Видео

I hate how people shitted on his career towards its end. This fight was just before he faced Mayweather. And then when he lost, despite being one of the few boxers to ever crack Floyd, they threw him under the bus. And then they immediately had Pacquiao finish him off. What a horrible to end such a great boxer's career.

Shane at this point, would have murdered both Pacquiao and Mayweather.

the first time he got a good beating the second he beat margarito up

I wouldn't say cotto destroyed him...

and cotto destroyed him too. like i said earlier margarito cant win without cement in his gloves, hes lost every single fight since they caught him cheating

margarito cant win a fight without cement n his gloves. hes the biggest disgrace ever

You can tell Tony's punches had no effect on Mosley. Accurate power punching versus no defense and a so called hard chin. You can see this KO coming since round 2. A fighter can't just sit there and take so many clean hard shots and hope to endure and press in the late rounds. Not against a fighter that actually throws more as the fight goes on. This one was one sided. Margarito doesn't belong in the ring with Mosley at any weight class. I honestly believed Paul Williams would do the same thing.

What if Pacquiao show no mercy against Margarito, Back in 2009, Pacquiao showed no signs of mercy when he attacked and bloodied the extremely durable boxer, Cotto. he rarely takes his foot off the gas pedal.

naw he was exhausted from those hooks to the body.

Shane Mosley one of the greatest from our era!!!

Jajajaja! Y hoy le toca al Jr llevarse otro palizón parecido

lol after being dropped twice and get brutally beat naw it was a good stoppage Margarito was done before the k.o.

thats not the point margarito he probly could have gone distance but he was getting his ass handled could have ended worse those punches of shane were packing too much power

ref should have give Marga a standing 8 count

Premature stoppage... Marga could have gone the distance

even with his wraps packed lol

Margarito gets -100% respect from anyone from the boxing world.

Thanks god they discovered the plaster that night, if not story would of been different for mosley and his career

ASI DEBIO TIRARLE GOLPES A L CANELO MOSLEY, SOLO CARICIAS LE DIO AL CANELO JAJAJA

3 GOLPIZAS YA RECIBIO MARGARITO, DEBE RETIRARSE DE YA ANTES DE QUE QUEDE LOCO.

i am mexican and i love how mosley kick ass of maragarito LOL

...

PACQUIAO HITS HARDER THAN MOSLEY, HIS SHOTS LANDED HARDER ON MARGACHEATO RIGHT?

I was so fuckin hyped watchin live..!

Shane on you

Mosley's style is so akward

Fight should've been stopped. Margarito was unresponsive to refs commands and didn't walk forward, so the ref wiped his gloves twice. Wtf?

Your comments have no substance. So you fill them up with "lols" and "too easys" to make up for your low IQ. There's never been a decade in history that Mexico has produced more all time greats. PERIOD. Your the one who needs to convince ME that Mexico has produced more great fighters. You FAILED. I'm done going back and forth about the 40's. I've already PROVEN that the same countries were competing. You have to lie to make up for your third world countries short comings. It's sad really.

Times up. I gave you weeks to brainstorm and you just repeated the same points that I already adressed and put "too easy" at the end. You FAILED to list any all time Mexican greats. You FAILED to provide any evidence that more countries are boxing or that boxing popularity has INCREASED in other countries, all you've done is state that we aren't as dominate(suprise suprise boxing has FELL OFF in America). I'm done reading your ridiculous comments. Enjoy your whopping THREE all time greats : )

@TheMexHurricane "Like I have past MMA experience because of hand to hand combat "training" in the Army." Umm, the sport of boxing didn't change AT ALL from the military to the pro's. It was basicaly like having an amatuer background. The hand to hand combat training in the army is nothing like MMA. Are you a fucking child? Do I really have to waste my time explaining these things to you? You already lost this debate WEEKS ago when you failed miserably to adress any of my points.

@TheMexHurricane You should feel honored that I'm taking time out of my day to educate you.

@TheMexHurricane Again, for the last 2 decades boxing hasn't been a top 10 sport in the U.S. It's still a top 3 sport in Mexico. If boxing was still a top 3 sport in the U.S. we'd be just as dominant as we were for the first 100 years. Despite all this, your 3rd world country STILL hasn't been as dominant as America in 90's or the first decade of the 2000's. We've produced WAY more great fighters the past 2 decades. BTW I'm STILL waiting for you to list those all time great fighters from Mexico

@TheMexHurricane Where's your proof that a larger percent of Mexico's population is boxing now than a few decades ago? Once again your logic is laughable, more Mexican champs means more Mexicans are boxing? No, more non-American champs is the result of boxing's popularity plummenting in the U.S. over the last few decades.

