Видео

I am not a university member, can you share EndNote 21?

Thanks so much for this video! Now I'm confident to continue my assignment

Can you share to me Endnote 21

You are good at imparting knowledge into people's brain! Some people are good, but do not know how to impart the knowledge into others, trust me. Thank you!

Thank you! Well spoken and very clear explanation.

04:16 Quantitative research is "purely objective". Why on earth do people keep (erroneously) repeating that? If a scientist said that in my lab, they would be immediately blacklisted for such an abomination.

Very helpful, Thank you

Very concise, thanks.

Thanks!

Well said. Logic keeping so called logic opinion in check.

it worth listening. Awesome job on clearly explaining the topic!

Thanks this is helpful.

Thank so much this is very informative

Thank you for this video. Maybe fix your audio, it's quite low

No entendí un qlo y capaz saco 0 gracias

Buen video, nuevo sub.

Thank YOU

thank you so much!!

If this and the scientific method was taught in schools things like the flat earthers and anti Vax crowd would simply not be a thing

this was wildly helpful! thanks

an alle kölner

If I get secondary resources. Author of resources has used quantitative studies for systematic review of given clinical problem. What level of evidence it would be? TIA

I'm curious how data collected based on memory from an environment filled with confounding variables can be considered reliable. That would mean that all forms of evidence in the pyramid aside from randomized control trial data and calculations and systemic reviews and meta study of randomized control trials contain reliable data and calculations. Also at the base of that pyramid, expert opinion, is considered the least reliable. Aren't all conclusions expert opinion on the data collected? Also isn't the pyramid itself an expert opinion thereby making the pyramid the least reliable form of evidence supporting the pyramid itself? Also how do you draw causative conclusions from associative data? Correlation is not causation. That being the case you can't conclude anything clinical from the epidemiological studies in the pyramid. That being the case, the only reliable sources of evidence would be randomized control trials and systemic reviews and meta analysis of randomized control trials. Am I misunderstanding something?

Thanks you very much for this clear and easy to understand review

This was very useful , and clear. Thank-you so much. I feel I have a much better grasp on this concept now.

Rebecca you are amazing

Thank you. Your video was very helpful!! I will be looking out for more from you!