Видео

😅

postspark.app/screenshot

If you can't see my comment for the link, please DM me on my LinkedIn and I will give you the link there. Thanks!

I am happy I could bring value to your life! Consider subscribing for more content like this.

@@runtimesnippets Subscribed! 👍

@ thankyou! 🙏😇

I agree! I couldn’t do more examples as my free monthly limit had expired. Do you think I should do a more detailed review next month as I will have the monthly limits back?

@@runtimesnippets Let the viewers do it and ask them to share the result in the comments, in your video! This way we have many examples from all walks of life. Or you could do next month.

@ great idea! Thanks! 😇🙏

I am happy that you feel that way. Fireship is a youtube channel I look up to, but I am not trying to replicate them.

@@runtimesnippets editing style and that AI voice is same as fireship, but the content is too good like fireship man. Great work!

@@Geera-xi2ei it’s my own voice 🥲 but yes I get what you are trying to say. So happy that you love my content! Thanks and do consider subscribing ❤️

Same style as the OG Fireship. Happy to see more AI content like this focused on devs.

@@sigma_z thankyou! 🙏❤️

Firebase dynamic links support deferred deep linking but it’s getting shut down on August 25, 2025

Unfortunately appflyer requires a business account so I won't be able to do it anytime soon. (Unless I get overnight success and I setup the runtime snippets website tomorrow.. hehe)

Yes, just make sure that for production everything is setup as discussed here: 7:16 + web server configs in the video description

What is the issue exactly?

Thanks! Here's how you can generate icons for web: arc.net/l/quote/ewspqttm Let me know if you have any other questions

I'm happy you enjoy how I teach!

Could be next but not the immediate next! :)

I am really glad that it’s helpful for you and your team!

Glad you found it helpful!

Thanks a lot and glad you liked it!

Thanks a lot!

Would it be possible to rename the first generated files and their references inside the firebase_options file? If that doesn’t work. Let me know and I will see how this can be handled.

You're not wrong! Packages tend to break whenever there is a new release, but it doesn't take long to get them to work. Good luck with Rust and GoLang!

Glad you loved it!

You’re welcome!

Thanks a lot! I still fangirl over Fireship videos! But this is generally what I strive for: deliver short and to the point tutorials with high value

If you are using Windows for development, please have a look at this issue: github.com/AngeloAvv/flutter_flavorizr/issues/250#issuecomment-2252799934

Hi. Can you look at this issue? github.com/AngeloAvv/flutter_flavorizr/issues/250

Thanks! Hope you found it helpful!

Glad you loved it! 😇

I am so glad. Stay tuned as I am about to post another video in some days!

Thanks so much!

Thanks! Hope it taught you something useful

I'm glad you found my content to be good!

Happy to help!

It is! Try it :)

Hope it helps you

Thankyou so much!!!

Do it!

Hey!! Glad you liked it and thanks for supporting me

@@runtimesnippets Shared with my coworkers, top grade content 👌 👏 🙌

@@gustavopriftis9290 thanks for your support!

@@gustavopriftis9290 if you need more content on a specific topic, let me know! :)

I am glad you think that!😊

@@runtimesnippets yes, keep it up

@@manishmg3994 these comments keep me motivated. Thanks and stay tuned for more :)

1."Why are loops a bad idea in unit tests?" Because 1. loops go against readability and conciseness. 2. The flutter test suite will only give you one output per unit test. So let's say, if your unit test had 7 inputs and one of them was wrong, the entire test will fail. Which is not very descriptive, and doesn't provide you with the right feedback. We also won't be able to know on which iteration the expect method failed. We will have to debug this ourselves. 2. "Should I divide it into multiple tests for each input?" Absolutely! 3. "Wouldn't that be a lot more verbose?" Remember the rule from the TDD video: "Write specific test cases that make your code generic" Meaning: The more specific test cases you have, the more general your code will become in handling different inputs. So it doesn't matter the number of tests you have. One input = One output, and there should be a single test case for that. 4. "What is the correct way of thoroughly testing a functionality?" To thoroughly test a feature, you should identify different edge cases that will break the feature, and then test your code through those inputs. For example, in your method, maybe a multiple of 5 or a multiple of both 3 & 5, might break your feature, so I would test your code with those inputs as well. But be cautious, don't write test cases that keep on testing the same behavior. For example, writing a test case for 3, then 6, then 9, then 12 will keep testing the same behavior of the feature. Once a behavior has been verified, go for different inputs that will test some other part of the method, like 5 or maybe 15. Have any other questions? I would love to answer :)

@@runtimesnippets Got it. Thank you! Cheers from 🇧🇷

@@lucas.marianno you’re welcome!

I am so glad you found this helpful! Please subscribe as more content is on the way!

Thanks a lot! It means a lot to me.

Glad you liked it!

Glad you like it!