Видео

Thank you for this well prepared interview.

Good stuff

The Jordan Peterson of AI

Brilliant! I felt there was something off about that thought experiment but couldnt quite put my finger on it

I'm so thankful for Joscha

Should we be afraid of AI?

Great content, as always! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). What's the best way to send them to Binance?

Thoughtful, well informed discussion, thank you!!

Thank you for the effort you put into this! I've perhaps listened to all of Bach's podcast appearances, and yours stands out because of your preparation, which enabled you to adress some of Bach's key points in an interesting way. and what's wrong with the youtube-algorithm, that the video has so few views? :)

Thank you for the effort you put into this podcast. I've perhaps listened to all of Bach's podcast appearances, and yours stands out because of your preparation, which enabled you to adress some of Bach's key points in an interesting way. And what's wrong with the RUclips algorithm that the video has so few views? :)

This is not a judgement but are all Goenka's big-boned? :P

This is so far from true nobody made any phone calls stop spreading misinformation 🤦‍♂️

The guest seems to speak less than the host of the show. Boring.

Just for the record… I do not oppose the creation of AI.

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461, and here is a video of Jeff Krichmar talking about some of the Darwin automata, ruclips.net/video/J7Uh9phc1Ow/видео.html

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461, and here is a video of Jeff Krichmar talking about some of the Darwin automata, ruclips.net/video/J7Uh9phc1Ow/видео.html

It's becoming clear that with all the brain and consciousness theories out there, the proof will be in the pudding. By this I mean, can any particular theory be used to create a human adult level conscious machine. My bet is on the late Gerald Edelman's Extended Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. The lead group in robotics based on this theory is the Neurorobotics Lab at UC at Irvine. Dr. Edelman distinguished between primary consciousness, which came first in evolution, and that humans share with other conscious animals, and higher order consciousness, which came to only humans with the acquisition of language. A machine with only primary consciousness will probably have to come first. What I find special about the TNGS is the Darwin series of automata created at the Neurosciences Institute by Dr. Edelman and his colleagues in the 1990's and 2000's. These machines perform in the real world, not in a restricted simulated world, and display convincing physical behavior indicative of higher psychological functions necessary for consciousness, such as perceptual categorization, memory, and learning. They are based on realistic models of the parts of the biological brain that the theory claims subserve these functions. The extended TNGS allows for the emergence of consciousness based only on further evolutionary development of the brain areas responsible for these functions, in a parsimonious way. No other research I've encountered is anywhere near as convincing. I post because on almost every video and article about the brain and consciousness that I encounter, the attitude seems to be that we still know next to nothing about how the brain and consciousness work; that there's lots of data but no unifying theory. I believe the extended TNGS is that theory. My motivation is to keep that theory in front of the public. And obviously, I consider it the route to a truly conscious machine, primary and higher-order. My advice to people who want to create a conscious machine is to seriously ground themselves in the extended TNGS and the Darwin automata first, and proceed from there, by applying to Jeff Krichmar's lab at UC Irvine, possibly. Dr. Edelman's roadmap to a conscious machine is at arxiv.org/abs/2105.10461, and here is a video of Jeff Krichmar talking about some of the Darwin automata, ruclips.net/video/J7Uh9phc1Ow/видео.html

Great analysis, thank you! Just a quick off-topic question: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?

He believes 😂 Kamala

Insane hairline

I'M STILLLL IN A DREAMMMM SNAKE EATERRRR

It makes no sense the best chess computer wins against humans all the time also in classic chess. This means that Magnus feel he is not that much better then his opponents in longform and therefor want to play shorter games to give himself an advantage. Despicable.

Your internal mechanism is a part of everything external; you are not a separate entity from the universe, you are a part of the whole system. In a sense there is no such thing as internal.

3 uap orbs made it disappear duhh

Drawing out the best in your guests with warmth.💫 Glad that i discovered this channel.

yoo, you should have Jon batiste on here next if you can get him! He has a new album out which is imo the coolest experiment in classical music and jazz in the recent past.

Who the F***K does he think he is? I wish l could meet up with him, SINATRA would have kicked his ass all over.

Does improv comedy have a future in India?

Will digital jewelry and NFTs completely replace physical jewelry in the future?

What total, unmitigated rubbish. To get to Kazakhstan MH370 would have had to pass over some of the most highly militarised countries in South Asia; India, Pakistan, Iran just to name a few. And why would Russia target Malaysia? A US, Australian, or emirate flight might make some sense.

This dude is so full of s..t, basically the Forest Gump of the mob,was there for every big move,Yeah ok😂😂

Not a contradiction 😂😂 the proposition "this sentence is false" is true which is an external proposition

From log cabins to legos

ohhhhhhh Jeff... Trump did it? Really. Pity the fool.

Mad props for your interview skills and questions you asked . Your jokes are also fantastic but please work a bit on your tonality and pauses . Sentences are too long ..but interview was very enjoyable nonetheless

😢😅😅😢

Host, chill out a little .. while speaking try to engage if the guest wants to .... your research is soooo good .. but engagement with the guest will help us to enjoy more The non scripted bits during the podcast/show was reaally nice👍🏼

@kaneezsurkha -When you realize that people do their homework unexpectedly.. 😱 Nice @shalijalawania 🤣😂🤣😂

Great content! I wish in the "Comedy in India" conversation you could have covered transition of standup comedy in India from early 2000s of Johnny Lever, Raju Srivastav & Kapil Sharma's era to the new age stand up comedy in 2010's to where it is moving today in 2020's (Which was briefed upon with how OTT platforms are impacting the scene). It would have also been insightful to discuss the challenges comedians & comics have to face where the audience, especially in India are critical and hold the comics accountable for their content, language, references on social & political topics and dark comedy.

also this was a riot!

I absolutely LOVE every guests reaction to your research! do you think they warm up to you easier if they feel known in that level of familiarity?

As a slightly bigger of hers than yours Shalaj, I have to comment what she said ‘Give the paper to KANEEZ’ 😂

Jag ghumma kya milla Sirf ek guruji mille saab milla ❤

❤

I believe

The dangling chain from her nose ring looks like a booger. I dont even know what she said because it was too distracting

More bullshit from mr duck and orange sause ie the pea pea headed assassin....

The US government stole MH370 as a show of force to China. Something about the Nicobar Islands and Jerry's cousin, Diego Garcia. Ask Ashton!

What is the name of the speaker?