- Видео 157
- Просмотров 158 790
Deniz Kenger
Добавлен 11 июл 2013
I do gaming videos. Will post content for both multi and single player games. OH YEAH!
AC Unity Arno Can Fight?
If Arno had a faster execution attack rather than the heavy slow attack (which takes too long when against this many enemies), he could've been a beast like Conor. Unity combat is satisfying but a bit slow due to this.
Просмотров: 480
Видео
Witcher 3 Roach Fighting (First Time I Saw Him Do This)
Просмотров 899 месяцев назад
Witcher 3 Roach Fighting (First Time I Saw Him Do This)
AC Odyssey Avenging A Wolf (Nightmare Difficulty)
Просмотров 339 месяцев назад
AC Odyssey Avenging A Wolf (Nightmare Difficulty)
AC Origins Fighting Arena Elite Seleucid (Nightmare Difficulty)
Просмотров 159 месяцев назад
AC Origins Fighting Arena Elite Seleucid (Nightmare Difficulty)
AC Origins Fighting Arena Elite Hoplite (Nightmare Difficulty)
Просмотров 209 месяцев назад
AC Origins Fighting Arena Elite Hoplite (Nightmare Difficulty)
AC Origins Fighting Arena Elite Duelist (Nightmare Difficulty)
Просмотров 559 месяцев назад
AC Origins Fighting Arena Elite Duelist (Nightmare Difficulty)
GTAV Civilian Throwing Kicks And Elbows
Просмотров 50Год назад
GTAV Civilian Throwing Kicks And Elbows
AC Black Flag I Shot The Rope Mid Fall LOL
Просмотров 19Год назад
AC Black Flag I Shot The Rope Mid Fall LOL
Rocket League Tactical Toxic Style Wins Another Mechanically Better Player
Просмотров 220Год назад
Rocket League Tactical Toxic Style Wins Another Mechanically Better Player
Rocket League Tactical Player vs Mechanical Player Comp 1s
Просмотров 24Год назад
Rocket League Tactical Player vs Mechanical Player Comp 1s
Rocket League If You're Not Mechanical Be Toxic
Просмотров 31Год назад
Rocket League If You're Not Mechanical Be Toxic
Sekiro Why You Should Not Deflect Every Attack
Просмотров 126Год назад
Sekiro Why You Should Not Deflect Every Attack
Sekiro Non Activated Mist Raven Blocks All Black Mortal Blade Damage????
Просмотров 49Год назад
Sekiro Non Activated Mist Raven Blocks All Black Mortal Blade Damage????
Sekiro Defeating Sword Saint Isshin Taking NO DAMAGE
Просмотров 107Год назад
Sekiro Defeating Sword Saint Isshin Taking NO DAMAGE
GTA V Think The Dude Was Claustrophobic
Просмотров 11Год назад
GTA V Think The Dude Was Claustrophobic
Sekiro Owl Father Is Actually Pretty Fun
Просмотров 25Год назад
Sekiro Owl Father Is Actually Pretty Fun
Sekiro Easy Way To Kill The Guardian Ape
Просмотров 7 тыс.Год назад
Sekiro Easy Way To Kill The Guardian Ape
Sekiro New Lightning Reversal On Inner Genichiro
Просмотров 752Год назад
Sekiro New Lightning Reversal On Inner Genichiro
Sekiro Defeated Inner Isshin First Attempt
Просмотров 200Год назад
Sekiro Defeated Inner Isshin First Attempt
Sekiro This Has To Be The Most Beautiful Lightning Reversal
Просмотров 75Год назад
Sekiro This Has To Be The Most Beautiful Lightning Reversal
Sekiro Killing Chained Ogre Without Kuro's Charm
Просмотров 50Год назад
Sekiro Killing Chained Ogre Without Kuro's Charm
Sekiro How To Easily Kill Shichimen Warrior
Просмотров 3,3 тыс.Год назад
Sekiro How To Easily Kill Shichimen Warrior
Sekiro First Playthrough Defeating The Demon Of Hatred
Просмотров 46Год назад
Sekiro First Playthrough Defeating The Demon Of Hatred
Sekiro Defeating Genichiro At Ashina Castle Without Taking Any Damage
Просмотров 52Год назад
Sekiro Defeating Genichiro At Ashina Castle Without Taking Any Damage
Sekiro My First Time Defeating Inner Father In The Gauntlet
Просмотров 159Год назад
Sekiro My First Time Defeating Inner Father In The Gauntlet
Sekiro Defeating Corrupted Monk No Charms No Tools (0 Damage Taken)
Просмотров 64Год назад
Sekiro Defeating Corrupted Monk No Charms No Tools (0 Damage Taken)
How do u jump during mist raven 🤔 I have been trying to jump but he won’t
@@abdulla_eljebouri first catch lightning with mist raven then press jump as lightning makes contact with you.
