Видео

University is weer universiteit 😊

Anabolic was a part of the vast Aryan/Iranian Plateau😮

57:00 Iranian migration😮

1:06:00 Sir, you just ruined White-Supremacy. Thank you. 1:12:00 I suggest that you compare the genome and the language of the Basque with those of Iran , although the ancient Persian language is very different from today's Persian. 1:18:15

Ice Age.

Near my home, 30,000 year old guy, covered by red ochre.

@@casteretpollux Joe-Biden???

1. You know Germany had destroyers that could sink any minesweepers hanging around in the area, right? Right? 2. Why are you pretending that 50k troops would be enough to oust the Bolsheviks or that the Czech Legion being evacuated caused the Bolsheviks to choose peace, when the Bolsheviks themselves had serious internal wrangling over the question of whether they should continue the war or not?

@@asimplepolyp5641 says, "You know Germany had destroyers that could sink any minesweepers hanging around in the area, right? Right?" By early 1914, the Royal Navy had more than 350 torpedo boat destroyers (TBDs) and cruisers, in addition to 20 Town cruisers, and 15 Scout cruisers. "Why are you pretending that 50k troops would be enough to oust the Bolsheviks or that the Czech Legion..." The Bolsheviks had no army to protect it, other than civilians who were termed Red Guards. The Czech Legion made mince-meat out of the Germans every time they confronted Germans, so the girlish Red Guards were an insult to the martial prowess of the Czech Legion, later eviscerating the newly formed Red Army (formed in February 1918), resulting in the Czech Legion taking over more territory than did Alexander the Great. "...the Bolsheviks themselves had serious internal wrangling over the question of whether they should continue the war or not?" The Bolsheviks came to power proclaiming "Bread and Peace", then three weeks later (Nov. 26) we have Armistice talks between Germany and Russia, but the Allies could care less that Russia was pulling out of the war, where one-million Germans would soon be facing Allied forces on the western front. Which is why today we have the West's Marxist co-opted institutions enabling the fake "collapse" of the USSR, as the following illustrates... The hammer & sickle logo is still attached to Aeroflot aircraft! Leningrad Oblast is still called Leningrad Oblast! Engels city is still called Engels! The Russian military's official newspaper is still called RED STAR (1924-2024), where the four Soviet era awards the newspaper won are still on the masthead... (1) Order of the October Revolution (2) Order of Lenin (3) Order of the Red Banner (4) Order of Victory The Russian Orthodox Church was never purged of its KGB clergy! All 6,000 monuments of Lenin remain standing throughout Russia, zero being destroyed! Lenin's Tomb still resides at Red Square! The State Seal of the USSR remains atop the Duma building, where at night it's illuminated for clear viewing by pedestrians/motorists! How can the above be, you ask? Simple, the West conspired to not conduct the required verification of the fake "collapse" of the USSR, and naturally the Marxist co-opted media didn't report this lapse, nor report the following... "The basic weapon in the Soviet political armoury is the KGB with its 5 or 6 million secret agents inside the USSR. Together, the Party and the KGB have fabricated controlled political opposition in the main cities of the USSR and in the national Republics. Together they have chosen and trained the organisers, leaders and activists of the new 'democratic', 'non-Communist', 'nationalist' and 'independent' organisations which are mushrooming under the Soviet 'multi-Party system'. Even non-democratic groups like the anti-Semitic 'Pamyat' movement are creatures of the regime. Gorbachev is not the creator of a true multi-Party system: he is not a Soviet Stolypin intent on saving Russia through capitalism.” - KGB defector Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, ‘The Perestroika Deception‘, September-November 1990, p. 123. ...and... "Official and unofficial Soviet statements have referred to resignations from the Party, to an overall loss in its membership and even to the possibility of its long-term disintegration. The New York Times of 4 November 1990, quoting the Central Committee paper ‘Glasnost’, gives a decline in membership of from over 19 million to 17.7 million. A more reliable figure can be derived from the representation at the Party’s 1990 Congress. This was attended by 4,700 delegates each representing 5,000 Party members - indicating a total membership of 23.5 million, a figure consistent with the increase in the strength of the Central Committee from over 300 to 412 members.” -- The Perestroika Deception, KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, (1995), pp. 122-123. Google: internet archive the perestroika deception Nice try, Comrade!

