- Видео 64
- Просмотров 45 167
COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)
Великобритания
Добавлен 6 окт 2017
Discussions and educational webinars on publication ethics issues and hot topics given by COPE Council members around the world and visiting speakers to COPE Seminars and Webinars. COPE provides leadership in thinking on publication ethics and practical resources to educate and support members, and offers a professional voice in current debates.
Is there a crisis in peer review? Publication Integrity Week 2024
In this conversation, hosted by Paul Fisher, Holden Thorp, editor-in-chief of Science and Ruth O’Hara, senior associate dean for research, Stanford Medical School, debate the strengths, challenges, and future of peer review.
See a summary of this event and more information on the topic Is there a crisis in peer review?: publicationethics.org/guidance/seminar-and-webinar/there-crisis-peer-review-publication-integrity-week-2024
See a summary of this event and more information on the topic Is there a crisis in peer review?: publicationethics.org/guidance/seminar-and-webinar/there-crisis-peer-review-publication-integrity-week-2024
Просмотров: 74
Видео
Expressions of Concern, introduction to a COPE discussion 2024
Просмотров 5014 дней назад
We introduce COPE's upcoming Expressions of Concern guidelines and discuss the situations when an Expression of Concern is appropriate, their purpose, potential challenges and how they should be issued. You can add to the discussion with your comments on the COPE website, where you will also find a summary of the webinar discussion held at the COPE Forum, December 2024. publicationethics.org/to...
Volunteer with COPE
Просмотров 1633 месяца назад
We asked some COPE Council Members and Trustees what made them join COPE and how they contribute to the work of the publication ethics community. If you are a COPE Member and would like to volunteer with COPE visit our website for more information publicationethics.org/about/work-with-us
Plagiarism in 2024
Просмотров 3764 месяца назад
Plagiarism as a concept has recently come under renewed scrutiny in general discourse, but even before then, changes in the nature of writing research articles has generated debate about how the term applies to scholarship. Some have suggested that different parts of a scholarly work should be held to different standards, such as methods sections, where precision and accuracy of expression are ...
Publishing when English is not your first language
Просмотров 1615 месяцев назад
Scholarly publishing is heavily focused on communication in English. While there are advantages to having a common language for reporting research, it can place unequal burdens on scholars from different backgrounds. Research has shown that it takes longer to prepare an article, book chapter, or conference paper in an additional language, it can be expensive to secure professional translation o...
Ethical considerations around watchlists, COPE Forum discussion
Просмотров 2479 месяцев назад
‘Watchlists’ are a contentious issue in scholarly publishing. They are used to maintain a record of authors or journals who have behaved unethically, either for internal publisher/journal purposes or as a public reference point. Several publicly available watchlists have been removed in recent years owing to concerns around the lack of transparency in the criteria they use. Others note the lega...
Welcome to COPE, Dan Kulp COPE Chair
Просмотров 8010 месяцев назад
COPE promotes integrity in scholarly research and its publication. This is an introduction to COPE and what we do, by COPE Chair Dan Kulp: When I began with COPE seven years ago it was to contribute to the work of COPE and to learn from those around me with the collective aim of protecting the integrity of published research. I have already learned from the work of COPE in my day job as both an...
Open retractions data
Просмотров 66810 месяцев назад
Ivan Oransky of Retraction Watch and Crossref's Ed Pentz join Trevor Lane to discuss the acquisition of the Retraction Watch database. They talk about the benefits to the community and how this partnership improves access to the data by authors, readers and publishers. The conversation moves on to the wider picture of researcher incentives and trust signals. More from COPE: publicationethics.or...
Claiming institutional affiliations, COPE Forum discussion
Просмотров 515Год назад
Journals and research institutions rarely provide guidance or standards on the definition of “deserving” affiliations or the number of affiliations per author on a publication. Multiple undeserved affiliations may be considered as research malpractice and may affect different stakeholders and the integrity of the published record. During this Forum we engaged in a discussion on “institutional a...
Ethical concerns in research on urbanisation: perspectives from the Global South
Просмотров 109Год назад
In this session Neha Sami -Associate Dean, School of Environment and Sustainability, and Senior Lead, Academics & Research, Indian Institute for Human Settlements- talks about the need to build a collaborative research agenda when carrying out work in the Global South. This discussion is one of eleven sessions hosted by COPE during Publication Integrity Week 2023. publicationethics.org
Caste and publishing ethics: an ethics gap?
