Видео

Zionism and Catholicism are mutually exclusion-and it is a dead issue long before discussions about Judeo-Masonic influences, the machinations of Perfidious Albion, Zionist Terrorism, and injustice to the Palestinian people are reached-oh, we should go there-HARD--but that's just adding more information. So called Christian Zionism is a wretched Protestant heresy and blasphemy-no surprise there.

@@RobertPentangelo Finally, someone with understanding.

Exactly Roman Catholics, popes included all through history have hated the Jews, I'm not surprised by his comments

"You're hilarious" is not a counterpoint, it's a deflection.

@@ImpeccableR6 It is hilarious trying to fight against God. God will always win

@@ImpeccableR6 point?

@@AndrewMcBride-p5n When did I fight against god? I was simply making a factual statement that saying “You’re hilarious” is not a debatable topic. It’s simply a deflection to avoid a conversation.

@@ImpeccableR6 Saying Judea and Samaria is not part of Israel is false

This is definitely not his day job, but why should he look for something else if it was?

@@ImpeccableR6 I seriously dont know where to begin or can be bothered with this

@@ImpeccableR6 What he is saying is totally false

Israel belongs to God not the Pope who hates the Jews, but Jesus is infinitely more powerful than the pope. God's will, will be done in heaven and on earth no matter what the pope says

To say that the land of Israel belongs to Rome is blasphemy. You can not claim to follow the Lord Jesus Christ and yet trample on His Words and Commands

@@AndrewMcBride-p5n "Rome" is a metonymy for the Church of Rome and the Apostolic See. It is wholesome that God's Church should rule the Holy Land.

@@doctrinaetveritas Not in the Bible. God gave it to the Jews not to be ruled by others. The descendants of Abraham not of Rome

@@doctrinaetveritas The Bible is the final authority in all matters. It does not matter what the pope says he is a man. Jesus is God

he’s discussing it from a Christian theological perspective. In that context, Christians believe the covenant was broken, shifting divine favor. This isn’t a dismissal of Jewish identity or history but a theological argument rooted in Christian beliefs. While you might disagree with the logic, it’s not "moronic"; it’s a doctrinal interpretation that can be debated, but it’s not inherently absurd.

​@ImpeccableR6 god said to Moses I shall never forsake my people, God all knowing knew what would come to pass and still said I shall never forsake my people...therefore the covenant has never been broken

​@@Sir_Galahad777 You're citing God's promise to Moses, which is a strong point from the Jewish perspective. However, Christian theology interprets that the covenant changed with the arrival of Jesus, shifting divine favor and establishing a new covenant. From this viewpoint, the original covenant was conditional, tied to obedience, and was superseded by Christ's fulfillment of the law. This isn’t a denial of God’s eternal commitment to the Jewish people but a theological difference about how that covenant is understood after Christ.

@@ImpeccableR6 Wrong God gave the land of Israel to Abraham, Issac, Jacob and their descendants forever. God does not break His Word or Promises

@@AndrewMcBride-p5n while you're right that God promised the land to Abraham and his descendants, the debate centers on how that promise is interpreted. In Christian theology, the arrival of Jesus is seen as fulfilling and transforming the old covenant. It's not about God breaking promises, but rather about a theological shift. The debate isn’t whether God’s promise was made, but how that promise is understood in light of Christian doctrine. You’re approaching this from a strictly Jewish perspective

The Jews want the world to accept the OT as establishing their exclusive claim to Palestine and beyond, yet they disdain the NT-no surprise-Christ and the apostles exposte them as they corrupt sepulchres they are.

During the presentation that included the Jewish covenant term, he states that the covenant of the Jewish people was annulled by them when they broke it with God, a Christian theology that is the heart of Christian doctrine. He claims this is the primary reason that allows him to question the modern Jewish possession of the land of Israel, thus he grounds it in a theological argument that is based on Christian doctrine. This is a clear rebuttal, even if one doesn’t agree with it.

This is not an anti-Semitic video, however, a religious and historical debate. It shows the flaws in the Zionist claim to Judea through Christian theology, not racial or ethnic cause. Anti-Semitism is the hatred of Jews as a nation, while in this case, the matter deals with the nature of a covenant. For instance, it's not an attempt at a religious or political point of view and an insult of Jewish identity. However, a criticism is made for the position about the land and religion, not for the Jewish identity.

