Видео

Elizabeth I killed more Catholics than her sister killed Protestants. Yet her sister has " Bloody Mary" as a nick name.

I love the music.

AS ADULT AND PARENTS, YOU TEACH YOUR KIDS NOT TO TELL A LIE AND SEND TO SCHOOL FOR GOOD EDUCATION. BUT YOU THERE PARENTS IS A LIERS. YOU LIE TO YOU WIFE AND WIFE SA TO HER HUSBAND.TEACHER TEACH THERE STUDENT ABOUT NOT LIEING TOO,BUT THEY LIE TOO. SO, HOW DO YOU CONDEM A PERSON IF SHE / HE IS NOT A LIER IF THEY SAY THEY INNOCENT? WILL YOU GOING TO BELIEVE OR NOT? IF YOU ALSO IN YOUR SYSTEM IS A LIER?

Painter must have had no idea about the fashion of that time

She didn’t steal anyone’s heart, she was a victim of Henry’s attentions until he got bored of her

Hello, everyone. "The Rehearsal for the Sacre" (1893) by Jean-Georges Vibert depicts an event that is said to have happened about a week before Napoleon’s coronation and consecration (otherwise known as the “Sacre”). Napoleon was able to fine-tune the orchestration of the ceremony with the help of the artist Isabey who also designed the costumes to be worn by the main protagonists at the ceremony at Notre-Dame cathedral on 2 December 1804. Isabey had the job of buying up little wooden dolls from toy stores, dressing them in elaborate ceremonial costumes, and laying out the plan of Notre-Dame. But Napoleon, ever the perfectionist, couldn’t resist knocking the dolls over with a stick-over and over again. The painting includes a range of figures like Pope Pius VII, who looks on in surprise, and Josephine, who looks a little amused. Through this quirky, behind-the-scenes moment, Vibert paints a picture of how Napoleon’s obsession with grandeur even extended to his own coronation. Thanks for stopping by.

Anne did not steal Henry from Katherin he'd had some 30 mistresses while Katherine was his wife. Katherine knew him for what he was a philandering creep. But Henry's problem was deeper than anyone knew he needed a son because he knew his Nobles would overpower a woman as his successor. Katherine couldn't have more children, honestly neither could Anne since the miscarriage that had happened. Henry took the low road & judiciously murdered Anne & her brother on trumped up charges then quickly ran off to marry Jane who died giving him a son.

Hello, everyone. I didn't think I'd follow up to the Catherine of Aragon video so quickly with this Anne Boleyn one. At this rate, I may even do a whole series on Henry's wives. We shall see. The painting "Anne Boleyn in the Tower" (1835) by Édouard Cibot captures a poignant moment of Anne Boleyn's final days before her execution. In the background, Anne, depicted in a black dress, kneels in a moment of quiet despair, her face filled with resignation. The young maiden in the foreground, most likely her niece Catherine Carey, stands close by, offering comfort in Anne’s last hours. The soft, muted colors and solemn expressions of both figures evoke the sadness of Anne's fate as she waits in the Tower of London for her impending execution. Cibot’s attention to detail in the figures' clothing and the somber atmosphere enhances the emotional depth of this historical scene, offering a glimpse into one of history’s most tragic and controversial figures. Thanks for stopping by.

Hears hammering and drills around him for the next 20 years....

She must have a great personality

Tweens and teens lie.

Don't people remember _being_ children?

Hello, everyone. Let me first start off by saying that this painting is based on a legend. This legend emerged from the medieval period, and among the earliest recorded is the French version from 1220. It is a cautionary tale about the triumph of a seductive woman, Phyllis, over the greatest male intellect, the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle. "Phyllis and Aristotle" (1530) by Lucas Cranach the Elder is not the only painting on this theme and many other artists depicted it in stone sculptures in churches, tapestries, engravings, brass jugs (aquamanile, shown in video), and stained glass. Thanks for stopping by. *If you are interested in the legend, here it is: Aristotle, tutor and counselor to Alexander the Great, sought to separate the youthful monarch from his paramour (Phyllis) who was absorbing all his time and energy. Reluctantly, Alexander agreed to it but also told Phyllis. She then came up with a scheme to nullify Aristotle's influence and to regain Alexander's affection. The plan was simple. Early in the morning, Phyllis sang and danced outside of Aristotle's window. Seized by her voice and beauty, Aristotle came out and expressed his desire for her. Phyllis answered that she will fulfill his wish only if he would pretend to be a horse, get on all fours, wear a saddle, and let her ride around the garden on his back. And you can guess what happened next. Having witnessed all of this from his window, Alexander later confronted his teacher. Aristotle only answered that there was a lesson to be learned from his example. If a wise philosopher, aged and grey as he, is unable to resist the power of Love, then Alexander, yet youthful and hot blooded, must be immeasurably more cautious in exposing himself to such danger.

