Видео 262
Просмотров 120 039

E3: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

33:47

E2: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

15:35

E1: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

14:25

Part 5: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

34:31

Part 4: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

27:40

Part 3: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

17:05

E4: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

Final episode. Listen to audio of the full opinion of the Supreme Court in Trump v. United States (July 1, 2024). The Court is asked whether (and to what extent) the President of the United States has criminal immunity for official acts taken while in office.
Episode 4. Opinion will be divided into multiple episodes.
www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Видео

E3: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

33:47

E3: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

Просмотров 8416 часов назад

Listen to audio of the full opinion of the Supreme Court in Trump v. United States (July 1, 2024). The Court is asked whether (and to what extent) the President of the United States has criminal immunity for official acts taken while in office. Episode 3. Opinion will be divided into multiple episodes. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

E2: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

15:35

E2: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

Просмотров 6219 часов назад

Listen to audio of the full opinion of the Supreme Court in Trump v. United States (July 1, 2024). The Court is asked whether (and to what extent) the President of the United States has criminal immunity for official acts taken while in office. Episode 2. Opinion will be divided into multiple episodes. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

E1: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

14:25

E1: Trump v. United States | Criminal Immunity for U.S. Presidents

Просмотров 11821 час назад

Listen to audio of the full opinion of the Supreme Court in Trump v. United States (July 1, 2024). The Court is asked whether (and to what extent) the President of the United States has criminal immunity for official acts taken while in office. Episode 1. Opinion will be divided into multiple episodes. www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Part 5: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

34:31

Part 5: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

Просмотров 39Месяц назад

Continued audio of Justice Sotomayor's dissenting opinion in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (June 29, 2023) www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_l6gn.pdf

Part 4: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

27:40

Part 4: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

Просмотров 11Месяц назад

Part 3: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

17:05

Part 3: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

Просмотров 14Месяц назад

Part 2: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

18:37

Part 2: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

Просмотров 22Месяц назад

Part 1: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

25:31

Part 1: Sotomayor, Dissenting | Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. Harvard College

Просмотров 47Месяц назад

Held: Race-based admissions policies at Harvard College and the University of North Carolina violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Listen to Justice Sotomayor's dissenting opinion in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College (June 29, 2023) www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/20-1199_l6gn.pdf

Part 2: Biden v. Nebraska (2023) Is Biden’s student debt relief plan legal?

26:44

Part 2: Biden v. Nebraska (2023) Is Biden’s student debt relief plan legal?

Просмотров 16Месяц назад

Continued audio of the Supreme Court's majority opinion in Biden v. Nebraska (2023) www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-506_nmip.pdf

Part 1: Biden v. Nebraska (2023) Is Biden’s student debt relief plan legal?

25:10

Part 1: Biden v. Nebraska (2023) Is Biden’s student debt relief plan legal?

Просмотров 15Месяц назад

Held: The Secretary of Education does not have authority under the HEROES Act (2003) to establish a student loan forgiveness program that will cancel roughly $430 billion in debt principal and affect nearly all borrowers. Audio of the Supreme Court's majority opinion in Biden v. Nebraska (2023). www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-506_nmip.pdf

11:40

Naked at the White House

Просмотров 7032 месяца назад

A fun collection of lesser-known stories from White House history. Written, produced, and narrated by Pippah Getchell

Part 4: Sotomayor, Dissenting in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

19:17

Part 4: Sotomayor, Dissenting in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

Просмотров 222 месяца назад

Does Colorado's public accommodations law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation violate the First Amendment? Listen to Justice Sotomayor's dissenting opinion in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis (June 30, 2023) www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

Part 3: Sotomayor, Dissenting in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

17:26

Part 3: Sotomayor, Dissenting in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

Просмотров 342 месяца назад

Part 2: Sotomayor, Dissenting in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

16:23

Part 2: Sotomayor, Dissenting in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

Просмотров 382 месяца назад

Part 1: Sotomayor, Dissenting in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

23:25

Part 1: Sotomayor, Dissenting in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

Просмотров 262 месяца назад

Part 1: Sotomayor, Dissenting in 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis

Part 2: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC (2023) Sears; §363(m) of US Bankruptcy Code

18:23

Part 2: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC (2023) Sears; §363(m) of US Bankruptcy Code

Просмотров 72 месяца назад

Part 2: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC (2023) Sears; §363(m) of US Bankruptcy Code

