modern human species and its relation to energy transformation and space exploration. My basic question is, should the modern human species still be called an animal, or is it now (soon) so different concerning its behaviour that it doesn't make sense anymore ? An animal has a brain mainly to control its body functions, a modern human is more and more developing towards a brain in focus which needs a body to survive, air and food. This brain is constructed to not accept total randomness and luck for surviving in the solar system, it can by transforming energy (then being able to deflect medium sized asteroids, survive in severe ica age etc) and spreading out in the star system, affect its own probability for survival. Then it has abandoned the main principle animal world, randomness and luck concerning survival in the long run.

Antropologi mencakup berbagai macam hal yang berkaitan dengan ilmu kemanusiaan secara keseluruhan

Short and sweet!!! Why don’t profs do it this easy to comprehend 🤧

Hi Mark. Who's framework are you using to analyze this policy?? Let me know asap please thanks

Great lecture. I became fulfilled academically in Anthropology through your explanation. Thank you greatly!

Very Nice! Clear & concise!

very very informative and helpful lecture. thank you very much.

Hey Mark, I was just wondering why you are uploading such profound and important lectures. What university do you work on? I'm going to immediately transfer to your classes. great info, keep it up!

what about our animal instinct? why wasn't mentioned in this video? its a major role in anthropology

One of the big problems in the world that has never been fully addressed is the practice of using skin color as a mean to differentiate honest and dishonest people; a belief going back at least to the Colonial era that has been left so inherently embodied in the beliefs of a large spectrum that they continue to use that as a sign of the stability of innocence. This is rooted in one-sided policy, where you are required to do something a particular way, but the downside is you could be blinded to another side, for every element of nature has two sides. In this case, using skin tone as a sign of morality is WRONG; skin tone is not a policy condition but one based on the nature of the Earth's climate, which is totally different; being darker-skinned is just a sign you're descended from people in warmer climates where the Sun's radiation baked the skin surface over time. The real question is judging people under individual terms. If one must establish a good policy of course you can emphasize with the perspective most relevant by inheritance, but you have to show an openness to another one and give fair consideration to that and not just assume the one important to you matters in all cases. Samuel F.

nice