Видео

No it's not.😂😂😂

Hungarians have nothing to do with Atilla or the huns,but just like them where a Turkic people came from almost the same region like most of the steppe people,they just tooked the name and btw they came as vassals of the Avars and by that time called Oghuz Turks or Oguz (western branch turks)....and that was far later...and if you read the Chinese chronicles you may have a hint.

turk lineage might came from attila , but Attila's lineage came from central asian, better known as xiongu/xianbei. The term turk was invented later on by french in the 1200's as a description for middle eastern turkish which was mostly ottomans already, not the central asian gokturks.

You should be scared, pay tribute or the golden horde will trample your village

Cry about it

Huns came from Asia and are descendants of Xiongnun. Chinese sources write Huns as Turks. Their war tactics, their clothes, their face masks, they all match with Turks. If you are ignorant, what can Turks do?

recent studies about Hun graves in Germany proved huge dna similarity between Huns and Anatolian Turks

@@sigmaentrepreneur5018 faked studies, no value

@@sigmaentrepreneur5018 ridiculously false

They are Turko-Mongol. But they are our Ancestors! 🇹🇷🇲🇳🇰🇿🇰🇿🇦🇿

true mongols attila, east asian looking, real mongols and gokturks have nothing to do with ppl in the country called "turkey"

@@ruzgar1903BJK true mongols attila, east asian looking, real mongols and gokturks have nothing to do with ppl in the country called "turkey"

@@ruzgar1903BJK xiongnu/great hunnic empire have absolute 0 thing to do with turkey. Their leader Modu Chanyu/ Mete Khan have 0 to do with ppl in "turkey"

@@military0f21stcentury2 oh really? The First Turkic Khaganate, also referred to as the First Turkic Empire, the Turkic Khaganate or the Göktürk Khaganate, was a Turkic khaganate established by the Ashina clan of the Göktürks in medieval Inner Asia under the leadership of Bumin Qaghan (d. 552) and his brother Istämi A study of 75 individuals from various parts of Turkey concluded that the "genetic structure of the mitochondrial DNAs in the Turkish population bears some similarities to Turkic Central Asian populations". The first Turkic tribe to leave their name in history is the Huns. Their first known homeland was modern Mongolia; their name appears in Chinese historical documents as Hiung-nu. The Hiung-Nus lived in the 8th century B.C. along the Yellow River (Hoang Ho), and posed a continually increasing threat to the Chinese.

369

Peace? Seriously? I can only come up with the image of a huge hunnic horde sweeping across Europe.😂

@@milkbaologist5610 you can only feel this peace if your ancestors came from the steppes. if you have ancestors who shit their pants when the huns raided while they sitting their stone houses this will be like a lament for you

true mongols attila, east asian looking, real mongols and gokturks have nothing to do with ppl in the country called "turkey"

@@JiraiyaSennin-li7yy turkish are good ppl, but they claim as turks just to differentiate from Arabs and Greeks

@Ilovelanguages you post that every Mongol video you see.

@Ilovelanguages yes,they have same words but Mongols have more words with turkic people(kazakhs,uzibeks etc).turkish is anatolian arabs,greeks and persians.Turkic,Tungus,Mongol languages have many similar words.

@Ilovelanguages yes, and there are atleast 609 Mongol words that have same meaning with tungus words.

@Ilovelanguages so what is your point ?

@Ilovelanguages i am Mongolian,i speak Mongolian.

And 🇹🇷

lol

true in realty they are bunch of greeks and arabs

He calls the Turks Greeks and Persians, not knowing that Greek genetics are preserved only on a small peninsula. Turks in Turkey have 41% Gokturk genetic heritage and over 70% Oguz Turk heritage, outside the region where Kurds live. Native Anatolian genetics do not exceed 25%. There are many Turkic tribes that migrated from Europe to Anatolia after the collapse of the European Huns. I also have high European Hun gene similarity.

btw you are turk too dude

@@sythe5579 Everything you wrote is garbage and also already proven false by modern DNA statistics. Modern turks in Turkey barely have 20% and the further West you go towards Istanbul,that percentage becomes less and less until it hits 0%. Finally I am not a Turk,but keep coping.

Atilla was Turk, not mongol.

@@Deniz-rp2uw Atilla was Mongol, like all Huns

@@catholicracialist776 the term "Mongol" was used in the 18th century and doesn't point to an ethnicity but to a dynasty. You likely mean Tatars who where a confederation of different peoples, mostly Turkic and Mongolic speaking but also Iranian and other

@@TheTokkie Go to a doctor, troll

@@TheTokkie He was Asian

Hello friend, from Kazakhstan🇰🇿

Subeedei and Attila both Mongolian.anatolians are arabs and greeks they have 15% or even less turkic dna.

@@Orgil. He calls the Turks Greeks and Persians, not knowing that Greek genetics are preserved only on a small peninsula. Turks in Turkey have 41% Gokturk genetic heritage and over 70% Oguz Turk heritage, outside the region where Kurds live.

​​No you Ignorant. Attila and the Huns are Turkic. The Mongols were not the only nation in the steppes. The history of the Turks in the steppes is much longer and earlier than the Mongols.​@@Orgil.

​@@Orgil.No you Ignorant. Attila and the Huns are Turkic. The Mongols were not the only nation in the steppes. The history of the Turks in the steppes is much longer and earlier than the Mongols.@Orgil.

Kimsenin umrunda degil, türkler olarak biraz olgunlasmaliyiz. Suan insanlik, milletleri dürüstlügüne göre siniflandiriyor, bizde bu konuda cok geriyiz.