Видео

The only embarrassing thing is dozens of countries cant defeat a bunch of drunk Russians with shovels.. fake news media at it again with their “victory stories”

Knowing Russia they're probably gonna say it was the latter

“The Terminator” wasn’t a movie… It was a prediction.

That was a funny start. I hate the name X also. I don't even have an account.

I was going to take you seriously but you are still going on about Twitter name change. Companies go through name changes all the time.

What does Elon musk have to do with this?

The Harpoon missile was state of the art when first deployed, but being subsonic and not stealthy, they're easy for modern ship defense systems to shoot down.

The US says it will stop talking if nuclear missiles are dropped on American soil. 👍

America is busy bullshitting it's workers, while china has been SHOWING them for years.

So C4 on wheels, the ISR/TA on another platform?

Yeah, like the embassy is going to admit it?

I wonder why the KC-10 was retired. KC-135's are still in use since the 50's/60's.

In USA they build submarines above ground and then launch into the ocean when finished

Shit like that happens when you get your gear from Temu.

No, I am afraid of Sharks with friggin Lazers on their head...mounted...somewhere 😁

Jesus ... US is doomed !!!!😪

Cant protect the fleet withput them

Who developed this item why does the navy have to fix a faulty item

Its the same vice versa

Historically, those who invade Russia have failed miserably. This is true of Napoleon, Hitler and many other enemies of Russia in the past. Their forces were much larger and much better organised and less corrupt than Ukraine. So the west doesn't want a nuclear war, because it still realises that starting a nuclear war over such a pathetic country as Ukraine is not a good idea.

War *and* anime??? Is this the Japanese Empire? 🤣

I don’t know how they manage to do these stunts.

What percent of Russian ICBMs have been maintained well enough to launch and reach their intended targets? How many would explode in or over Russia? No way to know, but there are reasons to believe that the majority of Russia's ICBMs would fail, perhaps the overwhelming majority. Consider first that, over the last two years, Russia conducted four tests of its ICBMs and all four failed. Furthermore, most or all of the tested missiles were Russia's NEWEST model not the aged Soviet-era models that constitute the bulk of Russia's nuclear arsenal. Moreover, that arsenal is the perfect victim for Russian-style corruption. The nuclear wing of the Russian military is the most richly funded wing. The US, for example, spends tens of billions per year just to maintain its nuclear arsenal. Furthermore, the money Russia allocates towards its nuclear arsenal is relatively amenable to stealing, that is, any given Russian officer in charge of an ICBM silo or battery will assess the odds as low that he'll ever get convicted for embezzling funds intended for ICBM maintenance. For starters, he very much doubts that his embezzlement will ever be discovered through the failure of the ICBMs under his watch, because he very much doubts there will ever be an order to launch them. Even if one day there was such an order, at that point in time a conviction for embezzlement would be the least of his problems. Indeed, at that point in time he's probably already dead from the nuclear exchange with the US or another major power. Even if he survived a nuclear exchange, the evidence to prove his crimes -- records, witnesses, physical evidence -- may not survive. In any event, it is hard to see a judicial system functioning in post-apocalypse Russia where the threat posed by roaming cannibals eclipses any threat posed by detectives seeking justice for financial crimes committed "in the before time". What all this means is that, in effect, the US has more functional ICBMs than Russia, probably far more. Indeed, it's possible that the fraction of Russia's ICBMs that function well enough to reach the US and cause a nuclear explosion is small enough that US anti-ballistic missiles (ABMs) would take out nearly all of them -- or even all of them were the US to first double or triple its inventory of ABMs.

well... I like to see 'em try it just once.... ROFL that brit been watching too many Bond movies IMHO