Ur good bruh and I'm thanking my feed for showing me
@@Victor-bk7zz thanks 🤩 😊
you actually deflected his second to last attack in the 9-flurry attack, WOW
4:00 Is Spiderman's real job a male stripper?
I wish i could play
Bro
Bro is so locked into the combat he didnt even recognized he deflected the waterflow passage perfectly. Masterpiece of a game.
are u supposed to jump and be in the air when u reverse the lightning using mist raven ?
yeah after catching it with mist raven, you jump then reverse it. You can do a cooler variation where you catch with mist raven, dodge then sakura dance and reverse the lightning like that. I posted doing that in a short, it looks cooler but the timing for the sakura dance is a bit harder because sometimes you get zapped before he goes into a sakura dance even if you press it so many people just spam it straight after the dodge.
@@denizkenger52 yeah I usually do only the Sakura dance and nothing else
@@siddhantdas1069 yeah i would say the mist raven is just for the looks, sakura dance alone is the most consistent option, these variations are just fancy tricks to make the fight look more beautiful. I've seen people use the kick to reverse lightning as well. And there's a way to catch the lightning with normal jump then press sakura dance mid air so you do 1 spin mid air, then land with the lightning on your sword but don't get zapped then straight away it goes into last spin of sakura dance and jumps again and returns it. There's a few variations, I think I saw someone do it with that special thrust art too I forgot the name (the same one owl father does). I don't play the game anymore but I was wondering how many mist ravens and sakura dances you could chain if you put that poison thing on to deal damage to yourself so you can use mist raven without needing to get attacked but stopped playing game before being able to test it.
@@denizkenger52 I actually started playing the bosses only and not the actual game itself 😂
@@siddhantdas1069 ahhh that's the first time i've heard of that being done. Did it include side bosses too? coz those headless dudes are a nightmare imo. I saw a dude put one against isshin where they fought against each other in a sim and the headless actually won against swordsaint isshin.
actually i love the monk chesse with mist raven
I was just wondering why pecfect deflect is easier than other soul game. is because sekiro program allow player to perform it in earlier time. should I rather explain like press the button just 0.3 - 0.5 second before you get hit will PD. But in other game, like in Lies of P the reaction time is 0.1 second press it before you got hit.
.... My name is Elijah....
Elijah’s a cool name. Reminds me of Elijah Mikaelson from Vampire Diaries. One of the original vampires.
What is this show called?
It's a movie, called Glass
Yeah it’s the last movie of the trilogy. The chronological order if you wanna watch all would be Unbreakable, Split, Glass.
@@gobgabevt1433 thank you!
Qxe2+ was such a moronic move
Presume he was frustrated from previous match
I have never seen somebody give up their queen so early into the game before
Try it with the kick combat art where he jumps up and then kicks down
oh yeah that one is cool too
С силой атаки 99 можно и закрытыми глазами победить 🤣🤣🤣
wasn't 99 attack power at the time I did this. Yashariku's sugar, divine confetti, empowered mortal draw, they contributed to such high damage. I think I was around NG 7 or 8 when I did this so maybe power 90 and enemy power level would be around 70-80 because it upgrades for them too until NG7 which then caps.
WHERE IS THE SECOND PHASE HEADLESS
I didn’t need do it for that part, you can always do the spear trick. Second phase easy imo so didn’t do anything special for it.
he hit him a little too hard, ape died in one phase
RUclips keeps deleting my comments. I feel like I'm arguing with myself from 15 years ago before I went vegan, and it's utterly pointless. You're going to keep defending your programming until you're ready to see the truth. Peace.
@denizkenger52 RUclips keeps deleting my comments so I'm putting this here. You're literally arguing that you want to "save animals" from crop deaths by buying the animals farms kill on purpose. That makes absolutely no sense. Also, the only reason there is "mixed" science for veganism is because the meat industries flood the scientific literature with their multi-billion dollar bogus studies. Look at the official WHO statement--meat is a carcinogen. And I already said the biggest associations for diet on the planet already prove we don't need to eat animals to live. Are you actually looking into the research? Or are you just parroting what you've been told your whole life?
