Видео

Yes quite agree.

Good decision and a close call, very easy to be seduced by the Blueprint S.

Sensational comment.

I've been given duff information if that's the case but whatever it is its going about the same but higher

I looked on Wilsons website to see if this was true and oddly enough it says that the new max model is the set where the 7 iron is 30 degree and the standard dynapower model now has the 7 iron at 28 degree versus the old 27.5. This was confusing as I would have thought that they were reversed as the new max model is classified as "game improvement plus" and the standard dynapower is classified as "game improvement". I wonder if the people in charge at Wilson who run their website confused the iron loft charts and placed them with the wrong irons.

That will probably be correct, the max model is game improvement but it’s for slower swing speeds, like the High Launch models other manufacturers have, they need more loft on these models to help get the ball in the air properly.

Think you would be better with the new one, better all rounder.

I’m much like you - tried a few irons a couple of months back and ended up with the Cleveland Zipcore XL; thoroughly recommend them.

Don't know anything about Takomo really. Not big over here yet.

Why wouldn't you, what's so great about the Takoma brand nothing

Id go Maltby first, then Wilson CB Forged, then the Dynapower, them Tacomo. Not nearly as impressive as Maltby TS3, TS4 or TS1-M.

Wilson has the tradition and the Major vs Tacomo. I'd take Wilson staff over any brand. Look at their Dynapower drivers kicking all the big boys in the nuts with their performance....

Yes they have, it's a really nice classy looking head with a really modern cutting edge feel to it now.

I tried those D9 forged Irons once on a simulator. Those were some sweet Irons.

Forged version is one of the best buys out there.

No it doesn't unfortunately, the other two make them specifically for their own trolleys.

Be a bit fiddly trying to get a ball marker in and out would it not. I'll have to have another look. Forgotten what it looks like, haven't played outside golf for ages.

Yes, that's one of my next experiments, to see how different those two are.

Yes and if you watch one of my later videos it didn’t work out! Will try not to make that mistake again , but can’t promise.

Yes, should be fine, there’s plenty of room at the top. You might need the headcovers but should be fine

I had someone order power spec in the i525 but I would recommend caution, the lofts on the standard ones are seriously strong, it all depends on your particular launch conditions, but they are very strong, no harm in trying them though.

@ i may just go with the Retro Spec instead. I don’t need to be hitting a 7 iron 220 yards lol. I’m going to hit them today and see what i think. They look absolutely stunning even slimmer than my Mizuno 225s.

Yeah Qi10 was more open looking

I wouldn't get a power lofted 4 iron, could be a world of hurt off anything other than a perfect lie or a tee. 5 - AP would be mu pick.

@ thanks mate 🙌🏻

Yes looks are subjective. I'm sure you're not the only one who will prefer the G430. Interesting differences with the balls. Wish I could be as sure as that about my yardages!

It does show a little bit of difference, albeit not a lot I'll give you that. The G730 is still noticeably bigger when you see them together.

Yes, but just skewed a little bit in favour of the new one - which is at least something. They have got a bit better and if you prefer the looks then there's some justification for a new purchase.

I've got a good video on pitching.

@@thejam7129 blimey! Some difference there.

@@andybt3989 lol ya I’m a wild man

I totally agreebut they do look better! Never considered Srixon until recently but they look so much better!

Yeah I can't get my hands on Srixons unfortunately, can't do every manufacturer in the shop, but they do look good.

Would need to source a 7 iron, if you fancy dropping one in I'll do it.

Yes, it did but it wasn't a 56 degree, it was 54. It's nice it's got a classic loft sand wedge.

@ no because the PW 41, then other wedges 45, 50, 54, 58.

Yes, that's one of my next reviews, G430 v I530.

@@MerrillWhittaker you may find G430’s discounted too!

Nice, couldn’t go wrong either way to be honest. Ping do make good stuff.

Yes I think so, a decent step down forward in aesthetics from Ping

Good that you feel this is a safe space for you to come forward with that. I feel privileged and honoured.

Good to hear, surprised you thought Ping feel was better though, I was really impressed with the Callaway on that side.

@ both very nice but the Ping sat nicer gave me more confidence.

I think they are especially if you take the top inside out. Certainly worth a try.

You might need an ambulance

@golffm6924 lol you could be right my last driver fitting i split my finger open and couldn't play golf for two weeks , who says it's not a dangerous sport

Thanks, much appreciated.

Totally……agree, couldn’t (have put it) “better …….myself.

I’d have to hit them back to back to be sure about feel but I remember thinking the Ai300 was one of the softest best feeling hollow bodied irons I’d ever hit. Hard to say on forgiveness, it’s a test I need to do but my gut feeling is that the Elyte could steal some sales from Apex range. I don’t think the Ai300 will be more forgiving, it will either be the same or slightly worse I reckon.

Yes, it’s noticeably longer, but as I said it doesn’t look bad.

Yeah you won’t get any arguments from me, I’ll be taking the 35 on the course to make sure but I’m like you; the looks are decent but not an improvement in my eyes.

Most accurate driver ive ever gamed

Agree actually, I couldn’t give up the feel and looks for the sake of a couple of yards.

The results would be Ping for me -- Te Ping 2 yards further with the same spin and 1 yard higher flight with higher descent angle

I was always struggle with the dispersion part of tests, I feel like the distance average is actually the figure that paints the clearest picture of how forgiving a club is. You can hit anything off line for a myriad of reasons but how well a club holds onto distance to me is the truer measure of how well designed the head is.

@@golffm6924 I hear you, dispersion can be more related to the players swing, club delivery, face to path not so much the club

Supposedly that was built more purely in the name of ultimate speed when you examine the resistance to twisting figures Taylor Made produce ( the 10 k stuff). But it just shows you that these differences are really pretty small.

Yeah unfortunately unless Srixon start handing out clubs to me FOC then it’s unlikely I’ll be doing that any time soon - same with Mizuno - I can’t stock everything sadly.

@golffm6924 completely understand. Thanks for the work

You won't be disappointed.

Don't think its a hard and fast calculation because would depend on different launch factors but I would say a couple of yards per mph max.

@golffm6924 thank you 👍

Thanks and yes there are an overwhelming amount of videos I need to get through at the moment, will try my best .

Mavriks will be hard to beat on performance but I do think you would notice the feel side of it quite a lot.

Yeah if your M6 is well suited to you which it sounds like it is, you might struggle to beat it. Look for the average though, not one off ultimate distance shots. How is the new one holding onto distance when you don't hit it 100% compared to the M6, thats the only bit you might expect to be better.

Ok, thanks

@@golffm6924 I would even suggest to get some (cheap) external microphone to catch the audio. Usually anything is better than the one integrated in your camera. And thanks for the videos you make!

It is but you should watch the Elyte iron review , the Apex has some serious in house competition