Видео

Time 7.39 CPR 36.7 (1) CPR 36.7 (2)

aow Mrs Rebekah Batt😎🤝

Is very difficult to hear things between his swallowing habits

They blocked me on everything, did not give me sick pay, vacation time, or personal time. They stopped paying me and said I quit when I did not.

That was very interesting Jules and will pass to my probate team Thanks

23:30 - for my own reference (discrimination concurrent with). Not sure what is meant by ‘accept breach’… 32:40 - doesn’t this contradict the ‘can’t give yourself time to look for a job’, or is this only within the notice period?

This was fantastic. Super valuable as CD is a tough one to plan out. 🙌

Please put slides on. Thanks

Hi, i have a query which you may be able to help me with. so in the case of Dobson v Griffey, you speak on their being no agreement nor detrimental reliance, which means it does not satisfy the express agreement from Rosset, however, you also speak on there being a trust inferred from their conduct, as in the inferred trust from Rosset. Was the case argued on both elements from Rosset, or just the 1? many thanks

My ex wife made offer with drew it got rid off her solicitor and represented her self put in lower offer she is solicitor herself.

Thank you for making and such a structured and informative video. It is very helpful and succinct. Peace & Love, Queen Ester, UK

I am gonna watch this video again and again and again Just what the doctor ordered Magnificent Ta

What if the courts refuse to take evidence of misuse or courts or vexatious claims into account? I’ve just been ordered to pay my stalkers costs after they launched a case against me to intimidate me into dropping a civil and criminal claim. Knocked it into high court by lying about damages, judge wasn’t interested and ordered me to pay costs despite evidence showing I offered to settle, he lied, case was a farce, the lot. I could have proven their costs were unnecessary but judge couldn’t be bothered to listen. Now owe 60k I don’t have. What do I do??

This was so good...My Employer did everything WRONG

very interesting thanks

If on long yerm sick, caused by an accident at work, and no sick pay, the employee is left claiming benefits . If the employee resigns, even as a constructive dismissal, they can be "sanctioned" as it counts as a resignation and can lose all benefits and left penniless. In the case i have been involved in, after many known breaches and altered accident / fire safety/ Cossh teports, they were forced to wait to be fired. Now my argument is that he couldnt resign thru constructive dismissal to the Tribunal. A horrible dilemma

Area of not ABLE to constructively dismiss if on long term sick and forced to claim benefits for sick pay run out, can mean employee being "sanctioned" and lose all benefits as dwp see it as "resigned" so have up employment. Few can give an answer as to ehether benefits are sanctioned. This needs taking into account

Hello - so I bounced back and forth with junior member of my union - f##king useless. This is very clear cut and definitive - awesome Ezra! I did resign after an industrial accident after 11 months service. This was 2021 almost about to go to tribunal - personal injurie claim will follow later. So unfortunate I couldn't resign and present Repudiatory Breach at the same time along with my grievance - buggers put me in hospital before I could. - This is one of the most concise and sensible media on you tube - well done!

Helen Brander- the worst barrister ever to come across. A weak and biased barrister, and poor preparation of the casework. Messed up my case a big time .......please stay away and never recommend to anyone

please your contacts

Excellent.

Excellent information thank you .

The whole issue of whether using a grievance procedure could be deemed as affirmation is such a grey area. I think it’s fair to say you would usually be expected to lodge a grievance before claiming constructive dismissal, otherwise any damages you are awarded at an employment tribunal could be reduced.

Brilliant video! Thank you so much Update: I followed the guidance/information in the video, lodged an ET claim for constructive dismissal. Recently Settled amicably via ACAS for a financial lump sum 👍

Hi my case is full off case management and mess up with Oxfordshire family courts and Northampton South ss.. Cheers

Great, as if faithless wives didn't already have enough incentive to bail on their marriages and take their husbands to the cleaners.

Many thanks. I’m representing a friend in an unfair dismissal case soon and this has been really useful.

how is "the more warped the defendant's standards of honesty the less likely it is to be convicted of dishonest behaviour" interpreted.

What about working under protest pending resolution of the grievance? What if the employer is deliberately delaying handling the grievance?

This is amazing video! Really helped, dealing with tribunals on my own and this has helped so much when I feel so lost!

Thank You. Very comprehensive. God Bless.

You censored my comment but perhaps ypu could at least respond to the question of impartiality with expert witnesses? In the case of the circumcision the paper states: "Cohen J, who gave permission for the instruction of Mr. Mangera, specifically incorporated into the proposed instruction that the expert should be "able to speak as to the religious importance and timing of the procedure"." I note that Cohen J is likely of Jewish cultural background and therefore from a practicing community, doesn't this breach impartiality? Imagine a case with female circumcision and the person instructing the expert as well as the expert are both from practicing communities, would this be acceptable?

Thank goodness he didn't have to have his genitals mutilated but frankly that this is legal let alone a finely balanced decision is appalling. We have the radical feminist Fran Hoskin and her unholy alliance with strong reactionary forces, to thank for the discrimination meted out to boys with respect to the lack of protection they have when it comes to genital mutilation. She had her two sons cut so it was vital for her to construct a narrative making it a gross violation of a child's dignity to mutilate their genitals, as long as the child was a girl, boys genitals didn't count! Extraordinary that her narrative became the standard and as a result the proportion of children, both boys and girls cut has only increased in the last three generations since. Cases like this serve to bring the law into disrepute, along with the medical profession, most human rights organisations and politicians.

Thanks guys for the free webiner. It has been very helpful and informative.

This was very helpful, thank you

Thank you, extremely Useful. 👍🏻

thank you , very good explanation