Видео

Reed Jeffery wave power

Loved your analysis of wave dynamics ..there is stacks of power in every wave everywhere waves form and build as they approach shore .. Why not put wind turbine blades underwater and have wave energy cause them to rise and fall over a great length ..whether they would be strong enough or hollow or half filled with water and bolted to what ? Maybe a twin system or triple so these blades mounted on a frame like old fashioned push lawn mowers might be forced to turn slowly with each wave with great potential energy ….just think transferring wave power could use more (length of wave)

Thanks for the video

Saludos por favor me dan dirección de venta de turbinas generadores e ingeniero guía

Que empresa puede hacer estos montajes

If we come from the Everything, then our listening antennas are made of the same everything that have emmited the photons. I can't understand how we could have moved away so fast into the none-space of none-existence, then exist for billions of years, then at some point to decide to stop and listen to the particles, we were made of, to catching up with us.

Clear explanations. Thanks.

Thanks a lot

Great video that finally cleared things up for me. Love to see a video on blazed gratings !!

It helped a lot!

How much is the cosmic background radiation redshifted? It originates from the largest possible distance/time?

Wouldn't the last one be mediated through a gluon u anti-u gluon s anti-s? Since, the W^- would need to be a W^+ going from the bottom for u quark to become an s quark, does it not?

Great explanation

The ultimate unification and understanding of physics/physical experience combines, BALANCES, AND INCLUDES opposites, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY manifest as F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Here's the proof. This also explains why objects (including WHAT IS THE FALLING MAN) fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=MA ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that E=MC2 IS clearly and necessarily F=ma ON BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. ON THE CLEAR, EXTENSIVE, SENSIBLE, BALANCED, THEORETICAL, AND UNIVERSAL PROOF THAT ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS clearly PROVEN TO BE F=MA ON BALANCE: Balanced inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE; AS gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Indeed, A PHOTON may be placed at the center of what is THE SUN (as A POINT, of course); AS the reduction of SPACE is offset by (or BALANCED with) the speed of light (c); AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma IN BALANCE. TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, it makes perfect sense that THE PLANETS (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) will move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN !!! ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as this balances gravity AND inertia; AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. GREAT. I have explained the cosmological redshift AND the supergiant stars. Stellar clustering ALSO proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 is CLEARLY F=ma IN BALANCE !!! By Frank DiMeglio

UNDERSTANDING EXACTLY WHAT IS A TWO DIMENSIONAL SURFACE OR SPACE AS invisible AND VISIBLE IN BALANCE, AS E=MC2 IS clearly F=ma (ON BALANCE): The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Now, very carefully consider what is a galaxy. Get a good look at what is THE EYE, AND notice the black space. E=MC2 AND F=ma IN BALANCE do ALSO FUNDAMENTALLY represent (ON AVERAGE) what is a TWO DIMENSIONAL surface OR SPACE (as what is a BALANCED MIDDLE DISTANCE in/of SPACE), AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. Gravity AND ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy are linked AND BALANCED opposites, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Now, consider what is the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. I have explained why THE PLANETS (including WHAT IS THE EARTH) move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN on balance, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS E=MC2 IS CLEARLY and NECESSARILY F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! Accordingly, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. It is CLEARLY proven ON BALANCE. E=MC2 IS CLEARLY F=ma ON BALANCE. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity !!! TIME dilation ULTIMATELY proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity, AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE !!! Indeed, TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE; AS E=MC2 IS F=ma IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. Gravity IS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy. "Mass"/ENERGY IS GRAVITY. ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. (BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is fundamental.) Objects AND MEN fall at the SAME RATE (neglecting air resistance, of course), AS E=MC2 IS F=ma ON BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. This NECESSARILY represents, INVOLVES, AND DESCRIBES what is possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE. Gravity is ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON BALANCE. The sky is BLUE, AND what is the Earth is ALSO BLUE. Carefully consider what is a galaxy !!! Energy has/involves GRAVITY, AND ENERGY has/involves inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass"/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON BALANCE); as E=MC2 is CLEARLY and NECESSARILY proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as this balances gravity AND inertia; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity; as E=MC2 is CLEARLY and necessarily proven to be F=ma ON BALANCE !!! So, “dark” matter/ENERGY is plainly unnecessary; and it is idiotic. I have mathematically unified physics, as I have explained the term c4 from Einstein's field equations along WITH the fourth dimension, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND necessarily proven to be gravity ON BALANCE. E=MC2 is CLEARLY proven to be F=ma IN BALANCE. By Frank DiMeglio

