- Видео 71
- Просмотров 339 251
Privater
Добавлен 17 авг 2008
Видео
Issue with Razer Viper Ultimate uneven bottom surface
Просмотров 1862 года назад
Issue with Razer Viper Ultimate uneven bottom surface
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 wireless charge with Samsung Duo Fast Charge 2.0 15w support with fan
Просмотров 1693 года назад
Similar settings but with mobile fan blow air to the phone and charger. Charging time is 1:58 Compare to previously 2:58 without external fan.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 wireless charge with Samsung Duo Fast Charge 2.0 15w support
Просмотров 7 тыс.3 года назад
Testing with fully 1-100% Total time: 2:55 Charging speed varies between 15w and 6w. Phone estimate 1:55, but couldn’t sustain full power due to overheating. Actual time is almost 3 hours.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 5G Qi Fast charge wireless charge test
Просмотров 3933 года назад
1-100% with Samsung EP-PN920 Fast Charge adapter. Total time 2 hours 24 min External fan used to cool down the device, it draws 9w from adapter constantly. Charge test without fan will be upload later. Total time will be more than 3 hours.
One reason Galaxy Flip 3 Black matte glass is superior than other colors
Просмотров 503 года назад
It doesn’t slippery like other colors
Galaxy Flip3 split screen and picture-in-picture reduce framerate from 120 to 60hz
Просмотров 3403 года назад
After activate split screen feature or using picture-in-picture feature, the framerate of Galaxy Flip 3 reduced from 120hz to 60hz
World War Z Ultra-Wide 3840x1600 w/ RTX 3080
Просмотров 1954 года назад
Running on AMD Ryzen 7 3700x ASUS ROG x570i G.Skill 16G 3800@CL15T1 ASUS TUF GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 38” UltraGear™ 21:9 Curved WQHD Nano IPS 1ms 144Hz Captured with Geforce Experience 100Mbps 60fps 3840x1600 15GB original file
World War Z 2020 10 26 Week Challenge Ultra-Wide 3440x1440 w/ RTX 3080 144hz locked
Просмотров 534 года назад
Running on AMD Ryzen 7 3700x ASUS ROG x570i G.Skill 16G 3800@CL15T1 ASUS TUF GAMING GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE G34WQC 34 Captured with Geforce Experience 100Mbps 60fps 3440x1440 12GB original file
Tesla Supercharger v3 Test 255kW peak reached
Просмотров 9 тыс.5 лет назад
Another tryout of Tesla supercharger v3, started from 9%, left with 90% within 35 minutes. It quickly jumped to 255kW just seconds with plugged in. Stayed for 15% and tamper kicked in. 9% - 50% 12 min 9% - 60% 15 min 9% - 70% 19 min 9% - 80% 25 min 9% - 90% 35 min
Tesla Model 3 Autopilot near hit
Просмотров 4196 лет назад
Tesla Model 3 Autopilot near hit Version 46.2
Tesla Model S 2016 v9.0 send location from phone
Просмотров 1,2 тыс.6 лет назад
Tesla Model S 2016 v9.0 send location from phone
Tesla Model 3 2018.20.5 Firmware card change
Просмотров 8516 лет назад
Tesla Model 3 2018.20.5 Firmware card change
Mar 23 2018 Tesla X crash on 101 possible explanation
Просмотров 83 тыс.6 лет назад
Mar 23 2018 Tesla X crash on 101 possible explanation
Hey I got the same issue it worked perfect for 2 1/2 months absolutely silent, and then when the fan came on it was silent as well, and then suddenly all these terrible noises.. Wondering if you got it RMA'd?
i have this problem on my razer deathadder v2 mini, and then i go look it up and saw a lot of post about the bad production quality of razer company, i regret buying this shit for 55 dollars
I am in love with this color as well. I wish it was offered. I wonder what car wrap color would be the closest to this? Any ideas?
I have the triple and Samsung Z FOLD 3, work great!!
Thank you so much... so... the estimated time at the bottom is not correct;;
It is normal for the galaxy flip3 to get very hot ? Greetings and blessings🙌
Hi. Can you tell me which wireless charger were you using in 2 videos before. The white one. Please do mention the link too
How's the temperature of the phone? Mine goes 104 regardless of slow or fast charging on wireless.