@TheMexHurricane Nobody said that boxing in the military will make you a world class boxer. I simply said the vast majority of journeyman in the 40's were in good shape and had past boxing experience becuase of the military, which made the divisions MUCH deeper than they are today. It was much more difficult to pile up a 25-0 record against journeyman back then. There were no paper champs, no Joe Calzaghe's with 2 signiture wins. EVERYONE was battle tested and the best fought the best constantly

@TheMexHurricane Your "talent pool" arguement has gotten completely off topic. First you use it to claim that fighters in the golden age weren't as good(larger population=better fighters) and therefore didn't deserve their spot on the p4p list. But then when I pointed out that training and fundementals have actualty gone down hill since then you agreed(basicaly admitted you were wrong LOL). Then you turn around and claim the U.S. was competing which itself when all the same countries were boxing

@TheMexHurricane LOL now you claim it was just the U.S. and the U.K. boxing in the 50's? You obviously don't know shit about boxing history. South Africa, Japan, Argentina, Australia, Cuba, Italy, Nigeria, all produced WORLD CHAMPS back in the 50's when there was just EIGHT BELTS. Mexico produced 3 world champ in the 50's, a lightweight and 2 batamweights. And some of the greatest Mexican fighters to ever lace up gloves fought in the in the 60's and 70's when the U.S. was STILL dominant.

@TheMexHurricane Lets just pretend that prior to the 50's that England wasn't boxing, France wasn't boxing, Germany wasn't boxing, Italy wasn't boxing, Australia wasn't boxing, Mexico wasn't boxing, Panama wasn't boxing, and Cuba wasn't boxing(I'll stop there). And the N.E. of the U.S. was competing against itslef (lol). Your pathetic country STILL HASN'T PRODUCED HALF AS MANY ATG'S SINCE THE 50'S. But I geuss thats because some "Mexiphobic" conspiracy LOL. Your wasting my time.

@TheMexHurricane I already adressed your ridiculous comments about size and athleticism. Your wasting my time here.

@TheMexHurricane Actualty the vast majority of WW2 vets returned unharmed and went right into pro boxing when they came home. The fact that you would use that to make a point shows how little you know about boxing history. Boxing was standard combat training in the military back then, it's were many great fighters like Marciano had their first bouts. That's why the divisions were MUCH deeper then becuase even the journeyman were in good shape and knew how to box BECAUSE of the military.

@TheMexHurricane Now your just grasping at sraws. I like how you type "too easy" to make it appear as though you made a good point LOL. The talent pool was actualty deeper back than you don't know shit about boxing. The top 100 p4p list only shows the all time greats, just because that's dominated by northeast Americans doesn't mean they were competing against themselves you dumb fuck. I'm still waiting for you to list some countries that weren't boxing back then...

@TheMexHurricane "America has 400+ heavyweights vs 1110 for the rest of the world." *facepalm* We have MORE people playing soccer in America than England, yet England is better at soccer. Why? BECAUSE THEIR BEST ATHLETES PLAY SOCCER AND OURS DON'T. Since boxings popularity has plummeted in the U.S. we have been losing all of our heavyweight prospects to other sports. Now our best heavys are FAT GUYS like Chris Aerola when we used to have guys Like Ali, Tyson, and Foreman.

@TheMexHurricane You keep rambling about this supposed better "talent pool" yet you haven't listed any countries that weren't already boxing back in the 40's, aside from eastern Europe. As for the world population increasing. As I've said there might be twice as many people now but in the industrialized countries their was probalby 10 times as many people boxing. So all in all there were actualty MORE people boxing in North America and Western Europe in the 40's.

@TheMexHurricane Punchers are born not made. The old timers hit just as hard and in fact most were in better condition because they did more kinesthetics instead of weight training. Many old school trainers and boxers think the fighters today are doing too much weight training and are LOSING speed. Joe Louis used to hit guys so hard they would do a 360, it's not like that somehow wouldn't happen if he hit guys today, unless you want to argue that chins have somehow improved? LOL

@smokinlefthook ...

@smokinlefthook Last time I checked the only REAL Americans are native Americans. You consider black people African but you don't consider white people European? Anyway I listed numerous white all time greats in my comments you just don't know how to fucking read.

@TheMexHurricane It's possible that the heavyweights of today are a little big for the heavyweights of the past, but they aren't as skilled, they lack speed and often times conditioning. I don't think I've ever seen so many fat heavys. Your point only apllies to the heavyweight division since that has no maximum weight, and you've already agreed with my point that the training has gone down hill, I have no reason to believe that the non-heavyweights of today have any advantages

@TheMexHurricane If you fail to respond to my questions and if you fail to articulate exactly how I haven't adressed your comments about the northeast and the heavyweight division, this debate will be over and you'll have gotten destroyed.

@TheMexHurricane I didn't include a SINGLE mexican American in all the ATG's since the 50's that I listed off the top of my head. Still waiting on you to list your ATG's since the 50's aside from the whopping three I've listed LOL. And no matter who you list your best dude STILL isn't in the top 25. I have adressed your ridiculous comments about the northeast and the heavyweight division. I know you have poor comprehension skills and a low IQ so just re-read my previous comments

@smokinlefthook I'm white but a Shane Mosley in the same form and conditioning like this when he destroyed Margarito would school Alvarez, I just don't know about now... He looked suspect at the weights over 147 when he fought Ronald Winky Wright, so I doubt he will win but I hope he does.