Видео

Did you happen to read verse 2?

@@Joe-HarleyHardRock no. Friday night

People want the genie in the bottle type god, sadly. Part of our sin nature is that we're always fighting a temptation towards something like that. I don't claim to be immune.

@ I am convinced that how we handle that temptation is what’s most important. Jesus quoted scripture when He was in the wilderness.

They were oral stories for 100 to 200 years. First manuscripts on new tree stamens were written 200ad

If that's the case, how would you explain the Ryland's fragment? Also, how is it that Clement of Rome refers in his letter to the Corinthians in AD 95 to Paul's and Peter's letters and also to the four gospel accounts?

@@gg4ksa With no realistic way to challenge it.

Lol

Praise the Lord!

@@jahmereyoung6000 What is your proof that the wine Jesus made was not in the prepared-to-be-consumed form. Unless you can demonstrate that, then you have only proved that you're speculating that it wasn't. Keep working on it, though.

@@jahmereyoung6000 You would also need to demonstrate that,even if it was consumed at undiluted levels, it was consumed in sufficient quantities to cause drunkenness. That's also not required by the text. Also, the reference is to the wedding feast at Cana of Galilee, not to the Passover. Also, alcohol has biphasic effects on the norepinephrine system and can actually cause psychomotor excitation in many individuals at moderate levels of intoxication, so the inference you attempted to make in a separate comment is unwarranted. I appreciate you trying to offer a counterargument, though. Cheers!

@@richsuga prepared to consume stage or not. Multiple drinks at the common alcoholic content threshold of the day, would still be intoxicating.

@@richsuga being drunk can make you feel sleepy because alcohol is a central nervous system depressant, which means it slows down brain activity, leading to feelings of relaxation and drowsiness. So, does that render your refutation unwarranted? Do you see how that works?

​@@richsugaAccording to John 2:1-11, Jesus turned water into wine at a wedding in Cana of Galilee, and the master of the banquet was so impressed that he called the bridegroom over to serve the best wine first. The master of ceremonies said, "Every host serves his best wine first, until everyone has had a cup or two, then he serves the cheaper wine".

Thank you for the encouragement. I agree re: repentance unto salvation. What specifically do you mean by "this class of sinner"? I was confused about that.

@@BiochemicalKevin No. It's a lot noisier out there than it seems on these videos. Tons of ambient noise. Need the speaker to cut through it. Many street performers downtown here use them, so we do, too. I wonder if you've ever left a similar comment on a street musician's videos? I'm guessing you haven't. Why do you think that is?

@richsuga yes, all street performers just need to be heard within 20 ft. There is no need for the noise to travel any further.

​@@BiochemicalKevinTheres 82 bars and nightclubs within a half a square mile in Athens, GA. The noise ordinance provides for up to 300 ft of audibility before 11pm and 100 feet after that. Our prayer is that God's Word will make it to as many as possible. We don't want people to live and die without Jesus. I hope you don't, either 🙏🏻🙌🏻

Why should he stop using a megaphone? an in the bible it says we can judge others ,but when we do we do it with righteousness 😊

@@colonalklink14 I don't see how I would be confusing anything since I agree with what you said there. Where, specifically, did I preach something to the contrary?

@richsuga Towards the end of your speech.

​@@colonalklink14That's not specific.

​@colonalklink14 Where did I say to trust in anything except Jesus for salvation? Search all my videos. I promise you'll never hear me say that.

@@richsuga You said that a saved person will have a changed life. That is just backloading works into the gospel message.

@@David-z1p1h So everyone should just do whatever they feel like doing? Are there any objective standards regulating morally acceptable human conduct? If so, who or what determines those? The sad world that you're missing out on is the one Aristotle described when he said that the unexamined life is not worth living.

Amen! Those are great Scriptures, too! 🙌🏻🙏🏻

It doesn't sound like Paul is describing the sexual orientations of individuals in Romans 1, as he is describing general patterns across all of humanity. The context dictates that he is speaking of the normal complementary nature of sexual unions and humans perverting that in their sexual sin. This describes what homosexual offenders do.

@@richsuga Ah, It was confusing because of the text at the bottom.

Yeah, but I was hoping to educate her instead of rebuke her. She probably sits under some false teacher cotton candy gospel ear-tickler hireling.