Thanks for this! Wow that is slow
Awesome moves dude!!
When you realize the battery percentage increased by 4% in one!! Minute
Model?
This is 400v @ 625a if you know anything about electricity you will know that this is an absolutely astronomical amount of power
But why do you have video footage from 8 days before the crash?
Make please. More videos regarding supercharger v3. For instance 5 per cent to 80 or to 90 per cent 20 per cent to 80 or 85 percent 30 to 90 and so on... Please..
Thanks for the video, it would be great to see a complete time lapse from 5% to 90% or so. If you have some free time on your hand it would be really awesome :)
Wow thats insane
Did this charge cost you $11.44?
That's the last charge before this charging sessions, because this is free
What Model 3 do you have ? I'm interested in a standard range plus but i donw know how it will handle the V3 SuC. I am aware that it will most likely have a gap since it doesnt have as much battery cells as the long range version. But it would be interesting to know how fast it can charge on V3 and to see how fast it can charge depending on the state of charge
The standard+ version should do around 160kw peak. It also already falls down on normal V2s at 40% SoC. So the Long range will be way faster.
@@kruemelfelix oof thats a bitter pill to swallow if you reagilarly go on roadtrips. .. and now i have to think where to get another 10 grand for a long range model :>
@@DJRaffa1000 m3 consumption per mile(km) is ridiculously low. It's not really that bad.
Hi, can I show a clip from your video in a machine learning class I am teaching internal to my company (TD)? I will ink back here for students to see the full video.
Sure, no problem
Phew... lucky me I watched it before it before going there on crushing))
AUTOPILOT DIDN'T NEARLY HIT THE ASSHOLE IN THE NISSAN DID.
Tesla autopilot may have just prevented another accident.
Yeah but that's one stupid driver passing by
Actually quite useful
I totally understand but why was the whole front of the Tesla gone it looked like it was going over 100 I auto pilot does not go ever 100
Nice thanks for showing. :) Do you like the change?
I remember reading something about a year ago that a Volvo exec from Europe was astounded by how poor many of the road markings on US roads are. From what I understand, there was a nasty bus crash in that same spot and the human driving the bus couldn't see the stripes due to the rain. I do wonder if maybe CalTrans needs to not only restripe that section of road, but should cross stripe it and put arrester barrels filled with salt water there too until this gets straightened. out.
Whatever. Emergency braking should still apply and bring the Tesla to a stop in front of the clearly recognizable obstacle. Even if it misunderstands the road markings, instead of only alerting the driver to take over the steering, it should - well it MUST - apply the brakes in this situation to prevent this crash in the best manner possible. The obstacle is literally rock solid, it is clearly recognizable via the front radar. No sun glare on earth can explain this. I mean, that's what radar is made for: 3D imaging when normal cameras are in trouble. And for line detection: The lane detection cannot only use a Sobel filter to detect lines of whatever form. It must find the white or yellow lines of a reasonable width complying with the road standard in that particular country. IMHO: this video can in no way explain the crash.
A great explanation here...looks like an infrastructure problem to an extent
This is especially bad when the sun is glaring on the road in morning/evening. 580 near Dublin has the same issue, and I did the same thing driving myself, causing me to drift into another open lane. The problem is the sun hitting the road at an angle at certain times of day makes the lane markings extra hard to make out, and that line/split in the road becomes much more distinguishable compared with the lane markings.
If you’re not going to watch the road closely when using autopilot, you should at least be in the right or middle lane, following a lead car.
Why have a feature if you're not going to use it? My niece told me the same thing when she got her IUD the day she turned 15. She's 17 now with Herpes. Both here fucked for life.
Comparing to the misread of lane markers, I'm more concerned that the software couldn't read the incoming obvious obstacle, painted in YELLOW AND BLACK. And there's a radar for that purpose in additional to cameras. This is the fatal mistake, I think it's an essential requirement that the software can detect a rock in the middle of lane, or a fallen furniture, before I can trust it with driving.
The same thing happened to me almost 2 years ago, in a different location though... It's a known limitation of autopilot and hence why Tesla tells you to keep your hands on the wheel and pay attention. If you don't keep your hands on the wheel and pay attention, catastrophe can result. ruclips.net/video/61gKS0il8I0/видео.html
Crash. Not crush.
