Видео

I'd love to see the next video, but cant find it. It certainly *seems* that 1331 gives Fed Distrirct Courts jurisdiction over all (or almost all) Constitutional or USC federal law issues, but it seems that Mottley very much limits the scope of Fed District Court jurisdiction. .... I did find discussion of Mottley in the 2nd half of the 2 week review. ruclips.net/video/f8apDN5rP00/видео.html

Have been making this recipe for more than 50 years and my parents for another 25 years. Thanks for sharing this.

You should define "person" and how a statute would apply to men/women as defendant who have not violated anyones rights or caused injury.

So how did the court assume the power of judicial review without a legislative statute? Seems awfully convenient that the court can assume powers on a whim but when it comes to fulfilling it's constitutional obligations and protecting the rights of the People, suddenly there's strict procedures and stipulations that must be met, which the Constitution makes no mention or implication of. There's a profound difference between interpreting the Constitution and making it up as it pleases the court. This interpretation implies that when the first Federal Courts were created by the Constitution, the courts had absolutely no jurisdiction over anything whatsoever because the Congress established under the US Constitution had not yet convened and passed legislation under the authority of the United States Constitution, which also implies that the entirety of Article VI is a complete nullity without any meaningful purpose. We the People gave the Judiciary life, power, and purpose, not Congress.

where has everyone drawn the conclusion that States have broad subject matter jurisdiction? The same provision if the US Constitution that limits the Federal Judiciary's jurisdiction, Amendment x, also limits the jurisdiction of the States "respectively" and reserves to, for and by the People jurisdiction over that which has not been explicitly delegated to either the Federal or their respective State governments. Neither the Federal government, nor State government. have the power to decide which of the People's sovereign powers must be delegated to government and which may be retained by the People. In so doing, a State ceases to be a Republic.

Excellent

These videos are so helpful! Wish you had them on every subject in Civ Pro. Thank you!

Thank you! solidified my understanding!

Smart women is hard to fine are you married

What if the person move every two year’s

I like you video but you need to talk faster

or You all can grow up and act as Man. Who does not require another Man to tell him what his constitution should be, there for maintaining Man's Authority over Government, Effectively establishing original God Given Freedom and eliminating ALL jurismydicktion crap all together.

I am the daughter of Frank Pope who died in May. Today he would of been 94.

Wow, I've been hoping to find one of the Popes making one of the family recipes. This is a dream come true!

Prof. WickMoore is the MVP of CA Bar Prep this year. Thank you!!!

The "act" or acting of a fairy tale character called a "defendant". I really don't do acting nor am I a fairy tale character. 👈👀🧐 Nor do I understand the jurisdiction and or authority of the corporate special maritime jurisdiction because I am a natural living man from the texas republic with un-a-lien-able rights as protected by the Constitution for the united States.

put the speed on 1.25 - 1.50 thank me later

And where did the $70,000 amount come from? And do you believe that it is usurping the 7th amendment of the constitution?

Hello! Can a defendant request a jury trial in this 28 USC 1441 removal in a fed court? Thank you!

Thank you so so so much. Super helpful!!!!!

Devices/methodologies/techniques/tools for Discovery: DISCOVERY 1. Request for Documents 2. Request for Admissions 3. Depositions 4. Written Interrogatories 5. Examinations by Expert Witness (ie. by Medical Examiner)

Thank you, this video has been extremely helpful

What is the difference between a defendant being regarded as an "Individual" and "en Propria Persona?"

Most Judges speak in this professional manner. They do not speak like Presiding Judge Wynn Carvill and his Clerk Yolanda Estrada's speaks. I have every right to question the competency of these People who allowed Trespassers to enter my home and tried to put a wrong name on my home in a wrong jurisdiction Court. This is the kinds of questions the Judges asks. They make sure we are where we are supposed to be. They do not hold us in limbo or play with our lives after we won our case by complying to another jurisdiction that had our case. The Judge does nkt let the oppising side that did not comply use their wrong jurisdiction Court as proof that they receive an unlawful eviction and that eviction is upheld by the original jurisdiction. The opposing side cannot use anything from the wrong jurisdiction Court to receive any kinds of justices from the original jurisdiction. This case was not complex. It was corrupted and intentional fraud. The Judge do not accept the opposing side to come to their jurisdiction because they did not comply to the first jurisdiction. The Renee C. Davidson Court actions committed for prosecution does not start ordering me around and slandering my name because they wronged my Family and I without authority and jurisdiction. A dismissal was to be granted in the wrong jurisdiction Court. Instead these annoying petty People kept playing with my life over and over again. The damages that their actions caused is enough for them to be permanently removed from this field. No excuses.

