Видео

@@minakatahizuru assasins creed, ghost recon and far cry games are considered triple A. As for chinese, South Korean studios making profit I've not looked into them and I don't like assuming things, I'll look into it. I also don't like projecting other businesses onto others coz the dynamics are entirely different but in Japan one out of every 3 anime studios operate in the red, again not sure if this applies to game studios but they are adjacent businesses and if Japanese games are just marketing products similar to anime, i wouldn't be surprised if they also do not make profits.

Sony won't be doing that anytime soon. Infact I suspect most Japanese companies are structured as conglomerates with diversified interests part of it is coz of the keiretsu networks I talked about. Anime is just another revenue stream for Sony

I think you are generalizing waaayyy to much. I've personally watched anime that I think have better story telling than any TV show. Attack on titan, legend of the galactic heroes, eight six, berserk come to mind. As for bad endings, I do agree. but what happens from the production side of the anime is once an anime becomes a hit, the Manga publishers sometimes force the mangaka to continue the story beyond the point he/she had intentionally decided to stop the story at. Though I wouldn't say this is unique to Anime/manga. even western TV shows like lost, and walking dead, prison break, supernatural etc try to milk their cash cows as much as possible. Creatively I hate it, but from a business perspective I understand why, it's better than funding an unknown project that might immediately flop and lose most of your capital. Lastly for tropes, i think most story telling generally follow the 7 story telling archetypes.

Yeah i also wanted to mention this as another revenue stream but I thought it was currently to small to include it. However it's certainly growing. Every hit anime nowadays makes a movie and generates millions

@@taticalypso-halls2261 thanks alot for the more detailed info. While researching the topic I saw she was signed under epic records which is owned by Sony Music so I made the connection. I would also love to know about the 2 million dollars involved in the deal. Was that real or a rumor?? What happened?

Oh hi🥰💜✨️ Not sure about the $2 million since there's no official information on how much the joint venture deal cost that I could find. I honestly think it was a mere exaggeration. I'm pretty sure it costs a pretty penny 😂. Yeah, I think people got confused with the Sony aspect of it though. Yeah, Sony purchased the music division of CBS Inc., which included Epic records. So basically Tyla is partly under a subsidiary of Sony and partly under FAX records an independent label. Your videos are very informative, it's astonishing how much that goes into creating a musical brand and selling it.✨️💫

@@prezzeruk4054 haha, personally I'll never forgive them for letting Splinter Cell die off. It was my best from their catalogue of games, but seeing what they are doing to Assasins creed, it's good riddance. what's the last assassin's creed game you played?

@BusinessDymystified i played oddessy last, got quite into it, but the grind got to me dude. Everything is soooooo drawn out!!

@@prezzeruk4054 haha that was intentional to make people buy time saver microtransactions

@BusinessDymystified didn't work on me, i just uninstalled it!!

The way I love thinking about those contracts is, every party is doing their damn best to absolutely screw the other, it's a matter of how much negotiating power you have. Bigger artists like Taylor swift and Drake basically dictate how their contracts will look like. The sad reality however is very few artists have that kind of negotiating power. Also, there are thousands of artists who would love for their music to be funded and promoted while there only a few record labels with the borrowed capital and cashflow to do so hence the power of UMG, Sony and Warner. As for Tik Tok, I wanted to get into their dispute and relationship but realized the video would be too long and go off tangent. Universal and Tik Tok each gave their own reasons for playing hard ball with each other. However, I think it came down to the revenue split between Tik Tok and Universal Music. Before their dispute, Tik tok licensed songs at a flat rate which is much lower than revenue based payments. Universal's argument was since tik tok widely uses its music to generate part of its revenue, it should be paid a percentage of it similar to its deal with spotify. Tik Tok argument on the other hand is it only uses Universal's music for synchronization purposes, it doesn't play full songs or even stream them so why should they pay part of their revenue when movies only pay synchronization fees for using a part of a popular song just like tik tok does?

@@BusinessDymystified that just reminded me of something I read way back at the start of the year/end of last year and on this I could be conflating but I came across all these patents some meta and other tech guys that were all kinda cool and new music features both on feeds and in their virtual space. Around the same time zuck was buying up decent % in record label shares that last time I checked I couldn’t find him owning anymore. Some features were things TikTok had referred to in their filings which made me just think is this a plan to fill the gap if the government work out a way to pretend the law says they can single out TikTok as a company to ban it (approaching a yes on that one lol). But this just reminded me how much information there is out there, that is accessible and prior to getting lazy or busy I’d started compiling it for analysis. I should do that again as it is super interesting that it would be great to dedicate some time to organise that and finish I think you can make reasonable conclusions for what they might be planning to do, including those artists selling their back catalog and allowing their likeness, labels surely 100% are going to make billions off you on a game or virtual meta concret space or whatever the youth call it lol and might want to extra consider that move. But also the way the IP law is detailed and the different type of rights, for these new techniques being used, it fundamentally doesn’t make sense, confused whether no one noticed or are they just trying to pretend that’s not a thing lol. My point is there is a lot of interesting legal and other issues in what they are doing and how they are doing it that are fairly solid and easily supported with documentation, it would be fun to go over, but as a person who can’t make videos it just makes me think, to what end tho lol. Like would anyone want this obsessive level of detail, even better would they pay for that information because I could do with a break from my job after this week lol. Personally I can’t think of anyone who might want that level of paper trail and legal analysis as artists are both not cashed up at that point or in the headspace to not know what they don’t know yet, considering diminishing returns if they just look for exploitation in a regular contract, that’s probably a better use of time on return. Videos are much better in that way to consume the information in yours I don’t think there is a place for that info, but tbh if I can’t think of a party who would be interested, and I free up I might do it anyway lol

Thanks for the feedback, I really appreciate it. Also thank you for the sub.

Haha you've made my day. When writing the script I was hoping a few people would get it lol

I was not making the argument they are greedy. Quite the opposite, my argument was there costs are extremely high

Thanks for the feedback

I won't, i got into this knowing youtube is a grind at first, but it will pay off later. Thanks for the words of encouragement

Thank you, I really really appreciate it. It means alot to get feedback confirming you are on the right track.

Hey, thank you for the suggestion. I had planned to do a video on the trucking industry.

Thank you. I really appreciate this.