Просмотров 128Год назад
In this talk, Gaurev Pathania, Assistant Professor of Sociology at the Center for Justice and Peacebuilding (Eastern Mennonite University), speaks about the often overlooked category of caste as a global form of discrimination. Anubhav Pradhan, COPE Council Member, hosts this talk and discussion. This discussion is one of eleven sessions hosted by COPE during Publication Integrity Week 2023. p...
Post-publication corrections
Просмотров 436Год назад
This discussion panel features Elizabeth Moylan (Senior Manager, Research Integrity Strategy & Policy at Wiley), Mark Hooper (Manager, Research Ethics and Integrity at the Queensland University of Technology), and Jennifer Byrne (publication integrity ‘sleuth’ and the University of Sydney), talking about dealing with issues that arise after publication has taken place. The discussion is hosted ...
Image manipulation
Просмотров 481Год назад
In this session, Jana Christopher, Image Data Integrity Analyst at FEBS Press, offers an authoritative overview of current issues and tools in detecting image manipulation. This discussion was part of 'Publication Misconduct and Fraud Day' hosted by COPE during Publication Integrity Week 2023. publicationethics.org
Inclusive language: policing or progressive?
Просмотров 269Год назад
This session examines the potential benefits and dangers of language use policies with Sara Dibari (Editorial Manager of JAMA Psychiatry and chair of the research and writing committees of the C4DISC working group that created the Guidelines on Inclusive Language and Images in Scholarly Communication), Rohan Pethiyagoda (research associate of the Australian Museum, Sydney, and an editor of the ...
Publication misconduct and fraud day introduction
Просмотров 25Год назад
Publication misconduct and fraud day introduction
Introduction to publication ethics and the COPE ethics toolkit
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.Год назад
Introduction to publication ethics and the COPE ethics toolkit
Publication ethics, research integrity and climbing mountains
Просмотров 498Год назад
Publication ethics, research integrity and climbing mountains
Artificial intelligence (AI) and peer review
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.Год назад
Artificial intelligence (AI) and peer review
Peer review models, COPE Forum discussion
Просмотров 391Год назад
Peer review models, COPE Forum discussion
Best practices for guest edited collections
Просмотров 192Год назад
Best practices for guest edited collections
Enhancing partnerships of institutions and journals: COPE webinar
Просмотров 16 тыс.Год назад
Enhancing partnerships of institutions and journals: COPE webinar
Artificial intelligence and fake papers
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.Год назад
Artificial intelligence and fake papers
An introduction to COPE and COPE resources for an audience of editors.
Просмотров 497Год назад
An introduction to COPE and COPE resources for an audience of editors.
Ethical aspects of conference proceedings. Introduction to the COPE Forum discussion September 2022.
Просмотров 3952 года назад
Ethical aspects of conference proceedings. Introduction to the COPE Forum discussion September 2022.
Practical steps for managing paper mills
Просмотров 1 тыс.2 года назад
Practical steps for managing paper mills
Dealing with complaints about the integrity of published research. COPE discussion 22 June 2022
Просмотров 3482 года назад
Dealing with complaints about the integrity of published research. COPE discussion 22 June 2022
Book wars: the impact of the digital revolution on Anglo-American trade publishing. Seminar 2022.
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.2 года назад
Book wars: the impact of the digital revolution on Anglo-American trade publishing. Seminar 2022.
COPE Seminar introduction and keynote: the evolving relationship between universities and publishers
Просмотров 1563 года назад
COPE Seminar introduction and keynote: the evolving relationship between universities and publishers
Thanks.
Outstanding work... As scientists we need solid support for better practices
Am Ready to anything you need
What is That its really Great
Paper Mills Issue #1 - ruclips.net/video/FPlwqi_sgpk/видео.html
Artificial intelligence and Chat GPT will provide and opportunity to hide for paper mills and their beneficiaries - ruclips.net/video/FPlwqi_sgpk/видео.html
Artificial intelligence boost paper mills - ruclips.net/video/FPlwqi_sgpk/видео.html
What happens to the medical writer who has helped in preparation of a manuscript found to be a case of misconduct...if he/she doesn't have any idea about data integrity. Would he/she be considered at default or their contract company responsible?
Very useful information, thanks for sharing!
Thank you
GREAT JOB
þrðmð§m 😂
USE MODERN VIDEO CODEC AV01 OR VP9, NOT OLD AVC1 !
Thanks for webinar
I think the best way is to perform a google search of provided email of the suggested reviewer and look at their publications. Further, the editor should select at least one self-identified reviewer.