@@brian78045 _"By early 1914, the Royal Navy had more than 350 torpedo boat destroyers (TBDs) and cruisers, in addition to 20 Town cruisers, and 15 Scout cruisers."_ Which were all deployed where? That's right, patrolling the sea lanes for U-boats and surface raiders, and keeping the battleship forces properly screened. _" __*_[1]_* The Bolsheviks had no army to protect it, other than civilians who were termed Red Guards. *_[2]_* The Czech Legion made mince-meat out of the Germans every time they confronted Germans, so the girlish Red Guards were an insult to the martial prowess of the Czech Legion, *_[3]_* later eviscerating the newly formed Red Army (formed in February 1918), resulting in the Czech Legion taking over more territory than did Alexander the Great."_ 1. When the November Revolution happened, large swathes of the Russian army defected en masse to the Bolsheviks. The army units in western Ukraine stayed mostly loyal, but the ones in eastern Ukraine, Belarus and northern Russia defected. Far from defended only by simple militias, St. Petersburg was in fact _surrounded_ by newly communist forces. 2. That is a lie. They did well against _Austrian_ units all the way through, which is not high praise since the Russians in general did pretty well against them. _Everyone_ did well against them. They fared _okay_ against the Germans, and only distinguished themselves from the rest of the Russian army at the time by the fact that the rest of the Russian army was disintegrating, and a lot of Russian units were also joining the Reds. 3. Also a lie. They negotiated with the Bolsheviks in Ukraine to go east, which they were allowed to do on the condition they gave up most of their weapons. They got to Siberia before Trotsky changed his mind and ordered them arrested, but the small Bolshevik forces in that area were too weak to stop them. They then ran east to Vladivostok as fast as possible, where they met up with White forces and helped them defeat the Bolsheviks in most of Siberia. Then the Bolsheviks recaptured the area around Lake Baikal with a large force, and suddenly the Czechs were encircled again. _It took an American intervention force to rescue them._

