Видео

Thank you

Thank you

no no no no no there is no "one" science also science is an art Forrester was very clear on this

Ty, I had exam today, def deserved a sub and a like

Thank you very good

very concise but easy to understand explaining of the overview of ST in practice. Thank you for this!

Should you be called the Synthesist rather than the Analyst?

It’s read helpful. Thank you Dr. Giles

Thank you, very helpful

wow,, thanks much

Can you explain the weighting process to me and the methods to weight the criteria, please?

Thank You.

Great video

Great! Could you please explain PAS part in a more detailed way with examples? Thank you.

Too many words. A gpt summary would be neat

YOU DO NOT SHOW RICH PICTURES! YOU ONY SHOW HAZY IMAGES!

Thank you for the clear lecture Dr. Giles

Is this SSM or EPIC?

Nice. Please make a video on Peter Checkland's SSM research and also on CATWOE. Thanks!

Actually, there is more theory than practice.

Great 👍

Thats great professor, how do the CATWOE elements interlink?

Greetings Sir. What is the MCDA method you were referring to?

Really helpful, thank you very much!

Thanks for sharing you knowledge and more importantly the books ;) I know these topics do not get many views due to the low target audience but your effort is well appreciated 👍

You should make a video about making a rich picture values based leadership

Ive done a lot with SSM since the 90s great to see that this is alive and well.

Good morning sir, how can I talk to you

this was super helpful thank u

One? Science? No! ●Explaining and Understanding are two different modes of thinking. ●The word "System" has been occupied by Natural sciences. ●The idea of a "Unity of Science" is old (1920) and wrong. ●Modern epistemology has a different view. ●The GREEN climate "scientist" are a real consequence of this anti-realistic and non-empirical thinking. ●They misuse this thinking and has turned it into "Normativ Vision" terror.

Thanks you sir

maza nhi aa raha hai

Nice video :)! How did you weigh the criterias? Is it by our choice or are there any standards for weighing?

Very clear, thank you

Really useful. Thanks Giles.

very good

Great video, really helped me understand the value chain. Thanks!

Excelente!

Good video. A little suggestion: Show the graphics/numbers a bit longer (while you are talking). That will make it easier to follow what is going on.

Amazing video! Thanks for the clear and concise delivery. Found the information to be really useful for my assignment.

As a part of the group assignment in university, We have been given a problem situation to provide our recommendations on. We have already drawn the rich picture and also done the PQR and CATWOE analysis. Now the next step is to conduct 2 workshops to discuss about the given problem situation and we all are supposed to ask questions as being stakeholders and consultants by swapping roles. I am confused about what kind of questions do we need to ask each other? Could you help in this regard. Thanks.

C50 association

nice video! What is the name of the MCDA Method you are using in the execution of the example?

Thank you - very good video!

thank you so much.. it helps on my masters exam..

ruclips.net/video/ZZazO8OlSYA/видео.html

Thanks very clearly

Great explanation. I was wondering: do you know of any examples, case studies where SSM was used in “Applied Research” as you stated? I.e. SSM was used as “epistemology”. I can’t find much on this type of use as most case studies seem to focus more on the implementation of solutions rather than the understanding of the problem. Is SSM also applicable as an epistemology for secondary, rather than primary research?

Thx!

Thx！