Видео

Yes, 1. It seems the base of the whole thing revolves around the gun first. 2. Then when to use it, when it's appropriate to draw it etc., then 3. The accuracy comes last. Then you are easily able to move into A category and it feels great when that has been accomplished. Have you taken my class in the past?

Thank you. more to come!

Happy to do that! I am just getting started on this task, many more to come!!

Defund the Media!!

I was a Sheriff's Deputy from 1996 until 2010 when the UPD was established. In 2010, the former Sheriff Jim Winder worked with the legislature in creating the new law, which designated the SHERIFF as CEO of the UPD; he did this for good reason, so he still kept his authority as Sheriff under the new model. Sheriff Winder had ALL of his 330 Deputies sworn in to the UPD, BUT because he was the CEO of the UPD, he still had control to protect them, if he needed to change things, in the event the legislature tries their shenanigans, trying to say the Sheriff Can't run "two" departments" very misleading to the public, not really two separate departments. IF I had been in Sheriff Rivera's shoes, I would have pushed back to the legislature and I would have told them IF they want to RENEG on the deal, on the agreement they made with Jim Winder in 2010, to remove me as CEO of the UPD, then fine, Give me back ALL of my 330 deputies, I will swear them in as deputies and the UPD will be dissolved and it will be EXACTLY like it was when I was a deputy in 2009, and we liked it better under the Sheriff's Office! NOW all of the Mayors under the UPD board, have the power with a strong police force that former Sheriff had and Rosie was bullied into giving up.

Republicans are getting more anti 2A as years go by. Most cops are good, yeah, there are some bad ones that give the good ones a bad name.

only if they allow it.

Thank you, stay safe!

Unfortunately, We the People have allowed government to infringe on the 2A throughout time.

All police are not cool no matter where you live. Some are just dicks and like to throw their weight around. I believe MOST are good, but we only remember the bad one. Believe me when I say that no one dislikes a bad cop more than a good cop. This video is intended to help things go better AND if there are problems how to handle that.

Amen brother, glad to see you are passionate about our constitutional rights! We need more passionate folks running for office to preserve them! BTW in my video, I did NOT say that we had a duty to inform in Utah as your comment said. In Utah, whether or not you decide to tell the officer, is your individual choice to make, as explained in the video. Putting your hands in your pockets when in contact with officers is NOT a good idea for obvious reasons; bad guys carry pocket guns in pockets, knives in pockets and if an officer has reason to believe you are reaching for a weapon on a contact and they feel threatened, you just may, NOT ALWAYS, have a gun drawn on you! Put yourself in the officer's shoes just for a moment, YOU also would want to go home to your family wouldn't you?

I knew that you didn't have a duty to inform. I was just saying that no one anywhere should have a duty to inform. Here in Ohio, we have Constitutional carry. We no longer have a duty to inform. We do have to tell the officer if he asks. I had a Concealed carry license before the law was changed. I was arrested twice for concealed carry even though I had a license because I didn't inform the officer immediately. The law stated to inform the officer promptly. Those two words are very different. The cop told me that 1 minute and 30 seconds had passed then arrested me. That was absolutely ridiculous!

If that had happened to me, I would have pleaded not guilty and had a jury decide

I am assuming you are talking about civil rights violations by officers? for example an illegal search? The remedy would be a civil rights lawsuit, commonly known as a 1983 case.

@@gunclassutah , OINK!!!!! I ain't mentioning shit to the pigs. Unless they directly ask me if I'm carrying I'm not going to say shit about it. I've seen how stupid cops get when you tell them you are armed. And what's so hilarious is that you say that cops like it when people are armed, and that's a massive crock of shit. Cops and their handlers the politicians don't want us armed If they wanted us armed they would be standing up against the government's anti gun laws they are so willing to enforce. The pigs love their power trip, so you clearly are bootlicking. That's another thing. You talk about respect, and how we should show the pigs respect, BUT, fact is, the pigs don't respect the people or their rights. You literally admitted as much by pointing out that every lawyer, and even yourself say people should not talk to the pigs. If the pigs were such good guys honest law abiding citizens would not have to worry about getting railroaded by quotas and cops wanting to make an arrest, EVEN if the arrest is that of an innocent person. My mother taught me that respect i EARNED, NOT given. The pigs haven't earned my respect cause every interaction I've ever had with them has shown me they don't respect the people or their rights. FUCK DA POLICE!!! They literally are the only publicly organization most people hate, and don't trust. Hmmmmm I wonder why? I guess it's the fact that pigs are more like storm troopers than actual public servants. We can see this in both Parkland and Uvalde. The motherfucking pigs sat by and just let kids get slaughtered cause they didn't have the motherfucking balls to go in, yet they don't have any problems beating up homeless men. If it means the pigs are actually in danger they don't want to do it. Lets also talk about the FACT that the pigs don't have a duty to protect you. They only protect the predator, also known as the wealthy. Pigs are not your friends.

