Видео

@@derfinsniter5185 It was about Passover

@@GloriaLeese-j1n Amen! Praise the Lord 🙏🏻

@@abrahamskaria4645 Hallelujah B'shem Yeshua HaMashiach! 🙌🏻

@meandmecash Yes Amen. Thank you and every blessing to you 🙏🏻

@Vadlife Thanks bro 🙏🏻

Amen! It was a great day!

@CJEtheINFJ Thank you very much. Glad you enjoyed this teaching. Every blessing to you 🙏🏻

Yes we go and preach the Gospel to the lost! Sharing the good news of Jesus Christ! God bless you!

@@vikakovachyk Thank you very much for your support. Blessings to you 🙏🏻

Thank you brother for commenting! God bless you!

God bless you!

Thank you, every blessing to you too 🙏🏻

Thank you. Every blessing to you 🙏🏻

Yes Hallelujah Praise the Lord 🙌🏻

Amen God bless you 🙏🏻

Thank you brother!

Thank you 🙌

Thank you for being part of our family! We welcome all to join us this Sunday at the Brotherhood in Clacton on Sea at 3:30pm!

Thank you comment brother!

Amen!

God bless you too!

Amen! God bless you!

@@highpriestofseti You are the definitive proof that God exists. Creation is evidence of a creator!

@@BreadofLifeCommunity we are not created, we evolved!!

@highpriestofseti Rubbish! Evolution is the dumbest theory of all time with not a shred of evidence. And even if we did evolve, whatever we evolved from had to come from somewhere. Matter cannot create itself. Life cannot create itself!

@@BreadofLifeCommunity Oh wow, guess you never even finished kindergarten, do some research: 1. Evidence for Evolution Evolution is one of the most well-supported theories in science, backed by a wide array of evidence from multiple fields: Fossil Record: The fossil record provides a chronological account of the changes in species over time. Transitional fossils, like Tiktaalik (between fish and amphibians) or Archaeopteryx (between reptiles and birds), demonstrate the gradual evolution of species. Genetics: The discovery of DNA has provided overwhelming evidence for common ancestry. All living organisms share a universal genetic code. The similarities in DNA sequences between humans and other primates (e.g., humans share over 98% of their DNA with chimpanzees) confirm evolutionary relationships. Comparative Anatomy: Structures like the forelimbs of whales, bats, humans, and birds have different functions but share a common bone structure, showing that they evolved from a common ancestor. Observed Evolution: Evolution isn't just a historical process. It’s observable today. For example, bacteria evolve resistance to antibiotics through natural selection. Similarly, the diversity of dog breeds was achieved through artificial selection, a form of guided evolution. 2. Matter and the Origin of Life The claim that "matter cannot create itself" and "life cannot create itself" raises valid philosophical and scientific questions, but evolution doesn't claim to explain the origin of matter or life itself. Evolution explains the diversity of life once life already exists. The origin of life (abiogenesis) and the origin of the universe (cosmology) are separate scientific fields, with research ongoing in both areas. For the origin of the universe: Big Bang Theory: Scientific consensus holds that the universe began around 13.8 billion years ago from an extremely dense and hot state. This theory is supported by evidence such as the cosmic microwave background radiation and the redshift of distant galaxies. Quantum Mechanics: In quantum physics, particles can spontaneously appear and disappear in a vacuum due to fluctuations. This suggests that under the right conditions, the universe’s "matter" could have arisen from a quantum fluctuation. For the origin of life: Abiogenesis: While still a hypothesis, abiogenesis suggests that life could have arisen from non-life through natural processes. Laboratory experiments (e.g., the Miller-Urey experiment) have shown that organic molecules (the building blocks of life) can form from inorganic compounds under the right conditions. More recent research explores how RNA molecules, capable of self-replication, may have been the first step towards life. 3. Life Cannot Create Itself? It's important to clarify that life today doesn't "create itself" from scratch. Evolution describes how life changes and diversifies, not how it starts. The origin of life likely involved simple chemical reactions that became increasingly complex over millions of years, leading to self-replicating molecules and eventually cellular life. 4. Misconception about Evolution and Religion It’s also worth mentioning that evolution does not inherently contradict religious beliefs. Many religious groups accept evolution as a scientific explanation of biodiversity. The Catholic Church, for example, acknowledges evolution as compatible with faith, considering it a means by which God could have created life. Conclusion Evolution is supported by substantial evidence across several scientific disciplines. The origin of matter and life are questions that fall under cosmology and abiogenesis, not evolution itself. Current scientific models explain how life might have arisen naturally, and research continues in these areas. Thus, the claim that evolution lacks evidence or is the "dumbest theory" misrepresents the overwhelming scientific support behind it.

When you look at a building, you know a builder created it. When you see a painting, you know a painter crafted it. It’s common sense to recognise that design comes from a designer. Now, regarding religion, it’s easy to dismiss something without understanding it, but isn’t it worth asking what you believe in? What are the reasons behind your perspective, and what evidence supports your views? It’s important to have a dialogue, not just about religion, but about where we think everything comes from. After all, if there’s a design, doesn’t that imply a designer?