That's not Anne portrait it's lady Bessie who's the mother of Henry

I thought he was dead for a second there-

Paintings told such meaningful stories back then

Love it ❤

My problem is just that all the people are white when he was born into a middle eastern family that certainly didn't have bright red hair and pale skin. Ans why does he have the wounds as a child? He got them as an adult right before he died... Weird

Interesting art piece. Thank you ❤

Hello, everyone. "The Secret Lover" (1757) is by Jean-Baptiste Le Prince, a French etcher and printer. During the Rococo era, love affairs were often depicted as playful, passionate, and... a bit frivolous. These paintings were all about indulgence and excess-romantic entanglements, not always as innocent as they seemed. In this scene, we see a young lover caught in a moment of intimacy...but there’s a twist. Not only is she married to another man (an older man at that, a common theme in Rococo art) but she is literally tied to him with a silk ribbon which her husband holds onto...like a leash. I think the fact that the husband is sleeping is the only part that's keeping the young love affair "secret." Thanks for stopping by.

Except the costumes depicted in this painting are not Elizabethan or Tudor in any way, they look more Jacobean in style.

did they then make one with boelyn in catherine s shoes? bc they should have . very very soon actually

Anne doesnt come near Catherine. Her patience, resiliance and not to mention she fought a war while pregnant. She was intelligent while Anne was just a power hungry mistress that Henry liked

I knew it the second I saw the caption

It’s so sad. There was absolutely nothing she could do. And in the end she got her revenge although she wasn’t alive to see it. And being beheaded was her own karma coming for her. When Catherine died and and Henry celebrated and rode a barge dressed in gold. I wouldn’t blame the other woman but in Anne’s case she got what was coming to her. She was a nasty vindictive woman who enjoyed causing pain.

Poor lady😢he was a pig

Clovis II (637-657/8) succeeded as king of Neustria and Burgundy from 639, initially with his mother acting as regent, then a succession of influential nobles. He married Balthild, an Anglo-Saxon aristocrat who had been sold into slavery in Gaul. They had three sons: Chlothar (who succeeded Clovis), Childeric, and Theuderic.- The Electric Light Company Also the other version is painted by the same artist, Luminais.

Men always look for younger when they younger.

So that explains her attraction towards the Caucasians powerful men 😂 she's white herself.

If I was Catherine of A. I would have given Henry a divorce only if I could go back to Spain with Princess Mary and a huge Amt of money and jewels 💎!!!

That’s weird.😮

Oh,I see. It is sad though.

Hello, everyone. Apollo in the Forge of Vulcan (1630) by Diego Velázquez, a Spanish painter. It is a striking departure from the idealized depictions of gods in classical art. Painted after his return from Rome, Velázquez captures the bodies with stunning detail, almost sculptural in form, but the faces are refreshingly human-far from the divine perfection seen in other works. If it weren't for the crown of laurel and the halo effect, we probably wouldn't even know that it's the god Apollo on the left. As for the depiction of Vulcan, many critics have call him ordinary at best and some even called him "ugly." You'll also notice that the cave in which the blacksmith god (Vulcan) forges weapons for the other deities in this painting is shown as a smithy, similar to those Velázquez could have seen in Spain or in Rome. After his visit to Italy, Velázquez's painting style expanded to include more dramatic gestures, nude figures, and colors learned from Italian masters. That said, Velázquez continued to be committed to painting ordinary lives and authenticity as he sees them. Thanks for stopping by.

A true glutton

I just thought of all the books and movies that try to humanize him and still fail.

This is stunning. And also speaks a lot about how much people forget that Jesus was born to a human mother and lived as a human under her care. I am not Christian so I might be wrong but this is still a fascinating depiction and the fact that people consider the human aspects of Jesus as 'disgusting' when in facts humans are said to have been created in God's own image... it says something.

Messed up theory What if Joseph had to be the one that made the crosses People were Crucified on and then when Jesus was Crucified he had to live with the knowledge that something he made killed his wife's son

OOP-

Hello, everyone. "Catherine of Aragon" (1919) is by Eleanor Fortescue-Brickdale, a British artist and a late exponent of Pre-Raphaelitism. You guys are probably familiar with King Henry VIII and his six wives, but have you ever stopped to think about what Catherine of Aragon must have felt during all of this? The painting captures her heartache as she silently witnesses the future unfolding before her eyes. By the way, Catherine of Aragon was the first wife of Henry VIII and the mother of Queen Mary I of England. Thanks for stopping by.

I love the painting!😊

Pro tip: if you have straight hair but want curly hair and need it to look polished, invest in a good hot rollers kit. They are truly miracule workers

Except Jesus wasn’t a little white child lol

Who reads this fast?

