Видео

xoxo

you meant the buddha's prakrit but i forgive you

@@dr-wz4gf PRAKRIT is a spoken dialect...just like different accent used by normal people in day to day life. Sanskrit is FORMAL language. used by scholars and priests.

@@n_B000 least unhinged response by a sanskrit formalist cleric scholar

It is a bit short-sighted to assume that only Sanskrit has the root words. Like any language, Sanskrit also borrowed roots from other languages.

❤ I would disagree sir, please if time permits look up the book 'an Arctic home for the Vedas' written by a Brahmans son, Indian nationalist in the 19th century it confirms that the original Vedic civilization must have originated in the Arctic circle, Hinduism is a evolution of this original Vedic culture, evidenced further by the oldest R1 DNA being found in Siberia dated to 24,000 BC. Namaste 🙏🥰

@@Watch-r3w You may be disagree,this is your right,but whatever I said is perfectly right.

@@drdheerendrarahi the evidence in the book is overwhelming not only is it written by an Indian nationalist (therefore not racially biased) and a Brahmans son, it has irrefutable evidence from the earliest Vedic texts that show that the astronomy used by them proves the original Vedic civilization had be located at a latitude near the Arctic circle 🙏 please read the book and refute it's evidence until then I do not claim to be correct I am confirming that the evidence is Namaste 🙏

@@Watch-r3w but we preserved that culture. Before evolution of new religions, all were Hindus.

@@drdheerendrarahi Vedic culture predates Hindu culture significantly, Hinduism is an expression of the original Vedic culture. Objectively seen in the Indo-european language group, the earliest of which was the Sanskrit language which evolved into Proto-Slavic, Hindi, Rus, Lithuanian, Etruscan, Hittite then Romanic, Germanic,English etc I have seen many videos on RUclips lately that show similarities between Sanskrit and Slavic languages (almost identical) but also Thai language as well .. this is also shown in the DNA haplogroup R1 where the oldest R1 genetic markers found are from Siberia dated to 24 thousand years ago the cranial shape of the skeleton was of Ulguric-mongoloid admixture!

Ohh, maybe Ivana Kupala?

Это ритуал посвящения в алкоголики😅

What a nutjob

BC kuch bhi😂

😂😂

Sorry, but it obviously originates from name "Roman")))

Even so Roman is derived from the name ROMA whic was the original name of Rome, the wor means Hairy.@@РусланЗаурбеков-з6е

Roman does not appear in Sanskrit alone it is joined with another word. You just got involve in this and you claim to know more than an Aryan who knows his people's history.@@РусланЗаурбеков-з6е

@@VRISOL-pz6gp no. Legend is that RoMulus and ReMus where brothers. Brothers from both parents is GeRManus. So, "ge" at front is meaningles in that form, form of kentum, but in previous, older, satem form could be only - SE (self)! Roma means brothers, cousins, and in Slavic languages is Rod+a (actualy, Rob+a).

@@СашаПетровић-н6х Romulus and Remus were twin brothers. Same as Lava and Kusha. Both were twins too. It is just a rehashing/corrupted version of Ramayana. You read Ramayana and you will be able to draw parallels to Romulus and Remus, their mother Rhea Silvia (who is Sita in Ramayana. Silvia is nothing but goddess of the forest in Latin, and Sita was banished to the forests. why was she banished? due to being declared as guilty by the commoners. Rhea translates to guilty as it comes from "Rea" (from Mens Rea) which means guilt. So Rhea Silvia translates to guilty woman of the forest). Anyways, the connection between Europeans and Indians was through the Vedic connection. Even to this day, Lithuanians who practice the Romuva religion associate themselves as Vedic practitioners (and even invite Hindu Priests to officiate ceremonies). Not to forget that all Indo-European languages have a lot of similarity with Sanskrit because they are part of the same proto group. There is a reason for that and that reason is that the Knowledge of these historical events that occurred in India was transported to Europe through the Middle East and during that process a lot of the Knowledge was either mistranslated or corrupted. Why else would you find, for example, Sanskrit inscriptions in the The Baku Ateshgah in far away Azerbaijan? What was the Religion that was practiced before Armenia became Christian? It was Hinduism!