Part 1: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC (2023) Sears; §363(m) of US Bankruptcy Code

14:21

Part 1: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC (2023) Sears; §363(m) of US Bankruptcy Code

Просмотров 62 месяца назад

Part 1: MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC (2023) Sears; §363(m) of US Bankruptcy Code

Part 2: Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (April 14, 2023)

18:24

Part 2: Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (April 14, 2023)

Просмотров 62 месяца назад

Part 2: Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (April 14, 2023)

Part 1: Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (2023)

23:40

Part 1: Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (2023)

Просмотров 102 месяца назад

Part 1: Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission (2023)

Donziger v. United States (2023) Justice Gorsuch, Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari

11:07

Donziger v. United States (2023) Justice Gorsuch, Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari

Просмотров 82 месяца назад

Donziger v. United States (2023) Justice Gorsuch, Dissenting from Denial of Certiorari

New York v. New Jersey (April 18, 2023) (Interstate Compacts)

19:31

New York v. New Jersey (April 18, 2023) (Interstate Compacts)

Просмотров 182 месяца назад

New York v. New Jersey (April 18, 2023) (Interstate Compacts)

Chapman v. Doe (2023) Justice Jackson, Dissenting to Grant for Certiorari

8:17

Chapman v. Doe (2023) Justice Jackson, Dissenting to Grant for Certiorari

Просмотров 32 месяца назад

Chapman v. Doe (2023) Justice Jackson, Dissenting to Grant for Certiorari

Part 2: National Pork Producer’s Council v. Ross (2023)

28:38

Part 2: National Pork Producer’s Council v. Ross (2023)

Просмотров 72 месяца назад

Part 2: National Pork Producer’s Council v. Ross (2023)

Reed v. Goertz (2023) 42 U. S. C. §1983 Suit Statute of Limitations

14:17

Reed v. Goertz (2023) 42 U. S. C. §1983 Suit Statute of Limitations

Просмотров 112 месяца назад

Reed v. Goertz (2023) 42 U. S. C. §1983 Suit Statute of Limitations

Part 1: National Pork Producer’s Council v. Ross (2023)

29:09

Part 1: National Pork Producer’s Council v. Ross (2023)

Просмотров 22 месяца назад

Part 1: National Pork Producer’s Council v. Ross (2023)

Part 1: U.S. v. Hansen (2023) Scam promising path to U.S. citizenship through adult adoption.

18:58

Part 1: U.S. v. Hansen (2023) Scam promising path to U.S. citizenship through adult adoption.

Просмотров 72 месяца назад

Part 1: U.S. v. Hansen (2023) Scam promising path to U.S. citizenship through adult adoption.

Part 2: U.S. v. Hansen (2023) Scam promising path to U.S. citizenship through adult adoption.

21:32

Part 2: U.S. v. Hansen (2023) Scam promising path to U.S. citizenship through adult adoption.

Просмотров 32 месяца назад

Part 2: U.S. v. Hansen (2023) Scam promising path to U.S. citizenship through adult adoption.

Polselli v. IRS (2023) Can IRS summons anyone’s records to help collect from a delinquent taxpayer?

27:26

Polselli v. IRS (2023) Can IRS summons anyone’s records to help collect from a delinquent taxpayer?

Просмотров 142 месяца назад

Polselli v. IRS (2023) Can IRS summons anyone’s records to help collect from a delinquent taxpayer?

U.S. v. Texas (2023) Homeland Security’s Guidelines for Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law

25:29

U.S. v. Texas (2023) Homeland Security’s Guidelines for Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law

Просмотров 102 месяца назад

U.S. v. Texas (2023) Homeland Security’s Guidelines for Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law

@user-yu3le2cg8v 2 месяца назад
As usual, non-partisan; informative; interesting
@user-yu3le2cg8v 2 месяца назад
Dr Getchell… comments are “off” for most of your postings… therefore I want to take this opportunity to say how valuable your YT channel is!
@user-yu3le2cg8v 2 месяца назад
Without your work here, I would not have had nor taken the time to read the indictments. I am a craftsperson and my hands are usually full; eyes diverted… but I can listen. How valuable to have unemotional readings of court documents. There is a difference between “politics” and news about political figures. Your readings hit the sweet-spot for me! So, THANK YOU!!!

Pippah Getchell

Комментарии