​@@gunclassutahYou are correct, presently a 1983. The problem with that is the taxpayer pays for the LEOS illegal act. It should come from the LEO and the Department that trained him. Equal Protection under the law.

Under Utah law, and most other states, You CAN sue the officer personally if you can convince the court why the officer should not be protected with qualified immunity. Officers don't have qualified immunity, when they break the law, policy and otherwise violate civil rights of others, it can be done.

That was a well written response, thank you! I agree with a lot of your points, (but not everything). The cops in my state that I have spoken to (and my own opinion) is that we love it when law abiding gun owners are able to protect themselves, YES, I am sure that you will find cops that don't care if you want to protect yourself. There are BAD cops, no doubt! Most of them are good, at least what I have seen. You are correct that police don't have an obligation to protect you! that has been ruled by the appellate courts. I also agree that ALL police need to uphold their oath first and foremost, no politics, just do your job you swore to do! Stay safe out there!

The Second Amendment say's "shall not be infringed"

@gunclassutah A well regulated militia,being nessessary to the security of a free state,the right of the people,to keep and bear arms,shall not be infringed.

If that person lawfully enters, through a house mate, you don't have a defense under defense of habitation, you DO have right however to defend yourself against unlawful immediate force through the force in defense of a person statute, and 76-2-402 would apply in that scenario

@@gunclassutah that’s very helpful, thank you.

Thank you!

lawyer question actually. Google scholar is a good source for finding case law on the subject. Let me know if you do some research on the matter

police only have as much authority as laws provide to them.

Public intox laws vary by state. In Utah 76-9-701, Intoxilyzer is not necessary, officers only need to show that the person was intoxicated AND to a degree they presented a danger to themselves, and/or another person

thank you

thank you

thanks

Yes, there could be some liability in the case of letting them drive away, IF you had reasonable suspicion BEFORE they drove away. Problem is that RS is a broad term that's not easily defined, hence would be the argument for allowing them to drive a short distance to observe a traffic violation. It's a discretionary decision and would depend on the desired outcome the officer wanted to see. An officer on the contrary, could argue, they wanted to give the benefit of the doubt this letting them drive to confirm suspicion

your academy instruction is not consistent w case law. miranda is case law on the subject as stated in the video. here's a link that supports the video en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona

can you be more specific?

AGREED

Very well put. Absolutely thumbs up on your comment

Me too!

It's unrealistic to expect cops to EDUCATE as I am doing. It IS their job to uphold your constitutional rights, They swore under oath to protect when they pinned that badge on their uniform. NO EXCEPTIONS.

@@gunclassutah Do you think police officers and sheriff's deputies are properly trained on constitutional laws and limitations and principles today?

It's a crap shoot. Some are​@SellamAbraham

So I can provide a meaningful reply to your comment, what exactly have I said that you believe is misleading?

@gunclassutah read the book, please, and review your post. Its the rights of the cops, they have no rights because they are unlawful, standing armys are unlawful and thats what they are. Then only lawful officer is the sheriff, because of the abuse of the people.

I WAS a Sheriff's Deputy, glad to see by your own post I had authority to do my job.

@gunclassutah you should read blacks stone commentary on the Laws of England, A Treatise of Arrest, and False Imprisonment. Lex parliamentary americana, the law of nations or the principles of the law of nature as well to have a better understanding that a deputy was not meant to be a full-time emolument, but only when the sheriff was in need of help at that point in time. Thats why the 2nd amendment was drafted because the people are supposed to police themselves, not a standing army at the command of a despotical government.

Yes, it can be

I'm glad to help.

Happy to do it!

Gotta keep these companies in line. At least it's against the law here in my state.

I agree

Glad you like them!

Yes, very bad. Glad they didnt touch 76-2-402 which is still a reasonable standard

#repealutahhb369

This assault on Castle Doctrine affects EVERYONE, including liberals. Only Anti 2A activists benefit. #utahHB369repeal

@@gunclassutah anti 2A people and the far left can’t see that far in the future. They sure are a virus on our rights.

#repealutahhb369

#repealutahhb369