There is no proff of this theory... It's all made up 😂

​@coginito8365 Idk if this person expressed himself badly, but Slavs where there in the same period 2000BC, alongside invading Aryans which brought sanskrit. Translating that to you, let's say there is 3 groups, one brought the language (Aryans) one were there to be influenced by it (Slavs) and the other were the heirs to the land, Indians. That's migration in a nutshell the theory of total isolation of people is a myth, specially when there is no sea to separate the land.

​​@@chillingcapybara8528Aryan invaded i in Danube region not in India Slavs and Aryans both were enemy ( proto slavs and proto Aryans ) Rigveda mentioned group of people known as srbinda ( which is name of Serbian/ srbenda) they were enemy clan , rigveda mentioned Indra destroyed the superiority of their gods Vala is mentioned foreign god and anti god in rigveda that is destroyed by Indra

​@@chillingcapybara8528vala in rigveda, veles in slavic myth ( god of all slavic people) Who was deafeated by thunder god perun (perun may have come from purendar, another name of Indra , From myth he destroyers of danav -pura , cities of danavas , those who resided in Danu, Danube eastern European region ) hence he known as purendar

​​@@chillingcapybara8528the Croatian term origin from geography of India (, haravati ) As par Hindu scriptures matsya puran the saraswat / haraxvat linage migrated to danu asur ( river ) And settled their One of scriptures also mentioned that Rishi kashyap ( the head of saraswats Hindus , married the danu godess river their offspring later known as danava) And Aryas Had battle with them

div also means bright, amongst other things, it is the profound nature of the 'categories' used in sanskrit which is, to my mind, evidence of its heritage in the indus valley.

Not sure that other dialects come from Macedonian. Perhaps there is an older source we call Old Slavonic

@@lubabosnjak6892 what hasn't been fully realised yet is that before the Greeks turned up at their present location today sometime after the eruption of Santorini volcano, the Macedonian capital city of Hella was the epicenter of the Macedonian world which would have existed for quite some time long before the 1500bce eruption that destroyed the city to get to that level of city building! And a nation of people who will go on to conquer the known world would have to have a good and well thought out language which is supported by an advanced alphabet of which there are two, the modern (in its day) koine alphabet and the Macedonian Sanskrit which predates it! The same two alphabets used on the Rosetta Stone who's history itself is very telling. If you dig into the history of the Rosetta Stone, you will find that none of the 3 inscriptions carved into the stone during the rule of the Egyptian dynasty by the Macedonian Cleopatra and Ptolemy which were placed there by Alexander The Great, no one could read what was on the stone when it was found by Napoleon and later by the British who took it from the French. History tells us that both British and French linguistic experts worked on trying to decipher what was on the stone, they could see that it contains Egyptian hieroglyphics which was not known how to read it, the middle text was at the time suspected of being Egyptian demotic but long forgotten, but the text along the bottom was somewhat familiar, it had been seen on the ancient ruins in the then Greece, but no one in Greece could read it! So the British and French linguistic experts wrapped the koine alphabet around the greek spoken language which is why the Greeks are using a Slavic alphabet, there is no previous alphabet that the Greeks derived their current alphabet from, it just magically appeared and no one seems to have questioned this problem! But you are here for the Macedonian Sanskrit... When being read by someone who can read it, anyone who can understand modern day Macedonian will understand what is being said, and this is a language and literature developed and used more than 3500 years ago! The ability to have good knowledge is the ability to have a good and fully furnished alphabet and spoken language, with these tools you can only then go on to conquer, unlike the Greeks who turned up after the Santorini volcano eruption after 1500bce which would give them approximately 200 years of population expansion before they were noticed by the Macedonians and King Philip II went and conquered them which to this day are called Grejci pronounced Greitsi meaning foreigners! They have their own language but were not advanced enough to develop an alphabet which is how the British and French linguistic experts believed that the Macedonian koine alphabet had to belong to the foreigners as that's where they had seen it before. The Macedonian civilization has existed a lot longer than most people realise! When maps were invented, you will find Macedonia is there on even the oldest maps! For the Greeks to have been as great as they claim to be, somehow all the ancient map makers seemed to have missed their greatness and left them off their maps! The Macedonians were using Sanskrit a lot longer than people realise... There are ancient Sanskrit carvings on rock's and in caves all over modern day Macedonia... Hell, even the Germans were using Slavic before Germanic was widely adopted if you dig into their archives...