@@asimplepolyp5641 says, "Which were all deployed where? That's right, patrolling the sea lanes for U-boats and surface raiders, and keeping the battleship forces properly screened. " The German U-Boat campaign didn't start in earnest until February 1915. At the start of the war Germany had only 33 U-Boats. And only 30 were available as of February 1915, of which 16 were destroyed. "1. When the November Revolution happened, large swathes of the Russian army defected en masse to the Bolsheviks. The army units in western Ukraine stayed mostly loyal, but the ones in eastern Ukraine, Belarus and northern Russia defected. Far from defended only by simple militias, St. Petersburg was in fact surrounded by newly communist forces." The Russian Army was demobilized by Trotsky on November 27, 1917. A civil war between those regiments loyal to Kerensky and those siding with the Bolshevik coup would spell the end of the Bolsheviks, so the whole Russian Army was sent packing. "2. That is a lie. They did well against Austrian units all the way through, which is not high praise since the Russians in general did pretty well against them. Everyone did well against them. They fared okay against the Germans, and only distinguished themselves from the rest of the Russian army at the time by the fact that the rest of the Russian army was disintegrating, and a lot of Russian units were also joining the Reds." At the Battle of Bakhmach (March 1918), the Czech Legion whipped Germans and Austrians. "3. Also a lie. They negotiated with the Bolsheviks in Ukraine to go east, which they were allowed to do on the condition they gave up most of their weapons. They got to Siberia before Trotsky changed his mind and ordered them arrested, but the small Bolshevik forces in that area were too weak to stop them. They then ran east to Vladivostok as fast as possible, where they met up with White forces and helped them defeat the Bolsheviks in most of Siberia. Then the Bolsheviks recaptured the area around Lake Baikal with a large force, and suddenly the Czechs were encircled again. It took an American intervention force to rescue them." The Czech Legion didn't make its own orders (!), the Czech Legion was ordered by the Allies to move east to Vladivostok for evacuation, and as they did so they still fought the Red Army, conquering more territory than Alexander the Great. As I said, the Allies could care less if they lose the war, with the looming prospect of one-million German soldiers moving to the Western Front. You show your true Marxist identity by your silence to the following shocking facts... The hammer & sickle logo is still attached to Aeroflot aircraft! Leningrad Oblast is still called Leningrad Oblast! Engels city is still called Engels! The Russian military's official newspaper is still called RED STAR (1924-2024), where the four Soviet era awards the newspaper won are still on the masthead... (1) Order of the October Revolution (2) Order of Lenin (3) Order of the Red Banner (4) Order of Victory The Russian Orthodox Church was never purged of its KGB clergy! All 6,000 monuments of Lenin remain standing throughout Russia, zero being destroyed! Lenin's Tomb still resides at Red Square! The State Seal of the USSR remains atop the Duma building, where at night it's illuminated for clear viewing by pedestrians/motorists! How can the above be, you ask? Simple, the West conspired to not conduct the required verification of the fake "collapse" of the USSR, and naturally the Marxist co-opted media didn't report this lapse, nor report the following... "The basic weapon in the Soviet political armoury is the KGB with its 5 or 6 million secret agents inside the USSR. Together, the Party and the KGB have fabricated controlled political opposition in the main cities of the USSR and in the national Republics. Together they have chosen and trained the organisers, leaders and activists of the new 'democratic', 'non-Communist', 'nationalist' and 'independent' organisations which are mushrooming under the Soviet 'multi-Party system'. Even non-democratic groups like the anti-Semitic 'Pamyat' movement are creatures of the regime. Gorbachev is not the creator of a true multi-Party system: he is not a Soviet Stolypin intent on saving Russia through capitalism.” - KGB defector Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, ‘The Perestroika Deception‘, September-November 1990, p. 123. ...and... "Official and unofficial Soviet statements have referred to resignations from the Party, to an overall loss in its membership and even to the possibility of its long-term disintegration. The New York Times of 4 November 1990, quoting the Central Committee paper ‘Glasnost’, gives a decline in membership of from over 19 million to 17.7 million. A more reliable figure can be derived from the representation at the Party’s 1990 Congress. This was attended by 4,700 delegates each representing 5,000 Party members - indicating a total membership of 23.5 million, a figure consistent with the increase in the strength of the Central Committee from over 300 to 412 members.” -- The Perestroika Deception, KGB Major Anatoliy Golitsyn, (1995), pp. 122-123. Google: internet archive the perestroika deception