Crop deaths happen from protecting crops from smaller animals. Pasture raised 100% grass finished free range farms mean the farmers don’t contribute to crop protection death to maintain the grass so would be deducing crop deaths in this way. Of course in winter periods this may change due to grass plants dying and certain methods for providing grass feed differing. I think the mixed science is because vegans and other benefitting groups like to blame meat to promote their own products. Just like the sugar company paying those 3 harvard professors $50k in around the 1960s to come to conclusion against saturated fat and cholesterol instead of sugar for the cause of heart diseases rising in the US. Meat being a carcinogen isn’t scientifically certain. It can form carcinogenic substances when heated, so eat it raw like I do then. And plants have carcinogenic substances too. Lets not ignore that. And I’ve told you it’s mixed. Are you actually looking into research. Or are you just parroting what your vegans brainwashed you to say? I’d recommend you do some research on oxalates. And do some research on advanced glycation end products. Vegans have a higher chance of stroke compared to carnivores according to some sources too. Depends on the research.
@@denizkenger52 The issue is killing animals needlessly. And your solution to reduce killing animals needlessly? By paying the people who do it on PURPOSE. And I was eating meat and dairy for 26 years until I went vegan. Until I actually looked into the research. Do you really believe vegan companies have more money than the MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR meat and dairy companies who have been around for almost a century? Vegans have reduced all cause mortality. The leading cause of death in the western world is heart disease--many of which are preceded by high cholesterol levels which are exclusively from a meat/dairy diet. There is no cholesterol in plants.
@@willakana3369 crop deaths are on PURPOSE too. I didn’t say vegan companies only, sugar companies may have more money than meat based companies. So many companies want to make meat bad so they can get the blame off their products such as carb based companies, sugar companies, medical companies that want you to get ill so they can get money from selling medicine to you. It’s not just vegan companies that want meat eating to be discouraged. Absurd think so. The amount of carnivore companies are very low. The fact that head of USDA I think in 2016 is a harvard professor that was caught to have been paid off by sugar companies to blame saturated fat instead of sugar shows it’s not just vegans, but sugar companies too and they’re soooop rich and have been manipulating data for decades. High cholesterol leading to heart disease has not been scientifically proven as of yet. It is theorised, not proven. I asked you to research Advanced Glycation End products precisely for this tbh. Multiple studies state that these toxins are the reason cholesterol and fat plaque in blood vessels. How do these form? 2 ways. Glycation (sugar reacting with protein or lipids) or Oxidation (either through heating protein or lipids, or protein or lipids going through oxidation process in the body hence anti-oxidants are encouraged which are in raw meat too). So since raw meat (how i eat it) isn’t oxidised through heat and I get antioxidants from it to reduce oxidation in my body and I don’t have carbs or glucose and fructose high foods like fruits in vegan diets, lesser AGEs are being formed from what I eat. The base of cholesterol being bad was from the same study where the 3 scientists manipulated data to shift blame from sugar because they were paid off. There’s no certain scientific data to say high cholesterol is bad for you. Using it in a debate concerning scientific evaluation of a meat eating diet is unnecessary because your point is built upon an uncertainty, you can research this as well, no study can directly account high cholesterol to be the certain reason for heart disease.
@@denizkenger52 Interesting. I gotta say, you've def looked into some stuff! Impressive. I'll go ahead and do my homework and circle back if I find anything pertinent. I know I left a comment that was pretty heated about 'seeing the truth' but heck, I don't have perfect info on my end either and am grateful for you spilling some of your knowledge on the subject. Cheers man, have a great day.
Well...bring on here. Your evidence.
thank you first of all for coming on my channel that other channel literally banned every single point I said.
@@denizkenger52 it is ok, I am still curious about the conversation.