@@BreadofLifeCommunity When I look at a building I know there is a builder because I see the construction materials, the plans, the labor, the failures/successes/inadequacies', etc etc. When I watch rain falling or the 'beauty' of a setting sun, I understand that it is ME who is imposing a value judgement to it that doesn't exist outside of my perception of the event. Ice crystals ( or the whole of the Cosmos for that matter ) form because of physical processes, and do not require the guiding hand of a creator myth. This is the philosophical fallacy of Affirming the Consequent. Something like "if X is true than Z must be true." This fails because there is no evidence to verify/prove Z or the connection between them. Or "...if humans build things then everything must, in some fashion or other, also be built." This is wrong. Let me switch gears and ask you a question about your god. If, as Christians/muslims/Jews insist, god is Omni-Omni ( all knowing, all powerful and eternal ) then how do you explain Genesis 6:6??? Either the description of god in the bible is dead wrong, or god is nothing but an ancient fantasy. HOW is it possible for an Omni-Omni being to be surprised by the results of his own creation? It's absolutely dishonest gibberish! Again, my biggest problem with any of the religious movements is that they teach us, then encourage and reward us for believing stories with ZERO evidence to buttress them. Once you teach people to ignore reality, and not worry that there is ZERO evidence for a given claim, you have a much, much easier time getting them to do it again and agian. This is useful for grifters and charlatans who benefit from the spread of other, smaller lies like voter fraud or "They're eating the dogs! They're eating the cats!" Just say it and they will believe you.....!!! Thank you for the discussion though.

@@BreadofLifeCommunity When I look at a building I know there is a builder because I see the construction materials, the plans, the labor, the failures/successes/inadequacies', etc etc. When I watch rain falling or the 'beauty' of a setting sun, I understand that it is ME who is imposing a value judgement to it that doesn't exist outside of my perception of the event. Ice crystals ( or the whole of the Cosmos for that matter ) form because of physical processes, and do not require the guiding hand of a creator myth. This is the philosophical fallacy of Affirming the Consequent. Something like "if X is true than Z must be true." This fails because there is no evidence to verify/prove Z or the connection between them. Or "...if humans build things then everything must, in some fashion or other, also be built." This is wrong. Let me switch gears and ask you a question about your god. If, as Christians/muslims/Jews insist, god is Omni-Omni ( all knowing, all powerful and eternal ) then how do you explain Genesis 6:6??? Either the description of god in the bible is dead wrong, or god is nothing but an ancient fantasy. HOW is it possible for an Omni-Omni being to be surprised by the results of his own creation? It's absolutely dishonest gibberish! Again, my biggest problem with any of the religious movements is that they teach us, then encourage and reward us for believing stories with ZERO evidence to buttress them. Once you teach people to ignore reality, and not worry that there is ZERO evidence for a given claim, you have a much, much easier time getting them to do it again and agian. This is useful for grifters and charlatans who benefit from the spread of other, smaller lies like voter fraud or "They're eating the dogs! They're eating the cats!" Just say it and they will believe you.....!!! Thank you for the discussion though.

@@BreadofLifeCommunity How is it possible that my responses to you are not getting posted!? It's almost as though you'd rather they didn't exist or get read by others. I'll waiting and see if they appear later, or maybe I'll post them again tomorrow...

@@seanmolloy9297 Your responses can be seen!

Thank you for commenting! ❤️

@@kelelithabane2849 Yes Praise the Lord 🙌🏻

@allpraisestothemosthigh4671 He gave us direct access to Him but only through Christ.

@@BreadofLifeCommunity that doesn't make sense. If you have direct access, you don't need someone in between. You guys are confused. Jesus isn't necessary to pray to the Most High God. He said so in many places in the old testament. Just pray, repent and keep his statutes, laws and commandments. That is all the Most High God needs from us.

@allpraisestothemosthigh4671 Isaiah 59:2, "Your iniquities have separated you from your God, so that He will not hear." This is why we need Jesus to reconcile us to God.

@@BreadofLifeCommunity 16Thou shalt know that I the LORD am thy Saviour and thy Redeemer, the mighty One of Jacob. Isaiah 60:16. Isaiah 43:3 3For I am the LORD thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour. 11I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour. Isaiah 44:6 6Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God. I DON'T SEE JESUS BEING NEEDED HERE. THE MOST HIGH GOD IS MY SAVIOUR.

@allpraisestothemosthigh4671 At the time Isaiah was written, the mediator between man and God was the high priest. When you had to come to the temple to worship God, you had to offer a sacrifice through the high priest. The book of Hebrews tells us that Jesus has become the great High Priest after the order of Melchizedek, and He offered Himself as a sacrifice for sins, once and for all time.

God bless you!

We will!

Amen!

God bless you!

@@KAMI_1911 Jesus Himself claimed to be God, which the rest of scripture confirms.

@@BreadofLifeCommunity where? Which chapter?

@@KAMI_1911 John 1:1

@@BreadofLifeCommunity for example, if you take a book about politics and take a line where it said "when h!tler was just a baby, h!tler was a good person" would you just take the last part and say he was a good person? No. You have to start from the beginning. You just say john 1:1. You have to read the whole chapter or even better if you read the whole bible. Jesus never claimed to be God you will see if you actually read the bible

@KAMI_1911 You must be reading a different Bible then. He claimed this many times. Why do you think the Pharisees were about to stone Him? Look at John 10:33, "The Jews answered Him, saying, “For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.” They wouldn't have accused Him of blasphemy and tried to stone Him if He hadn't have claimed to be God. Look at the verse, this is exactly what they accused Him of.

@@sylvestercrowley It's between you and God.

@@BreadofLifeCommunity no it's the Time in between meals you humorless twat. It's literally the space of time between eating

@@alexross2671 You will find Him in the Holy scriptures.

Amen!

@@GuiMMA_MMA Every blessing to you too 🙏🏻

So true! Amen!

@@DaveD-w3f Thank you very much. Unfortunately most churches refuse to do this, but we are committed to spreading the Gospel 🙏🏻

We live in end times but God will find away 🙏

My pleasure!

Amen! Thank you for commenting!

@@jamesspence5492 Most Bible-believing Christians would have done!

@@BreadofLifeCommunity so im right

@@jamesspence5492 Do you have a point?

@@BreadofLifeCommunity stupid is as stupid does i guess, be well.

@@LowCostVideo Yes indeed. God bless you 🙏🏻

Amen!