Видео

The army loves wasting tax payers money.

silencer/flash hider doubles as a blow touch and flash light

That thing is uuugly

The new guns shot by a real Army unit starts at 4:03

Is there a hydraulic/pneumatic recoil dampener or is that poor carrier taking it raw?

Thanks you made in germany !

massive scope

Badass

Eu ainda continuo acreditando que essa máquina é inútil. Muito lenta , instável e muito fácil de abater.

I'm here from iron man 2

Its too big and long pause😂

My favorite LMG😊😊

Hello Navy personnel some of you are still fine like me this is Fredie Jovellano Reporting.

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩👍💪

Thompson Kevin Robinson James Hall Jeffrey

Keep the m250 machine gun. The xm7 rifle is just to heavy and too much recoil

931 Littel Shores

09438 Metz Springs

Chalie G

Shorter, lighter and more reliable than the M249 SAW.

1014 is their designation for the Benelli M4.

In those clips that the mg338 witch is bigger and more powerful than the xm250

Pink Forest

Kadin Burg

Watching it come up over the hill gave me crazy goosebumps 🩸🇺🇸

I have recently revisited the topic of the XM7 again and had some thoughts. *The rifle itself is well engineered for the most part, two charging handles is a bit weird, and the folding stock not locking when folded is odd but whatever. *The XM7 is quite front heavy, heavy barrel, plus suppressor, plus extra weight, plus kit on the front. Doesn't seem fun to use. *The Barrel is 13" which is bloody short, it's very inefficient. It's quite wasteful. You have dropped a lot of potential velocity from the round you are firing by giving it so much less barrel length. Hence why a 80k PSI, spicy round is felt to be needed. *Related to above point, there is adversity to increasing the length of the weapon. This isn't unfounded or unreasonable, Long weapons are less suitable for mounted troops and urban fighting like room clearing. * I feel the whole thing may be an over learned lesson from Afghanistan, since the US went into some pretty long range fighting with some pretty short barrels. Onto what I think are some issues and possible solutions: *Training is being done by using a normal brass cartridge, which must obviously not be the full 80k psi round with the Steel and Aluminum reinforcement. This is because the spicy round would be rough as guts on the gun. It's also far more expensive and less available. ***The problem here should be obvious to most people: If soldiers are being trained on a round with different ballistic properties, and different much lighter felt recoil, then handed out the Spicy "Combat Round" when deployed which feels different (Harsher recoil) and acts differently (Different ballistics). Then that's going to cause a lot of problems. Alongside some of the other issues related to ammo capacity and fire superiority you now have troops being issued a round they have no, or limited experience with. Imagine training everyone on SCAR-L then only giving them SCAR-H in combat. There would be problems. Now, maybe you get some range time on the spicy round during training, but the average soldier only has so much range time so you're undercutting the value of the training by using the lighter training round. But, you cant use the spicy round, because it costs too much and is too rough on the rifle. So I suspect what will happen is that the "Training" round will be the normally issued round until such time as the spicy is considered needed because someone made new body armour. Or possibly a third round, a Carbide tipped version of the "Training round" becomes standard issue to defeat body armour Now, I don't have a real practical solution to the issues of the XM7 because the decision has been made and that's locked in a lot of issues that are only going to be solved by throwing money at things. Beyond extending the barrels and using the "Training round." I don't know what you could do. What I would have done. I would of adopted a bullpup with around a full 20" barrel. I know some people in america have an aversion to Bullpups but The French, UK and Australia have or had Bullpups with barrels of around that length, that were shorter overall weapons than the XM7. These weapons have worked well for decades. Obviously the British had some initial issues, but those were solved decades ago. The only outstanding issue with a bullpup weapon is the shell ejection. Which multiple example have solved to one degree or another. Depending on how radical you want to be. A 20" bullpup means increased barrel length which means higher velocities out of lighter rounds, from a barrel that is starting to approach twice the length of the XM7. Or if you want the 6.8mm it means getting much better performance without feeling the need for the 80k spicy round. Whichever way you cut it the performance will be better out of a more compact bullpup. I'm curious to see what the ADF does. I know Thales has made a 6.8mm Steyr for assessment. If we do make the jump to 6.8mm for some reason then i hope we go with that, over the SIG XM7 and I hope we use the normal Brass rounds instead of that hybrid Steel/Aluminum/Brass case thing.

Saw a M88 towing 2 M60s in Germany 1977.

They buried the baseplate? We never did that, the 1st round usually sank it on its own....

Althea Springs

Another one of the platforms dreamed up the the BRASS. Idiots that don't go into combat. Logistics are how wars are won (period) and this NEW round sucks. AMO depots around the world are now going to have to stock up.

Cassin Well

There will be a lot of problems with these two systems. Parts breaking and excessive maintenance and repair cycles. It's a fragile build weapon system. It will be the modern era M14.

Are they all women shooting? ALOT of these folks look either scarred to shoot or just never been around guns. The one shooter had a gap between the butt and the shoulder while shooting the shotgun.

This is a bad idea. These guns are going to be a whole lot heavier when you’re loaded down with full gear in the field. Not to mention unnecessarily overpowered. We moved away from heavy battle rifles and full sized ammo for a very good reason. Just adopt the MCX Spear LT but convert it to 6.8 Wolverine and make a belt-fed upper for it.

Its not at holland. But the Netherlands .

is that a C-RAM in the background at the start? 😅

why would you put a suppressor on any bullet that goes way over the threshold of the speed of sound.

Creola Ferry

This is the standard armament for this cutter.

The M250 looks good. I'm sure it'll replace the M240B nicely. The M7, not so much as an M4 replacement. I see it more of a DMR and would excel at that role. The Spear LT seems better suited as an all-around M4 replacement. From what we've been shown (not much at that) is that XM157? smart optic being the real gamechanger.

Por más que veo las nuevas armas no le veo futuro a este proyecto...

lol the finals s4

HELL YEAH BROTHER

Carbon build-up in the suppressor would be my guess. Another cleaning issue like we had with the M-16. You'll be soaking them in varsol out at Whitesands. Lol

excited for The Finals S4, I see

Light dash mains stand up

Any other Light mains here preparing for S4 lol

awesome old tech

Who's betting that these weapons go the way of the M-14?

Corruption 😅