@@homelandfreedom Think about the irony of you coming here to judge me 😂 Also, the Scriptures tell Christians to judge. You can't really be a good Christian if you refuse to judge. What we're forbidden to do is to condemn others, and I didn't do that here, so...🤷🏻‍♂️

I agree! It sounds like you were just "judging" your former life, before you came to Christ! That's called a testimony! Crazy to me how quick professing Christians want to play the "judge not" card. Jesus forbids hypocritical judgement but actually commands righteous judgment! Anyway, spot on here! Don't listen to the detractors and keep doing what you do! We need many more like you! ​@@richsuga

Thank you and God bless you! ​@@KittyNineteen

@richsuga not judging at all just made a statement of facts Jesus is the only one who can pass judgement an what ever we do in the end Jesus will pass judgement if we will enter heaven or not Jesus said do not judge unless you be judged

I assume you're referring to Matthew 7:1. Have you bothered to keep reading a few more verses to Matthew 7:6? Who are these dogs and swine that Jesus refers to? Actual animals or certain people? If people, then how do we identify them without exercising some sort of "judgement"? And why does Jesus tell us in John 7:24 to judge with righteous judgement? Why does Paul write in 1 Corinthians 6:2 that the saints (Christians) will judge the world? Why is there a book in the Bible called "Judges" if humans are never supposed to judge anything? Is it wrong to have courts of law presided over by judges? AGAIN: What Christ forbids, if you actually study the Scriptures, is HYPOCRITICAL judgement. For example, if one were to be secretly having an affair or viewing porn (sexual immorality) but making it a point to, say, publicly rant and rail against LGBTQ at every opportunity. Jesus says for a person like that to first get their own life right before the Lord, and then they can actually be useful in helping others make the changes God would have them make. Please go and learn how to better study and apply Scripture so that you will be making righteous judgements, rather than judging by mere appearances as you have here (again, see John 7:24) @@homelandfreedom

Studying the documentary evidence of Jesus had a lot to do with it, especially the non-Cheistian early witnesses.

@@richsuga I've seen it. None of this is verifiable.

​@@DRayL_ I disagree.

@@richsuga If you're biased toward the dogma, you won't be open to that which runs contrary to the dogma.

Correct, I preach those verses virtually every time I'm out there! Praise God 🙏🏻🙌🏻

@@im_cart8656 Public proclamation of the gospel goes on all around the globe. It actually originated on the continent of Asia.

@@richsuga i was referring to the whole scene.. you preaching, the gay stuff on the ground, a bunch of young people walking by trying to ignore you, the person in the car trying to start something. something i would see in a 90s comic book

Yes, it's very colorful 🙏🏻🙌🏻

So everyone who uses an amplifier or PA system is "screaming" according to your definition. Here's the thing, though. I bet you don't apply that criterion elsewhere. That shows that your real problem is with the message. Also, God doesn't tell us to "spread" the gospel. The command in Scripture (e.g., Mark 16:15 and elsewhere) is to PREACH. The Greek word is a conjugation of "kerusso" which means to proclaim, publish, announce, herald. Was it a "personal thing" when Peter preached the crucified and risen Jesus on Pentecost? When Stephen preached in front of the Jews? When Paul preached all over the place, including at the Aeropagus in Acts 17? Of course, Christians should be bringing the message of the Cross to those God has brought into their sphere of close personal influence (i.e., their oikos). But the Scriptures CLEARLY give a basis/support for also heralding the gospel publicly. If I'm wrong, then prove that I'm wrong FROM SCRIPTURE, not from your opinion or from how you think other people might feel about it.

Also, this very night 3 people professed faith in Christ for the first time based on the outreach God sent us to do there. Maybe go read Romans 14:4.

Another gospel. Mathew 7:21-23 describes his fate. Free Grace is the only true gospel.

​@@colonalklink14​We preach salvation by God's grace alone expressed through faith alone in Jesus Christ alone to the glory of God alone. Which part of that, specifically, do you disagree with and why? ​@colonalklink14

@richsuga The part where you backload works into the gospel message.

@@the3rdfrequency That's one way, and all Christians should already be doing that. However, throughout Scripture (including the New Testament) God also calls some to preach the gospel openly. The Greek word translated "preach" (kerusso) means to herald, to announce, to proclaim publicly, to publish. It was used primarily of carrying the gospel into the world, not preaching in front of a congregation of people who were already believers. (That would be teaching, which is also necessary but a different activity.) If you read Mark 16:15, Jesus didn't say we were required to first "earn the right" to speak into people's lives. If we can do that, then great, we should. But Peter, for example, didn't first earn the right to speak into people's lives on Pentecost (Acts 2). Nor did the other preachers in Acts, including Stephen, who they killed for his sermon (proof that your audience won't always like it even if you're preaching a true message with correct motives). We definitely encourage Christians to avail themselves of the personal relationships God has given them and leverage those for the gospel. That's the starting point, and we all should already be doing that. But that doesn't mean that open air preaching isn't valid today. God still uses it to convict backslidden Christians and even call sinners to repentance and faith in Jesus. I have seen that happen personally many, many times.