@@PeterMilanovski will definitely do more research. I have been following some of the independent archeologic research into the megalituc past in the Balkans (Bosnia, Serbia, Macedonia ) So far i am under the impression that there was a much older civilisation perhaps during what Vedas refer to as the Golden age or older.

Aryans migrated to india from the Russian steppe region 5000 years ago. Their language is sanskrit then they mixed with South Indian people and formed today's Indian people which is a mix of indo Aryans and dravidians. That is why upper caste people in India have R1A gene. All indo European people who lived in the steppe region have this gene.

@@lubabosnjak6892 in my search for ancient Macedonian history in Europe, I had already come to the conclusion that the Greeks could only and possibly arrive at today's present location after the massive volcanic eruption of Santorini island volcano! The fact that pumice stone ejected from and fell in Egypt 800km away should confirm that it was a violent eruption! It had to be to produce pumice stone! But the location of Greece in relation to the island volcano is a very key factor for their arrival in Europe! The eruption is dated to have taken place around 1500bce, what's interesting is that around the same time we have an account in the bible (the book of exodus) telling the story of things that would have seemed to be the work of god, stuff like fire and ice falling from the sky which is basically lava bombs and pumice stone! Then there's the escape of Moses and his Israelites, they cross the water by Moses using gods power to part the sea or with today's understanding they crossed during a tsunami! The bible tells us that God told Moses to head for the pillar of smoke by day and pillar of fire by night, this of course is the Santorini island volcano which is erupting! There's actually archeological evidence that the Israelites made it to the island of Crete! Now isn't that interesting 🤔...... It's this same volcano which played a major role in the history of the Greeks and the Macedonians, before the volcano, the Macedonian capital city was Hella which is in present day Greece today. The city was abandoned due to the volcano and relocated further east to the new city of Pella! Notice that the ancient Macedonian city of Hella still lay in ruins today! The Greeks turned up after the eruption to find an ancient city that lay in ruins and totally abandoned! And for hundreds of years they occupied the land until they were noticed by the Macedonians. The history books tell us that King Philip II of Macedonia went and conquered the Greeks, the Macedonians called them Grejci pronounced Greitsi meaning foreigners, the word greek which comes from the Roman Latin word Grecians which they got it from the Macedonians who called them Grejci..... It's no surprise when you think about it, if the Greeks were as they want to believe they were then the majority of Europe would be speaking some version of a greek dialect! But that is not what we see! In fact, by the time the Rosetta Stone was found, it had to be deciphered because no one in Greece could read it! No one! There's actually 3 alphabets on it, the bottom Macedonian koine alphabet, the middle Macedonian Sanskrit alphabet and the top Egyptian hieroglyphics! At the time of the making of the Rosetta Stone, the Macedonians were still using the ancient Sanskrit alphabet but had already introduced the koine alphabet, the modern Macedonian alphabet used today is based on the koine alphabet but improved.... Every other Slavic alphabet in Europe is based on the original Macedonian alphabet.... Anyway, just last week I was looking at the map of the journey that Alexander The Great took on his conquest and while looking at it and trying to get into Alexander's head, I asked myself why? Why did he go when he did? I mean it's such a long journey! He could have gone north from Pella in the direction of the Germanic tribes? Or west towards the Etruscans (Italy today), they are much closer and would need far less resources! And even when he got to Egypt, he ventured close to the Carthaginians (present day Tunisia) but he didn't go there either! And then it hit me! There's actually a very good reason why he didn't go west! The West was already apart of the Macedonian empire! Philip II only went west due to learning that the ancient Macedonian city was occupied by foreigners and quickly conquered them! There's