Видео

Time Pressure 🙂‍↕️

Latest

Pragg won pawn ending was awesome

🫠😭

Fr 🥹

Felt bad, Danya is so hard on himself 😢

Sure, why not

@@Chesshomie24 🤝

​@@Chesshomie24me 2😭

@@arshdeepkaur5174 🫂

Ya it could had been a possibility

@@Chesshomie24 what do you mean "possibility".. it's the best move for him for sure... He can't make win anyway, and this is the quickest way for draw... But whatever.. maby that is the reason of Magnus's smile...

​@@user-uj2zi3ky9b You're absolutely wrong. After Rxh6 (pawn is on h6 not h3) Kg5!, Rxh5 Kxh5! And basic winning endgame. The easiest way to lose noob

​@@pitergames9228true

He just can't digest a lose 🙂‍↕️

he does think too much of himself, firouzja humbled him but it just made hiknak more salty

Yup

Kaniechna 👌

😂

Nice 😂😂

@@Arpitshindeyy you clearly have studied very little, belonging to that generation that... before internet chess didnt exist. Study history of the game, there are lots of books and discover how phenomenal were players like Blackburne, Rubinstein, Capablanca, Smyslov, Keres, Karpov and Kramnik when there is an endgame to win.

His opponent resigned.

+1 position after opening

2 pawns

These endgames r usually tricky and usually a bit drawish 2 vs 3 pawn if one pawn got exchanged Magnus end up with one pawn and keymer will sac his knight for the pawn so that's why the move is kind of brilliant and deep

😂🤣

You should be more careful before saying something like this. You can at least watch it again before writing. Because kramnik just takes it back before Hikaru could even press the clock. So we don't know if he was going to promote or press the clock since kramnik just made his move before it was his turn

​@@kdayahyayour answer doesnt make sense. Doesnt matter how fast kramnik responded, hikaru would have to pick up a piece like queen, knight etc. Before making the move. Therefore it is technically an illegal position, but maybe there were specific regulations in this tournament, that we dont know but we do know that pawns on 1st or 8th rank are illegal.

​@@Pascal-md9osthe answer make a lot of sense because it is kramnik who did not let him finish his move, and that is illegal as well. the position is such that Hikaru did not complain because not recapturing the promoted piece, regardless of which piece it is, would be losing for kramnik. nakamura understands that and did not complain.

Как сыграли?

Like, you'd just have to. It's a bad sign

He ain't lucky If u r lucky enough it's quite tough to even win a local tournament Winning a world championship Is not all by luck

@Chesshomie24 Thinking that luck is not involved in ANY multi-game tournament shows you've never competed before. He wouldn't even have been there if not for Magnus being Magnus and thumbing his nose to FIDE. He just had a very fortunate, LUCKY, run.

@@basedbear1605I’d disagree, some people play good some days and bad others. Also I’m not saying that I disagree that some games aren’t lucky (in the fact that the opponent messes up) but you simply saying he got lucky shows how little you value chess and the work people put into it. Stop trying to devalue his work. Man worked for the title. Just because he loses some more games after doesn’t mean he’s bad. No one wins on luck alone in this game. Not at this level.

@@drsands2417 You can disagree with facts all you want. Plain and simple truth is he was lucky as Hell to even be there because Magnus gave up his rightful spot. That was LUCK, plain and simple. He did not deserve to be there, as it should have been Ian and Magnus. Every tournament of every game or sport requires luck to win. Ding was super lucky in the last game that Ian made some really bad moves. Watch analysis of the match, Ian was favored heavily to win until the end where he messed up. Stating the truth, that someone was lucky, doesn't diminish his skill. He is a top 10 player in the world, and WAS consistently top 5 for years. His ability is not questionable. However, denying he was lucky to even be there is ludicrous.

@@basedbear1605I said I don’t disagree that luck has nothing to do with it…. Also I see you edited your first response to have a Magnus Carlson subject so you could relate to it in your response to me…. Anyways I was just stating that I it looked to me as if you didn’t respect the work that he put into it by simply calling him “lucky”. But now however you have given context to what EXACTLY you meant by that. I think we can both agree that he may have gotten lucky with some of the last games, I’m just saying that I can still respect his title and work even if your saying it’s luck (heck as you said it yourself the game does have some luck [mainly the opportunity of opponents screwing up]). In conclusion, thanks for clarifying what you meant by “lucky”. Just want to ask a question I guess, do you agree that he is still very skilled and even tho he may have gotten that title a little luckier then others that he still deserves it? Or no?