Its from fallout

What percent of Russian ICBMs have been maintained well enough to launch and reach their intended targets? How many would explode in or over Russia? No way to know, but there are reasons to believe that the majority of Russia's ICBMs would fail, perhaps the overwhelming majority. Consider first that, over the last two years, Russia conducted four tests of its ICBMs and all four failed. Furthermore, most or all of the tested missiles were Russia's NEWEST model not the aged Soviet-era models that constitute the bulk of Russia's nuclear arsenal. Moreover, that arsenal is the perfect victim for Russian-style corruption. The nuclear wing of the Russian military is the most richly funded wing. The US, for example, spends tens of billions per year just to maintain its nuclear arsenal. Furthermore, the money Russia allocates towards its nuclear arsenal is relatively amenable to stealing. A Russian officer in charge of ICBMs unlikely to think that he'll ever be punished if he embezzles money meant for ICBM maintenance and daily operation. For starters, he very much doubts that his embezzlement will ever be discovered through the failure of the ICBMs under his watch, because he very much doubts there will ever be an order to launch them. Even if one day there was such an order, at that point in time a conviction for embezzlement would be the least of his problems. Indeed, at that point in time he's probably already dead from the nuclear exchange with the US or another major power. Even if he survived a nuclear exchange, the evidence to prove his crimes -- records, witnesses, physical evidence -- may not survive. In any event, it is hard to see a judicial system functioning in post-apocalypse Russia where the threat posed by roaming cannibals eclipses any threat posed by detectives seeking justice for financial crimes committed "in the before time". What all this means is that, in effect, the US has more functional ICBMs than Russia, probably far more. Indeed, it's possible that the fraction of Russia's ICBMs that function well enough to reach the US and cause a nuclear explosion is small enough that US anti-ballistic missiles (ABMs) would take out nearly all of them -- or even all of them were the US to first double or triple its inventory of ABMs.

GENERAL ATOMICS??????

🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻god is the best our weapon

The 2 don't seem in competition to me. Andurils is small, lacks a substantial payload bay and probably a lot cheaper. GA's has been flying for a while now, has a weapons bay and has a lower RCS, but it's much more expensive. Why can't we just have both?

hey Iran , stand by

Raider heißt jetzt Twix

MURICA!

Apparently, when you fly one, you don't have to be able to view the ground

I am 68 years old now. A few years ago, for me, this was sciencefiction 😲

Well crap! Now I have an image of Tom Jones singing a song praising the Raider. Get that out of your head...

Idk what job id want more 🤣

I would love to know the difference between the B2 and the b21 that changed the maintenance problem

disgusting

Lockhead Martin had lost its way. All they do now is make technology overpriced, over budget to the U.S government. Seriously you design study and company is located in California, but your building F35 in Texas 💩. No wonder the cost overrun became the most expensive in government contracts. The government should invest more in company like Anduril instead of Boeing and Lockhead Martin. No wonder he didn't even mention the cost 🫣🫣.

I don’t understand, clearly this is a weapon the US military especially Navy needs 100%. Yet, no one at the pentagon is giving it a chance at trials? All the work seems to be done so they say, it is the smallest hypersonic weapons on the market. If everything is as they say about the MAKO what is the delay?

bravo 👏

Zelensky doesn't decide anything, his profession is an actor, and who gives him the script is the USA

I just don’t believe that the Biden administration ever wanted Biden to win. The U.S. protects Russian territory and Russian aircraft. Ukrainian airspace is denied to Western aircraft by the U.S. , the only foreign aircraft permitted are Russians. The U.S. insures that no new fighter jets from the west are transferred to Ukraine. It send 30 old tanks……

Awesome video! 👍

🤗🤗🤗🤗👍🏽

Lower standards

She looks like shes 110 pounds. A 14 year old boy is capable of more than she is, physically

3d Batt boy here. I'm not being sexist, just speaking from my own experience & the experience of trusted sources, but I want to see her packet from all 3 schools & talk to soldiers who went to the schools with her in confidence, before I believe she EARNED those tabs. Unfortunately, all 6 services have been infected with DEI, quotas, etc.

1000 have. Been ordered. But. Must be. Painted. Yellow

lol I knew a instructor at sapper when the army started letting women in, the instructors voices were muffled cuz they had to let the women pass same with ranger. People can say what they want I trust my homie that went to Afghanistan 3 times over any big brass. Maybe she truly made it, idk lol 😂 the shit I was hearing about some situations that would get most recycled just seems like a political experiment to me. I was competing for a potential slot myself we had a few women and they all got shit on badly in the runs and rucks, even are best women got totally dominated from what I seen with my own eyes but yet some of them were sent over males that completely destroyed them