Great work 👏 👍 👌

At 15:42 you use theta for first minimum=lambda/b when the ratio is 1, however theta=lambda/b is approximate, How can you use it in this case?

I love the graphics on the equipotential lines and the explanation about the J with the Cullon to the power of -1 is magnificient!

Mr. Roby represent 🤪

How does the proximity of a red k series affect the field?

If you want to REALLY understand Special Relativity, then I suggest you look at the demonstration videos here: www.energyfieldtheory.com/demos The length contraction comes about due to the different Doppler shifts of the upstream and downstream wave components in the standing waves that make up matter. The standing wave nodes automatically get closer together by a factor determined by the Lorentz factor when the waves become Doppler shifted. Also, the rate of time automatically slows due to the anisotropy in the speed of light through the moving frame of reference, combined with the Doppler shifted waves. You can see this is box 3 of the demonstration video on the webpage (link given above). And, the mass (not rest mass as we are talking about objects that are moving fast, not at rest) DOES get larger, as the mass is the equivalent of the energy in the waves that form the standing waves of the particles. The energy of the standing waves is the sum of the upstream and downstream waves (over the contracted length of the object) and it comes out to EXACTLY the rest mass multiplied by the Lorentz factor! Coincidence? I think not... See this paper that proves that the Relativistic mass increase is real and makes perfect sense once you understand what is actually going on to the Electromagnetic waves that make up particles when they move fast: www.researchgate.net/publication/326647422_Relativistic_Mass_Increase_Explained If you can open your mind on this issue and want to learn more about how thing REALLY are, then please explore my other papers here: www.researchgate.net/profile/Declan-Traill/research

this guy sounds like Christian Bale👌🏾

Quran, أَوَلَمۡ يَرَ ٱلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوٓاْ أَنَّ ٱلسَّمَٰوَٰتِ وَٱلۡأَرۡضَ كَانَتَا رَتۡقٗا فَفَتَقۡنَٰهُمَاۖ وَجَعَلۡنَا مِنَ ٱلۡمَآءِ كُلَّ شَيۡءٍ حَيٍّۚ أَفَلَا يُؤۡمِنُونَ (Sahih International) Have those who disbelieved not considered that the heavens and the earth were a joined entity, and We separated them and made from water every living thing? Then will they not believe? -Sura Al-Anbya, chapter 21, verse 30 وَٱلسَّمَآءَ بَنَيۡنَٰهَا بِأَيۡيْدٖ وَإِنَّا لَمُوسِعُونَ (Sahih International) And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander. -Sura Adh-Dhariyat, chapter 51, verse 47 Thanks

Bro please do the math behind this

I never read about a possible alternative explanation for the CMB ??

Sir , it's very informative , we shall be benefited more if you could go a bit slow .

Thank you

Great vid but I’d argue there is Special Relativistic effects because if the UFO is located directly above a point on earth then said UFO with a 200 km greater radius than said earth point will have a greater angular velocity relative to both point’s axis of rotation. In fact, GPS satellites incorporate both SR and GR time dilation equations due to both special and general relativistic phenomenons happening simultaneously to said GPS satellites relative to all earth points.

Educative video

thanks

Nice

Thanks for quick refresh.

So glad I found this before my exam!

Isn't resolvance defined as lambda/ delta lambda?

Overriding evidence from the CMB of no Big Bang, the earth is at the centre of a universe that would not have a centre if the big bang is correct. This suffers with confirmation bias of the evidence.

Thanks. Your videos are highly underrated. I will recommend this channel to all my friends!

This was very helpful. Your video makes me want to research more about this. I really appreciate your efforts. Thank you, sir.

