Видео

Excelent Explanation, precise and concise. Good job

Hello Kirby, interest rate denoted by I in discrete compunding is periodic rate not the usual simple annualized version which is the usual quotation am I correct ? forex. t=0.25 simple annual interest quotation is 0,0004 * 4 = 0,0016 = 0,16%. In Hulls book cahpter example table 4.7 they quote simple annual rates.

Hull, J. C., & Basu, S. (2010). Options, Futures and Other Derivatives (7th ed.).

You know what if you search for this it’s hard to find much information on it. Thanks for the upload

Why so less energy? Hardly understood a thing

www.independent.org/pdf/working_papers/76_expectancy.pdf

www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2012-03/1_KIRBY%20R.%20CUNDIFF.pdf

Hi, thank you for these videos they are extremely well explained, will you be doing an episode on option greeks, chapter 17 I believe. Thanks

Thank you !

The list at @46:21 is a who's who of discredited and rebutted scientists, most of whom have taken materially relevant amounts of financial remuneration directly from fossil fuel companies or from organizations with significant financial support from those companies. Their "science" has been rebutted independently again and again by repeated studies by indepentent research groups. I suggest your own ignorance in climate science is preventing you from making meaningful arguments, because you haven't grasped the complexity of the interconnected, interdependent environmental feedback mechanisms. You are squarely in the peak of the Dunning-Kreuger curve here, where you know enough to believe you know enough. I hope you continue research with an open mind and correct your many, many errors in this presentation, and consider removing it before in contributes more to the misinformation prevalent on this topic. Stick to options strategies and gaming the crooked markets. Science has enough mediocre talent, yours is not needed.

Extremely concise and useful, thanks!

NEED CHAPTER 13 SIR !

Really helped me a lot.

is APV same as FCFF?

hello sir, I found your teaching quite helpful to understand Bootstrapping, could you please please help me understand the impacts of Bootstrapping and Risk free rate over foreign exchange rate?

finance.yahoo.com/news/sec-adopts-landmark-climate-rule--heres-what-that-means-for-public-companies-172839134.html?.tsrc=fin-notif

"It's different this time...", good video thank you.

3:30 the graph and this guy is so misleading. The so-called "slight elevation" is actually 519, 3 times higher than 2001 peak of 154. Is this guy actually a professor? This is blatant misinformation

thefelderreport.com/2017/10/26/what-were-you-thinking/

What was the pe and ps of sun at its peak??

Love it!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you s much for this. No one talks about Sun.

yawn.... SPX to 6k by end of June easy....

How AI takes over the world: 1. Chip stocks rise to the top. 2. Moore's law ends, so chip production must double every two years to compensate. 3. AI engineers become superior to human engineers. 4. AI designs a superior computer (for example, a quantum computer).

If there are all these new regulations, why are there so many reports of POORER quality homes being built, which mat end up costing more to live in and maintain?

I have to disagree with this "analysis" as it pertains to Nvidia. 1st, price to earnings is really more important than price to sales. Nvidia's business has a wide moat and a high margin as a result. 2nd, it is divorced from the outlook of the buisiness. We already know they are sold out of chips for the rest of 2024 and into 2025. Furthermore, companies will want to upgrade with their H200 chips to save on energy costs. Worst case scenario is 100 billion in earnings this year, this means a PE ratio of 40. And the industry is only growing. I agree Nvidia is not cheap, but 900 is not crazy either.

Gee thank you algorithm for this information that only makes me more angry. Good video though

What would be your response to criticism from many people who believe the game changed during covid. Both sides have no fiscal responsibility and the massive amount of money printing to pay for infrastructure and other services, will keep the stock market propped up , at least in nominal terms ? Not to mention the ocean of money sitting in money market accounts that will seek a better return when cuts eventually do happen? Personally I'm about half and half. The labor market looks solid still, earnings are still pretty solid, P/e ratios are higher than historical averages, but access to the stock market has also never been easier. Millions can buy fractions of a share from their phone so overvaluation could be here for good. I think the fiscal irresponsibility of both parties and willingness to print more if we do go through a recession, can keep the market artificially propped up for a long time. I could see the market negative for the year, but I'm not convinced a crash is likely.

So stack cash?

eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/2332/9489

The S&P was NOT a leading indicator in 08-09. That recession is now officially dated to start December 07, right around all time highs. In the last 20 years, at least, the stock market has been a coincident indicator with employment, which lags behind new orders and profits.

Thank you for this helpful video!

Sir can u give me formula for european 30/360 day count convention? I need to calculate days btwn 28/29 Feb to 31 Aug as 180. I m not sure what formula to use?

Can you bring Turkish subtitles?

seekingalpha.com/article/4645345-value-stocks-are-usually-a-safe-haven-during-bear-markets

chapter ending question solving video needed

Hello, how do you find Rm and unlevered firm’s beta

Thanks for the wonderful videos! They are very practical, not only text books.

great series mate, cheers

Something doesn't look right to me with the time value It's increasing up to 50 and than it drops off So the ITM option has no time value ?

Thank you for your video. Some of the charts are very blurry. Clicking ‘higher picture quality’ doesn’t seem to increase their readability.

Im so confused by the rsL and rsU. Unlevered cost of capital should equal cost of equity, and therefore use the CAPM equation. Levered cost of capital means that there is debt in the Cap structure and therefore should be using the WACC formula. Yet this video swops this around. Can someone please explain?

Are futures and other hedging tools available/reasonable for retail investment use or is it purely for corporations. Thanks

Thank you. I have 2 questions. 1: what rate you used to find Horizon values and why? 2: why you used rsU for discounting explicit tax shield? Will we not use rsL since, there will be debt and shareholders will require debt risk adjusted return (levered beta with CAPM). Please answer.

You explain this better than my professor. Thank you!!

Where can I download the file?

Where can I get the sheet?

Good video. Is it your opinion that there are no real opportunities for arbitrage profit after all costs are input with formula?

can you tell us from which chapter is this from?