I agree. I do this when I am nervous, too. However, isn’t there a time limit in all appellate court cases? The time limit might be a factor to a lawyer’s talking speed. For me, someone speaking fast is hard to follow if I am trying to learn something from him. But in a real appellate court, the fast talking lawyer would be addressing judges familiar with the case and all the terms he would use, so I would imagine they are not bothered by the speed. Also, from the appellate court cases I have watched, the judges are not hesitant to stop a lawyer and make him explain.
August text twenty-six of twenty-twenty-third.
ridiculous, irrelevant tiresome speeches!!, nothing theyre spewing is EVIDENCE
He's talking too fast!
I agree. I do this when I am nervous, too. However, isn’t there a time limit in all appellate court cases? The time limit might be a factor to a lawyer’s talking speed. For me, someone speaking fast is hard to follow if I am trying to learn something from him. But in a real appellate court, the fast talking lawyer would be addressing judges familiar with the case and all the terms he would use, so I would imagine they are not bothered by the speed. Also, from the appellate court cases I have watched, the judges are not hesitant to stop a lawyer and make him explain.