@@brian78045 > _The German U-Boat campaign didn't start in earnest until February 1915. At the start of the war Germany had only 33 U-Boats. And only 30 were available as of February 1915, of which 16 were destroyed._ On the other hand, you know what _was_ available at the time? Von Spee's squadron in the Pacific, the SMS Emden, and a bunch of merchant raiders like the SMS Cap Trafalgar. > _The Russian Army was demobilized by Trotsky on November 27, 1917. A civil war between those regiments loyal to Kerensky and those siding with the Bolshevik coup would spell the end of the Bolsheviks, so the whole Russian Army was sent packing._ Also wrong. The Russian army was still fighting on the frontlines up until Trotsky's boneheaded move at Brest-Litovsk of "no war, no peace". Up until Brest-Litovsk, even those units not loyal to Lenin and Trotsky were at least willing to not mutiny against their new leaders for the sake of wartime unity. It was only after the Bolsheviks ended the war and sold out vast tracts of Russian land to the Germans that serious resistance started popping up to Soviet rule. > _At the Battle of Bakhmach (March 1918), the Czech Legion whipped Germans and Austrians._ Incorrect. They (along with a larger force of Bolsheviks, btw) were besieged at a rail terminal by a slightly smaller force of Germans and Austrians who were far away from any supporting units. After being repulsed once, the besiegers then decided it wasn't worth their while to dig them out and let them pass eastward. > _The Czech Legion didn't make its own orders (!), the Czech Legion was ordered by the Allies to evacuate east to Vladivostok for evacuation, and as they did so they still fought the Red Army, conquering more territory than Alexander the Great. As I said, the Allies could care less if they lose the war, with the looming prospect of one-million German soldiers moving to the Western Front._ It was ordered to evacuate east _so it could go to France._ By the time they got to Vladivostok, the Bolsheviks had already done Brest-Litovsk, so the Entente suddenly wanted them to help the Whites defeat them and get Russia _back into the war!_ Also, you cling onto "conquering more territory than Alexander the Great" as if it's some kind of holy idol. I've got news for you: conquering a thousand miles long by ten feet wide of railroad does not constitute actual _conquest,_ and it most especially doesn't constitute conquest of the hundreds of miles of endless forest on either side of it. They ran east until they linked up with White forces, they liberated some cities with them, and that's it. > _You show your true Marxist identity by your silence to the following shocking facts..._ Man, take your pills, you're seeing Reds in your toilet again. > _The hammer & sickle logo is still attached to Aeroflot aircraft! Leningrad Oblast is still called Leningrad Oblast! Engels city is still called Engels! The Russian military's official newspaper is still called RED STAR (1924-2024), where the four Soviet era awards the newspaper won are still on the masthead..._ So you expected that if I were not a Marxist, I would've mentioned this in my reply to your insane babbling about WW1? Do you realize how disconnected these two subjects are? > _How can the above be, you ask? Simple, the West conspired to not conduct the required verification of the fake "collapse" of the USSR, and naturally the Marxist co-opted media didn't report this lapse, nor report the following..._ Even if I accepted all of that as true, I still wouldn't have mentioned it *_IN A THREAD EXCLUSIVELY ABOUT WW1._*

Lactose tolerant herders?

Says the person (Clark) with a vested professional interest in NOT assigning blame to the Germans and dismissing or memoryholing any evidence that forces him to have to do so.

@@asimplepolyp5641 If you're going to blame Germany then tell me your argument as to why they were to blame. I'm honestly curious. I love debate and discussion about this

