Видео

ELECTROMAGNETIC field travels at finite speed. True. But that doesn't explain how ELECTROSTATIC field can exist around a charge upto arbitrarily large distances, which effectively is, action at a distance.

That’s interesting! Thank you!

The whole day would be gone. I am sad all day. Rumination is not a choice.

Yes, Jesus said in the Bible to love one another, not because we feel like it or when we want to.

Thank you so much👍❤

Thank you sir

Now I know what positive and negative twerks are

Very instructive video, this will blow up.

Now I understand why we engage only roughly 60% of our body weight while doing a pushup. Brilliant video!

Great video sir, very thoughtful. And the funniest part is when you emphasise glorious and luxurious hair which is of course for your baldness😅. I'm sorry i dont mean to hurt you

This is an amazing video thank you so much! I love how you go through everything step by step and there's no rushing so I actually get what's going in thank you.

If we are talking AC not DC as most transmission lines are, there needs to be other RF variables included... It is a dynamic threat not a static threat as you suggest...

Favorite teacher so far!!

is it not right hand rule?? Why is this man using his left hand, if its out of field is it not just down???

This video was very well made and informative! Your grip on this subject is really displayed throught your fluent presentation of this example and you made it simple to understand. I look forward to seeing more of your educational videos! Sincerely, Nathan

atrocious audio :(

since they both will have the same potential energy (at the same height), does this mean that the linear velocity of the sphere will be lesser than that of the block?

mmm so for our next experiment...accidentally leaving someone in an mri machine and disabling any safeties built in.

Lovely 😊😊

What about tue high electric field surrounding overhead power transmission?

God I remember this in class lol 😂it never got old! And I’m still amazed

physics is so cool man

I had a 30-minute, 3 tesla MRI about 9 days ago. I asked the MRI technician if in his MRI training he and the other students were encouraged to keep a distance from the MRI machine in order to minimize any affect the 3-tesla magnetic field might have on his body. He said, "No, magnetic fields do no harm to the body as far as anyone knows." From that conversation, I learned that the magnetic field of the MRI machine is not turned off and on with each patient. The 3-tesla magnetic field is on 24-7. He told me that it costs tens of thousands of dollars to "extinguish" and re-establish the magnetic field. Every time they extinguish it they have to release all of their liquid helium, which is there to keep the MRI conductors at super-conducting temperatures. Replenishing the helium is expensive. I have said that to say that the technician is in and out of the very strong magnetic field many times a day every workday of the week and through out his or her career. If they were being harmed, almost certainly we would have heard of it by now. Also, I have searched quite a bit on websites for information about harm from electric or magnetic fields, but those whose job it is the research these things say they cannot find evidence of harm. Some of those who say that these fields don't appear to do harm are: WHO, CDC, FDA, IEEE, European Commission, OSHA, FCC, and on and on. The only such fields that may cause harm are those electromagnetic waves which carry enough power to cause heating of flesh, or those whose frequency and photon energy are ionizing. The frequency of the EM wave would need to be higher than 2.4 million GHz (10 electron-volts).

Do you type laterally inversed😮

if you want to know the truth, watch this one. This guy is missing the real impact of the high voltage pylons with multiple lines. ruclips.net/video/FssSoQNZc1Y/видео.html

Can someone calculate the speed at which the pollen grain is moving during transfer?

Thankyou so much sir ♥️🫡

Tritium is radioactivy yet has only 3 nucleons so size doesn't seem to matter. Women know this lol

If it were stronger than the em force, He-2 should exist.And it doesn;t. The repulsion and attraction tend to offset each other with repulsoin winning sometimes and nuclear binding force (aka nuclear strong froce) winning sometimes

isn't the 60Kg result we get the mass of the RIGHT side of the board ???? otherwise it does't really make sense to me

Are these calcs based on a single wire? Most transmission pylons in Europe carry six or more lines, does that mean the percentage is 8% times six?

Einstein's Nobel prize was for photoelectric effect, not brownian motion. Still a great video btw.

really helpful!!! hopefully i ace my phys test

Hyperopia is not the same as presbyopia... This is how to correct for farsightedness in general... Alsp is not fix, is correction lol

This video should be noticed, wow great work so brief and understood

Most overhead lines are AC 3PH not DC.

Writing in reverse is pretty impressive, cool video.

I got 33.3 m/s for cheetah problem and 10,755.6 cm/s for falcon problem :)

Goated

didn't explain anything waste of my time

You are great

Thank you for wasting three minutes of my time

Cant see that blue writing against the black background dude.

Thanks ❤

Everything shrinks

thank you professor!❤

If you guys think that Black Holes are nuts like I did, look up "Spaghettification". Basically, once you get close to a black hole to where it pulls you in, the force is so great that you get stretched out like a Spaghetti noodle. Black Holes turns you into Spaghetti. Supermassive Black Holes smashes you into a pancake instead (known as Pancake Detonation). So, Supermassive Black Holes turn you into Pancakes. Even more nuts! universe.nasa.gov/news/241/what-happens-when-something-gets-too-close-to-a-black-hole/#:~:text=This%20effect%20essentially%20stretches%20out,A%20Brief%20History%20of%20Time.%22

"I hope this did a fun job of merging the physics world that we've been studying for this last year with this chemistry world where you've studied atoms for the last you know probably since high school, and now you kind of understand how they fit together and they're married in a holy matrimony" Those two must be long-time compatible partners to fair so well after all these years! Their child, Chemical Physics, must be just as neat as its cool, fun parents!

For those of you wondering why at 11:57 , Sin(θ) = y/L when it should be tan(θ) = y/L since L is adjacent to θ and is not the hypotenuse, and in SOH CAH TOA, Sin(θ) = Opposite/Hypotenuse whereas Tan(θ) = Opposite/Adjacent, please look up and read more about Small Angle Approximation for Tangent, where for very small angles in right triangles, the hypotenuse and adjacent lines are almost similar in lengths, thus tan is going to be equal to sine. www.google.com/search?q=Small+Angle+Approximation+for+Tangent&sca_esv=662cffd7cc06fb3f&hl=en&sxsrf=AM9HkKkKbdZyoEiwmN18pionvzrXN2MUZw%3A1701398700243&source=hp&ei=rEhpZcKgDLjXkvQPwN-uiAE&iflsig=AO6bgOgAAAAAZWlWvJWfxpJOj32gP6roy0CQrKZLK2NU&ved=0ahUKEwjCppaJnO2CAxW4q4QIHcCvCxEQ4dUDCAw&uact=5&oq=Small+Angle+Approximation+for+Tangent&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IiVTbWFsbCBBbmdsZSBBcHByb3hpbWF0aW9uIGZvciBUYW5nZW50MgUQABiABDIGEAAYFhgeMgYQABgWGB4yCxAAGIAEGIoFGIYDMgsQABiABBiKBRiGAzILEAAYgAQYigUYhgMyCxAAGIAEGIoFGIYDSMUFUNECWNECcAF4AJABAJgB_AGgAfwBqgEDMi0xuAEDyAEA-AEC-AEBqAIKwgIHECMY6gIYJw&sclient=gws-wiz

why do you not need to use Fdcos(180) for your work to friction?