I get why the Autopilot would follow these lines, but why wouldn't it brake before hitting the barrier ? Can't it detect it ?
Yeah. This is another evidence that LIDAR is crucial.
Good catch! Which is, again, why L2+ cars can not operate with CMOS cameras only but require a mix of cameras, radar, lidar and whatnot to be reasonably safe. "Autopilot" beats the texting-while-driving teen in accident statistics but unfortunately not (yet) the alert, responsible human...
Not hard to see why the Tesla autopilot failed and why the driver obviously didn't realize the coming obstacle either. Thanks for the upload, great to have such information. The shitty journalists of today seem incapable of providing the facts, they only spread opinions.
Good to know this. What if the driver was on the left most lane? He works at Apple so probably on the left lane. Even if he was on the same lane as you are and autopilot got confused, then he was probaly inbetween lanes for sometime before autopilot alerted him. That mean he has more thna 5 seconds to react.
I think he was in the left lane - and i think the autopilot followed concrete/asphalt line as the video suggests, but in the left lane, the deviation from the white line is actually much much closer to the gore point, meaning he had much less time than 5 seconds.
Cody Trigg - Agreed. Concrete/asphalt line is probably providing the most contrasting and consistent edge. Most of the painted lines are inconsistent early on. Worse, the yellow line seems to disappear momentarily about the time the seam gets close to it. About this time, the right line provides a more convincing delineation of the right side of the "lane" and on up into the barrier. For a place that doesn't have to worry about snow plowing, frost heaving, and everything other than traffic destroying the roads, you'd think they could do a better job of painting lines (including cross hatching in between diverging lines) and maybe set out some crash barrels as a temporary fix until they get a replacement crush barrier.
Nice explanation. How do people fix this?
and another reason is the bumper was brocken than it's usual, as a car crash it on 12/3/2018.
Wouldn't the radar pick the median up?
Radar cannot detect fixed objects, in general. Radar only measures the difference in velocity between the car and the "thing" that is reflecting. For those "things," the radar can estimate the distance away, too. There are "things" all over the place that are reflecting back radar waves, and there's no way to tell them apart from the background (e.g., roadway). So basically radar removes anything that has a velocity that is the same as the background and looks at things that are moving either away from or toward the car (relative to the background). This is why radar-based TACC systems can pick up stopped cars that weren't previously being tracked (because they were seen moving before). It is also why radar-based cars will happily drive into another stopped car in your driveway or a wall or a median or a barrier. Detecting features that are obstacles requires vision (cameras and/or LIDAR), and the vision needs to be VERY confident that it is really seeing something before taking severe action to stop or veer. Vision is hard. Vision is used in Tesla AP in only very crude manner today; it only recognizes certain things like car/truck rear-ends, etc. They most likely then try to correlate that with radar image to confirm that a true obstacle is present, even if it isn't moving. That's why AP has recently started getting better at detecting stopped, previously-untracked cars (about 95% reliable, in my experience). Tesla's radar processing is extremely good, given the limits of the technology, but it is nowhere near able to detect obstacles, in general.
Thanks for the explanation,
Good catch! Those pavement marks have probably messed up the Autopilot.
Great video. Still, why the autopilot doesn't see an obstacle on the (fake) lane and hit the brakes?
Exactly. If there was a LIDAR on the car, it might have been able to detect an obstacle.
This is really a bad design, the space between the lines should be shaded.
Exactly, I just wonder whos' responsibility for this?
drive around in california. Most dividers aren't shaded in the middle. This isn't Europe.
I did. Didn't notice that TBH. That this isn't Europe isn't the best argument ever.
All it takes is money, but the Democrats that control all branches of government in California have diverted highway maintenance funding that largely comes out of fuel taxes into other projects, like the High Speed Train to Nowhere and social programs for illegal aliens.
Milosz Ostrow So you want the state to use tax dollars to run around with a bucket of paint because a single player in a nascent technology builds a car with vision problems... something to benefit a tiny % of the driving population, rather than regulate that manufacturer to build a better car Get real.... that sounds like corporate (in the singular) welfare to me
Caltrans needs to fix the crash barrier and repaint the lines very clear.
I hate concrete highways so much. Hard to see even as a person.
looks fine to me...?
I've been saying the same things since the day of the crash.