@the3rdfrequency That's why we go out there! To be like Jesus and meet sinners where they're at! Praise God! We've seen hundreds either come to faith or have their faith rekindled from this same street corner over the past 10 years! It's so fruitful! Keep us in your prayers 🙏🏻🙌🏻

Saving repentance has absolutely nothing to do with turning from sins whatsoever. *Saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation.* When you have believed on Christ alone for salvation then you have repented unto life!

@@DanielMoon1776 Amen! Preach it!

Your personal obedience has absolutely nothing to do with salvation at all. That's a service issue. Salvation is absolutely free and not conditional upon service to God. Romans 9:5, "By the obedience of one many are made righteous." *You're obsessed with pride.* Everything you said has absolutely nothing to do with salvation at all. *Saving repentance is realizing that you are a sinner deserving of God's just punishment in Hell and turn (repent) from whatever you trusted in before, if indeed you trusted in anything; to trusting in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation.* You've got another gospel.

@@colonalklink14 i love you brother or sister in Christ, so ill give some scripture to read Matthew 7:21-23

@@DanielMoon1776 Mathew 7:21-23 actually describes the fate of the faith plus works equals salvation crowd.

@@colonalklink14 John 15:2 Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away: and every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit.

Go research "Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement". Criticizing tone / modality is one of the lowest levels of analysis. And, again, do you consider it "yelling" anytime anyone uses a microphone? I doubt it. I can yell, and this is definitely nowhere close to yelling. Public speaking 101 dictates that a speaker generally matches or exceeds the energy of their environment. There's no way to effectively do that without some inflection and emphasis in your voice.

First, you would need to define how you're using the word "judgment" in this context. Otherwise, you have no valid point and are being hypocritical.

@richsuga I have a question ❓ if you don't mind me asking ❓ Is that you in the VIDEO SCREAMING AT EVERYONE LIKE THAT ❓❓

It's a Bose S1 speaker. Do you go around judging everyone who uses voice amplification? Let's be real: Your real issue is with the message, not the medium. Thanks for playing, though.

@richsuga have a good weekend👍🙂

I don't follow you. I use ESV typically and almost never KJV, although I think it's okay. Which countries today of Christian heritage have chattel slavery? Also, if you're an atheist (not sure if you are?) then by what transcendent, unchanging, objective standard would you identify slavery as evil?

@ ESV is a modern derivative of the KJV and I’m not an Athiest. If you look at the history of the US, Ireland, India, and most of Africa you’ll understand that Pretestantism and Evangelism have been supporters of slavery and slave traders themselves since the time of King James. Then there’s Jim Crow laws in the American South, which Evangelism was used to justify segregation and oppression of the black community. Look at Billy Graham and his messages to his supporters. Many Southern Evangelists lynched black folk as a “blood sacrifice” to crucifix effigies. Don’t get me started on Evangelism and child brides…

@@zigzagjag243 Why do you care how the preacher chooses to live his life?

@@richsuga you are the weirdo screaming at others

@@sammyrhoads265 You missed the point entirely, which was the undeniable impact of Jesus' life, not what particular date he was born on. It's actually more likely that he was born in the spring, based on where the shepherds were that night, but thanks for weighing in.

@@richsugacelebrating Jesus on one day of the year is kind of absurd in my opinion. Why not celebrate him every day at all times of the day?

Agree 100% ​@@Transmutathan

@@davidspencer7718 Died 19 April 1882. Still dead.

@ Darwin died for a lie.

@@davidspencer7718 Do you think he believed it was true? I know that people debate this. It seems to me that he did manage to convince himself. Anyway, I think he died from natural causes in relative prosperity.

@@GloryGloryToThemDawgs How long does that bring you joy? If that's what your hope is in, prepare to be disappointed. In the historical FACT of the resurrection of Jesus, God has provided believers with a "living hope" (1 Peter 1:3). I pray you apprehend that by faith one day 🙏🏻🙌🏻

@@Lonesome-y6w What you meant to say is that Peter DENIED knowing Christ 3 times on the night that Jesus was arrested. And that actually helps my point immensely. That was before the resurrection. 50 days later, the same Peter is boldly preaching the risen Christ in front of many of the same people who had him arrested and put on trial.

@@Lonesome-y6w you are correct, but after that third time, never again.

@@Lonesome-y6w 😁

@@Lonesome-y6w According to what external, transcendent and unchanging moral standard do you make these judgements? 🤔