Видео

Brilliant approach in explaining these concepts. I’ve grappled with them for the past weeks and I did not get anywhere. Thank you so much Dr Hu. It now makes sense 😅

Thank you so much Dr Hu for a very informative session/lesson on these terms. I'm a new researcher and having to write a Literature Review of 10,000 words but trying to get my head around the terminology and their meanings - Ontology, Epistemology, Methodology and Methods. I really appreciate your examples and the clarity of explaining the meanings of each word and its application. Blessings

how can I access the form

Thank you Dr. Hu for the presentation. I now have a better understanding of these key concepts.

Thank you so much Dr. Hu for this simplified high level tutorial that on research philosophy. much appreciated. Kindly share your email address.

Highly appreciated

thank you doctor. this really helped build my concepts. it was really hard to grasp the essence of it but your video has helped alot. what i learned, if im not wrong is that Ontology is what we take as reality so we took pyramid as the reality, the epistemology is how do we know that the pyramid is the reality and then comes the methods to know prove the pyramid as a reality in which the broader methods were quantitative and qualitative from methodology in which for the sake of the comment ill take qualitative and take surveys and ask people of what they think of it where surveys are a method. please correct me if im wrong or need some more guidance in the comments. btw thanks again doc.

Though the path is ontology, however, some methods require and demands Epestimology first, then ontology.

Thank you very much Dr.Hu for considering different style of learning and for patiently explaining the most complex theory. Your style of teaching using visuals are very helpful. The most effective style of teaching that makes me understand and remember for a very long time is through visuals. I REALLY ENJOY LEARNING THIS RESEARCH TERMINOLOGY. Thank you very much. keep doing what you do best.

Thank you for the lecture.

Thank you.

Thank you for the clarfiications.

Thank you so much.

Very helpful. Thank you for uploading this to RUclips.

Thank you Dr. This has really been helful

i have been spent half a day watching videos' of ontology and epistemology and non- of them made sense, even went to the extent of asking chat gpt " explain epistemology like am 5" and in just a mater of 20 Min you just perfectly explained what took me a whole day to get.

It's so hard to listen to you.

Good examples and explanations. Her command of english does interrupt the flow of her presentation

Simple.. yet deep and exact explanations....👍

I am very glad to inform you that my confusion about those concepts is cleared after watching your video. Thank you so much. 😇

Thank you so much for the video! Trying to read the text book, I was completely lost. Your beautiful presentation of the concepts made things much clearer. I keep thinking how wonderful of a social service RUclips educators are doing for the world. Thank you! ❤

very helpful :) thank you !

thank you, brilliant video !

Dr. Hu, I am a graduate student studying at Arizona State University in the field of curriculum and instruction. I came across your video as part of the course I am taking on research and evaluation in education. Your video has been very helpful to me as a supplementary source of information and explanation between the relationships and philosophy of research. I am interested to know if you have any insight as to the differences between research and evaluation, something that has come up as a topic of discussion in my course. I would love to hear from you as to your thoughts. Thank you! Cala Courtner