I cant listen to this she is too low and boring extremely boring Lord have mercy on her students

Loved the tv show from the '50's. (What was that Chopin piece they used as the theme song?)

Excellent teaching style. Great content.

Have to comply...? Is that not a contract forced under duress? RESPECT THE RULE OF LAW OR GO TO HELL !!

If a man fails to respond it's because he does not consent or want to enter into contract with the for profit foreign courts that lack the jurisdiction required to enter into contract with innocent men and women!

Corrupt corporate criminals for profit courts benifiting off the pain and suffering of human beings.... creating fraudulent jurisdiction over intelligent human beings that are awake and aware of just how evil and corrupt the foriegn crown corporations truly are! All personal corporate entities have been created under duress without a meeting of the minds or consent making all corporate NAMES under contract null and void... Now why not understand and respect the laws of contract and stop harassing innocent men and women who don't want to act in your for profit courts as there's a conflict of interest as you continue to remove the integrity of a once equal and just hearing under the rule of law not under the interest of corporate profits so practice the law respect inalienable rights of non consent.... All you corrupt criminals need a hole in the head ... If a man or women does not consent they do not consent ENOUGH SAID... Yet you don't wish to respect the rule law or inherent human rights.... NOW GO FUCKING DIE ... !!

great job!

What a treasure! Pope's Caesar Salad has been a family favorite for decades and by which all others are compared!

So I'm guessing that she's trying to tell us the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion supersedes the Constitution of America? In that case, whats the point of having or abiding by the Constitution

Interesting .........

Hi, I am from Croatia and I'm doing my thesis which is forum non conveniens and this REALLY helps to understand it for someone who comes from civil-law country! Thank you !!

She states the due process PART of it come on professor you can do better than I hope

Notice how she mentions the constitution and due process

The statute applies becuase the statute said so right YOU are on your oath today right professor can you honestly answer THAT

Your still just talking crazy please see mark Stevens of the NOSTATE PROJECT this lady is a psychopath

The insurance company is having a lawsuit brought to them by another company no wonder the supreme court ruled as it did there is no personal jurisdiction for a corporation your still just talking crazy lol but good try

Your still saying the statute applies becuase the statute says so coming back to a contract entered into by physicality or by any other means EXEPT. A contract without a signiture or consent which proves your a psychopath

You can talk all you want personal service or not and it is not constitutionally sufficiant as you said they will say it is until your broke and in jail fact is whatever they serve on you your name will still be in all capitals which by thier own legal definitions denotes a corporation and the element itself will never be submitted to court in a LAWFULL manner such as the evidence of having your signiture on constitution or a signiture under thier laws they call statutes thier claim that they apply becuase you are physically here still require evidence of a contract entered into vis a vis poof your ours becuase you have a domicile on a peice of land we call the STATE of SO AND SO thus this proves thier psychopathy is seeing something that is not really there POOF your gone

Please please make it louder please.

Should not jurisdiction be a widely discussed topic to the people? And often?

Thank you Prof. Moore. Can you do an update video? Although it really hasn't changed, an update would keep the subject going. Unfortunately, this isn't taught to the masses, but is nonetheless priceless. Thank you.

I live in Wa state in March my estranged wife served me with a restraining order in Utah and the alleged event happened in Washington yet went to court in Utah and now have a 2 year order against me

I live in Wa state in March my estranged wife served me with a restraining order in Utah and the alleged event happened in Washington yet went to court in Utah and now have a 2 year order against me

you provide very, very easy instructions, I wish you were my professor. Thank you.

I think you could help your students understand better if you livened this up a bit. Sure, this isn't the most fun area of study, but your voice is monotone, slow, and putting me to sleep. Also, examples, examples, examples! It's hard for students, or anyone, to fully grasp abstract concepts without concrete application. Just a suggestion, of course...

This is a very well made video, thanks for posting it on youtube