@denizkenger52 it shows that you have two replies but I can only see one. So it is something youtube
The debunk for the source you stated is due to the source you stated's source's source being based on the data from the journal american medical association published in 2015 where 3 harvard professors were paid a grand total of around 50000 dollars in today's worth to shift blame off sugar and blame heart disease on fats and cholesterol. They falsified the data to make their sugar daddies proud of them (pun intended). Then, one of these professors/scientists becomes head of USDA where he can further spread this misinformation. You can search about cholesterol. There is no actual 100 percent certain or undeniable study to say high cholesterol is bad for you. It's built upon corrupt data. So that's the cholesterol argument I was talking about, you can do research yourself regarding the sugar company thing and further search for undeniable evidence against high cholesterol values being what causes heart disease and atherosclorosis but in the end, you'd find what makes the cholesterol and fat end up plaqueing blood vessels is either sugar or oxidation due to the advanced glycation end products forming as a result of glycation (sugar reacting with proteins or lipids) or oxidation which is (heating of proteins or lipids, or oxidation process within body making protein or lipids oxidate, hence anti-oxidants in diet are so recommended for which raw plants are very good for, and raw meat has enough if you eat enough, hence I eat animal products raw). So anyway, once you do that research, you'd come to conclusion that there's no study directly coming to meaning that high cholesterol is bad for you, it's an assumption built on corrupt base and also it undermines high triglycerides in an individual for example, hence low triglyceride and high cholesterol valued people exist and are healthy so shows cholesterol's blame isn't actually accounted for as in how much if any it contributes to heart diseases and atherosclorosis or if it's contribution is due to other factors such as AGE products which are the toxins I mentioned earlier. Around 70-90% of these toxins stay in the body depending on a human's health, then the body tries to water down these toxins using fat but can't get the proper fats so it ends up attaching to bile which has cholesterol in the bile there to neutralise toxins (also has hormones like adrenaline in the bile) but now they have attached with the AGEs where 70-90% will stay in the body, this cholesterol and some fat that came to water it down are causing plaques in the blood vessels and messing up the whole system in your body and creating a nice glycogen like environment for cancer to thrive as well. You can research this as well of course. I haven't stated sources because I'd rather you research it yourself than me finding sources that obviously support me because I have them but I'm sure just as I could've said to healthline and the other source you stated that I simply don't agree with it, (although i did disagree with that but now have sent my reasoning for it, i mean i couldve said it without reason and just opposing source by another doctor lets say one of the carnivore doctor influencers and caused a no conclusion draw with two opposing sources and we couldve both been stubborn, I'd rather you research the topics I mention and check for yourself on multiple sources and make your mind up as such because I'm not trying to win a debate, I'm saying it with genuine intent to spread truth about a topic that has a lot of misinformation around), you can do that and it'd just make it a debate where we reach no conclusion and just argue to argue in a way and that tarnishes accuracy or incentive to actually reach some understanding. The part I said about vegans relates to the AGEs because a lot of vegan foods are high in sugar, many of the fruits high in glucose and fructose. If you have a decent amount of protein in your diet, these are bound to react with one another in your body so glycation. Also, a lot of the higher protein foods in vegan diet require cooking so against oxidation this time which leads to AGE products being formed. I didn't say all vegans would suffer heart disease or ED just like I don't think all meat and milk consumers would but many would still and a research I know based on this is regarding processed meats and pasteurised milk heavy diet (not just these 2) led to highest heart disease rates according to the study, but not all meats are processed and not all milks are pasteurised or even of the same protein type (Casein A1 vs Casein A2, Casein A1 has studies connecting it to heart disease. In fact a scientist went over to feed starving kids and was doing a report on doing this with milk but he noticed Casein A1's effects of causing heart disease obviously in pasteurised milk he tried, so can't say if it would be same in raw, but point is, these studies show the normal versions and I am not defending normal meat and milk consumption at all, carnivore is a very specific diet which I defend, and I precisely defend a raw version as well. Just like having raw plant based would be healthier regarding the topic I mentioned with toxins created as a result of the heating process (AGEs arent only toxins created through heating) plus reducing anti-oxidant amount, so these would be factors if vegans were on high glucose/fructose diet so like those that eat loads of fruits with high protein and had lots of their foods cooked, that could lead to heart diseases and ED which is from artery narrowing so reducing anti oxidant intake due to heating improperly or spiking blood sugars too much with fast turned glucose would lead to heart disease and also feed cancer cells. Also, many plants have anti nutrients and one of the most studied of these are oxalates. They have associations with coronary heart disease and stroke due to the formation of kidney stones which oxalates can cause formation of due to oxalates combining with calcium and crystallising to form said kidney stones. High oxalates can also mess up the heart's beating rhythm, and the other relevant to our chat affect is genital irritation and the intestinal inflammation which affects the whole body really, and prostatitis. Usually people dont get too high on oxalates but on a vegan diet, some people don't pay attention to these plus sadly it goes against that eating raw being better as sometimes heating can reduce antinutrient content, but not completely and not all ways of heating. But people who already have health conditions can be much less tolerant than average people and it can worsen certain conditions like Hypothyroidism/hashimoto's as it can also reduce iodine absorption. I can go into more detail on the other types of anti nutrients in plant based foods and give examples of the plant based foods they are in if you would like, the main reason for carnivore diet people to avoid plants are the anti nutrients tbh.