Hello, everyone. Before I forget, let me start with the pearl in wine reference. Among the most colorful tales in the pearl world is that of a legendary banquet where Cleopatra bet Marc Antony that she could host the most expensive dinner in history. According to author and noted pearl expert Fred Ward, in his book, Pearls, the queen hoped to impress Antony and the Roman Empire he represented with the extent of Egypt’s wealth. In her clever attempt to do so, she crushed one large pearl from a pair of earrings and dissolved it in a goblet of wine (or vinegar), before gulping it down. Antony was allegedly astonished and declined his dinner and declared her the winner. So, what's the image you think of when you see the name 'Cleopatra'? A bejeweled queen with blue eyeshadow? An exotic beauty surrounded by servants fanning her? As you can see from the video, Cleopatra had been imagined and reimagined as a blonde, a brunette, thin, tall, petite, voluptuous, etc...and her ethnicity was anyone's guess. Despite what is known of her brilliance and charm, in mass media depictions what often comes to the forefront is Cleopatra as a ravishingly seductive proto-femme fatale. Today many historians, under the influence of Sarah B. Pomeroy, an expert on the role of women in the ancient world, subscribe to the theory that Cleopatra’s looks-however pleasing they might have been-were ancillary to her considerable intelligence, learning, foresight, and strategic skills. The image of her as a sultry seductress likely stems from a narrative originally pushed by Octavian (Augustus) to rationalize his rivalry and conflict with fellow Roman Marc Antony, who was portrayed as having been manipulated by a foreign temptress. What’s more, casting Cleopatra as an evil beauty conveniently downplayed her competence and significance as a ruler. But Cleopatra was far more-a skilled linguist, brilliant diplomat, and cunning strategist who aligned with Caesar and Marc Antony to maintain her power and protect Egypt. By the way, the marble bust in the video (last shot), housed in the Old (Altes) Museum in Germany, is referred to as "Berlin Cleopatra" and is believed to attest to Cleopatra’s appearance. Thanks for stopping by. 1. "Cleopatra's Feast" (1653) -- Jacob Jordaens 2. "The Banquet of Cleopatra" (1743-44) -- Giovanni Battista Tiepolo 3. "Cleopatra Puts a Pearl in the Wine" (1706) -- Anthoni Schoonjans 4. "Cleopatra Testing Poisons on Condemned Prisoners" (1887) -- Alexandre Cabanel 5. "Cleopatra" (before 1911) -- Władysław Czachórski 6. "Cleopatra and Caesar" (1866) -- Jean-Léon Gérôme 7. "Cleopatra" (1934) -- Edward Mason Eggleston 8. "The Triumph of Cleopatra" (1821) -- William Etty 9. "Cleopatra" (1876) -- Heinrich Faust 10. "Cleopatra on the Terraces of Philae" (1896) -- Frederick Arthur Bridgman 11. Cleopatra on a coin of 40 drachmai from 51 to 30 BC, minted at Alexandria 12. "Cleopatra" (1888) -- John William Waterhouse 13. Bust of Cleopatra, 40 to 30 BC

That was a great video

Hmpph. I did not know that was true!!!

Ok,I love the painting !!!

Hello, everyone. "Christ in the House of His Parents" (1849-1850) is by John Everett Millais, an English painter and illustrator who was one of the founders of the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood. When this painting appeared at the Royal Academy annual exhibition of 1850, the critics only had scathing reviews. The most prominent critic was Charles Dickens (yes, the writer) who wrote his review in his magazine "Household Words" in June 1850. In it he described Christ as: a hideous, wry-necked, blubbering, red-haired boy in a nightgown, who appears to have received a poke playing in an adjacent gutter, and to be holding it up for the contemplation of a kneeling woman, so horrible in her ugliness that (supposing it were possible for any human creature to exist for a moment with that dislocated throat) she would stand out from the rest of the company as a monster in the vilest cabaret in France or in the lowest gin-shop in England. The reason for such backlash was the realism of the painting. Pre-Raphaelite paintings are today seen as uncomplicatedly beautiful images. But when they were first painted in the mid 19th century, they were regarded as assaults on the eye, objectionable in terms of their realism and morally shocking. The commentary in "The Times" was equally unfavorable, stating that Millais’ “attempt to associate the Holy Family with the meanest details of a carpenter’s shop, with no conceivable omission of misery, of dirt, of even disease, all finished with loathsome minuteness, is disgusting.” The painting proved to be so controversial that Queen Victoria asked that it be removed from the exhibition and brought to her so she could personally examine it. That said, the painting sparked a wider debate about the relationship between realism, medievalism, and modernity in the arts. Its use of symbolic realism also inspired a wider movement that combined detailed observation with the choice of theme and composition. Thanks for stopping by.

History of the white man and How Cruel they Were and Still Are 😒

The Holy Bible James, teaches that Jesus Christ is the final priest. 🙏 All people can pray directly to God the Father, through faith in Jesus Christ, alone. God doesn't want us to murder people, either. 🕊🌿🫒🌱🌱🐛🌾🌵☘️🌴🌳🌲🍀🍃🪲