@@ImpeccableR6 right.....

@@danielhixson3717 ?

@@ImpeccableR6 Judea and Samaria are part of the Holy Land, what are you talking about

@@AndrewMcBride-p5n no one is denying that Judea and Samaria are part of the Holy Land. The debate here isn’t about their geographical importance but the religious and political claims to them. From a Christian theological standpoint, the Jewish covenant was altered with the arrival of Jesus, which challenges the exclusive claim to these lands based on the original covenant. The issue isn’t whether these regions are historically significant-it’s how religious interpretations impact the legitimacy of those claims today. That’s what’s being debated here.

No, Jesus is Lord. That is why I detest Rabbinic Judaism and pray for all its adherents to covert to Christianity.

@@doctrinaetveritas Yes Jesus is Lord and 'King of the Jews' a title He has not abrogated. He returns to the Jews in Israel and rules over the world from Jerusalem. The Jews will (by and large) convert to Jesus not to Catholicism. You need to discover the Jesus of the bible.

@@jamesmg4694 The Church of God is Israel, and the Jews. Modern Rabbinic Jews and the Zionist Entity, on the other hand, are referenced in Revelation 3:9

@@doctrinaetveritas The Bible says to love the Jews. They shall prosper that love thee

@@doctrinaetveritas Wrong God said He would bring the Jews back to Israel in the last days, which He has. He promised that the desert would blossom as the rose, it is. The Bible says if you try and harm the Jews you are touching the apple of God's eye. I would not be in your shoes for anything

You got more likes than the video itself lol. Ratio.

Islam is only 1400 years old. Christianity in less than 2000 years old, Judaism is roughly 3600 years old. Islam and Christianity is based of Judaism for only believing in one God and Islam is influenced by and created from christianity and Judaism. And Islam blends Christian and Judaism values in with the tribal culture that was in the Arab world 2000 years ago before Islam and Mohammed was around.

Sorry I miss read what you typed and I half sleep because of looking after my three kids with disabilities and the name Son of Hamas throw me cause I see Hamas has terrorist

I don’t think this video is justifying anything against Palestine, just simply stating what is the basis of fact in what was written by the religion they follow. The identification of ancient Canaanites or Samaritans with modern Palestinians is highly anachronistic and lacks clear historical evidence. The Canaanites were a distinct ancient civilization that existed long before the term "Palestinian" emerged in the 20th century as a modern national identity. Even if I were to assume your claim is true, the Samaritans still exist today as a small religious group in Israel and the West Bank, distinct from the broader Palestinian population. Are they not Palestinian too? There is no biblical or historical basis to suggest that the Canaanites or Samaritans were simply the ancient "Palestinians" under another name. It's a misrepresentation of both groups.

IF THEY WENT BY A DIFFERENT NAME THEN THEY WEREN'T PALESTINIANS... thay is a stupid assertion ...

@@kramsdrawde8159 Exactly.

There are no crimes of israel on palestinians. Muslims just really dont like jews and all the war and loss is self inflicted by their violence

Palastinians who use islam to justify jihad are not vindicated. The samaritans were people that submitted to islam

I have said nothing wrong. The Rabbinic Jews have no divinely granted entitlement to the Holy Land, if any at all.

My father's entire side of my family are Rabbinic Jews. I don't hate them but I do hope and pray that they see the truth and the falsehood of their religion lest they die and face perdition. My father himself has already converted to Christianity.

@@doctrinaetveritas your ethnic religious background doesn’t change anything. You’re simply claiming something that is wrong and you seem to miss the contradiction in what you’re saying. I will ask you this: Do you believe in God?

@@SCUT_Z0NE Yes, I believe in the Triune God.

@@doctrinaetveritas You’re stating: The Rabbinic Jews etc… So you’re taking a small portion of the descendants of the people that God has taken under his wing and you’re claiming that they are the only ones to represent this population? You’re also claiming God made a mistake seems like you don’t see the flaw in your own argument. God is not a human that makes mistakes and changes his mind…

Tf wtf is your university teaching lol

@@davaasurennyamdavaa7862 I'm still in school and we r following the CBSE curriculum