btw if you want sources for the stuff i said, i can provide but I'm sure you would research to find stuff against it anyway (rightfully so), so I thought they'd be unnecessary at least until you find opposing source, then we can go into a source preference draw where you accept your source and I accept mine.
Bro tenias para hacer mate y comiste reina
Lol yeah oh well i still won after🤣
Nice 😊
Thanks 😊
Opponent make queen
Hard coz my bishop sees one possible queen making square and my rook sees the other.
Another version of INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSILE GAMBIT!
After pawn took pawn at d8... kinght to e8 is best here...if pawn take the knight... ....then..........
Then my rook takes the pawn
Knight e8 makes it decreases the temptation for opponent further taking the pawn to open up the attack because then he’ll think I’m just gonna move my queen but giving him a cool looking attack pushes him more towards taking that pawn. Idm giving up a horse, I’ll take with rook and not allow promotion and lose a horse for his queen any day.
WTF ?
Ikr he just hops on her head. I’d never seen parkour on civilians in other games🤣
pawn c8??
Bishop take c8
pawn c8??
My bishop is seeing it
Pawn b8 ?
My rook would take it.
@@denizkenger52 what if he didn't take horse
@@fndjfy2255 So in the full game itself the dude did wait and didn't take but I took it later mid game so he gained nothing from it, not even the horse. If he advanced to C8, my bishop takes and if he left it where it was I'll use me being up a queen to arrange a trade because he put his green square bishop to protect it, but since I'm up a queen, I just forced a trade with one of my pieces so i could end up at endgame with as few special pieces on his side as possible so I could clean the 1 or 2 special pieces with my queen and remove his chance of getting a queen.
Very cool
Cheers🤠
Playing rapid like bullet ok😂
People do that at the start fir some reason 🤔
Good punishment for premoving with 9 min on the clock!
🤣
I love forcing stalemate. Or winning by flagging. It’s so funny imo
He thought I was gonna take Bishop with my Bishop, so he’d take my Knight so premoved that clearly and he resigned obviously right after it.
It's easier than a normal lightning reversal tho
Really? I think Sakura alone is easiest, then normal then mist raven, then mist raven dodge sakura dance. Normal just requires jump so I don’t think there’s any hardness to it
sup
Good mate, cheers for the sub.
How
Activate mist raven when he shoots lightning at you, then jump when it hits you so nearly right after doing mist raven. Then when you’re in the air just return it as normal so pressing attack button.
very nice 🍆🍆🍆🍆🍆🍆🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑🍑🥒🥒🥬🥬🥒🥒🥒
When lightning hits: Great feather mistraven straight forward then sakura dance lightning reversal. One of the coolest moves I have done in sekiro. Sakura dance with fire, divine confetti or bestowal, then sabimaru when falling downwards or using either the fire or lazulite axe when falling down, then continuing that prosthetic attack chain. Or even High monk lightning reversal makes sekiro a lightning bender xD One of Sekiro's biggest strengths imo is the ability to fight with style, it allows you to be creative with the limited arnsenal that you have.
Yeah I agree I think the most beautiful lightning reversal is greater mist raven, dodge, then sakura dance. I’ve got a vid of me doing that in my shorts, exactly the way you described🥳
Big ups on deflecting the floating passage. No easy feat
Cheers I think it was the first time I got all 🦍
Nice 👌
you could have won
Yeah i missed it 😰
Karşıma niye çıktı bilmiyorum ama çok fazla saldırı şansın vardı.
Kale d7 disinda var miydi?
Why is this trash on my fyp
This looks like a 150 elo game
im so close to 1200 in blitzs
Nice one🥳🥳🥳🥳
W
gei
You wish 🤣