Видео

9:30 to all you Lucy Letby SIMPS, it was Lucy herself who decided to not have an expert witness. She has her self to blame for her own inadequate defence

It’s only people with a chip on their shoulder when it comes to authority that think she’s innocent. Letby is guilty.

Massive stitch up. That is obvious. But to what purpose? Who benefits from this?

It appears to be a modern day witch hunt. Found guilty because there are unexplained deaths and she is the person present for most of them. Don't need actual evidence because her behaviour is a bit strange.

Could Lucy have children herself? That could be one motive why she targeted babies and wanted to befriend the mothers.

I suspect this drastic increase in pressure on hospitals and healthcare systems in 2015 had nothing to do with the coinciding flood of illegal immigrants being welcomed in during that same period

What a sham of a case!!!! Its sad for the babies and parents, but i.m.o its worse for letby if she did nothing wrong!!!! I would,nt work with kids for a million quid a week, its just not worth the hassle!!!!!

Sign the Petition: chng.it/PGMsQ7nt92

As interesting as I find Letby content, I'll be glad when it finally fades away from the news cycle and we can move on, leaving her to serve her sentence for her crimes.

Dreadful journalism. The standards at the BBC nowadays are appalling.

So the parents of the babies are upset about LL being innocent? Shouldn't they be concerned about the truth if she is innocent? We lock up an innocent woman for life to make parents feel a bit better??

There is excellent research by Stuart Gilham on YT undermining Dewi Evans credibility. Thanks for upload, was unable to access in Australia

Thanks for uploading

Mismanagement at the hospital and pathogens on the ward are likely explanations that should have raised massive alarm bells. Injection of air and Insulin poisoning should have been very low in the realms of possibilities. I’d ask, are there experts able to confirm infection can cause the same symptoms and outcomes witnessed, and provide natural logical explanations for these tragic baby deaths and crashes. Science doesn’t change, what changes is our understanding of it.

I found this program to be a prime example of confirmation bias. The presenter seems to have concluded guilt due to Lucy Letby's demeanor in the witness box ... "she got confused" etc. What did she expect from somebody inexperienced being aggressively questioned by a professional inquisitor under those conditions ? The tone of the program was obviously influenced by the presenters bias as it leaned quite transparently toward the guilty side of the argument. A poor effort.

Oh wow! Thanks!

"It must be this" she says.... guessing game eh?? Disgraceful justice system. Shameful

Where was Lucy’s experts for the defence!!!

Stitched up ,by the legal criminals.

Most of the comments are just uninformed. Will bacteria make you produce deadly amounts of insulin? Or will bacteria put air into babies veins? Bacteria has nothing to do with this.

I don't know if she's guilty or not. But take her words as the main evidence as a confession in a diary in such a crazy handwriting, what kind of cold-blooded killer would write a confession in such a dirty, unstable handwriting? This is the handwriting of a emotionally , unstable person and this whole set of words is just a nervous cry from the head.The hidden killer writes beautifully about the thrill of murder.. And anyway, if I write in my diary that I killed John Kennedy, will I be arrested too? In general, this case is very strange, in which there is only circumstantial evidence and that’s all.Sorry for my English, I'm from Asia.

Excuse me, but the chance that someone could have objective circumstancial evidence such as being the only one present for all the infant deaths, and also writing a note like she did, and nonetheless being innocent, is next to impossible.

They investigated this case for 6 whole years and the only common denominator is Lucy the babies stop dying like that after she was removed the only triplet that survived was the one that got away from her from her confessions to her severe covert narcissism and need for control her psychosis up into every action she took indicates that this woman murdered these babies!

Thank you for sharing! I am from Chester and was born at the CoCH. I fully believe Lucy is innocent. This whole time following the case, I have been waiting for them to finally whip out a conclusive piece of evidence, but they never have. It's shocking that a person can be locked up for life on so little.

I had NO idea that the post mortem results concluded that 5 (or 6?) of the 7 babies had all died of natural causes and the remaining were undetermined. Like one of the gentlemen said - how (and why?) did they present a different story in the trial? Thats a huge piece of evidence proving Lucy's innocence!!

It's going to be hilarious when the only future developments are her being charged and convicted of even more crimes, leading the members of her fan club to cry, "No, that's not what we meant by revisit her case!"

The “evidence” presented in this video against the evidence shown in the trial is so weak it’s actually bordering the conspiracy theory level… waste of my time watching this

Writing, "I killed them" is not a confession?

Oh really? Well at no point did anyone see Peter Sutcliffe actually kill anyone so...

"How logical is it that someone suspected of multiple workplace murders would still want to return to the same department after being placed on leave? Even after being transferred to an administrative role and arrested three times, they stay with the same employer, go to therapy at their workplace, and don’t destroy the incriminating files they took home. They even write notes admitting to having done something bad, on the advice of their therapist at work, while already under suspicion, and keep these notes in their diary, which they also hold onto. Wouldn’t a guilty person claim illness or find another job at the first sign of suspicion? Has anyone ever heard of such a case?"

I always felt that there was no effective evidence against her.

Well done, keep going, this is very important. As a hands on lifetime experienced multinational medical practitioner i had doubts since her conviction. there are so many issues wrong and misinterpretations growing by the day. it starts with a lesson in basic human anatomy that essentially rule out injection of venous air to reach the skin. it nullifies the air embolism theory created by the "expert" prosecution witness. An expert medical witness could potentially come up with false evidence or incorrect conclusions about air embolism through misunderstandings or deliberate misrepresentation of medical facts. An expert medical witness could falsely claim air travels through the venous system to the skin by misunderstanding, overlooking the physiology of air embolism, or deliberately misrepresenting the situation to fit a narrative. In reality, for air to reach the skin, it would have to pass through the venous system, enter the right side of the heart, and then cross into the arterial system, which typically only happens through a defect or abnormal lung circulation.

david evans is a true perverse person

PS...the first documentary,if you haven't seen it yet!?.. is available HERE :ruclips.net/video/nekxq9HT5SY/видео.html

They threw a nurse under the bus.

Thanks for focusing on this case ! Keep up the good work!!

Sign the Petition if you haven't already: chng.it/HFfrhcNhqN

Thanks. The more of these videos we can get up, the better.

The next Channel 5 documentary, "The New Evidence", can be found here: ruclips.net/video/SMTa8wjsrgc/видео.html

The deaths that were investigated were out of the ordinary.

Still think she was guilty

I think she is innocent,from the very beginning I said so!---

lucy is innocent

Really interesting video. So much stuff that didn't come before the court or went completely under the radar!

Even if she can be shown to be innocent, watch how they'll keep her locked up anyway, until the judge in question (Goss) is first quietly removed from the picture (retirement etc).

Finally the UK gates of information is open!! This is a horrific case moving way too slowly!! All hallmarks of a witch hunt is there … she is definitely made a scapegoat !! My heart goes out for her as well as the parents. Hoping for a fair trial soon, however I’m not sure it will happen 😕. Thanks for covering. Following from DK with no vpn, this channel is important !!!

Lucy was found guilty by suspicion and not evidence. No one is saying she’s innocent, but the evidence certainly isn’t beyond reasonable doubt, not anywhere near.

Thanks for the upload. Very unsafe conviction.

If it wasn't for those letters ✉️... Maybe I'd have doubt.

I think what’s frightening in this case is how easily circumstantial evidence can be found to convict someone who could be entirely innocent 🤔