​@@rockytoptom Some terms to start with: 1912 German Imperial War Council, Friedrich von Bernhardi, Kurt Riezler's letters and redacted diary, the Nuremberg aircraft hoax. Since the early 1900s, the German general staff had become convinced that Russia was going to eventually become unbeatable in a war (in 1910, they believed this point would come by 1916), and almost universally believed that Germany would have to attack Russia soon or never. If it did not act soon, Germany would become subservient to Russia and lose its great power status. They also believed that capturing lebensraum in the east, which had been pushed for by popular politicians since Bismarck's time, was the only way to secure German global supremacy and racial prosperity for all time. France and Russia were allies, so any war against one would involve the other, so all Germany needed was to provoke a war with either one. However, Germany also needed Austria on its side and Britain out of the war, so it couldn't fire the first shot. So they planned to start diplomatic incidents which would cause the other nation to declare war on Germany. In 1905, they instigated the 1st Moroccan Crisis with France, but France refused to fight and Britain looked like it would support France, so it fizzled out. In 1908, they gave the Austrians carte blanche to start the Bosnian Crisis in the hopes that they could provoke a Russian declaration of war against Austria. But the Russians backed down, so the chance was lost again. In 1911, they started the 2nd Moroccan Crisis; this time, Britain came down firmly on France's side and Germany had to back off. In December 1912, the Germans held a war council to discuss what to do, now that it was highly likely Britain would side against Germany in any future war; most attendees wanted to go to war immediately to take maximum advantage of their temporary military superiority against the Russians, but Tirpitz nixed that by pointing out that the reconstruction of the Kiel Canal wouldn't be finished until late 1914, so they couldn't fight both the British and Russian fleets at the same time until then. Look up the wikipedia page for the war council to see some of the results. Those results are damning, but there are two results which the page doesn't show: (1) the Kiel Canal's reconstruction was sped up several months so it would be ready by _June_ 1914 instead of October 1914, and (2) the German army was doubled in size from 1912 to 1914, an increase much higher than any other nation in that time. From that point onward, the Germans were going to take any opportunity for war that they could, which is why they pressed the Austrians as hard as possible to attack Serbia when the Archduke was assassinated. However, even then the Russians didn't take the bait. On the 26th, the British tried to arrange a mediation of the crisis; Russia accepted, Germany and Austria refused. The next day, Austria declared war on Serbia. The Russians half-mobilized to show the Austrians they meant business, but got no response; tsar Nicholas pleaded with the kaiser to talk the Austrians down, but he refused. So the Germans, tired of trying to get the Russians to declare war, finally did it themselves by giving the Russians an ultimatum to stop mobilizing within 12 hours _on midnight_ to make sure they would run out the deadline. They then fabricated a hoax of a French bombing raid on Nuremberg to declare war on them under the guise of self-defense. And the rest is history. By the way, at the end of WW1, the Germans went out of their way to censor and hide all evidence of the war council as part of a campaign to hide evidence that would make them appear 1000% guilty of starting the war and with very evil intent, and it would only reemerge into public consciousness when Fritz Fischer discovered and publicized the minutes from the meeting. Read "Clio Deceived: Patriotic Self-Censorship in Germany after the Great War" for details. This is why the war guilt clause hit such a nerve with the Germans; it was _true_ - in fact, if anything it was understating the truth.

@@rockytoptom My reply got yeeted, but you can see it if you sort by Newest and go to this comment thread. It's a long post.

@@asimplepolyp5641 And yes, I was able to see your reply when I followed your directions, my response cannot even be posted. I keep getting an error message. It's probably because it's half a book hahah

Je maakt een denkfout in deze. H-fusie in een ster zoals de Zon duurt 10 miljard jaar. Bij een ster zoals Betelgeuze, die pak hem beet 20 keer zo zwaar is, moet veel harder werken om tegenstand te bieden tegen de zwaartekracht, gaat veel slordiger om met zijn brandstof (H). En daarom duurt die H-fusie fase bij Betelgeuze maar 10 miljoen jaar. Overigens moet ik je wel gelijk geven maar anders verwoorden, het was een rommelige presentatie.

I think this presentation is deliberately aimed at a more general (online) audience that might be younger or less familiar with the topic. Nothing wrong with that.

Nope, it is she who politicized her legacy with her own misandry unfortunately. More specifically, gimbutas' noble matriarchy theory of old Europe has been thoroughly discredited by David Anthony and others. It turns out, the process was far more peaceful and gradual and voluntary by both sides, than her feminist theory has claimed

Secondly, only in the imagination of her religious defenders is linguistic hypothesis named after the scholar. In reality, they rarely are See also: Anatolian hypothesis, out of India theory, altaic theory, out of Africa hypothesis

@@johnsmith-ir1ne this is the first time I hear Gimbutas being labelled with "misandry". On what grounds do you do that? As far as I know the brutality of the Eastern invadors is very well documented, not only through DNA analyses, that show they literally killed all European man.

@@magasverlag yes that's what she promoted many years ago. But today her academic descendants who owe her a lot of thanks and gratitude, have themselves disproved her matriarchal old Europe theory which rests on her own prejudice. See David Anthony's classic book, the horse the wheel and language

@@magasverlag and btw same happened with the so called Indian invasion by Indo European speakers: it was partially rivalry but mostly commercial and cultural mixing and coexistence that lasted many centuries, not a military invasion like what Arabs did in the sixth century