Видео

Use a melmetal deck. Destroys it easily

Golem w guard press

I used Primeapes and marshadows.

There is actually a link of it under one of my other mew immersive videos I think it’s the oldest video I have about it. If you can’t find it I can still post the link here too though

No sadly there is no way to specifically farm the Venesaur one but doing the advanced will give you a guarantee to get a promo pack

Wait so say I’m missing venusaur and do not have the regular version or EX but I have the new promo one, does that count for venusaur?

@Jewmama Apparently not. I had a promo butterfree but it didn't count until I made one

@@lazarusbooth8898 thank you for letting me know that sucks now tho because mewtwo is the only pack I don’t need to open beside getting venusaur I was really hoping that this promo would’ve worked

need to spend quite a bit to get this

@@sutnack7537you don’t I’m only 5 cards away and haven’t spent a dollar

@@sutnack7537 not too much to be honest I’ve only spent 30 and am very close only 15 cards off and I have all the rarer ones

I opened 26 and got one which was the 26th one

I got it in my 2nd pack😂😂😂

@@xsparik you and I both bro. At this point I’m doing all the achievements in the Lapras event to just do it

@@alexbell8865 Lol same

@@Rankedbros5 i got it in my 1st thinking thats what is supposed to happen 😂😂

I got it in my 2nd pack

I got 5 LMAOOO

I had the opposite problem. Pikachu was the last one I was able to finish max flair for. I've had almost 10 lapras. Not sure about the pull rates or maybe I'm inversely lucky

@cash_ketchum4958 everyone's saying it's a simple 1/5 however I don't believe it. Took me 33 to get a single butterfree

Bro I can’t get anything BUT those two.

@@cash_ketchum4958Send me your id, I might need a Lapras from you once the trading begins. 35 packs in, no Lapras so far.

How would it be creating a bias exactly? Wait yeah I know what exponential distribution you mean and yeah that is also a thing but that is I think though related to thus not really what I am trying to find out here. Also yeah agree with that game design perspective and that makes a lot of sense, also mainly why I was curious what the actual values where of this one

@@PokemonCardCollector9000 I am not entirely sure how it would create a bias, I am going off really shaky memories from 2 ish years ago. I am probably totally wrong on that. However I am pretty sure the number of heads will follow an exponential distribution. unlike the binomial distribution where if you squint it looks like a bell, the exponential distribution looks like a ski slope. I think the name comes from the exponential decay of the number of each outcome. It is quite easy to calculate the exponential distribution, something like P(desired outcome)^n = P(it takes n tries for the desired outcome). For example the probability of a coin landing on tails taking 4 tries would be (1/2)^4 = 1/(2^4) = 1/16. The graph of it is y = ap^x where y is the number of times it takes a certain amount of tries, x is the number of tries, a is the number of times the test is run and p is the probability of the desired outcome. The graph for the number of heads between each tail is y = 0.5^(x+1). Hopefully there is something coherent in that block of text. If you have any more questions, I am significantly better at speaking on discord.

I coin can have a bias, so in this case yes the word bias is used in the correct sense. Dont worry im doing university courses in statistics I should know :)

@@PokemonCardCollector9000 edit: when you are discussing the bias as in the colloquial sense, then its ok, but then your statistical bias then needs to represent that i.e. probability estimate - 0.5. what you are calling the bias would be the probability and since a normal coin would be p=0.5 a bias in the coin would be +-[0,0.5]. anyways, you didnt come to a conclusion, i would have liked to see some sort of test or CI as those would be a natural extension. also, still liking and subbing for stats videos, dont worry

Stronger, not functionally fairer since nothing really needs 4+ water energy. Having a Lapras with 25 water energy is hilarious but unless you wanna swap it in every turn and out the next not quite useful.

@vbarreiro Definitely more fair for both players, as the rate of 0s would be reduced, but it also can't spike.

Isnt that basically a huge nerf, since the moltres basically has that ability but then for the cost of one energy instead of actually playing a card

@@SarajevoKyoto The spike is meaningless though. A Starmie with 2 energy or with 2 million energy functions exactly the same. Maybe in later expansions when they add more boss Pokemon with move costs of 5 energy the spike will matter, but as it stands, the absolute most a Misty can do for a game is “Articuno either both Blizzard and switch out without losing the ability to Blizzard when it comes back in”, which yes is good, but not incredibly powerful for how rare an event it is

@PokemonCardCollector9000 I suppose you could see it like that, but it also doesn't use up your attack that turn and isn't tied to Moltres staying alive. We don't have a water-type "Moltres" either as far as I know, so Misty works in its place. I think overall the card is in a really weird place, but there are definitely solutions.

Oooh yeah absolutely, its a game changer if you flip tails or not. The only plus side is getting free wins like that if you play against people flipping tails. But it’s not fun, I was more trying to figure out if the coin was biased or not just out of interest

I still think Charizard moltres is the strongest coin flip deck as you get a min of 6 coins before Charizard and if 4 comes head you can one any pokemon without extra energy and if you put a min of 5 before starting you can one shot 2 turns in a row.

I agree with you fully and did consider only looking at the first flip, but for completeness took all of the flips into account. Technically once the first flip is a heads the second flip has a 50/50 chance again to be heads so would still be relevant information. Unless they have different chances for every subsequent flip but that would be a lot of work on their end and I don’t expect that to be the case

@@PokemonCardCollector9000 Game developer here (not for this game). While I do agree that most of us wouldn’t do something like tweak the odds on different flips of a coin, it would only take about 20 minutes and a few lines of code to make something like this possible. It’s not a hard thing to do, we would just question *why* it’s being done.

@@meteorfossil Yeaaah I figured after placing that comment that it actually wouldnt be too hard to change it haha, but thank you for the clarification!

Starting player should get energy but shouldn't be able to attack. This would already balance the game against Misty.

the strongest deck in the game is Pikachu EX , which barely has coinflips

Yeah that is pretty much also what happened to me, I had a few games with some really good flips but then also way more games where I just didn’t get any heads at all

Good idea actually, it should be technically. If you look at the occurances, if there is a big dataset then getting 2+ flips should occur in a 50/50 split with getting 1 heads. Same for if you get atleast 2 heads the chance of the next one is again just a 50/50 chance. At least it should be So again a 50/50 split between 2 and 3+

had the same experience

They might have programmed the flips for the event slightly differently actually