Thanks mam

Good content mam

Respect from pakistan

Thanks mam

Thanks mam

In terms of research philosophies, I tend towards "Integrative Constructivism" based on a "Holistic Psychology" (see below) perspective. Integrative constructivism posits that there is an absolute reality that encompasses and gives rise to a multitude of apparent realities. These apparent realities are subjective and relative, shaped by personal and social factors, and are not separate from the absolute reality but emerge as manifestations within it. The epistemology of the integrative constructivism perspective posits that conventional knowledge is inherently subjective, individually and socially constructed, contextual, biased in its selective emphasis. From my understanding, non-dualistic wisdom traditions such as Advaita Vedanta and Dzogchen/Zen Buddhism suggest that "absolute knowledge" is an intuitive, direct realization of the true nature of reality as an undifferentiated, non-conceptual whole, beyond human articulation. While we cannot know the absolute reality as an "entity," we can consciously experience its property of wholeness. The multitude of "apparent realities" arise as manifestations within the absolute reality, and though they may appear distinct and separate, they are ultimately expressions of the unified and indivisible reality. Integrative constructivism acknowledges that these apparent realities (diverse appearances) are shaped by personal and social factors, but also emphasizes their interconnected nature as part of a larger, absolute reality. ---- The following is an old handout that my father, a retired educational psychologist, would give to his students in his "Holistic Psychology" high school course: Holistic Psychology Class Notes ('98-'99) A. Absolute Reality An assumed ultimate state of the universe/creation, existing unconditionally, independent of a perceiver/experiencer. It is thought to be holistic and ineffable and so, by nature, cannot be directly known or understood in an intellectual or conceptual sense. Our best guess as to its physical manifestation is that it is a dynamic, integrated whole, endlessly changing, evolving, creating and extending; made up of overlapping and interacting systems and subsystems; a "seamless sea" of energy and matter in interchanging manifestations in time and space, with nothing existing independently of anything else. What lies beyond/beneath/behind the physical world of energy, matter, space and time is more controversial. The idea of an ultimate infinite eternal absolute from which, or within which, all else arises has, in various cultures, been referred to with such terms as God/Goddess, Great Spirit, Source, Purusha and Tao. B. Apparent Realities (Virtual/Relative Realities) Perceived or perceptual "realities", mentally constructed by, and existing only relative to an experiencer. They are conditional, depending on a perceiver's "point of view" in time and space. This is the experiential world of our mind/senses/thoughts and is the exclusive realm of all sensation, perception, cognition, imagery, and feelings - e.g., all sounds, colours, tastes and smells, as well as emotions, concepts, and seemingly separate forms (including self-image/concept), are created in and exist only within the mind of the experiencer/creator. These are virtual realities in that they seem real to the experiencer (have the subjective power of reality) but are not truly real in the ordinary sense of the word. 1. Individual (private, separate, personal) "reality": A unique and endlessly changing individual mental construction/creation, manifesting in the display of conscious awareness through an interaction of memory and imagination, often combined with current data/information/sensory (and perhaps extra-sensory?) input in digital form. It is determined by genetic/inherited neuropsychological and sensory/perceptual/cognitive capacities and dispositions (i.e., hardware), interacting with experientially acquired psychological and physical factors (e.g., learning and adaptation, software and hardware), and ongoing environmental stimuli and conditions. Each individual's unique sense of reality is similar to and different from that of others according to the relative similarities and differences in their particular genetic makeup and environmental experience. (Note that this applies to both within and between species.) Such subjective personal phenomena may be experienced as ordinary waking reality, illusions, hallucinations, dreams, delusions, or some combination thereof (all of which occur on a continuum). 2. Social (public, conventional) "reality": A group or social construction/creation. The shared, agreed upon, common, overlapping elements and aspects of the individual personal virtual realities of the group members. This is what is typically called "reality' in common language usage - i.e., what is considered real within a particular society or cultural context - yet it includes all recognized and unrecognized myths and belief systems, as well as scientific "facts" of the culture, whether valid or not (e.g., the flat Earth was a popular common element there for a few thousand years). The social reality evolves constantly with the changing thought patterns of the group members and can be experienced by the individuals only as an aspect of their own personal, subjective virtual reality - no independent existence. All communication simply bridges the gap between, and increases the common elements of, the communicators' individual separate realities, thereby enhancing and corroborating the subjective experience of a seemingly external social reality.

Love your instructional style. Where do you teach? What are your thoughts on the efforts to standardize upper/foundational ontologies (e.g., Basic Formal Ontology) to be used across all domains. Do these ontologies risk reinforcing positivism/realism by suggesting there is a single, objective reality upon which a universally accepted ontology framework can be based? Could you please provide a recommended reading list of your favorite books on the subject of research philosophy? I am interested in how the conceptual frameworks of research philosophy, including ontology, epistemology, methodology, and method, as well as related knowledge organization systems, can be applied to curriculum design in any domain - from elementary school to post-secondary. It seems to me that these fundamental "big ideas", that underly any domain of knowledge, provides a holistic perspective that could help teachers and students with critical analysis and synthesis.

Your instructional approach is very refreshing! You have a talent for presenting theoretical subjects in a personally relatable and easily understandable way.

obligations we are expected to fulfill? prohibitions we are required to respect? and ideals we are encouraged to meet. Discuss wethwir these are ethical in nature or not? pkisagut po

Α ρε σακονιδη 🤡

Is there a difference between post-positivism and interpretivism, or are they the same? because I see that both of them reject the positivism.

Hi

Thank you so much dor this video

Gratitude to u❤️ It is very helpful for me 🧡

Extremely helpful. Thank you so much.

Superb exercise. Would you kindly share the link of the questionnaire? I believe I am an interpretivist but would like to check through your amazing tool.

Thank you Dr.Hu! Virtual learner like me can benefit so much! 谢谢老师

hello , I want to ask you which research assumption should you adopt.

Very clear and informative. You are for sure a good teacher. an excellent presentation. Thanks

Dr Hu, you are the most incredible teacher! Thank you! I find myself smiling as if you were sitting beside me teaching me haha

Simply amazing. The content delivery, examples and exercises helped me narrow down and justify my research philosophy and its relevance to my research question. Thank You

Thanks, Dr. Hu for your clear approach including visuals and real-life examples

I must say you are really good at explaining! The different use of teaching methods depending on the students' learning styles, the patience and the excellent use of terminology and the flow of information! i just love everything about what u did and if i ever were to teach i aspire to be like you! Thank you for your efforts

this helped me alot...... iam sooo grateful dr.Hu .

講解得很好 謝謝

Great job