Thanks a lot, is it possible to explain how energy conservation is maintained concerning a Doppler shifted EM wave (when a light source is moving towards and from an observer) ? Is EM wave energy dependent both on the amplitude and the frequency of the wave ? What I've started to wonder about, concerning special relativity, is why, in a more physical sense, the velocity of the light source + the velocity of the light beam itself always is c, for an observer. The wave is obviously blue-shifted (compressed) if the light source is moving towards the observer, but what other properites of the wave have changed ?

well done

Thank you, really helpful!

Good presentation.. .If we just assume for a while light speed is not constant absolute C in every vaccum given it is not constant across mediums anyways, believe it or not analogy of SOUND IN IDEAL GAS MODEL FITS PERFECTLY WITH LIGHT IN EITHER MODEL & FULLY SATISFIES ALL EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS including Michelson Morey one. 1.Just as photons come into earth gravity they will accelerate according to classical mexhanics v=f*lamda No wonder higher f closer to earth. 2.When 747 flows in air at Mach 0.5 air there is no wind at its surface instead there is a boundary layer across which at 1 end it has 747 velocity & at other end earth velocity likewise when earth flows through solar system aetcher, earth will have aether boundary layer with earth surface must have no aether wind & other end of boundary layer at same velocity as solar system.In b/w the velocity transition region.... 3.Now speed of sound. All people in 747 will observe speed of sound mach 1 bcz local air within 747 has 0 velocity wrt 747 but wrt to earth ref frame sound speed within 747 is actually 1.5 mach but u cannot easily measure sound speed within 747 sitting outside it just the way we cannot measure light speed in space wrt earth using instrument sitting in space. How to measure? ahhhhhhhh If u have a probe with material base within earth & 747 has a tiny side opening & 747 runs through it u will measure speed of sound 1.5 mach.What? yes. Just the way even with car win open u really cannot appreciate speed of your car. It is only when u take your entire arm out ie outside car boundary layer u feel how fast your car is going wrt rest of the world. 4. So how to measure light speed variation practically. Light is EM so no EM based system or nano particles based system should be used to measure variation bcz of light's strong interaction with those. Just the way u cannot measure thermal expansion of steel tube using steel rule. It will always say steel tube length is universal constant for all temperatures.....Use some macro size mechanical tool like eg tuning fork to measure time given u know its time period not atomic clock. 2nd just the way both ends of measuring tool have to extend across boundary layer probe should extend across earth aether.So various altitude geostationery satellites good candidates. Now even interferometers in those will measure aether wind & thereby changing light speed. Some rather crude experiments show fringe varies on rotating interferometewr on vertical plane no wonder light speeds up towards earth due to gravity of classical mechanics & decelerated going away.

I THINK THIS IS A FALLACY! Am I missing something or, has no-one realised one crucial point? The light-path illustrated at 5:24 is MISLEADING because, in reality, the distance that the beam of light has to travel is EXACTLY the same for BOTH observers. The 'zig-zag' path that is always used to explain this theory is deceitfully confusing and WRONG! In truth, the beam of light in the rocket IS STILL only going UP and DOWN - it is NOT zig-zagging! Therefore, there is NO difference in the distance it has to travel, or in the amount of elapsed time for BOTH observers.

This is so cool and underrated. Needs a bit of toning down for lay people but for grad students I can totally follow.

Very well done.

Why does not electron antielectron pair annihilate into Z0 boson??

Hi there...great videos for IB....what application do you use to make your videos? Thanks.

How many subscribers can a piece of pizza get ??🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕🍕 Also love your videos!!!

so helpful thank you so so so much!

The sun has an atmosphere how was that included in the calculation for the star?

So in strong gravity, one cycle of photon (period = 1/frequency) happens in x seconds(?) and in weaker gravitational field, one cycle of photon happens in y seconds(?) . And x < y so while photon cycles once in weaker field, during that time(?) photon cycles many times in stronger field. However we say time passes slowly in stronger field. This last part is strange, it is just counter to my intuition. So that means although photon cycles many times, those many times is equivalent to one cycle in weaker field. And that means, not frequency but wavelength controls time