Видео

Small correction: the Poles made the "bomb", but the process was still partly manual, the decoding took about 15 minutes. This all collapsed when Germans added one extra wheel, making the faily itoces into roughly ~28 years. It was afaik August 1939, so the entire bureau was evacuated from Warsaw to Paris, then to the UK. The rest is very well known. PS Credit to the French secret service, who found a disgruntled German officer, who sold them one Enigma, together with the manual.

James Harden teaching us the good stuff.

This video is very important to watch carefully to undestand code it really helped me

"ethically ofcourse"

great video mn!

Awesome stuff boss! Waiting for part III. 💯

Hello can you teach me reverse engineering in deep

Ayo this is top dopey 🎉🎉

I showed my grandma this at 2x speed she thought I was changing religions

I agree. You hit the algorithm. Your video just popped up on my radar. Not really my subject, but really informative. Thank you. ps. Yes, I subscribed 😊

You aint sleek JAMES HARDEN .

heimdal ?

You have such great content. Looking forward to those RSA and Diffie-Hellman videos!

Hey, a Hornets fan 👋

Great video, very thorough explanation

I haven't done reverse engineering since 2005 when I cracked a USB dongle for my boss!! I was surprised that I was able to do it actually. I was using IDA Pro at the time. Previous to that I disassembled some 8 bit MC6809 code in the 1980's ... Reverse engineering is complex, difficult, and time consuming. Makes you wonder what AI tools will emerge that makes it way simpler.

Very good content, worth 4 years of college 👍

Thank yu for sharing. Very informative.

Str8 up, James Harden has always been one of my favorites, now this n#### gotta hacker channel, lemme get my jersey out! Get em!!!

Enjoyed the entire topic and reminder of reverse engineering. Presented VERY well and look forward to part 2. You have a new subscriber to your channel. Thanks.

Yes please part 2!!

Hell yea; love ur channel, this what i was looking for. just subbed

Takes me back to my WIndows days.

10/10

Anyone else thought he was saying little Indian and big Indian 😅

Provide link to part 1 in description please

on the evolution of processor architectures: x86 Architecture: Initially developed by Intel, the x86 architecture started with the 8-bit 8086 processor in 1978, then evolved to 16-bit and 32-bit versions1. It’s known for its Complex Instruction Set Computing (CISC), which allows for a wide variety of instructions, making it versatile but sometimes slower due to the complexity. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86 RISC vs. CISC: Reduced Instruction Set Computing (RISC) was indeed developed to simplify the instruction set, allowing for faster execution of instructions. This approach contrasts with CISC by using a smaller set of simpler instructions. Here, in the task of performing subtraction (reducing an instruction set) addition (becomes the result, when coding and in practical use, which is why RISC failed its original goals and is an open source failure now, with huge money behind it.. meh.. whatever), the program is divided into three parts, i.e., load, operate, and store, which makes RISC programs long and requires more memory to store instructions while needing fewer transistors as the commands are simple and less complex. AMD64 and Intel 64: AMD developed the AMD64 architecture, which extended the x86 architecture to 64 bits. Intel later adopted this architecture, branding it as Intel 642. This extension allows for more memory addressing and improved performance. superuser.com/questions/383711/whats-the-difference-between-intel-64-and-amd64 Microcode Contributions: Both Intel and AMD use microcode updates to fix bugs and improve performance in their processors. While AMD64 (or x86-64) is a significant contribution from AMD, both companies regularly update their microcode to address security vulnerabilities and enhance functionality. techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/core-infrastructure-and-security/demystifying-microcode-updates-for-intel-and-amd-processors/ba-p/1000845 P.S - 40 years ago, I started with this.

client id is a weak point over http .. oauth perhaps could be further constrained by imposing a http header say like x-forwarded-for .. but that can be spoofed .. so it ends up being forever non-deterministic .. otherwise we'd have already locked it down .. but alas

Great work fella, love the vids❤

This man looks like he's born by reverse reproduction

just beacuase you your low sub count but still you proved you have quality content

😎👍

great content

Dude... this is JUST what I needed.

great vid.

🎉🎉🎉

🔥

🎉

Yall, I got a new camera and didn't realize it was zoomed into my face so much, until after the fact. Enjoy the close up.

Definitely would like part 2!

Awesome video. Your presentation is excellent, you have some great graphics, and your knowledge is impressive. Could you keep them coming? On a side note, X86 refers to 16-bit and 32-bit processors, not just 32/64-bit processors. It was only in the Pentium and later series processors that they used 32-bit registers. Thus, from a historical point of view, the X86 would be referring to 16-bit and 32-bit processors in this family. Timeline 1978: The original processor used 16-bit registers. In 1982, 80286 used 16-bit registers, and then, in 1985, the processor with a 32-bit register was released.

I really enjoy your content! Could we schedule a second session on reverse engineering? I’d love to dive deeper into the details, and if possible, a live demo of a piece of written software would be greatly appreciated. You're doing fantastic work, and I truly value it!

i admire your work so much, you’re a true inspiration!

Excellent video, bro. The intro was a bit unnecessary but the remaining part of the video was fire and by far the best content on reverse engineering I have seen.

Wish I had time to dive more into this. My brain is currently consumed by machine learning. Bookmarking for a rainy day.

LIked. Subscribed.

I shouldn't give you a like for that slander at the beginning 😂 But this was informative.

I fully expected to be overwhelmed but you broke it down in a digestible way. Thank you.

That was honestly amazing. I would love a part 2, and 3, and 4.

Excellent starting point. Thank you so much for making this! You explain things very clearly.