Видео

Its because of the aether

Your accent is so cute 🥹🫠 Video have passed like it's 2 seconds, reminds me the relativity principle 😁

Very nice explanation

damn, that makes a lot of sense!

As a retired college prof (NOT in physics) I was wildly impressed by your explanation. Way to go!

Life saver, better than chatGPT

Nice

Was attentive to your explanation at my best, Just saying happy subscribed to your channel. 🎉 🧠

If virtual particles aren't real, maye particles in general aren't real. Just a misconception due to the history of the definition of an atom. take for example the double slit experiment. if we measure just one time, the copenhagen interpretation states the particle is in super position until it hits the detector. but if we continue to measure, like 2000 times, the wave nature reveals itself. if we think about particles as excited quantum fields, there's no point like object in space, just as there are no real particles, rather our interpretation of the wave function and it's probality density. also, it is possible to explain the casimir effect without virtual particles in a pilot wave theory framework with it's quantum potential. I can provide the math.

That was helpful, thanks.

Laure where are you?

How does one measure the quantum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field?

I agree with Andrewbordor4891 below, that the zero-point energy (the aether) causes pressure on matter, and probably is the root cause of the expansion of the matter in the universe. But I don't agree that it causes gravity just by itself. Gravity is more likely a separate type of field emanating from matter which pulls on any form of energy (and therefore also the zero-point energy). At a black hole event horizon for example, the velocity of the pulled zero-point energy is the speed of light, therefore light can't leave, it has a relative velocity (relative to zero-point energy) equal to the speed of light at the event horizon. So, imo the modern "aether" has a double nature, it pushes on matter, and also is pulled towards matter by the gravitational fields. Small matter objects follow the movement of the aether, caused by large matter objects. This double nature, causes a balance act which explains much of the behaviour of both the universe as an object, and the objects in it.

Just curious what has brought anyone who reads this comment to this video❓

Over my head but it sounds really smart. Thank you, definitely not a waste of time.

thank youuuuuuuuuuuuu so muchh

You explain things well. You have a new subscriber 🏆💯🙏🏾🙂

MAYBE IM MISSING THE POINT, but if numerous people measure variable / subjective "stuff" from different perspectives, the results will um er vary, even in a vacuum

In relativity, time is the distance along a world-line. It is a local and not relative. The "time" that is relative is unphysical, it is the arbitrary choice of a particular slicing of the gravitational field

Thing is, the Bernoulli principle is why the ships attract. Two submarines would also attract

The Bell inequality simply shows that the particles do not have a definite value before measurement and nothing else. However, everyone is wrong to assume this rules out every class of classical local hidden variables.

Bell's Theorem does *not prove that the world is quantum or demonstrate entanglement either.

Nucleus is so small, its just 1/23,000 to 1/145,000 size of atom. So the probability electron hit the nuclues is very rare but not imposible

It isn’t just electron capture. The electron spending some time inside the nucleus is also responsible for the hyperfine splitting (whose transitions give rise to radio astronomy) and for the ability to measure the proton charge radius spectroscopically (due to the small shifts in the hydrogen energy levels for s states when we take into account the finite radius of the nucleus or just proton for hydrogen).

Bell inequality violations are more general than most think. Check out MIT's John Bush explaining Bell violations in HQFT. You can violate Bell inequalities with classical light, Ising models, Brownian motion, chaotic balls and water waves. There is a lot of misinformation about this subject because few understand conditional probability on background fields (non-Kolmogorov probability). HQFT violated Bell in a simple system with water by modifying well geometries. Classical analogs exist for spin-1/2, superposition, entanglement, tunneling, Unruh radiation, Hawking radiation, etc. All of this is a media fabrication. Ask Andrei Khrennikov (arXiv:quant-ph/0003017) about what constitutes "non-Kolmogorov" probability. Quantum mechanics is an outdated theory. The Standard Model is a FIELD theory. QM can't even explain the Pauli exclusion principle. The field commutators vanish! Get it? Quantum states are an abstraction from field ontology. They don't really exist! Fields are trivially nonlocal and measurement is giving readings on a complicated and macro-level measurement device. The states are not really observable. There are no particles but fields. That is the MODERN understanding of physics. CS grads are ignorant. This stuff doesn't even rise to the level of the 30s, where field theory took over. There was only some problems developing the theory of renormalization, accomplished mostly by Ken Wilson by the 70s. These videos are embarrassing.

Photons are a mathematical abstraction. Light is real, photons are not.

Because they are good drivers.

Thank you very much. Great work. it would be very nice if you can make a tutorial on legends and color schemes.

Great video

The simplist answer is they can't be squashed în the nucleus, 'coz of uncertainty principle în regard with their mass. If their mass would be the same as proton's, they certainly smash!

Does wave package is why we call them particules , i mean does particules are wave travelling in packages what simulates a particules?

Great explanation! I’m not scientists but I felt like I could grasp the concept after your real work examples 🙏

Wow! you are amazing for sharing these secrets with us <3 thak you so much, it's really the best video for MatLab figures that I found on YouToube. If you can allow me to ask more secrets: how can I specify the "box" property to be "off" only for the figure, but not for the legend? And how can I specify the "font size" for the numbers on the axis to be different? And is it possible to also specify the axis thick marks, like the primary to be outside and the secondary to be inside? Thanks a lot ! Big hugh :)

Thank you for the thorough explanation 🙏🙂

The ultraviolet catastrophe was logically invalid thinking. They didn't realize atoms have finite size and the field around them is smooth, so as they bump into each other, the interactions are smoothened, low-passed by this gradual field gradient instead of the false assumption of the idealized model. Therefore ultraviolet light is radiated in very diminished amounts, and no ultraviolet catastrophe happens and the concept of quanization is not needed.

I observed shot noise in my wireless optical preamplifier which can be explained by quantization of electricity into electrons, no photons are needed.

This was rather simple

great video! thank you!

A very valuable explanation. Thank you.

How to save each graphic element separately in png?

So, are they buzzing around or oscillating or what? How can they remain stability, when in some cases they are nearer and the other further from the nucleus, thus attracted differently?

Caused by gravity... the press of the dense aether on either side of the plates. Matter and the aether repel each other. The aether does not just disappear but bunches up in the space away from the matter, much like a berm left by a snow plow. This immense mountain of aether is what is pressing on the plates from the sides. It also presses downward, causing what we call gravity.

Hiya, I've got some questions as I am having issues implementing your code. Taking 1:08 as a screenshot, your code is split into two parts. For the part of the code "Picturewidth..." and below, do I need to copy this after every single figure I create on MATLAB or can I include it at the bottom of my document and be done with it? It would be cool if you could share a document showing the implementation of your code within a MATLAB livescript rather than in isolation (to made it idiot proof haha). Appreciate the work Ciao

Thank you! I'm so tired of hearing people talk about "particles popping in and out of existence" 🙄 So refreshing!

Zreat Zexplanteion zhenk zu

Zas is fantaztiz)

Can you please help me how you create your videos? I really like the style.

They have optimal occupency by function

Very helpful... thanks

the "fuk" states? lol