no need for future action! That's why when you look at artifacts dug up from the Etruscans and you see the ancient architecture it looks like it's Macedonian! Even on the island of Malta! Or Carthage! I think that it's more than just a coincidence! All these places were ruled by king's who were in turn ruled by the Macedonian capital! Think of the time when England conquered many lands and put people in place to rule over the indigenous peoples! Democracy! With the path that Alexander The Great took, he was going to conquer the east! That's why Egypt got a macedonian king and queen (Ptolemy and Cleopatra)! And I'm sure that there was other kingdoms set up in the same way! There's actually an ancient Macedonian kingdom that's still present today deep inside Pakistan today! And that's just another example but I'm sure that there's more! And I'm sure that he had the same plans for India! But didn't succeed, or we are told that he didn't, there's an area in India where he came in contact with that the people there claim that they are the descendants of Alexander's army! I'm thinking that it's quite possible that he tried to set up a kingdom there too! Of course this is just my hypothesis, but it's really starting to make a lot of sense to me! The Macedonian empire was a huge democracy! Same as what we have seen more recently! LoL and they say that history repeats itself! But what this means if it's true and correct is that the history of humanity goes way beyond what we think it has! And when you take a good look at the ancient Macedonian city of Hella, the Parthenon in today's Greece! Just take a closer look at the platform that it's built on! While the ancient Macedonians were master craftsmen, the base is definitely megalithic and hiding in plain sight! There's no way that the Macedonians built that base! I think that it's more likely that the base was already there and built by a previous civilization which I think is also responsible for the Pyramids and other megalithic structures around the world and that would mean that human civilization has existed for a lot longer than most people realise! These megalithic structures must have been built before the last major ice age! Which I believe that there probably wasn't anyone living in Europe contrary to what the Greeks claim that they have always been there! If you remember the story of Moses, as a baby, his mother put him in a little reed basket and sent him down the river, he was found in Egypt which could only mean that he came down the Nile River, and then there's the Greeks who have a strong DNA linkage to Sub Saharan Ethiopia! Coincidence? I think not! Most people think that the bible is just a religious book concerned with the Christian faith but from what I have red, this is the story of Moses and his journey of how he and his Israelites become greek! (Foreigners)..... That would mean that the Greeks and the Israelis are one and the same! When you know a lot more about the Greeks and then compare them against the Israelis, the resemblance is uncanny! What Israel is doing today, Greece has already done! They called it the greek civil war but it was ethnic cleansing in disguise! There used to be a southern Macedonia! Which is why the Macedonians accepted the title of North Macedonia! It's true, North Greece is south Macedonia and they still are Macedonian people there today which are not allowed to use traditional Macedonian name and surnames! (Forced assimilation). Like Israel claims that Palestine never existed, Greece claims that Macedonians existed and they were Greek but no longer exist! It's a sort of forced cultural misappropriation, if you push it hard enough, the rest of the world will accept it! So like yeah, that makes sense right! The biggest empire in ancient times that the world has ever seen and they disappear but a minority of foreigners somehow managed to survive? Greek logic! Go figure..... There's actually a lot more to the story but I'm ending it here......

🤣🤣🤣 kuch bhi

😂😂😂

Their are multiple theory 1) Russia term came from ruxoalani Where ruxo or russo mean bright Current region of Russia was region of alans ( indo Iranians) they mixed with white people and hence known as bright or shinning alans 2) Another theory is it is word came from rus Vikings 3) it may have some from rasa ( sankrit avestan term for nector)

😅😅Don't serve your stupidity here'

I read somewhere Rishivarsha was the old name...not sure though