Видео

The shark may not have missed as much if you went slower. A newer model would have done much better. Heck even an Nv352 would.

What about riccar and Kirby

Riccar wins

The fact that the Shark couldn't even agitate the rubber backed rug says A LOT. And to everyone saying the Riccar is more expensive, we know, but the point is anything with a good brushroll, even a cheap Hoover or Bissell, will clean better than the Shark.

Not a fair test at all he was rapid with the shark and he went so slowly with the second I have a shark and couldn't fault it

Well which Shark model is that? It seems clear that you're bias towards the Riccar which is already a red flag as far as trying to research.

"A Shark." You tool bag, that is one of their cheapest models (and it sounds clogged). Let's see it go head to head against a Shark Vertex you pudgy liar. Get wrecked.

Speed not fair assessment

Sharks blow everything else away! They’ve been consistently rated the BEST vacuum over and over for YEARS!

That is a low end quality Shark vacuum….

first of all you took a basic model of sharks but you got one of the top of the line models from riccar that costs thousands of dollars more. and pass the riccar of the sand at the same speed of the shark and see what happens.

You can tell by the sound that the shark sounds clogged

this is waaaaaaaay to pointless! Of course the riccar is going to win! ITS $1,010 MORE EXPENSIVE THAN THE SHARK AND IT HAS 2 MOTORS! TWO MOTORS!!!!!!!!

try with a shark vertex or the stratos now

Bro, at least go slow with the shark vacuum as you did with the Riccar. Come on! Stop upselling expensive equipment with these "Sh!tty" side by side comparison.

At that point i’d rather just buy a Bissell powerforce bagless 6582

Sharks are sharks because they steal your money for vacuum that don’t even work that good

My Dyson Up34 would kick that thing's butt why, because " No bag, no loss of suction."

$2500 vs $150. $150 did the job good enough for me

Mmm how about comparing a tesla vs a Bugatti Chiron?

Make one at the same cost of course a 2 thousand dollar vacuum is going to be better

They always do these stupid test that’s what got me to buy a shark then I realized shark can’t get the most simple stuff right. Use the hose on a shark and the entire vacuum tips over. Use the hose on a shark and it clogs so easily. I’m not sucking up anything different than I’ve done with 5 different vacuums in the past yet I find myself trying to unclog these shark hoses every time I use it. I feel like sharks should be for EV drivers they type of people who ignore the inconvenience or truly don’t care.

Do you know of residential clear cleaning companies that have used this product?

Welp… Riccar for the win

❤srktfjdzsk

You're using 2 different types of vacuums with 2 different types of motors to prove something 🤔that makes no sense. If you're going to try to prove something, at least use two vacuums of the same caliber and similar as close as possible motors.🧐

You did the shark hoover really fast but the other hoover really slow so it would pick more up.

No Shark that's a minnow 😂

lol, why would you buy a Jewish made vacuum cleaner with high degrees of engineered obsolescence? Garbage product. Sharks are garbage.

iguess he needs to sell these over price commercial grade vacuum to regular household.

Stupid people are easily duped. Don't be stupid. He used a bottom of the line cheap shark against a high-quality Riccar. The shark is not even a duo-clean model. Truth is, a shark Stratos will blow the Riccar away, and easily converts from carpet to hard surface.

This test is biased AF. 😂

This is a fake review I know for a fact the shark vacuum is a beast!!!

You realise why a lot of people think Sharks are awesome, right? And think your test is hilarious. Also the fact that you passed over the Shark so much faster, lol 😂. Shark suction is SUPERIOR, period.

1) you went half the speed with the riccar, giving it way more time. How ever I still believe it would have done better. 2) the riccar is literally 10x the price of the shark you are using. It better have also come with Bluetooth.

i like there riccar vacuums because of how well they clean but id perfer a belt drive brush roller instead of a electric brush roller

Pass the cheaper one quickly over the sand compared to passing the expensive one more slowly 🤷🏾‍♂️

Lmao !! That shark is no where near the best or newest model !!

That shark brush roll is designed for hair hahaha!!! Dig some hair into that carpet and see what happens then see how clean the brush rolls are after.

Is this a joke? You went literally wayyyy slower with the Riccar. Do the same speed on the Shark. Itll do about as damn good of a job.

Aka.....Shark is killing our business, please buy a $1,500 vacuum.

If you’re unable to see your own bias here, then you have to be blind. “Let’s compare this 10nyear old Mitsubishi mirage to a brand new Bugatti” 💀

😂I'm happy w my Shark!!

Nice editting skills

Another American company sold out to a Chinese company, JS Global Lifestyle. Hard NO to Shark.

Let’s see the same test done on normal residential carpet 🤔 Also, let’s compare handle weight, cost to own, And Reliability (Riccars tandem air model is a joke for this) I’ve taken apart so many tandem air units it’s literally unreal 😂 also shark is made in the same country the components are for the Riccar. It’s just not assembled here 🙄

Problem is no one is old and dumb enough to buy a 1000 dollar vacuum that looks like it’s from the 50’s and still has a bag. That’s old technology trying to be sold as new because they put a huge motor in it basically. 😂

No doubt that the Riccar is a better vacuum, but it does seem like he passed the Riccar over the sand more slowly than he did with the Shark

Not even...an old lowodel shark vs. a $2500 vaccum 😂

hum that Shark sounds like it plugged up. I think this is set so makes it look like the Shark is terrible. No doubt in my mind that Shark would have picked all that up. I know the Riccar is way more premium.